請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83542完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林沛群(Pei-Chun Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Yu Lai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴景裕 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T21:10:03Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] X. Zhou and F. Xi, 'Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process,' International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 969-977, 2002. [2] J. Chen, Q. Fang, and P. Li, 'Effect of grinding wheel spindle vibration on surface roughness and subsurface damage in brittle material grinding,' International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 91, pp. 12-23, 2015. [3] T. Zhao, Y. Shi, X. Lin, J. Duan, P. Sun, and J. Zhang, 'Surface roughness prediction and parameters optimization in grinding and polishing process for IBR of aero-engine,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 653-663, 2014. [4] Y. Liu, A. Warkentin, R. Bauer, and Y. Gong, 'Investigation of different grain shapes and dressing to predict surface roughness in grinding using kinematic simulations,' Precision Engineering, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 758-764, 2013. [5] C. Zhu, P. Gu, Y. Wu, D. Liu, and X. Wang, 'Surface roughness prediction model of SiCp/Al composite in grinding,' International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 155, pp. 98-109, 2019. [6] A. Esmaeilzare, A. Rahimi, and S. Rezaei, 'Investigation of subsurface damages and surface roughness in grinding process of Zerodur? glass–ceramic,' Applied Surface Science, vol. 313, pp. 67-75, 2014. [7] S. Chakrabarti and S. Paul, 'Numerical modelling of surface topography in superabrasive grinding,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 29-38, 2008. [8] S. Agarwal and P. V. Rao, 'Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in ceramic grinding,' International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1065-1076, 2010. [9] R. L. Hecker and S. Y. Liang, 'Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding,' International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 755-761, 2003. [10] J. Jiang, P. Ge, and J. Hong, 'Study on micro-interacting mechanism modeling in grinding process and ground surface roughness prediction,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1035-1052, 2013. [11] S. Kumar and S. Choudhury, 'Prediction of wear and surface roughness in electro-discharge diamond grinding,' Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 191, no. 1-3, pp. 206-209, 2007. [12] D. Nguyen, S. Yin, Q. Tang, and P. X. Son, 'Online monitoring of surface roughness and grinding wheel wear when grinding Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy using ANFIS-GPR hybrid algorithm and Taguchi analysis,' Precision Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 275-292, 2019. [13] H. Baseri, 'Workpiece surface roughness prediction in grinding process for different disc dressing conditions,' in 2010 International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 2010: IEEE, pp. 209-212. [14] D. Lipi?ski, B. Ba?asz, and ?. Rypina, 'Modelling of surface roughness and grinding forces using artificial neural networks with assessment of the ability to data generalisation,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1335-1347, 2018. [15] J. Guo, 'Surface roughness prediction by combining static and dynamic features in cylindrical traverse grinding,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1245-1252, 2014. [16] S. K. Pal and D. Chakraborty, 'Surface roughness prediction in turning using artificial neural network,' Neural Computing & Applications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 319-324, 2005. [17] A. Kohli and U. Dixit, 'A neural-network-based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in a turning process,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 118-129, 2005. [18] I. Asilt?rk and M. ?unka?, 'Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in turning operations using artificial neural network and multiple regression method,' Expert systems with applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5826-5832, 2011. [19] M. Mia and N. R. Dhar, 'Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using Artificial Neural Network,' Measurement, vol. 92, pp. 464-474, 2016. [20] K. V. Rao, B. Murthy, and N. M. Rao, 'Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network,' Measurement, vol. 51, pp. 63-70, 2014. [21] V. Dhokia, S. Kumar, P. Vichare, S. Newman, and R. Allen, 'Surface roughness prediction model for CNC machining of polypropylene,' Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 137-157, 2008. [22] A.-R. Alao and M. Konneh, 'Surface finish prediction models for precision grinding of silicon,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 949-967, 2012. [23] D. R. Salgado, F. Alonso, I. Cambero, and A. Marcelo, 'In-process surface roughness prediction system using cutting vibrations in turning,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 40-51, 2009. [24] A. P. Markopoulos, S. Georgiopoulos, and D. E. Manolakos, 'On the use of back propagation and radial basis function neural networks in surface roughness prediction,' Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 389-400, 2016. [25] S. Kumanan, C. Jesuthanam, and R. Ashok Kumar, 'Application of multiple regression and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for the prediction of surface roughness,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 778-788, 2008. [26] M. R. Razfar, R. Farshbaf Zinati, and M. Haghshenas, 'Optimum surface roughness prediction in face milling by using neural network and harmony search algorithm,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 487-495, 2011. [27] T. Wu and K. Lei, 'Prediction of surface roughness in milling process using vibration signal analysis and artificial neural network,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 305-314, 2019. [28] A. M. Zain, H. Haron, and S. Sharif, 'Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using Artificial Neural Network,' Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1755-1768, 2010. [29] W.-J. Lin, S.-H. Lo, H.-T. Young, and C.-L. Hung, 'Evaluation of deep learning neural networks for surface roughness prediction using vibration signal analysis,' Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 1462, 2019. [30] W. Guo, C. Wu, Z. Ding, and Q. Zhou, 'Prediction of surface roughness based on a hybrid feature selection method and long short-term memory network in grinding,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 2853-2871, 2021. [31] 林郁衡, '高動態多控制模式研磨工具開發,' 碩士學位, 機械工程學系, 國立台灣大學, 台北, 2021. [32] T.-M. Inc. 'U10 PLUS 170KV.' https://store.tmotor.com/ (accessed 05/25, 2022). [33] M. Inc. 'HVCM-095-038-051-01.' http://moticont.com/HVCM-095-038-051-01.htm (accessed 05/26, 2022). [34] S. I. Inc. 'M3705C ' https://www.srisensor.com/ (accessed 05/26, 2022). [35] C. M. Inc. 'VIA-1000-AA0-20-30A.' https://www.celeramotion.com/microe/products/linear-encoders/ (accessed. [36] 企誠自動控制公司. 'HS302.' http://tw.honestsensor.com.tw/ (accessed 05/26, 2022). [37] T. Inc. 'TM5-700.' https://www.tm-robot.com/en/regular-payload/ (accessed 06/25, 2022). [38] 陳永修, '以強化式學習達到機械手臂避障及能量速度優化之軌跡規劃,' 碩士學位, 機械工程學系, 國立台灣大學, 台北, 2019. [39] N. I. Inc. 'myRIO-1900.' https://www.ni.com/zh-tw/support/model.myrio-1900.html (accessed 14/07, 2022). [40] 游崴舜, '可側傾雙輪機器人之運動控制與其內部機器人泛用機電系統架構,' 碩士學位, 機械工程學系, 國立台灣大學, 台北, 2012. [41] N. I. Inc. 'LabVIEW.' https://www.ni.com/zh-tw/shop/labview.html (accessed 04/06, 2022). [42] M. Tomizuka, T.-C. Tsao, and K.-K. Chew, 'Analysis and synthesis of discrete-time repetitive controllers,' 1989. [43] M. Tomizuka, 'Zero phase error tracking algorithm for digital control,' 1987. [44] D. Sbarbaro, M. Tomizuka, and B. L. de la Barra, 'The windup problem in repetitive control: a simple anti-windup strategy,' IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 307-311, 2006. [45] 劉民偉, '自動化拋光研磨系統之路徑生成、表面瑕疵檢測及回拋回磨修補,' 碩士學位, 機械工程學系, 國立臺灣大學, 台北, 2021. [46] '三角網格示意圖.' https://www.nicepng.com/maxp/u2e6e6t4t4r5t4a9/ (accessed 13/06, 2022). [47] G. Taguchi, 'Quality engineering (Taguchi methods) for the development of electronic circuit technology,' IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 225-229, 1995. [48] B. Inc. 'Bosch砂布輪.' https://www.bosch-pt.com.tw/tw/zh/searchfrontend/?q=%E7%A0%82%E8%BC%AA%E6%A9%9F (accessed 23/06, 2022). [49] M. Inc. '表面粗糙度量測儀.' https://www.mitutoyo.com/webfoo/wp-content/uploads/Surftest_SJ210.pdf (accessed 09/06, 2022). [50] I. O. f. Standardization, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)--surface Texture: Profile Method--rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture. Iso, 1996. [51] A. I. Nicolas-Silvente, E. Velasco-Ortega, I. Ortiz-Garcia, L. Monsalve-Guil, J. Gil, and A. Jimenez-Guerra, 'Influence of the titanium implant surface treatment on the surface roughness and chemical composition,' Materials, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 314, 2020. [52] M. Inc. 'MATLAB.' https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html (accessed 22/06, 2022). [53] Z. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Shi, and D. Wu, 'Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning,' Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 57, pp. 488-495, 2019. [54] Wikipedia.org. 'Skewness.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skewness (accessed 24/06, 2022). [55] CrossValidated. 'Kurtosis.' https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/84158/how-is-the-kurtosis-of-a-distribution-related-to-the-geometry-of-the-density-fun (accessed 24/06, 2022). [56] MathWorks. 'Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox.' https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/index.html?s_tid=CRUX_lftnav (accessed 24/06, 2022). [57] Scikit-learn. 'sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression.' https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression.html (accessed 27/06, 2022). [58] P. S. Foundation. 'Python.' https://www.python.org/ (accessed 27/06, 2022). [59] L.-C. Hsu and C.-H. Wang, 'Forecasting the output of integrated circuit industry using a grey model improved by the Bayesian analysis,' Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 843-853, 2007. [60] D. F. Specht, 'A general regression neural network,' IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 568-576, 1991. [61] O. I. Abiodun, A. Jantan, A. E. Omolara, K. V. Dada, N. A. Mohamed, and H. Arshad, 'State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey,' Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 11, p. e00938, 2018. [62] M. AI. 'Pytorch.' https://pytorch.org/ (accessed 30/6, 2022). [63] A. F. Agarap, 'Deep learning using rectified linear units (relu),' arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08375, 2018. [64] S. Santurkar, D. Tsipras, A. Ilyas, and A. Madry, 'How does batch normalization help optimization?,' Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018. [65] H. Wang, Z. Liu, D. Peng, and Y. Qin, 'Understanding and learning discriminant features based on multiattention 1DCNN for wheelset bearing fault diagnosis,' IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 5735-5745, 2019. [66] S. Huang, J. Tang, J. Dai, and Y. Wang, 'Signal status recognition based on 1DCNN and its feature extraction mechanism analysis,' Sensors, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 2018, 2019. [67] 昌盛機器人. '拋光等級對照表.' https://www.csamrobot.com/h-nd-89.html (accessed 12/07, 2022). [68] 'Surface Roughness of Abrasive Grits and Sandpaper.' http://www.cnccookbook.com.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Calculators/SurfaceFinishChartMeasureSymbols.html | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83542 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究承襲實驗室開發的自動化研磨工具,透過研磨過程中六軸力規量測的研磨力資訊建立表面粗糙度預測模型,使用之表面粗糙度指標為Ra值,藉此簡化傳統上研磨工件後人工操作儀器量測表面粗糙度的過程,直接透過模型預測表面粗糙度以判斷研磨品質。 在訓練資料集蒐集部分,首先使用田口法(Taguchi method)最佳化進給速度、研磨輪轉速、研磨正向力與研磨角度等研磨工具的研磨參數,並分析其各自對表面粗糙度的影響。接著根據田口法的結果設計資料蒐集實驗,實驗中使用黃銅板進行研磨,實驗變因包含研磨輪轉速與研磨正向力各三種水準,研磨後之試片量測表面粗糙度後作為表面粗糙度模型的訓練資料使用。 在表面粗糙度預測模型訓練部分,訓練了線性迴歸、深度神經網路(DNN)與卷積神經網路(CNN)的模型架構,並使用原始特徵、統計特徵及FFT特徵對原始力資訊進行特徵提取,另外套用最小值最大值標準化與L1標準化,透過在驗證資料上計算預測Ra值相較實際Ra值的平均絕對百分誤差(MAPE)選擇最適合的模型,結果顯示FFT特徵的DNN模型,在套用L1標準化下驗證資料的MAPE可達3.17%,說明模型能準確的預測Ra值。 在表面粗糙度預測模型測試部分,透過表面粗糙度預測實驗及回磨實驗測試提出之表面粗糙度預測模型在實際研磨時的應用情形,表面粗糙度預測實驗中分別研磨黃銅板與不鏽鋼板,實驗結果顯示黃銅板測試資料上Ra預測值的MAPE可達6.96%,但不鏽鋼板測試資料上Ra預測值的MAPE則僅有19.13%,由於預測模型是透過黃銅版的研磨力資訊訓練,所以預測不鏽鋼板Ra值時由於材質特性的不同,MAPE才會明顯上升。另一方面,回磨實驗中使用模型預測黃銅板的表面粗糙度後,針對Ra值高於預期的區域進行回磨,實驗結果顯示表面粗糙度預測模型能有效預測出Ra值過大的區域,回磨也確實能降低Ra值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research inherits the automatic grinding machine developed by the laboratory and constructs the surface roughness prediction models using grinding force measured by a six-axis force sensor, the label used in this research is Ra. The prediction model can directly get Ra of the workpieces, rather than measure it by humans, which is effective to determine the grinding quality. In the training data set collection section, firstly use the Taguchi method to optimize the grinding parameters of the grinding tool such as feed rate, grinding wheel speed, grinding force, and grinding angle, and also analyze their respective effects on surface roughness. Then, the data collection experiment was designed based on the results of the Taguchi method, and the brass plate was used for grinding. The experimental variables include three levels of grinding wheel speed and grinding force, and the specimens are used as training data for the surface roughness model after grinding and measuring the surface roughness. In the surface roughness prediction model training section, Linear regression, deep neural network (DNN), and convolutional neural network (CNN) model architectures were trained, and feature extraction of raw force information using raw features, statistical features, and FFT features are conducted, then apply min-max normalization and L1 normalization to the input data. By selecting the most suitable model by calculating the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the predicted Ra values compared to the actual Ra values on the validation data, the DNN model using FFT features with L1 normalization achieves a MAPE value of 3.17% for the validation data, showing that the model can accurately predict the Ra value. In the section on testing the surface roughness prediction model, the application of the proposed surface roughness prediction model in actual grinding is tested by a surface roughness prediction experiment and regrinding experiment. The surface roughness prediction experiment was conducted by grinding brass plates and stainless steel plates respectively, and the experimental results showed that the MAPE of Ra prediction on brass plate test data could reach 6.96%, but the MAPE of Ra prediction on stainless steel plate test data was only 19.13%, since the prediction model used is based on the abrasive force information of the brass plate, so when predicting the Ra value of the stainless steel plate, the MAPE increases significantly due to the difference in material characteristics. On the other hand, after using the model to predict the surface roughness of the brass plates in the regrinding experiment, the areas with higher than expected Ra values were reground, and the results showed that the surface roughness prediction model was effective in predicting the areas with excessive Ra values, and the regrinding did reduce the Ra values. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:10:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1808202214245900.pdf: 8700837 bytes, checksum: 2ae47ffd4baba882ef146ad41dfa0db9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 審定書 I 致謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V 目錄 VIII 圖目錄 XII 表目錄 XV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 文獻回顧 3 1.4 貢獻 10 1.5 論文架構 11 第二章 平台架構 12 2.1 前言 12 2.2 硬體系統 12 2.2.1 研磨工具 12 2.2.2 機械手臂 18 2.2.3 工件夾具 21 2.3 機電系統 22 2.4 控制系統 25 2.4.1 自動化研磨工具控制系統 25 2.4.2 TM5-700機械手臂控制系統 26 2.5 功能實作 28 2.5.1 TCP校正 28 2.5.2 研磨軌跡生成 30 第三章 表面粗糙度資料蒐集實驗 33 3.1 前言 33 3.2 實驗場域介紹 33 3.2.1 實驗平台 33 3.2.2 研磨工件 34 3.2.3 研磨輪 35 3.2.4 表面粗糙度量測儀 35 3.3 表面粗糙度介紹 36 3.4 研磨參數介紹 37 3.4.1 進給速度 37 3.4.2 研磨輪轉速 38 3.4.3 研磨正向力 39 3.4.4 研磨角度 39 3.5 田口法最佳化研磨參數 40 3.5.1 前言 40 3.5.2 實驗因子與實驗水準 40 3.5.3 田口法直交表 41 3.5.4 實驗與結果分析 42 3.6 研磨資料蒐集實驗 49 3.6.1 前言 49 3.6.2 實驗變因選擇 49 3.6.3 實驗結果 50 第四章 表面粗糙度預測模型 54 4.1 前言 54 4.2 模型建立流程 54 4.3 訓練資料特徵提取 56 4.3.1 原始特徵 56 4.3.2 統計特徵 61 4.3.3 FFT特徵 65 4.4 特徵標準化 67 4.4.1 最小值最大值標準化 67 4.4.2 L1標準化 67 4.5 線性迴歸模型 68 4.5.1 前言 68 4.5.2 演算法架構 68 4.5.3 原始特徵模型訓練 69 4.5.4 統計特徵模型訓練 72 4.5.5 FFT特徵模型訓練 73 4.5.6 訓練結果比較 74 4.6 深度神經網路模型 76 4.6.1 前言 76 4.6.2 演算法架構 76 4.6.3 原始特徵模型訓練 78 4.6.4 統計特徵模型訓練 81 4.6.5 FFT特徵模型訓練 83 4.6.6 訓練結果比較 85 4.7 卷積神經網路模型 87 4.7.1 前言 87 4.7.2 演算法架構 87 4.7.3 原始特徵模型訓練 89 4.7.4 FFT特徵模型訓練 92 4.7.5 訓練結果比較 94 4.8 本章小結 95 第五章 表面粗糙度預測模型測試實驗 98 5.1 前言 98 5.2 表面粗糙度預測實驗 98 5.2.1 前言 98 5.2.2 黃銅工件表面粗糙度預測結果 99 5.2.3 不鏽鋼工件表面粗糙度預測結果 101 5.2.4 預測結果比較 103 5.3 回磨實驗 104 5.3.1 前言 104 5.3.2 回磨實驗設計 104 5.3.3 黃銅工件回磨實驗結果 106 5.4 本章小結 108 第六章 結論與未來展望 109 6.1 結論 109 6.2 未來展望 110 參考文獻 112 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 卷積神經網路 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研磨 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 接觸力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 田口法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 表面粗糙度預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 線性迴歸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 深度神經網路 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | contact force | en |
| dc.subject | CNN | en |
| dc.subject | DNN | en |
| dc.subject | linear regression | en |
| dc.subject | surface roughness prediction | en |
| dc.subject | Taguchi method | en |
| dc.subject | grind | en |
| dc.title | 以研磨力和數據模型建構研磨工件表面粗糙度估測 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Surface Roughness Estimation of Ground Workpieces Using a Data-Driven Model and Grinding Force Inputs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | 林沛群(0000-0001-9146-3817) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 連豊力(Feng-Li Lian),顏炳郎(Ping-Lang Yen),田維誠(Wei-Cheng Tian) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | 連豊力(0000-0002-1260-4894),顏炳郎(0000-0001-8020-6241) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 研磨,接觸力,田口法,表面粗糙度預測,線性迴歸,深度神經網路,卷積神經網路, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | grind,contact force,Taguchi method,surface roughness prediction,linear regression,DNN,CNN, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 117 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202544 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1808202214245900.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 8.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
