請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84083完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌(Taychang Wang),劉嘉雯(Chiawen Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng-Hsuan Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林孟萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:04:35Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李秀玲,2011,淺談審計委員會之設置,證券暨期貨月刊,第29卷,第6期:26-36。 李建然與廖秀梅,2022,審計委員會設置及其品質與盈餘穩健性,會計評論,第74期:151-192。 李建然、廖秀梅與張卉諭,2016,審計委員會設置及其品質對公司價值的影響,中華會計學刊,第12卷,第2期:231-265。 邱安安,2018,審計委員會與企業避稅,臺灣管理學刊,第18卷,第1期:23-43。 范宏書與陳慶隆,2007,會計師異動、存在最終家族控制股東與財務報表公佈時效性之探討,當代會計,第8卷,第1期:1-33。 范宏書、林彥廷與陳慶隆,2013,財務會計準則第 35 號公報與財務報表公佈時效性,臺大管理論叢,第23卷,第2期:97-131。 范宏書、陳慶隆、李淑華與謝永明,2008,總審計調整數對公司財務報表公佈時效性之影響,輔仁管理評論,第15卷,第1期:73-105。 許文馨,2014,Can Audit Committee Improve Earnings Quality More than the Supervisors in Taiwan?,臺灣管理論叢,第24卷,第S1期:203-232。 傅碧軼、楊雅智與黃鼎喬,2019,會計師產業專精與審計報告時間落差:中國證據,會計審計論叢,第9卷,第1期:75-117。 廖秀梅與廖益興,2002,會計師更換時機對年報揭露時效及資本市場之影響,當代會計,第3卷,第2期:221-230。 蔡彥卿,1996,家族控股集團企業財務報表公告期間之研究,管理與系統,第3卷第1期:1-16。 Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory 23 (1): 69-87. Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., & Stefaniak, C. 2014. The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness. Advances in Accounting 30 (2): 283-297. Ashraf, M., Michas, P. N., & Russomanno, D. 2020. The impact of audit committee information technology expertise on the reliability and timeliness of financial reporting. The Accounting Review 95 (5): 23-56. Ashton, R. H., Willingham, J. J., & Elliott, R. K. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of accounting research, 275-292. Baatwah, S. R., Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. 2019. Audit committee chair accounting expertise and audit report timeliness: The moderating effect of chair characteristics. Asian Review of Accounting. Bamber, E. M., Bamber, L. S., & Schoderbek, M. P. 1993. Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: An empirical analysis. Auditing 12 (1): 1. Be´dard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory 23 (2): 13-35. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting review: 443-465. Beekes, W., Pope, P., & Young, S. 2004. The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (1): 47-59. Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., & MacGregor, J. E. 2014. The relationship between audit report lags and future restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (2): 27-57. Bromilow, C., & Keller, D. 2011. Audit committee effectiveness: What works best(4th ed.). Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The accounting review 75 (4): 453-467. Chan, A. M. Y., Liu, G., & Sun, J. 2013. Independent audit committee members’ board tenure and audit fees. Accounting & Finance 53 (4): 1129-1147. Courtis, J. K. 1976. Relationships between timeliness in corporate reporting and corporate attributes. Accounting and Business research 7 (25): 45-56. Davies, B., & Whittred, G. P. 1980. The association between selected corporate: attributes and timeliness in corporate: reporting: further analysis. Abacus 16 (1): 48-60. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature 21: 38-75. Dhaliwal, D. A. N., Naiker, V. I. C., & Navissi, F. 2010. The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 787-827. Dyer, J. C., & McHugh, A. J. 1975. The timeliness of the Australian annual report. Journal of Accounting Research: 204-219. Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy 88 (2): 288-307. Farber, D. B. 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter?. The accounting review 80 (2): 539-561. Frankel, R., & Li, X. 2004. Characteristics of a firm's information environment and the information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders. Journal of accounting and economics 37 (2): 229-259. Free, C., Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. 2021. How audit committee chairs address Information-Processing barriers. The Accounting Review 96 (1): 147-169. Ghafran, C., & Yasmin, S. 2018. Audit committee chair and financial reporting timeliness: A focus on financial, experiential and monitoring expertise. International Journal of Auditing 22 (1): 13-24. Gigler, F. B., & Hemmer, T. 2001. Conservatism, optimal disclosure policy, and the timeliness of financial reports. The Accounting Review 76 (4): 471-493. Gilling, D. M. 1977. Timeliness in corporate reporting: some further comment. Accounting and Business Research 8 (29): 34-36. Givoly, D., & Palmon, D. 1982. Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. Accounting review: 486-508. Hansen, J. C., Lisic, L. L., Seidel, T. A., & Wilkins, M. S. 2021. Audit committee accounting expertise and the mitigation of strategic auditor behavior. The Accounting Review 96 (4): 289-314. He, X., Pittman, J. A., Rui, O. M., & Wu, D. 2017. Do social ties between external auditors and audit committee members affect audit quality?. The Accounting Review 92 (5): 61-87. Henderson, B. C., & Kaplan, S. E. 2000. An examination of audit report lag for banks: A panel data approach. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (2): 159-174. Hoitash, U., Hoitash, R., & Bedard, J. C. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The accounting review 84 (3): 839-867. Holder, A., Karim, K., Lin, K. J., & Pinsker, R. 2016. Do material weaknesses in information technology-related internal controls affect firms'8-K filing timeliness and compliance?. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 22: 26-43. Khemakhem, H., & Fontaine, R. 2019. The audit committee chair's abilities: Beyond financial expertise. International Journal of Auditing 23 (3): 457-471. Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors' incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management journal 33 (1): 129-150. KPMG. 2018. The role of the audit committee chair. KPMG. 2019. The role of the audit committee chair. Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The accounting review 80 (2): 649-675. Kross, W., & Schroeder, D. A. 1984. An empirical investigation of the effect of quarterly earnings announcement timing on stock returns. Journal of accounting research: 153-176. Lev, B. 1988. Toward a theory of equitable and efficient accounting policy. Accounting Review: 1-22. Lisic, L. L., Myers, L. A., Seidel, T. A., & Zhou, J. 2019. Does audit committee accounting expertise help to promote audit quality? Evidence from auditor reporting of internal control weaknesses. Contemporary Accounting Research 36 (4): 2521-2553. National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). 2013. Honing skepticism. NACD directorship. Nipper, M. 2021. The role of audit committee chair tenure—A German perspective. International Journal of Auditing 25 (3): 716-732. O’sullivan, N. 2000. The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review 32 (4): 397-414. Owusu-Ansah, S., & Leventis, S. 2006. Timeliness of corporate annual financial reporting in Greece. European Accounting Review 15 (2): 273-287. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). 2018. PwC Governance Insights Center. Audit Committee Excellence Series. London, U.K.: PwC. Schmidt, J., & Wilkins, M. S. 2013. Bringing darkness to light: The influence of auditor quality and audit committee expertise on the timeliness of financial statement restatement disclosures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (1): 221-244. Schwartz, K. B., & Soo, B. S. 1996. The association between auditor changes and reporting lags. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 353-370. Sharma, D. S., Tanyi, P. N., & Litt, B. A. 2017. Costs of mandatory periodic audit partner rotation: Evidence from audit fees and audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 36 (1): 129-149. Sharma, V. D., Iselin, E. R. 2012. The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (3): 149-175. Soltani, B. 2002. Timeliness of corporate and audit reports: Some empirical evidence in the French context. The International Journal of Accounting 37 (2): 215-246. Sommer Jr, A. A. 1991. Auditing audit committees: An educational opportunity for auditors. Accounting Horizons 5 (2): 91. Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Van der Zahn, J. L. M. 2015. Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag. International Journal of Auditing 19 (2): 72-87. Tanyi, P. N., & Smith, D. B. 2015. Busyness, expertise, and financial reporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (2): 59-89. T Turley, S., & Zaman, M. 2007. Audit committee effectiveness: informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. Vafeas, N. 2003. Length of board tenure and outside director independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 30 (7‐8): 1043-1064. Vafeas, N. 2005. Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings. Contemporary accounting research 22 (4): 1093-1122. Wan-Hussin, W. N., & Bamahros, H. M. 2013. Do investment in and the sourcing arrangement of the internal audit function affect audit delay?. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 9 (1): 19-32. Wan-Hussin, W. N., Fitri, H., & Salim, B. 2021. Audit committee chair overlap, chair expertise, and internal auditing practices: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 44: 100413. Whittred, G. P. 1980. Audit qualification and the timeliness of corporate annual reports. Accounting Review: 563-577. Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of corporate finance 9 (3): 295-316. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84083 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以我國2016年至2020年已設置審計委員會之上市(櫃)公司為樣本,探討審計委員會召集人特性對財務報表時效性之影響。本文以審計報告時間落差及總時間落差衡量財務報表時效性,並聚焦在審計委員會召集人擔任公司其他功能性委員會席次多寡、在公司總任期及具會計專業背景。實證結果顯示,審計委員會召集人擔任公司其他功能性委員席次越多及在公司總任期越長時,能縮短審計報告時間落差,而審計委員會召集人具會計專業背景時,將使審計報告時間落差拉長。本研究亦探討審計委員會召集人不具會計專業背景,但審計委員會其他成員具會計專業背景情況對時效性之影響,而實證結果顯示在該情況下將使審計報告時間落差縮短。在總時間落差中,實證結果顯示審計委員會召集人擔任公司其他功能性委員席次越多及在公司總任期越長時,能縮短總時間落差。但審計委員會召集人具會計專業背景及審計委員會召集人不具會計專業背景,但審計委員會其他成員具會計專業背景情況,皆與總時效落差沒有顯著關聯。 本研究進一步分析新冠疫情期間及新冠疫情前,審計委員會召集人特性對財務報表時效性影響之變化。實證結果顯示相較於新冠疫情前,新冠疫情期間審計委員會召集人擔任公司其他功能性委員會席次越多及在公司總任期越長時,能更加縮短審計時間落差及總時間落差。本研究亦將超過法令規定期限始公告財務報表之公司刪除以進行敏感性分析,迴歸結果顯示部分公司之特殊情況並不影響主要迴歸結果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The study relies on listed companies that have established audit committees from 2016 to 2020 in Taiwan and examines the effect of timeliness of financial reports and audit committee chair. This article takes audit report lag and total lag as the standard to measure timeliness of the financial report and focuses on three audit committee chair characteristics which are the number of seats in other committees, tenure, and accounting expertise. This research results show that the number of seats in other committees and tenure can significantly decrease audit report lag. However, when audit committee chair is accounting expertise, audit report lag will significantly increase. Moreover, when the audit committee chair is not accounting expertise and another audit committee member is accounting expertise, audit report lag will significantly decrease. For the total report lag as the standard to measure timeliness of financial report. The research results show that the number of seats in other committees and tenure can significantly decrease total report lag. However, when audit committee chair is accounting expertise has no significant effect on total report lag. When audit committee chair is not accounting expertise and another audit committee member is accounting expertise has also no significant effect on total report lag. I further focus on the different impact of audit committee chair characteristics on the timeliness of financial reports during and before the COVID-19. These research results show that compared with the period before COVID-19, the number of seats in other committees and tenure can shorten the audit report lag and the total lag during the COVID-19. For robustness tests, I deleted those companies which released their financial reports after the deadline. Robustness tests provide the same empirical results as the main tests. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:04:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1607202215433500.pdf: 3263158 bytes, checksum: 04b6a520f51b304eaf588d1fde4262b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目 錄 iv 表目錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 財務報表時效性相關文獻 5 2.2 審計委員會及審計委員會召集人相關文獻 7 2.3 審計委員會召集人與財務報表時效性相關文獻 9 第三章 假說建立 11 第四章 迴歸模型、迴歸變數及樣本來源 16 4.1 迴歸模型 16 4.2 迴歸變數 17 4.2.1 應變數 17 4.2.2 主要自變數 17 4.2.3 控制變數 18 4.3 樣本選取及資料來源 23 第五章 實證結果與分析 25 5.1 敘述性統計 25 5.2 相關性分析 27 5.3 實證結果分析 30 第六章 額外分析 36 6.1 新冠疫情 36 6.2 敏感性測試:排除超過法定公告期限之觀察值 41 第七章 總結 43 中文文獻 45 英文文獻 45 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 財務報表時效性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 審計委員會召集人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Timeliness of Financial report | en |
| dc.subject | Audit committee chair | en |
| dc.title | 審計委員會召集人特性對財務報表時效性之影響—以臺灣公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Audit Committee Chair Characteristic on the Timeliness of Financial Report: Evidence from Taiwan. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡元棠,吳元利 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 審計委員會召集人,財務報表時效性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Audit committee chair,Timeliness of Financial report, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 50 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201500 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-02 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1607202215433500.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 3.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
