Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 醫學工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83960
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor趙福杉(Fu-Shan Jaw)
dc.contributor.authorChuan-Ching Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃全敬zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T21:25:15Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-12
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-26
dc.identifier.citation1. Amiridis IG, Hatzitaki V, Arabatzi F. Age-induced modifications of static postural control in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Oct 30;350(3):137-40. 2. Baloh RW, Jacobson KM, Beykirch K, Honrubia V. Static and dynamic posturography in patients with vestibular and cerebellar lesions. Arch Neurol. 1998 May;55(5):649-54. 3. Barin K, Seitz CM, Welling DB. Effect of head orientation on the diagnostic sensitivity of posturography in patients with compensated unilateral lesions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Apr;106(4):355-62. 4. Bell T, Pope C, Fazeli P, Crowe M, Ball K. The Association of Persistent Low Back Pain With Older Adult Falls and Collisions: A Longitudinal Analysis. J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Nov;40(11):1455-1464. 5. Burns ER, Stevens JA, Lee R. The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults - United States. J Safety Res. 2016 Sep;58:99-103. 6. Castelli L, Stocchi L, Patrignani M, Sellitto G, Giuliani M, Prosperini L. We-Measure: Toward a low-cost portable posturography for patients with multiple sclerosis using the commercial Wii balance board. J Neurol Sci. 2015 Dec 15;359(1-2):440-4. 7. Chang WD, Chang WY, Lee CL, Feng CY. Validity and reliability of wii fit balance board for the assessment of balance of healthy young adults and the elderly. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Oct;25(10):1251-3. 8. Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010 Mar;31(3):307-10. 9. Cook CJ, Cook CE, Reiman MP, Joshi AB, Richardson W, Garcia AN. Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of patient history, clinical findings, and physical tests in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):93-112. 10. Dellinger A. Older Adult Falls: Effective Approaches to Prevention. Curr Trauma Rep. 2017 Jun;3(2):118-123. 11. Don AS, Carragee E. A brief overview of evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with surgery. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):258-65. 12. Drza?-Grabiec J, Rachwa? M, Podg?rska-Bednarz J, Ryka?a J, Snela S, Truszczy?ska A, Trzaskoma Z. The effect of spinal curvature on the photogrammetric assessment on static balance in elderly women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 29;15:186. 13. Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Apr;10(3):262-76. 14. Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Chihara Y, Ushio M, Sugasawa K, Yamaguchi T, Yamasoba T, Iwasaki S. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory dependence. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;120(7):1408-14. 15. Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Sugasawa K, Chihara Y, Ushio M, Yamasoba T, Iwasaki S. Assessment of postural stability using foam posturography at the chronic stage after acute unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):432-6. 16. Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):253-65. 17. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Wenderoth N, Van Impe A, Swinnen SP. Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Mar;33(3):271-8. 18. Henry M, Baudry S. Age-related changes in leg proprioception: implications for postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):525-538. 19. Hurvitz EA, Richardson JK, Werner RA, Ruhl AM, Dixon MR. Unipedal stance testing as an indicator of fall risk among older outpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May;81(5):587-91. 20. Imagama S, Ito Z, Wakao N, Seki T, Hirano K, Muramoto A, Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y. Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jun;22(6):1346-53. 21. Ishikawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Hongo M, Shimada Y. Spinal sagittal contour affecting falls: cut-off value of the lumbar spine for falls. Gait Posture. 2013 Jun;38(2):260-3. 22. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, Takiguchi N, Minamide A, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jun;21(6):783-8. 23. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7. 24. Jeng YJ, Young YH. Evolution of vestibular disorders in older adults: From young-old to middle-old to oldest-old. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Jan;20(1):42-46. 25. Jensen RK, Jensen TS, Koes B, Hartvigsen J. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020 Sep;29(9):2143-2163. 26. Jensen RK, Lauridsen HH, Andresen ADK, Mieritz RM, Schi?ttz-Christensen B, Vach W. Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 19;12:891-905. 27. Jonsson E, Seiger A, Hirschfeld H. One-leg stance in healthy young and elderly adults: a measure of postural steadiness? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Aug;19(7):688-94. 28. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9 (7):545-550. 29. Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, Katz NP, Bayley J, Fossel AH, Chang LC, Lipson SJ. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1236-41. 30. Kitayuguchi J, Kamada M, Inoue S, Kamioka H, Abe T, Okada S, Mutoh Y. Association of low back and knee pain with falls in Japanese community-dwelling older adults: A 3-year prospective cohort study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Jun;17(6):875-884. 31. Kneis S, Bruetsch V, Dalin D, Hubbe U, Maurer C. Altered postural timing and abnormally low use of proprioception in lumbar spinal stenosis pre- and post- surgical decompression. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 1;20(1):183. 32. Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43. 33. Landi F, Liperoti R, Russo A, Giovannini S, Tosato M, Capoluongo E, Bernabei R, Onder G. Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls in elderly individuals: results from the ilSIRENTE study. Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;31(5):652-8. 34. Leach JM, Mancini M, Peterka RJ, Hayes TL, Horak FB. Validating and calibrating the Nintendo Wii balance board to derive reliable center of pressure measures. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Sep 29;14(10):18244-67. 35. Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Aug;40(8):1033-9. 36. Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK, Kang HS. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1095-8. 37. Lin CY, Wang SJ, Young YH. Correlations between foam posturography and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential tests in M?ni?re's disease. Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):673-9. 38. Llorens R, Latorre J, No? E, Keshner EA. Posturography using the Wii Balance Board?: A feasibility study with healthy adults and adults post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2016 Jan;43:228-32. 39. Lord S, Sherrington C, Menz H, Close J. Falls in Older People: Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007. 40. Lusardi MM, Fritz S, Middleton A, Allison L, Wingood M, Phillips E, Criss M, Verma S, Osborne J, Chui KK. Determining Risk of Falls in Community Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using Posttest Probability. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2017 Jan/Mar;40(1):1-36. 41. Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M72-84. 42. Marshall LM, Litwack-Harrison S, Makris UE, Kado DM, Cawthon PM, Deyo RA, Carlson NL, Nevitt MC; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) Research Group. A Prospective Study of Back Pain and Risk of Falls Among Older Community-dwelling Men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):1264-1269. 43. Massion J, Alexandrov A, Frolov A. Why and how are posture and movement coordinated? Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:13-27. 44. Nies N, Sinnott PL. Variations in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults. Subjects with healthy backs compared with subjects with low-back dysfunction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Mar;16(3):325-30. 45. Park SH. Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jan;30(1):1-16. 46. Pizzigalli L, Micheletti Cremasco M, Mulasso A, Rainoldi A. The contribution of postural balance analysis in older adult fallers: A narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Apr;20(2):409-17. 47. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii37-ii41. 48. Scaglioni-Solano P, Arag?n-Vargas LF. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board to assess standing balance and sensory integration in highly functional older adults. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):138-43. 49. Scherder E, Eggermont L, Swaab D, van Heuvelen M, Kamsma Y, de Greef M, van Wijck R, Mulder T. Gait in ageing and associated dementias; its relationship with cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(4):485-97. 50. Schizas C, Kulik G. Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):98-101. 51. Sch?nstr?m N, Lindahl S, Will?n J, Hansson T. Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(1):115-21 52. Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys Ther. 1986 Oct;66(10):1548-50. 53. Sipko T, Chantsoulis M, Kuczy?ski M. Postural control in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the early postoperative period. Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):409-14. 54. Smith P, Ariti C, Bardsley M.:Focus on hip fracture: trends in emergency admission for fractured neck of femur, 2001 to 2011. Nuffield Trust/Health Foundation, 2013, London. 55. Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, Hodler J; LumbSten Research Collaboration. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 28;12:175. 56. Stevens JA, Olson S. Reducing falls and resulting hip fractures among older women. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000 Mar 31;49(RR-2):3-12. 57. Stubbs B, Schofield P, Binnekade T, Patchay S, Sepehry A, Eggermont L. Pain is associated with recurrent falls in community-dwelling older adults: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2014 Jul;15(7):1115-28. 58. The prevention of falls in later life. A report of the Kellogg International Work Group on the Prevention of Falls by the Elderly. Dan Med Bull. 1987 Apr;34 Suppl 4:1-24. 59. Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Yun H, Delzell E. Minor, major, low-trauma, and high-trauma fractures: what are the subsequent fracture risks and how do they vary? Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2011 Sep;9(3):122-8. 60. Young YH. Assessment of functional development of the otolithic system in growing children: a review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):435-42.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83960-
dc.description.abstract腰椎狹窄症是老年族群中常見的脊椎疾病。由於脊椎骨骼、韌帶及肌肉退化,再加上神經壓迫,這些因素可能導致本體感覺及動作控制功能異常。過去的研究指出腰椎狹窄症患者會有姿態平衡功能異常,然而此平衡功能異常與臨床表現及影像學檢查結果之間的關係仍不清楚。因此,目前對於腰椎狹窄症的診斷及治療決策主要依據臨床表現及影像學檢查結果,較少參考相關的生理檢查。 人體在維持姿態平衡上仰賴視覺、平衡覺、及本體感覺的多方訊息,經由複雜的神經系統整合及調控。泡綿重心動搖儀可評估整體平衡功能,並透過不同檢查模式,分析視覺、平衡覺、及本體感覺的影響程度,目前常規醫療中已使用泡綿重心動搖儀檢測患者的姿態控制能力。然而,此儀器不適合攜帶且輸出項目固定,限制了其用於腰椎狹窄症患者之平衡功能的相關研究。 為克服傳統重心動搖儀的限制,本研究初期以發展一個適合攜帶、量測精準、且可擴充輸出項目的姿態平衡檢測系統為目標。此外,亦將探討腰椎狹窄症的臨床表現及影像學檢查結果與姿態平衡能力之間的關係。 本研究所開發的姿態平衡檢測系統以自行編寫的程式透過藍芽技術連接任天堂公司的Wii平衡板,擷取其內部類比數位轉換器的原始訊號以得到各荷重感應元之受力大小,取得人體站立時重心投影在二維平面的座標,後續用以計算姿態平衡的相關指標。與目前市面上臨床使用的泡綿重心動搖儀作性能比較測試中,召募20位年輕的周邊型前庭系統功能失調病患以及20位經年齡性別配對的健康成年人進行系統可靠度測試;另外,亦招募50位年長的周邊型前庭系統功能失調病患以探討本系統在判別跌倒病史上的效度。 與臨床上常規使用的系統相比,本研究以Wii平衡板為基礎所開發的系統所測得的靜止站立動搖面積較小 (p < 0.01),但系統的可靠度達到0.67–0.87,再測信度達到0.53–0.88。此外,若搭配軟泡綿墊使用,於開眼及閉眼狀態下對是否有跌倒病史的判斷,ROC曲線分析模型之area under the curve (AUC)分別達到0.88及0.83 (p < 0.001),而動搖面積的閾值為1.03及3.09平方公分。 為探討腰椎狹窄症的臨床表現及影像學檢查結果與姿態平衡能力之間的關係,招募了47位年紀介於50至85歲的病患。每位病患均接受詳細的病史紀錄、理學檢查、脊椎的X光檢查、核磁共振檢查、以及泡綿重心動搖儀檢查。另外,亦招募47位經年齡性別配對的健康成年人接受泡綿重心動搖儀檢查作為對照組。 與健康對照組相比,腰椎狹窄症患者的靜止站立動搖面積在重心動搖儀檢查的四個情境中皆顯著增加 (p < 0.001)。進一步利用多元迴歸分析發現,年紀大、較差的行走耐受度、以及在核磁共振檢查中有L2/3節段的神經壓迫與重心動搖儀檢查的指標顯著相關 (p < 0.05);相反的,病患主觀的不適、失能程度、以及X光檢查的結果,與重心動搖儀檢查檢果無顯著相關 (p > 0.05)。 因此,脊椎狹窄症的患者即使症狀輕微,仍可能有姿態平衡的問題;而患者的姿態平衡功能與核磁共振檢查結果顯著相關。除了詳細的病史詢問、理學檢查、以及影像學檢查之外,加上重心動搖儀檢查或許可以對患者有更完整的評估。此檢查花費時間短、費用低廉,可考慮作為評估腰椎狹窄症患者的常規檢查之一。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common cause of discomfort and disability. The current diagnosis and treatment decision-making mainly depend on clinical symptoms and image findings. Although functional impairment in patients with LSS have been reported, the relationship between balance assessment and clinical findings in patients with LSS remains less investigated. Multiple sensorimotor networks, such as visual, vestibular, somatosensory, and cerebellum systems, integrate with each other to maintain postural control. Clinically, foam posturography has been applied to evaluate standing balance, but it is costly and lacks portability, which makes it unsuitable for daily clinical use. Hence, this study first developed a portable posturography system to meet the requirement of daily clinical use, and investigated its reliability and validity. Then, we correlated clinical symptoms, radiographic parameters, and findings in MR imaging with posturographic results in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. A custom-written software application was developed to link a computer to the Nintendo Wii balance board (WBB) via Bluetooth connection, and native data from the analog-to-digital converter of the WBB were retrieved to obtain the force applied to each load cell. The center of pressure was acquired, which was then compared with that obtained from commercially available foam posturography (FP). Forty younger adults including 20 patients with peripheral vestibular disorders as well as 20 healthy controls, and 50 older patients with peripheral vestibular disorders were enrolled. All subjects underwent postural balance testing using the WBB system (WBBS) and FP system (FPS) in a randomized order. For the inter-system reliability, although the WBSS obtained a significantly smaller mean sway area than the FPS (p < 0.01), both systems revealed adequate to excellent reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.67–0.87. The WBBS showed adequate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.53–0.88). For the validity, the respective cutoff sway areas were 1.03 cm2 and 3.09 cm2 under Conditions C and D via the WBBS for discriminating the fallers from non-fallers, with the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis being 0.88 and 0.83 respectively (p < 0.001). To correlate clinical and radiological assessment with functional assessment in LSS patients, 47 LSS patients aged 50–85 years were enrolled. All patients received subjective outcome measures first, followed by plain radiography of lumbosacral spine and whole spine, MR imaging, and foam posturography under four conditions. Then, these results were analyzed using stepwise multiple regression analysis. Another 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls also underwent foam posturography for comparison. The LSS group revealed significant increases in the sway area of foam posturography than the control group regardless of various conditions (p < 0.001). Advanced age, poor walking endurance, and neural compression at the L2/3 level on MR images were significantly correlated with the characteristic parameters of foam posturography (p<0.05). In contrast, subjectively reported pain and plain radiography did not correlate with posturographic results (p>0.05). In conclusion, patients with LSS who exhibit less severe symptoms do not ensure normal postural balance. Functional assessment (foam posturography) on postural balance significantly correlated with radiological assessment (MR imaging) in LSS patients. The use of foam posturography may help assess postural control in LSS patients. It takes a short time and costs less, and would be practical to make this a routine examination in LSS patients.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:25:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2606202211540900.pdf: 2244907 bytes, checksum: c8e1dec34c05282290dcadb54b038f91 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書…………………………..……………..………..……..i 誌謝…………………………………………..……………..………..…….ii 摘要……………………………………….……………………………….iii Abstract…………………………………………………………………... ..v Table of Contents………………………………………………………...viii List of Figures…………………………………………………………….xi List of Tables…………………………………………………………….xiii Chapter 1 Background……………………………………………………1 1.1 Lumbar spinal stenosis………………………………………….…………….1 1.2 Postural balance and falls…………………….……………………....……….4 1.3 Posturography…………………………………………….…………………..6 1.4 Unmet medical needs……………………………………………….……….11 1.5 Study goals………………………………………………………….……….12 Chapter 2 The Wii Balance Board System……………………..……….13 2.1 System development and data processing…………………………………...13 2.2 Reliability and validity test of the Wii Balance Board System – Methods.....20 2.3 Reliability and validity test of the Wii Balance Board System – Results…...26 2.4 Discussion………………………………………………………….…….…38 2.5 Summary………………………………………………………………….…41 Chapter 3 Cinical and Radiological Assessment in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis………………………………………………………42 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………….…………………42 3.2 Patients and methods…………………………………..…………………….43 3.3 Results…………………………………………………..…………………...52 3.4 Summary…………………………………………………..………………...58 Chapter 4 Postural Balance Assessment in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis………………………………………………..……………..59 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………..……………...59 4.2 Patients and methods…………………………………………..…………….60 4.3 Results…………………………………………………………..…………...64 4.4 Discussion………………………………………………………..………….69 4.5 Summary…………………………………………………………..………...73 Chapter 5 Clinical Relevance…………………………….………..…….74 5.1 Evaluating patients with lumbar spinal stenosis………………….…..……..74 5.2 Identifying the elderly with high risks of falls………………………...…….75 Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Expectation..……………………..….77 References…………..…………………………………………………….79 Publications……………………………………………………………….89
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject姿態控制zh_TW
dc.subject泡棉重心動搖儀zh_TW
dc.subject腰椎狹窄症zh_TW
dc.subject核磁共振zh_TW
dc.subject跌倒zh_TW
dc.subject站立平衡zh_TW
dc.subjectfoam posturographyen
dc.subjectfallen
dc.subjectMR imagingen
dc.subjectpostural controlen
dc.subjectstanding balanceen
dc.subjectlumbar spinal stenosisen
dc.title腰椎狹窄症對姿態平衡的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Influence of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Postural Balanceen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee楊怡和(Yi-Ho Young)
dc.subject.keyword腰椎狹窄症,泡棉重心動搖儀,站立平衡,姿態控制,核磁共振,跌倒,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordlumbar spinal stenosis,foam posturography,standing balance,postural control,MR imaging,fall,en
dc.relation.page89
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201119
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2022-06-28
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept醫學工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:醫學工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2606202211540900.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.19 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved