請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83777完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊舜欽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Shun-Chin Yang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T21:17:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-03 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2019). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. MIT Sloan School of Management.
CA100+ (2020). CA100+ 2020 Progress Report. https://www.climateaction100.org/progress/progress-report/ CDSB (2018). CDSB Framework for reporting environmental information, natural capital and associated business impacts. https://www.cdsb.net/sites/default/files/cdsb_framework_2.1.pdf DJSI (2022). S&P global esg scores methodology DJSI (2022). CSA Companion 2022 Corporate Sustainability Assessment. https://portal.csa.spglobal.com/survey/documents/CSA_Companion.pdf GRI (2021). GRI Standard 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ KPMG (2020). The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020: The time has come. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf MSCI (2022). MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology Executive Summary. https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/esg-ratings/materiality-map Merrian, S. B. & Associates. (2002), Qualitative Research in Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Refinitiv (2021). ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE SCORES FROM REFINITIV. https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf SASB (2021). SASB Standards. https://www.sasb.org/standards/ SASB (2021). SASB Standards Application Guidance Bases For Conclusions & Invitation To Comment On Explusure Drafts Sustainalytics (2021). Sustainalytics ESG Ratings Methodology Abstract version2.1 https://connect.sustainalytics.com/hubfs/INV/Methodology/Sustainalytics_ESG%20Ratings_Methodology%20Abstract.pd Sustainalytics (2021). Sustainalytics OVERVIEW OF SUSTAINALYTICS’ MATERIAL ESG ISSUES. TCFD (2021). Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures United Nations (2015). UN SDGs, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals Wimmer, R.D. & Dominick, J. R. (2000), Mass media research: An introduction, Wadsworth, CA. 林琬青(2021) , 2020新冠肺炎疫情期間企業對員工福利之重視程度與股票報酬之間的關係。國立台灣大學財務金融系 碩士論文 胡寬程(2021)。企業永續性報告是否反應企業之永續表現?針對美國與香港之實證研究。國立台灣大學土木系 碩士論文 孫震(2009)。企業倫理與企業社會責任 莫冬立(2021)會計研究月刊, (422), 公司治理3.0-編製企業永續報告強化ESG資訊揭露 陳麒宇(2022)。 台灣經濟新報(TEJ)全球主要金融服務公司ESG評等介紹 第154期 謝秉陞(2007),高科技產業中公關與記者間之權力關係探討,國立交通大學傳播研究所,碩士論文 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83777 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 企業永續議題與利害關係人連結日深,利害人關係人與企業緊密的程度,為企業攸關存續的關鍵。GRI 自 2016 以來成為企業 ESG 報告書主要指引,然按照以往的 GRI 準則分類,係對於不同產業類別,鑑別利害關係人重大議題及特定主題準則而產生管理方針。
鑒於 GRI 於 2021 年 10 月改版後,「通用準則 2021」著重揭露:影響力(impact)、重大性議題(materiality)、盡職調查(due diligence)、利害關係人議合(stakeholder engagement)。其中更涵蓋人權和以及盡責調查項目,產業範圍包括:煤炭、採礦、農業、水產養殖和漁業等 40 個行業別。國內前 50 大集團多為跨產業型公司,針對通用準則及重大議題管理,利害關係人應有相同界定標準。 以跨產業集團共同利害關係人作為研究案例,並透過案例分析鑑別共同重大議題,提供跨產業集團公司所製作之永續報告書,能更契合絕大部分利害關係人作為評鑑參考,並讓社會大眾相信 ESG 表現的實際作為,且讓公司積極看待公司自身的永續發展。 本研究最終結論如下,GRI作為ESG評鑑準則,根據實際案例研究,解決大型企業在不同產業類別,確立重大議題及落實到公司實際作為,並透過非財務性的財務指標建構成為KPI,讓永續行動名實相符真正落實。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The issue of corporate sustainability is increasingly connected with stakeholders, and the degree of intimacy between stakeholders and enterprises is critical to the survival of enterprises. GRI has become a major guideline for enterprise ESG reports since 2016. However, according to the previous CLASSIFICATION of GRI criteria, management guidelines are generated for different industry categories, identifying major issues and specific subject criteria for stakeholders.
In view of the October 2021 revision of GRI, the General Guidelines 2021 focuses on revealing: Impact, materiality, due diligence, stakeholder engagement. It also covers human rights and due diligence projects across 40 industries, including coal, mining, agriculture, aquaculture and fisheries. Most of the top 50 groups in China are cross-industry companies. For general standards and management of major issues, stakeholders should have the same defining standards. With common stakeholders across industry group as a case study, and through the case analysis to identify major issues together, provide across industry group co., LTD. The sustainability report, produced by the more fit most of the interested party as evaluation reference, and make the public believe that actual as of ESG performance, and make the company a positive view on the company's own sustainable development. The final conclusion of this study is as follows: GRI, as ESG evaluation criteria, based on actual case studies, solves the problems of large enterprises in different industry categories, establishes major issues and implements them into the actual actions of the company, and establishes non-financial financial indicators as KPIs, so that sustainable actions can be truly implemented in name and reality. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:17:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0308202211013300.pdf: 1837338 bytes, checksum: 7d35b4201ad1ad08e3f4c95e97db1004 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝 I 中文摘要 II ABSTRACT III 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 研究目的 3 1.4 研究範圍 3 1.5 研究流程 4 第2章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 永續性(SUSTAINABILITY) 5 2.2 企業社會責任(CSR, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY) 5 2.3 ESG (ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE) 6 2.4 利害關係人理論(STAKEHOLDER THEORY) 6 2.5 企業永續性報告準則比較 7 第3章 研究方法 10 3.1 實證研究法 10 3.2 深入訪談法 10 第4章 案例研究 12 4.1 案例背景 12 4.2 永續資產盤點背景與目標 12 4.3 訪談作業方法與規劃 13 4.3.1 基礎背景 13 4.3.2 利害關係人 13 4.3.3 核心優勢 13 4.3.4 永續機會與挑戰 14 4.3.5 未來展望 14 4.4 永續資產盤點 15 4.4.1 依彙整結果與建議 15 4.4.2 永續資產盤點與永續議題 16 4.4.3 重大議題分析結果 24 第5章 實證分析與討論 25 5.1 外部利害關係人調查 25 5.1.1 利害關係人定義 25 5.1.2 問卷題型分類 25 5.1.3 問卷重要性評估定義 25 5.2 不同利害關係人對各永續議題關注之差異-敘述性統計 26 5.3 不同利害關係人對各永續議題關注之差異-實證分析 29 5.3.1 所有利害關係人對三大永續內涵關注差異-平均統計 31 5.3.2 所有利害關係人對六大永續構面關注差異-平均統計 32 5.4 利害關係人對永續內涵(ESG)重要性分析 32 5.5 跨產業集團共通性與差異性分析 35 5.5.1 差異性重大議題分析 37 5.5.2 跨產業集團共通性重大議題分析 53 第6章 集團ESG通用性報導揭露策略 55 6.1 重大議題揭露內容與目的 55 6.2 重大性議題報導原則 55 6.3 利害關係人永續議題相對重要性落差改善 57 6.3.1 集團ESG共通性永續構面 57 6.3.2 績效指標檢討 59 6.3.3 績效指標行動方案 61 第7章 結論與建議 70 7.1 關係企業重大議題鑑別 70 7.2 研究建議 70 參考文獻 72 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 重大性議題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人議合 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 盡職調查 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 影響力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ESG | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業永續性報告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | materiality | en |
| dc.subject | impact | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Sustainability Report | en |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | stakeholder engagement | en |
| dc.subject | due diligence | en |
| dc.title | 營建跨產業集團之ESG重大主題分析與企業策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of the ESG Material Topics and Corporate Strategies of Construction-based Conglomerates | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正芳;林建元 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Cheng-Fang Lin;Chien-Yuan Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業永續性報告,ESG,影響力,重大性議題,盡職調查,利害關係人議合, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ESG,Corporate Sustainability Report,impact,materiality,due diligence,stakeholder engagement, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 73 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202001 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-110-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
