Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84095
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李財坤(Tsai-Kun Li) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Cheng Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林煒幀 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:04:43Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-10-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Khan, I., F. Hou, and H.P. Le, The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ, 2021. 754: p. 142222. 2. Ouyang, Y., et al., Impact of climate change on groundwater resource in a region with a fast depletion rate: the Mississippi Embayment. J Water Clim Chang, 2021. 12(6): p. 2245-2255. 3. Maresca, A., V. Bisinella, and T.F. Astrup, Life cycle assessment of air-pollution- control residues from waste incineration in Europe: Importance of composition, technology and long-term leaching. Waste Manag, 2022. 144: p. 336-348. 4. Oliveras, L., et al., Energy poverty and health: Trends in the European Union before and during the economic crisis, 2007-2016. Health Place, 2021. 67: p. 102294. 5. Komarulzaman, A., J. Smits, and E. de Jong, Clean water, sanitation and diarrhoea in Indonesia: Effects of household and community factors. Glob Public Health, 2017. 12(9): p. 1141-1155. 6. Fore, L.S., et al., Heeding a call to action for US coral reefs: the untapped potential of the Clean Water Act. Mar Pollut Bull, 2009. 58(10): p. 1421-3. 7. Tumwine, J.K., Clean drinking water for homes in Africa and other less developed countries. BMJ, 2005. 331(7515): p. 468-9. 8. Mohamadi, H., et al., Assessment of wind energy potential and economic evaluation of four wind turbine models for the east of Iran. Heliyon, 2021. 7(6): p. e07234. 9. Hunt, J.D., et al., Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage. Nat Commun, 2020. 11(1): p. 947. 10. Goh, H.H., et al., Application of choosing by advantages to determine the optimal site for solar power plants. Sci Rep, 2022. 12(1): p. 4113. 11. Chen, H., et al., Urbanization, economic development and health: evidence from China's labor-force dynamic survey. Int J Equity Health, 2017. 16(1): p. 207. 12. Gyamfi, B.A., Consumption-based carbon emission and foreign direct investment in oil-producing Sub-Sahara African countries: the role of natural resources and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022. 29(9): p. 13154-13166. 13. Cao, Y., et al., Electricigens in the anode of microbial fuel cells: pure cultures versus mixed communities. Microb Cell Fact, 2019. 18(1): p. 39. 14. Mukherjee, A., et al., Microbial fuel cell performance for aromatic hydrocarbon bioremediation and common effluent treatment plant wastewater treatment with bioelectricity generation through series-parallel connection. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2021. 15. Wang, C. and H. Jiang, Real-time monitoring of sediment bulking through a multi- anode sediment microbial fuel cell as reliable biosensor. Sci Total Environ, 2019. 697: p. 134009. 16. Helder, M., et al., The flat-plate plant-microbial fuel cell: the effect of a new design on internal resistances. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2012. 5(1): p. 70. 17. Pattanayak, P., et al., Performance evaluation of poly(aniline-co-pyrrole) wrapped titanium dioxide nanocomposite as an air-cathode catalyst material for microbial fuel cell. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021. 118: p. 111492. 18. Nissen, S., et al., Comparative c-type cytochrome expression analysis in Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C grown with soluble and insoluble oxidized metal electron acceptors. Biochem Soc Trans, 2012. 40(6): p. 1204-10. 19. Carmona-Martinez, A.A., et al., Cyclic voltammetric analysis of the electron transfer of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and nanofilament and cytochrome knock- out mutants. Bioelectrochemistry, 2011. 81(2): p. 74-80. 20. Peng, H., et al., Enhanced biosynthesis of phenazine-1-carboxamide by engineered Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. Microb Cell Fact, 2018. 17(1): p. 117. 21. Bilal, M., et al., Metabolic engineering strategies for enhanced shikimate biosynthesis: current scenario and future developments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2018. 102(18): p. 7759-7773. 22. Islam, M.A., et al., Optimization of co-culture inoculated microbial fuel cell performance using response surface methodology. J Environ Manage, 2018. 225: p. 242-251. 23. Engel, C., et al., Long-Term Behavior of Defined Mixed Cultures of Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis in Bioelectrochemical Systems. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019. 7: p. 60. 24. Merkey, B.V. and D.L. Chopp, Modeling the impact of interspecies competition on performance of a microbial fuel cell. Bull Math Biol, 2014. 76(6): p. 1429-53. 25. Ioannou, L.A., G. Li Puma, and D. Fatta-Kassinos, Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: a review. J Hazard Mater, 2015. 286: p. 343-68. 26. Bolzonella, D., et al., Winery wastewater treatment: a critical overview of advanced biological processes. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2019. 39(4): p. 489-507. 27. Escalante, H., et al., Anaerobic digestion of cheese whey: Energetic and nutritional potential for the dairy sector in developing countries. Waste Manag, 2018. 71: p. 711-718. 28. Keskes, S., et al., Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the aerobic treatment of abattoir wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2012. 103(1): p. 28-34. 29. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., A. Kassaveti, and S. Stefanatos, Olive oil waste treatment: a comparative and critical presentation of methods, advantages & disadvantages. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2007. 47(3): p. 187-229. 30. Chen, H., et al., Recovery of High Value-Added Nutrients from Fruit and Vegetable Industrial Wastewater. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 2019. 18(5): p. 1388-1402. 31. Ikeda, S., et al., Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as a bacterial platform for lectro-biotechnology. Essays Biochem, 2021. 65(2): p. 355-364. 32. Lee, J.J., et al., Effects of combining two lactic acid bacteria as a starter culture on model kimchi fermentation. Food Res Int, 2020. 136: p. 109591. 33. Tanamool, V., M. Chantarangsee, and W. Soemphol, Simultaneous vinegar fermentation from a pineapple by-product using the co-inoculation of yeast and thermotolerant acetic acid bacteria and their physiochemical properties. 3 Biotech, 2020. 10(3): p. 115. 34. Choi, G., D.J. Hassett, and S. Choi, A paper-based microbial fuel cell array for rapid and high-throughput screening of electricity-producing bacteria. Analyst, 2015. 140(12): p. 4277-83. 35. Wang, V.B., et al., Metabolite-enabled mutualistic interaction between Shewanella oneidensis and Escherichia coli in a co-culture using an electrode as electron acceptor. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: p. 11222. 36. Ucar, D., Y. Zhang, and I. Angelidaki, An Overview of Electron Acceptors in Microbial Fuel Cells. Front Microbiol, 2017. 8: p. 643. 37. Lan, J., et al., High current density with spatial distribution of Geobacter in anodic biofilm of the microbial electrolysis desalination and chemical-production cell with enlarged volumetric anode. Sci Total Environ, 2022. 831: p. 154798. 38. Zhang, L., et al., Improving electroautotrophic ammonium production from nitrogen gas by simultaneous carbon dioxide fixation in a dual-chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Bioelectrochemistry, 2022. 144: p. 108044. 39. Zou, L., et al., Enhanced anaerobic digestion of swine manure via a coupled microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresour Technol, 2021. 340: p. 125619. 40. Lu, L., et al., Microbial Electrolytic Carbon Capture for Carbon Negative and Energy Positive Wastewater Treatment. Environ Sci Technol, 2015. 49(13): p. 8193-201. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84095 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 永續發展目標 (SDGs) 是聯合國於 2015 年宣布的普遍目標。在 SDGs 中,隨著我們面 臨更加嚴峻的氣候、空氣污染和能源危機和人口壓力:乾淨衛生的水資源、便宜的 再生能源、永續都市及社群發展這些目標越來越受到重視。微生物燃料電池 (Microbial Fuel Cell, MFC)為一種再生能源,利用特定電活性微生物(electrogens)分解 各種有機物的同時獲取其產生之電子轉換成電能,起初 MFC 相關研究多用於污水、活性污泥之處理以及土壤復育;近期研究方向發展轉向微生物電催化的運用,致力於固碳、再生原料上。 微生物間的交互作用與廢水中含有的有機物種類是生物層面主要影響燃料電池效能的主因,MFC 的菌種來源可分為混合菌相與固定菌相,剛開始多直接使用廢水污泥 作為燃料電池的菌種來源屬於混合菌相,產電量穩定持久;到後期才發展出藉由特 殊的電化學環境篩選出具有產電能力的菌株,並以單一菌株或共培養的形式培養於 燃料電池中屬於固定菌相,透過研究共培養微生物燃料電池中個株菌種代謝物的消 長,使我們了解微生物之間如何配合彼此的代謝途徑達到交互補償(cross-feeding)的 情形,相較混合菌相更為簡單的系統除了方便建構微生物之間交互作用的網絡也可 以避免混合菌相中菌種間的競爭,使系統更有效率,但相對來說共培養的系統對於 不同種類的有機污染物的適應性就沒有原來的好。 另一方面現行的食品生技產業中已有許多成熟的共培養菌相系統,像是果醋產業所 使用到的酵母菌與醋酸菌的結合,韓式泡菜中使用三種乳酸菌作為發酵起始菌種等等,這些成功的案例不但在代謝路徑上有著互補的關係,同時也能產生諸多小分子 代謝物,具有被 MFC 模式物種 Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 進一步利用產電的淺力。 本研究以現行生技食品產業的共培養發酵系統與產電菌結合,期望建立能應對多樣 的污水,並維持良好的產電效能的微生物燃料電池。使用產電菌模式物種 Shewanella oneidensis MR-1(S. o. MR-1) 作為中心,因其能代謝多樣小分子有機物之能力,搭配釀醋所使用的酵母菌、醋酸菌共培養菌相形成共培養系統,以及其他食品工業菌種做結合,並以 S. o. MR-1 單一菌株及 S. o. MR-1 與 E. coli 共培養之燃料電池則作為對照組,紀錄不同菌相處理人工廢水所產生之開路電壓(open circuit voltage, OCV) 作為產電能力之依據。 結果顯示酵母菌、醋酸菌與 S. o. MR-1 的共培養組合 OCV 平均為 450 mV,其他多菌 相組別 OCV 平均則介於 650 至 700 mV,與對照組在統計上並無明顯差異,我們推估 可能是酸鹼值的改變、不同菌種間的平衡以及一些具有抑制產電反應的代謝物產生, 使得多菌相的 MFC 沒有達到預期中增強發電的效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are universal goals announced by United Nations in 2015. Among SDGs, clean water, clean energy and sustainable cities are getting more awareness as we are facing more severe climate, air pollution and energy crisis while the population still growing around the world. The microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a promising technology to combat those challenges, which it utilized electroactive bacteria (EAB) to generate electricity and decompose the organic waste. In the beginning, the research about MFC originally focus on wastewater treatment and soil decontamination; recently, people change the direction to electrochemical biocatalysts for carbon fixation and valuable by- product production. The interaction between microbes and the types of organic matter contained in wastewater are the main factors affecting the efficiency of fuel cells at the biological level. The source of bacteria in MFC can be divided into mixed culture and pure culture. For those used wastewater sludge as direct inoculum which belongs to the mixed culture: the electricity production is stable and long-lasting; on the other hand, the strains with the ability to generate electricity were isolated by utilized special electrochemical environment, and cultivated in the fuel cell in the form of a single strain or co-culture which are the pure culture: by studying the fluctuation of the metabolites from each individual strains in the co-cultivation microbial fuel cell, we can understand how the microorganisms cooperate with each other's metabolic pathways to achieve cross-feeding. It also avoids the competition between bacterial species in the mixed culture, which is more efficient than the mixed culture, but the co-culture systems have less adaptability to different types of organic pollutants. On the other hand, ‘Fermentation’ has been developed for centuries, people use various of single strain and co-culture systems that produce valuable products from different ingredients. Like yeast and acetobacter for vinegar and several lactobacillus species for kimchi fermentation. It provides the opportunity to improve MFC system by combine the EAB with exist fermentation models as we assume that EAB could benefits by the various metabolites produced by fermented co-culture model. In this study, we try to build a multi-cultural MFC that has the ability to utilized various wastewater stream from food industry. MFC model organism Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (S. o. MR-1) is selected as center to construct the cross-feeding network, candidate microbes include Bacillus spp., Acetobacter spp., yeast species and E. coli. The electricity productivity was estimated based on the open circuit voltage (OCV) of fuel cell for each group. The single strain and co-culture MFC system (S. o. MR-1, S. o. MR-1 * E. coli) were served as reference models. The results showed that the multi-cultural MFC with yeast, acetobacter and S. o. MR-1 had an average OCV around 450 mV, and other combination were about 650 to 700 mV, but is didn’t show significant improvement between control and experimental groups, the reason could be the pH value changes, balance of population of each species and some inhibitors for repressed the electricity production were synthesized during the operation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:04:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1807202213035200.pdf: 6092551 bytes, checksum: 93609a8f886def18caed68f59141b711 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi INTRODUCTION 1 1.SustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs) 1 2. Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) 2 2.1. Overview of MFC 2 2.2. Organic compounds from Food industrial wastewater 4 3. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 6 3.1. Description and metabolism 6 3.2. Current research and application 7 4. Co-culture models from food industry 7 SPECIFIC AIM 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS 9 Bacteria strains 9 Electrolytes for fuel cell 9 Pretreatments and construction of MFC 10 Electroactivity measurement 10 Building the multi-cultural MFC 11 RESULTS 12 1. OCVs for Shewanella species MFC 12 2. OCVs for S. oneidensis MR-1 * E. coli co-culture MFC 12 3. OCVs for multi-cultural MFC 12 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 13 TABLE AND FIGURE 15 Table 1: Microorganisms that were used in this study 15 Table 2: Candidate Co-culture species for multi-cultural MFC 15 Figure 1: Vegetable processing line in Bordeaux, France 16 Figure 2: Overview of H-type MFC reactor 16 Figure 3: Maximum OCVs of three Shewanella species 17 Figure 4: Maximum OCVs of model co-culture MFC 18 Figure 5: Maximum OCVs of three multi-cultural MFC 19 Figure 6: Comparison of maximum OCV between best multi-cultural MFC and single & co-cultural model 20 Figure 7: Systematic outline of MEC-AD operation (Zou, L., et al., 2021) 21 Figure 8: Systematic outline of MECC operation (Lu, L., et al., 2015) 21 REFERENCE 22 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以食品工業中之共培養菌相建構多菌相微生物燃料電池的濳力之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | To explore the potential of multi-cultural Microbial Fuel Cell − base on co-cultural model from food industries | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 丁照棣(Chau-Ti Ting),沈湯龍(Tang-Long Shen),周涵怡(Han-Yi E. Chou),張慶國(Chin-Kuo Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 微生物燃料電池,S. oneidensis MR-1,共培養,交互補償,發酵, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Microbial Fuel Cell,S. oneidensis MR-1,Co-Culture,Cross-feeding,Fermentation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 24 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201524 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際三校農業生技與健康醫療碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-10-03 | - |
Appears in Collections: | 國際三校農業生技與健康醫療碩士學位學程 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1807202213035200.pdf Access limited in NTU ip range | 5.95 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.