請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84788
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 朱錦洲(Chin-Chou Chu) | |
dc.contributor.advisor | 朱錦洲(Chin-Chou Chu | chucc@iam.ntu.edu.tw | ), | |
dc.contributor.author | Min-Hong He | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何旻紘 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:25:41Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻 [1] Weis-Fogh, T., Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of experimental Biology, 1973. 59(1): p. 169-230. [2] Chang, C.-C., Potential flow and forces for incompressible viscous flow. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1992. 437(1901): p. 517-525. [3] McMichael, J.M., Micro air vehicles-toward a new dimension in flight. http://www. arpa. gov/tto/MAV/mav_auvsi. html, 1997. [4] Hsieh, C.-T., C.-F. Kung, C.C. Chang, and C.-C. Chu, Unsteady aerodynamics of dragonfly using a simple wing–wing model from the perspective of a force decomposition. Journal of fluid mechanics, 2010. 663: p. 233-252. [5] 謝政達, 以力元理論之觀點剖析昆蟲飛行的氣動力機制. 2009. [6] Ellington, C.P., C. Van Den Berg, A.P. Willmott, and A.L. Thomas, Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996. 384(6610): p. 626-630. [7] Birch, J.M. and M.H. Dickinson, Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 2001. 412(6848): p. 729-733. [8] Choudhry, A., R. Leknys, M. Arjomandi, and R. Kelso, An insight into the dynamic stall lift characteristics. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2014. 58: p. 188-208. [9] Ryu, Y.G. and J.W. Chang. An experimental investigation on flapping wing flexibility for insect-inspired MAVs development. in Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Unmanned Systems. 2014. [10] Dickinson, M.H., F.-O. Lehmann, and S.P. Sane, Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999. 284(5422): p. 1954-1960. [11] Resh, V.H. and R.T. Cardé, Encyclopedia of insects. 2009: Academic press. [12] Srygley, R. and A. Thomas, Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature, 2002. 420(6916): p. 660-664. [13] Lehmann, F.-O., S.P. Sane, and M. Dickinson, The aerodynamic effects of wing–wing interaction in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005. 208(16): p. 3075-3092. [14] Broering, T.M., Y. Lian, and W. Henshaw, Numerical investigation of energy extraction in a tandem flapping wing configuration. AIAA journal, 2012. 50(11): p. 2295-2307. [15] Salami, E., T.A. Ward, E. Montazer, and N.N.N. Ghazali, A review of aerodynamic studies on dragonfly flight. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2019. 233(18): p. 6519-6537. [16] Norberg, R.Å., Hovering flight of the dragonfly Aeschna juncea L., kinematics and aerodynamics, in Swimming and flying in nature. 1975, Springer. p. 763-781. [17] Somps, C. and M. Luttges, Dragonfly flight: novel uses of unsteady separated flows. Science, 1985. 228(4705): p. 1326-1329. [18] Azuma, A. and T. Watanabe, Flight performance of a dragonfly. Journal of experimental biology, 1988. 137(1): p. 221-252. [19] Wang, Z.J., Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering. Physical review letters, 2000. 85(10): p. 2216. [20] Lan, S. and M. Sun, Aerodynamic interactions of two airfoils in unsteady motion. Acta mechanica, 2001. 150(1): p. 39-51. [21] Sun, M. and S.L. Lan, A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004. 207(11): p. 1887-1901. [22] Wang, Z.J., The role of drag in insect hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004. 207(23): p. 4147-4155. [23] Pulok, M.K.H. and U.K. Chakravarty. Experimental analysis of aerodynamic performances of dragonfly wings. in AIP conference proceedings. 2018. AIP Publishing LLC. [24] Wang, Z.J. and D. Russell, Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Physical review letters, 2007. 99(14): p. 148101. [25] Usherwood, J.R. and F.-O. Lehmann, Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2008. 5(28): p. 1303-1307. [26] May, M., Thermal adaptations of dragonflies. Odonatologica, 1978. 7(1): p. 27-47. [27] Wakeling, J. and C.P. Ellington, Dragonfly flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces. The Journal of experimental biology, 1997. 200(3): p. 543-556. [28] Zhang, J. and X.-Y. Lu, Aerodynamic performance due to forewing and hindwing interaction in gliding dragonfly flight. Physical Review E, 2009. 80(1): p. 017302. [29] Åke Norberg, R., The pterostigma of insect wings an inertial regulator of wing pitch. Journal of comparative physiology, 1972. 81(1): p. 9-22. [30] Heisler, H., Advanced vehicle technology. 2002: Elsevier. [31] Liu, H., G. He, C. Ma, Q. Wang, and Y. Luo. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly forewing in gliding flight. in MATEC web of conferences. 2018. EDP Sciences. [32] Chen, Y. and M. Skote, Gliding performance of 3-D corrugated dragonfly wing with spanwise variation. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016. 62: p. 1-13. [33] Michelson, R.C. and S. Reece. Update on flapping wing micro air vehicle research-ongoing work to develop a flapping wing, crawling entomopter. in 13th Bristol International RPV/UAV Systems Conference Proceedings, Bristol England. 1998. [34] McIntosh, S.H., S.K. Agrawal, and Z. Khan, Design of a mechanism for biaxial rotation of a wing for a hovering vehicle. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2006. 11(2): p. 145-153. [35] Nguyen, Q.V., Q.T. Truong, H.C. Park, N.S. Goo, and D. Byun. A motor-driven flapping-wing system mimicking beetle flight. in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 2009. IEEE. [36] Wood, R.J., The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE transactions on robotics, 2008. 24(2): p. 341-347. [37] Koh, J.-S. and K.-J. Cho. Omegabot: Biomimetic inchworm robot using SMA coil actuator and smart composite microstructures (SCM). in 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). 2009. IEEE. [38] De Wagter, C. and J. Mulder. Towards vision-based uav situation awareness. in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. 2005. [39] Lentink, D., S.R. Jongerius, and N.L. Bradshaw, The scalable design of flapping micro-air vehicles inspired by insect flight, in Flying insects and robots. 2009, Springer. p. 185-205. [40] De Croon, G., K. De Clercq, R. Ruijsink, B. Remes, and C. De Wagter, Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the DelFly. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2009. 1(2): p. 71-97. [41] De Wagter, C., S. Tijmons, B.D. Remes, and G.C. de Croon. Autonomous flight of a 20-gram flapping wing mav with a 4-gram onboard stereo vision system. in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2014. IEEE. [42] Karásek, M., F.T. Muijres, C. De Wagter, B.D. Remes, and G.C. De Croon, A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns. Science, 2018. 361(6407): p. 1089-1094. [43] Stewartson, K., D’Alembert’s paradox. SIAM review, 1981. 23(3): p. 308-343. [44] Landau, L. and E. Lifshitz, Chapter I-Ideal Fluids. Fluid Mechanics (Second Edition). Ed. by L. Landau and E. Lifshitz. Second Edition. Pergamon, 1987: p. 30-31. [45] Alfonsi, G., Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbulence modeling. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2009. 62(4). [46] Launder, B.E. and D.B. Spalding, Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. 1972. [47] Wellinger, P., P. Uhl, B. Weigand, and J. Rodriguez, Analysis of turbulence structures and the validity of the linear Boussinesq hypothesis for an infinite tube bundle. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2021. 91: p. 108779. [48] Wilcox, D.C., Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA journal, 1988. 26(11): p. 1299-1310. [49] Menter, F.R., Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. 1992. [50] Richardson, L.F., Weather prediction by numerical process. 1922: University Press. [51] Kolmogorov, A.N., The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1991. 434(1890): p. 9-13. [52] Leonard, A., Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in Advances in geophysics. 1975, Elsevier. p. 237-248. [53] Kalmár-Nagy, T. and B.D. Bak, An intriguing analogy of Kolmogorov’s scaling law in a hierarchical mass–spring–damper model. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019. 95(4): p. 3193-3203. [54] Shur, M.L., P.R. Spalart, M.K. Strelets, and A.K. Travin, A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. International journal of heat and fluid flow, 2008. 29(6): p. 1638-1649. [55] Spalart, P.R., Detached-eddy simulation. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 2009. 41(1): p. 181-202. [56] Gritskevich, M.S., A.V. Garbaruk, J. Schütze, and F.R. Menter, Development of DDES and IDDES formulations for the k-ω shear stress transport model. Flow, turbulence and combustion, 2012. 88(3): p. 431-449. [57] Anderson, J.D., Ludwig Prandtl’s boundary layer. Physics today, 2005. 58(12): p. 42-48. [58] Mali, V. and S. Dange, Basics of Y Plus, Boundary Layer and Wall Function in Turbulent Flows. LearnCAx,[Online]. Available: https://www. learncax. com/knowledge-base/blog/by-category/cfd/basics-of-y-plusboundary-layer-and-wall-function-in-turbulent-flows.[Accessed 15 February 2016], 2010. [59] Schultz, M., J. Finlay, M. Callow, and J. Callow, Three models to relate detachment of low form fouling at laboratory and ship scale. Biofouling, 2003. 19(S1): p. 17-26. [60] Von Kármán, T., Mechanische ahnlichkeit und turbulenz. Math.-Phys. Klasse, 1930. [61] Brzek, B., J. Bailon-Cuba, S. Leonardi, and L. Castillo, Theoretical evaluation of the Reynolds shear stress and flow parameters in transitionally rough turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Turbulence, 2009(10): p. N5. [62] Naz, N., Numerical Simulation of Flow around Ship Hull Considering Rudder-Propeller Interaction. 2017, M. Sc thesis, Department of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering …. [63] Sears, W.R., Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1941. 8(3): p. 104-108. [64] Patankar, S. and D. Splading, A Calculation Procedure for Heat, Van-Doormaal, JP, and Raithby, GD, 1984. Enhancements of the SIMPLE Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-Dimensional Parabolic Flows,' Interna- Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows,' Numerical Heat Transfer, tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972. 5: p. 1878-1886. [65] Van Doormaal, J.P. and G.D. Raithby, Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numerical heat transfer, 1984. 7(2): p. 147-163. [66] Issa, R.I., Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. Journal of computational physics, 1986. 62(1): p. 40-65. [67] Bomphrey, R.J., T. Nakata, P. Henningsson, and H.-T. Lin, Flight of the dragonflies and damselflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016. 371(1704): p. 20150389. [68] Conn, A.T., C.S. Ling, and S.C. Burgess, Biomimetic Analysis of Insect Wing Kinematics for Flapping MAVs. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2011. 3(1): p. 1-11. [69] Deng, J., L. Sun, L. Teng, D. Pan, and X. Shao, The correlation between wake transition and propulsive efficiency of a flapping foil: A numerical study. Physics of Fluids, 2016. 28(9): p. 094101. [70] 林詠盛, 以力元理論分析在中低雷諾數流場中撓性平板擺動之推力機制. 2017. [71] 賴思量, 海鷗撲翅流場的力元理論分析. 2021. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84788 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文主要探討蜻蜓在向前飛行時,非定常撲翅運動的撲翅受力情形,蜻蜓藉由雙對翅膀,能應付各種不同的飛行需求,其飛行模式一直是仿生空氣動力學中的課題之一。分析蜻蜓撲翅運動的受力情形,能有助於仿生微飛行器的設計。本論文使用商用軟體Ansys Fluent進行蜻蜓撲翅運動的模擬。以兩組旋轉網格模擬三維蜻蜓於飛行時前後翅的拍撲情形,並利用DES紊流模型進行數值運算,分析並比較蜻蜓在同相及完全異相飛行模式下的受力情形,並利用力學的角度解釋蜻蜓為何在起飛及爬升之時會採用前後翅同相的飛行模式,而穩定平飛時則會採用前後翅完全異相的飛行模式。本論文並透過探討不同的參數條件,包括撲翅角度(±20°, ±30°, ±40°)、飛行仰角(2°, 9°, 16°)、及雷諾數(Re=1125, 2250, 4500, 6750),配合前後翅相位差(0T, 0.5T)來分析更多飛行型態的受力情形及飛行效率的比較。 本論文特別引入力元理論(Chang, 1992)分析方法,透過勢流場的角度觀察受力,將蜻蜓非定常撲翅運動之受力與渦度作連結。力元理論藉由力的分解,將物體之受力分解為體渦度項、表面渦度項、勢流力項、摩擦力項、及雷諾應力項,藉此計算出各個流元(fluid element)對蜻蜓撲翅流場造成各項力的貢獻。一般計算升阻力時會採用表面壓力積分法進行整體受力的計算,而力元理論分析可探討此非定常流場各項受力的逐時變化,如此便能深入分析翅膀的受力來源。經過力元理論分析後得知蜻蜓撲翅流場之受力係由體渦度項所主導,故透過繪製力元理論中的體渦度分布圖,清楚表達蜻蜓於撲翅時,周圍流場之渦漩結構變化,以及體渦度對翅膀的力貢獻分布,經過繪製分析後得知,前緣渦的消長與結構變化,主導著撲翅運動的受力情形,其為昆蟲及鳥類等撲翅生物得以飛行的重要因素。 經過計算分析後得知,前後翅同相飛行,即前後翅相位差零個週期時,與一般鳥類撲翅之飛行效果類似,能帶來大的升力有助於滿足飛行時的爬升需求;而前後翅完全異相飛行,即前後翅相位差1/2個週期時,因前後翅相反方向運動,會形成一正一負的體渦度力而互相抵消,使得在各種飛行參數下,平均升阻力及週期內的升阻力大小皆相較同相飛行時來的小,不過又能保有足以支撐身體重量的升力,以及飛行所需的推力,此有助於蜻蜓穩定平飛之需求。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The study mainly discusses the unsteady flow field of dragonfly flapping wings when flying forward. Dragonflies can cope with various flight needs by means of two pairs of wings, and their flight patterns have always been the subject of bionic aerodynamics. Analyzing the force of dragonfly flapping motion can be helpful for the design of bionic micro-aircraft. This study uses the commercial software Ansys Fluent to simulate the flapping motion of dragonfly. Two sets of rotating grids were used to simulate the flapping of the fore and hind wings of a three-dimensional dragonfly during flight, and the DES turbulence model was used for numerical calculation to analyze and compare the force of the dragonfly in the in-phase stroking and counter-stroking flight modes. Explains why dragonflies use a flight pattern with their fore and hind wings in-phase stroking during takeoff and climb, and a counter-stroking flight pattern for stable flight. This study also discusses different parameters, including flapping angles (±20°, ±30°, ±40°), body angles (2°, 9°, 16°), and Reynolds number (Re=1125, 2250 , 4500, 6750), combined with the phase difference between the fore and hind wings (0T, 0.5T) to analyze the drag and lift of more flight patterns and the comparison of flight efficiency. The study especially introduces the force element theory (Chang, 1992) analysis method, observes the force from the perspective of the potential flow field, and connects the force and vorticity of the unsteady flapping motion of dragonfly. The force element theory decomposes the force into a volume-vorticity term, a surface vorticity term, a potential flow force term, a friction term, and a Reynolds stress term, thereby calculating the fluid element to the contribution of various forces to the flow field of dragonfly flapping wings. Generally, the surface pressure integration method is used to calculate the overall force when calculating the lift and drag. The force element theory analysis can explore the time-to-time changes of the forces in this unsteady flow field, so that the force source of wings can be deeply analyzed. After the analysis of force element theory, it is known that the force of the flow field of the dragonfly flapping wings is dominated by the volume-vorticity term. Therefore, by drawing the volume-vorticity distribution diagram in the force element theory, the change of the vortex structure and the distribution of the force contribution of the volume-vorticity can be clearly expressed when it flaps its wings. After drawing and analysis, it is known that the structural change of the leading edge vortex dominates the force of the flapping motion, which is an important factor for winged creatures to fly. After calculation and analysis, it is known that the fore and hind wings fly in-phase stroking, that is, when the fore and hind wings have a phase difference of zero period, it is similar to the flying effect of general birds flapping their wings, which can bring large lift and help reach the climbing needs during flight; The dragonflies fly as counter stroking, that is, when the fore and hind wings have a phase difference of 1/2 period, due to the movement of the fore and hind wings in opposite directions, a positive and a negative volume-vorticity force will be formed to cancel each other out, so that under various flight parameters, the average lift and drag, and the magnitude of the lift and drag during the period is smaller than in-phase stroking flight, but it can retain enough lift to support the weight of the body and the thrust required for flight, which helps the dragonfly fly stably. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:25:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1908202207363200.pdf: 11130938 bytes, checksum: 2236e4372cd4ce768dde97eb07ef6284 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 致謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 撲翅運動之非定常空氣動力機制 2 1.2.1翼前緣渦漩(leading-edge vortex, LEV)(前緣渦) 2 1.2.2動態失速機制(dynamic stall) 3 1.2.3翼轉效應(rotational circulation) 4 1.2.4尾流捕獲機制(wake capture) 5 1.2.5前後翼交互作用(forewing-hindwing interaction) 6 1.3 文獻回顧 6 1.3.1蜻蜓飛行機制 6 1.3.2仿生撲翼飛行器 9 1.4 研究動機與全文概述 10 第二章 基礎理論 11 2.1 力元理論 11 2.1.1 理論思維 11 2.1.2 輔助勢流 11 2.1.3 一般力元理論推導 12 2.2 紊流模型 16 2.2.1 雷諾平均理論(RANS) 16 2.2.1.1 k-ε模式 18 2.2.1.2 k-ω模式 19 2.2.1.3 SST k-ω模式 20 2.2.2 大渦理論 21 2.2.2.1 大渦漩模擬法(LES) 23 2.2.3 分離渦模式(DES) 24 2.2.3.1 延遲分離渦模式(DDES) 24 2.3 紊流力元理論 26 2.3.1 前言 26 2.3.2 基於RANS理論之紊流力元理論 26 2.3.3 基於DDES模式之紊流力元理論 28 2.4 邊界層理論 32 2.4.1 近壁處理 35 第三章 數值方法 37 3.1 簡介 37 3.2 網格建立及模擬參數 37 3.2.1 流場模型 37 3.2.2 流場模型網格化 39 3.2.3 流場模擬參數 40 3.3 數值求解方法 42 3.3.1統御方程式 42 3.3.2空間離散 43 3.3.3時間離散 45 3.3.4壓力-速度耦合計算方法 46 第四章 結果與討論 48 4.1 圓柱驗證力元理論 48 4.1.1 圓柱之輔助勢流場數值計算結果 48 4.1.2 層流力元理論驗證(Re=1000) 49 4.1.3 紊流力元理論驗證(Re=6750, 100000) 51 4.2 蜻蜓撲翅運動之受力情形 56 4.2.1 前後翅同相飛行(相位差0T)(In-phase stroking) 56 4.2.1.1 相異撲翅角度之受力情形 57 4.2.1.2 相異飛行仰角之受力情形 59 4.2.1.3 前後翅渦漩分布 60 4.2.2 前後翅完全異相飛行(相位差0.5T)(Counter-stroking) 61 4.2.2.1 相異撲翅角度之受力情形 62 4.2.2.2 相異飛行仰角之受力情形 64 4.2.2.3 前後翅渦漩分布 65 4.2.3 平均升阻力及升阻比之探討 67 4.3 以力元理論觀點分析蜻蜓撲翅運動之流場 69 4.3.1 撲翅流場之輔助勢流場數值計算結果 69 4.3.2 前後翅同相飛行(相位差0T)(In-phase stroking) 70 4.3.2.1 力元理論分析撲翅運動之受力情形 70 4.3.2.2 各力元項對前翅及後翅之貢獻比較 73 4.3.2.3 渦漩對撲翅運動造成的體渦度力效應 77 4.3.3 前後翅完全異相飛行(相位差0.5T)(Counter-stroking) 84 4.3.3.1 力元理論分析撲翅運動之受力情形 84 4.3.3.2 各力元項對前翅及後翅之貢獻比較 87 4.3.3.3 渦漩對撲翅運動造成的體渦度力效應 92 4.4 以相異雷諾數探討真實飛行情況 100 4.4.1 平均升阻力 100 4.4.2 推進效率(飛行效率) η之探討 101 第五章 結論與未來展望 103 5.1 結論 103 5.2 未來展望 105 參考文獻 106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 蜻蜓撲翅運動之仿生模擬及力元理論分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analyzing Aerodynamics of Dragonfly Flapping Wings from the Perspective of the Force Element Theory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 張建成(Chien-Cheng Chang) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張家歐(Chia-Ou Chang),周逸儒(Yi-Ju Chou),牛仰堯(Yang-Yao Niu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 蜻蜓,撲翅,相位差,力元理論,非定常流動,微飛行器, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | dragonfly,flapping wings,phase difference,force element theory,unsteady flow field,micro air vehicles, | en |
dc.relation.page | 110 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202569 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 應用力學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-31 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 應用力學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1908202207363200.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 10.87 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。