請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84680完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王皇玉(Huang-Yu Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jen Joe Kok | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡倩柔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:20:17Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-09-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻 一、 中文部分 王兆鵬（2006），〈論一事不再理之憲法原則(上) 〉，《台灣本土法學雜誌》，80期，頁51-67。 王皇玉（2007），〈論醫療行為與業務上之正當行為〉，《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》，36卷2期，頁41-91。 王皇玉（2012），〈論醫師對藥物副作用之說明：從99年台上字第558號判決談起〉，《甘添貴教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集上冊》，頁153-174。 王紀軒（2013），〈美國電子監控性犯罪者的經驗：以美國加州為例〉，《世新法學》，6卷2期，頁377-412。 沈勝昂、廖秀娟、董道興、張英勛（2013），〈性侵犯罪化學去勢的本質與爭議〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，16期，頁219-236。 李震山（2018），〈國際人權規範國內法化的意義：以「禁止酷刑公約」為例〉，《台灣公法學的墊基與前瞻：城仲模教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集（上冊）》，334期，頁3-29。 李佳玟（2021），〈性犯罪者刑後強制治療制度的定位（上）〉，《台灣法律人》，2期，頁87-104。 法思齊（2013），〈性侵害犯罪加害人登記與公告制度之比較研究：從梅根法案對世界之影響談起〉，《臺北大學法學論叢》，85期，頁135-224。 林順昌（2020），〈韓國社區矯正法制與實務論考〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，23 期，頁31-82。 林順昌（2022），〈美國社區矯治措施之分類與運用：兼論對我國法制之借鏡與建議〉，《軍法專刊》，68卷1期，頁117-156。 許福生（2012），〈論風險社會與性侵害犯治理法制之變革〉，《警政論叢》，12期，頁1-33。 許福生（2014），〈我國性侵害犯刑後強制治療之檢討〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，17期，頁215-256。 許福生（2014），〈臺灣地區性罪犯社區處遇銜接機制之現況與檢討〉，《警學叢刊》，44卷6期，頁1-34。 許福生（2019），〈運用科技設備監控在性侵害犯司法處遇之探討〉，《中央警察大學法學論集》，37期，頁59-93。 張麗卿（2018），〈社區矯正法制之比較法檢討：以德日法制為借鑑〉，《月旦法學雜誌》， 279 期，頁118-138。 曾品傑（2012），〈我國醫療上告知說明義務之實務發展：最高法院相關判決評釋〉，《科技法學評論》，9卷1期，頁15-49。 曾財和（2016），〈對性侵害犯實施GPS監控相關問題探討：兼論終身GPS監控，以美國密西根州為借鏡〉，《檢察新論》，20期，頁154-185。 楊士隆、鄭添成、陳英明（2003），〈性犯罪者之處遇與矯治制度〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，96期，頁110-127。 楊秀儀（2005），〈美國「告知後同意」法則之考察分析〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，112期，頁138-152。 楊錦青（2012），〈性侵害犯罪防治與人權議題之探討：兼論社區處遇之作法〉，《國際文化研究》，8卷2期，頁1-25。 劉邦繡（2001），〈性侵害犯罪防治法之性侵害犯罪新解：以一九九九年修正之刑法妨害性自主罪、妨害風化罪為論述〉，《律師雜誌》，267期，頁86-118。 劉寬宏（2013），〈論美國性侵害加害人社區處遇之電子監控法律規定及實例分析〉，《刑事法雜誌》，57卷1期，頁87-126。 劉寬宏（2018），〈美國性侵犯刑後強制治療介紹：以美國華盛頓州性侵害暴力掠食者民事監禁法律為中心（一）〉，《法務通訊》，2924期，頁3-6。 蕭宏宜（2012），〈電子監控與性犯罪者：借鑒美國經驗？〉，《國立高雄大學法學論叢》，7卷2期，頁99-144。 二、 英文部分 Aagaard, L. (2014). Chemical Castration of Danish Sex Offenders. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(2), 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9534-3 Armstrong, G. S., & Freeman, B. C. (2011). Examining GPS monitoring alerts triggered by sex offenders: The divergence of legislative goals and practical application in community corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.006 Batchoo, L. (2007). Voluntary surgical castration of sex offenders waiving the eighth amendment protection from cruel and unusual punishment. Brooklyn Law Review, 72(2), 689-720. Beckman, L. (1998). Chemical Castration: Constitutional Issues of Due Process, Equal Protection, and Cruel and Unusual Punishment. West Virginia Law Review, 100(4), 853-896. Benecchi, L. (2021, August 8). Recidivism Imprisons American Progress. Harvard Political Review. In: https://harvardpolitics.com/recidivism-american-progress/ Berlin, F., & Meinecke, C. F. (1981). Treatment of sex offenders with antiandrogenic medication: conceptualization, review of treatment modalities, and preliminary findings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(5), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.5.601 Blumer, D., & Migeon, C. (1975). Hormone and hormonal agents in the treatment of aggression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 160(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197502000-00007 Bund, J. M. (1997). Did you say chemical castration. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 59(1), 157-192. Codispoti, V. L. (2008). Pharmacology of Sexually Compulsive Behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(4), 671-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2008.06.002 Crowe, A. H., Sydney, L., Bancroft, P., & Beverly, L. (2002). Offender supervision with electronic technology: A user's guide, 1-127. Dickson, D. J., & Dickson, D. T. (1998). Confidentiality and privacy in social work: A guide to the law for practitioners and students. Free Press, 1-312. Di Lorenzo, G., Autorino, R., Perdonà, S., & De Placido, S. (2005). Management of gynaecomastia in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. The Lancet Oncology, 6(12), 972-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70464-2 Druhm, K. W. (1997). A welcome return to Draconia: California penal law 645, the castration of sex offenders and the constitution. Albany Law Review, 61(1), 285-344. Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., & King, N. M. P. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, 5, 3-392. Fitzgerald, E. A. (1990). Chemical Castration: MPA Treatment of the Sexual Offender. American Journal of Criminal Law, 18(1), 1-60. Foote, R. M. (1944). Diethylstilbestrol in the management of psychopathological states in males. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 99(6), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-194406000-00006 Freund, K. (1980). Therapeutic Sex Drive Reduction. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 62(s287), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb10433.x Gagné, P. (1981). Treatment of sex offenders with medroxyprogesterone acetate. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(5), 644-646. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.5.644 Garcia, F. D., Delavenne, H. G., Assumpção, A. de F. A., & Thibaut, F. (2013). Pharmacologic Treatment of Sex Offenders with Paraphilic Disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0356-5 Garner, B. A., & Black, H. C. (2009). Black's law dictionary. 9th ed. St. Paul, MN: West, 1-1920. Gimino, P. (1997). Mandatory chemical castration for perpetrators of sex offenses against children: following California's lead. Pepperdine Law Review, 25(1), 67-106. Green, W. (1986). Depo-Provera, Castration, and the Probation of Rape Offenders: Statutory and Constitutional Issues. University of Dayton Law Review, 12(1), 1-26. Grubin, D. (2018). The Pharmacological Treatment of Sex Offenders. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Forensic Neuroscience, II, 703-723. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118650868.ch27 Harrison, K. (2008). Legal and Ethical issues when using Antiandrogenic Pharmacotherapy with Sex Offenders. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3(2), 1-11. In: http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=70&type=123 Heim, N., & Hursch, C. J. (1979). Castration for sex offenders: Treatment or punishment? A review and critique of recent European literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8(3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01541244 Heller, C. G., Laidlaw, W. M., Harvey, H. T., & Nelson, W. O. (1958). Effects of progestational compounds on the reproductive processes of the human male. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 71(5 New Steriod C), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb54641.x Henderson, P. J. (1997). Section 645 of the California Penal Code: California’s Chemical Castration Law—A Panacea or Cruel and Unusual Punishment. University of San Francisco Law Review, 32(3), 653-674. Icenogle, D. L. (1994). Sentencing male sex offenders to the use of biological treatments. Journal of Legal Medicine, 15(2), 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947649409510946 Kaplan, M. S. (1989). A Description of Self Reports of Convicted Child Molesters Following Incarceration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x8903300108 La Fond, J. Q. (2000). The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(2-3), 153-168. Laschet, U., & Laschet, L. (1975). Antiandrogens in the treatment of sexual deviations of men. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 6(6), 821-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4731(75)90310-6 Leeb, R. T., Lewis,T., & Zolotor, A. J. (2011). A Review of Physical and Mental Health Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect and Implications for Practice. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 5(5), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827611410266 Maire, L. L. (1956). Danish Experiences regarding the Castration of Sexual Offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 47(3), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140320 Maletzky, B. M., Tolan, A., & McFarland, B. (2006). The Oregon Depo-Provera Program: A Five-Year Follow-Up. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800308 Miller, J. A. (2010). Sex offender civil commitment: The treatment paradox. California Law Review, 2093-2128. In: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25799963 Money, J. (1987). Treatment guidelines: Antiandrogen and counseling of paraphilic sex offenders. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 13(3), 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926238708403894 Morgan, D. (2000). Yale Study: U.S. Eugenics Paralleled Nazi Germany. In: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45/302.html Nunes, K. L.,Hermann, C. A., Renee Malcom, J., & Lavoie, K. (2013). Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(9), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.01.008 Patricia Godeke Tjaden, Thoennes, N., Justice, O., & Centers. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. United States. Department Of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, 1–41. Pfaffenroth, P. C. (2003). The Need for Coherence: States’ Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders in the Wake of Kansas v. Crane. Stanford Law Review, 55(6), 2230-2266. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229648?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents Pitts-Taylor, V. (2008). Cultural encyclopedia of the body. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1-577. Richard Gordon Wright. (2015). Sex offender laws: failed policies, new directions. Springer Publishing Company, 1-386. Rosenfield, A. (1983). The Food and Drug Administration and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate. JAMA, 249(21), 2922-2928. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1983.03330450052025 Rosen, Michael W(1976). Informed Consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act, Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 4: Iss. 3, Article 5, 701-727. Russell, S. (1997). Castration of repeat sexual offenders: an international comparative analysis. Houston Journal of International Law, 19(2), 425-460. Schwitzgebel, R., Schwitzgebel, R., Pahnke, W. N., & Hurd, W. S. (1964). A program of research in behavioral electronics. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090305 Sneader, W. (2005). Drug discovery: A history. Wiley, 1-468. Stancer, H. C., Garfinkel, P. E., & Rakoff, V. M. (Eds.). (1984). Guidelines for the Use of Psychotropic Drugs,1-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7618-7 Sun, M. (1982). Depo-Provera Debate Revs Up at FDA. Science, 217(4558), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6211767 Testa, M., & West, S. G. (2010). Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa.: Township)), 7(10), 30-40. Turner, S., Chamberlain, A. W., Jannetta, J., & Hess, J. (2010). Implementation and Outcomes for California’s GPS pilot for high risk sex offender parolees. Irvine: Center for Evidence-Based Corrections. University of California at Irvine. Chicago, 1-24. Wincze, J. P., Bansal, S., & Malamud, M. (1986). Effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on subjective arousal, arousal to erotic stimulation, and nocturnal penile tumescence in male sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01550364 Winslade, W., Stone, T. H., Smith-Bell, M., & M. Webb, D. (1998). Castrating Pedophiles Convicted of Sex Offenses against Children: New Treatment or Old Punishment. SMU Law Review, 51(2), 351-412. Wong, C. M. (2001). Chemical castration: Oregon's innovative approach to sex offender rehabilitation, or unconstitutional punishment. Oregon Law Review, 80(1), 267-300. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84680 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近些年來，為了進一步解決社會中層出不窮的性犯罪案件，一些國家已經陸續通過立法，把化學去勢合法化，作為對性侵害犯罪行為人之處遇措施，以期能夠藉此降低性侵害犯罪行為的發生或再次發生。儘管化學去勢面臨著許多爭議，但是這些爭議並沒有成為阻礙這些國家制定化學去勢法規之障礙。美國針對性犯罪行為人制定的法規與政策，可以說是嚴密且先進的。美國於1996年至2019年，已有近10個州陸續通過立法，把化學去勢作為一種新型的性犯罪再犯預防處遇。儘管這些州的化學去勢法規尚有不足之處，但作為他國化學去勢之立法模板，仍具有極大的參考價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, chemical castration has been increasingly adopted into the criminal treatment of sexual offenders in some countries in an attempt to prevent or reduce the occurrence or recurrence of sexual crimes in an effort that will further resolve the growth of sexual crimes in society. Despite the controversy surrounding chemical castration, these debates have not stymied the growth of chemical castration laws in these nations. In the United States, sex offender legislation and practices are strict and progressive. Nearly ten states in the United States approved legislation to make chemical castration a new way of sexual recidivism prevention between 1996 and 2019. Despite their flaws, these states' chemical castration laws are nonetheless extremely valuable as a model for chemical castration legislation in other nations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:20:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0109202217305100.pdf: 2014094 bytes, checksum: 3d8a2d6f826fe2e0b12d078d9b4c840a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 謝辭............................................................................i 中文摘要.......................................................................ii Abstract.....................................................................iii 第一章 緒論................................................................... 1 第一節 論文背景與動機...........................................................1 第二節 研究方法 ...............................................................3 第二章 化學去勢的概念與歷史......................................................6 第一節 何謂「化學去勢」 ...............................................................................6 第二節 化學去勢和物理（手術）去勢.................................................8 第三節 化學去勢的歷史沿革.......................................................11 第四節 化學去勢使用的藥物類型....................................................14 第五節 小結...................................................................20 第三章 化學去勢的爭議問題.......................................................22 第一節 「化學去勢」的適用對象....................................................22 第二節 反對「化學去勢」的理由....................................................26 壹、 人權保障之爭議 ..............................................................................27 貳、 知情同意的問題 ..............................................................................31 參、 一事不再理或雙重危險.....................................................39 第三節 「化學去勢」是治療還是懲罰................................................40 第四章 美國對性侵害犯罪人之處遇..................................................46 第一節 美國對性侵害犯罪的刑事政策................................................46 壹、 性犯罪行為人的刑罰 ......................................................48 貳、 性侵害行為人的民事監護制度................................................50 參、 性犯罪行為人登記以及社區公告制度...........................................53 肆、 性犯罪行為人的電子監控制度................................................57 第二節 小結...................................................................63 第五章 美國化學去勢的法律依據....................................................66 第一節 美國「化學去勢」的合憲性..................................................68 壹、 是否屬於殘忍和不尋常的懲罰................................................68 貳、 是否侵害「隱私權」與身體自主權.............................................72 參、 是否違反「雙重危險」原則..................................................79 第二節 美國「化學去勢」合法化的各州法規...........................................81 壹、 加利福尼亞州的「化學去勢」法規.............................................82 貳、 威斯康辛州的「化學去勢」法規 ..............................................87 參、 蒙大拿州的「化學去勢」法規................................................88 肆、 佛羅里達州的「化學去勢」法規...............................................92 伍、 愛荷華州的「化學去勢」法規................................................95 陸、 路易斯安那州的「化學去勢」法規.............................................99 柒、 阿拉巴馬州的「化學去勢」法規..............................................102 捌、 喬治亞州的「化學去勢」法規...............................................103 玖、 奧勒岡州的「化學去勢」法規...............................................105 壹拾、德克薩斯州的「化學去勢」法規.................................................108 第三節 小結..................................................................111 第六章 台灣化學去勢措施之可行性.................................................117 第一節 台灣對性犯罪行為人之處遇.................................................120 壹、 強制治療..............................................................120 一、1994年至1999年之相關規定....................................................120 二、2005年之刑法修正............................................................123 貳、 社區監控措施...........................................................128 一、性侵害犯罪行為人之電子監控制度.................................................128 一、性侵害犯罪行為人登記報到以及查閱制度............................................129 第二節 台灣化學去勢合法化問題...................................................130 第三節 小結..................................................................134 第七章 結論..................................................................136 參考文獻 .....................................................................143 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 化學去勢之發展趨勢—以美國的化學去勢法規為中心 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Chemical Castration Development Trends: The chemical castration legislation in the United States | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝煜偉(Yu-Wei Hsieh),林琬珊(Wan-Shan Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 化學去勢,性犯罪行為,社區處遇,美國,兒童,物理去勢, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | chemical castration,sexual crimes,community-based treatment,United States,children,surgical castration, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 153 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203076 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-14 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0109202217305100.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。