請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8322
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕河嘉(Ho-Chia Chueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Fan Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳偉帆 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:52:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-05 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:52:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Augoustinos, M., Crabb, S., Shepherd, R. (2010). Genetically Modified Food in the News: Media Representations of the GM Debate in the UK. Public Understanding of Science, 19(1), 98-114. Baker P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. UK: Continuum. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 361–362. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), 1-12. Bonacich, P. (2007). Some Unique Properties of Eigenvector Centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555-564. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. MA: Analytic Technologies. Botelho, D., Kurtz, H. (2008). The Introduction of Genetically Modified Food in the United States and the United Kingdom: A News Analysis. The Social Science Journal, 45(1), 13-27. Burke, D. (1999). No GM Conspiracy. Nature, 401, 640-641. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., Bauin, S. (1983). From Translations to Problematic Networks: An Introduction to Co-word Analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. Carley, K. M. (1993). Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126. Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological Cultures and Media Discourses on Scientific Knowledge: Re-reading News on Climate Change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223-243. Carvalho, A., Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural Circuits of Climate Change in UK Broadsheet Newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457-1469. Chaffee, S. H., Metzger, M. J. (2001). The End of Mass Communication? Mass Communication Society, 4(4), 365–379. Chen, H., Chen, X., Liu, H. (2018). How does Language Change as a Lexical Network? An Investigation Based on Written Chinese Word Co-occurrence Networks. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0192545. Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103-126. Chou, K. T. (2007). Public Trust and Risk Perceptions: A Preliminary Study of Taiwan’s GMOs, 2003-2004. Taiwanese Journal of Studies for Science, Technology and Medicine, 4, 149-176. Collins, L., Nerlich, B. (2015). Examining User Comments for Deliberative Democracy: A Corpus-driven Analysis of the Climate Change Debate Online. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 189-207. d’ Haenens, L. (2005). Euro-vision: The Portrayal of Europe in the Quality Press. The International Communication Gazette, 67(5), 419-440. Danowski J. A. (2011). Counterterrorism Mining for Individuals Semantically-similar to Watchlist Members. In U.K. Wiil (Eds.), Counterterrorism and Open Source Intelligence. (pp. 223-247). Vienna: Springer. Danowski, J. A. (1993) . Network Analysis of Message Content. In W. D. Richards, Jr., G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences. (vol. 12, pp. 197-221). NJ: Ablex. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News Framing: Theory and Typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51-62. Dibden, J., Gibbs, D., Cocklin, C. (2013). Framing GM Crops as a Food Security Solution. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 59-70. Doerfel, M. L. (1998). What Constitutes Semantic Network Analysis? A Comparison of Research and Methodologies. Connections, 21(2), 16-26. Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural Bias. Occasional Paper no. 35, The Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic Network Analysis as a Method for Visual Text Analytics. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4-17. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing US Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. Fiske, J. (2011). Introduction to Communication Studies. New York: Routledge. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2009). The State of Food Insecurity in the World: Economic Crises - Impacts and Lessons Learned. Rome: FAO. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Marsh, R. (2002). The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 701-711. Gamson, W. A., Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37. Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., Sasson, T. (1992). Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 373-393. Godefroidt, A., Berbers, A., d’Haenens, L. (2016). What’s in a Frame? A Comparative Content Analysis of American, British, French, and Russian News Articles. The International Communication Gazette, 78(8), 777-801. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. MA: Harvard University Press. Greussing, E., Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Shifting the Refugee Narrative? An Automated Frame Analysis of Europe’s 2015 Refugee Crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749-1774. Grundmann, R., Scott, M. (2014). Disputed Climate Science in the Media: Do Countries Matter?. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 220-235. Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., Morris, M. (2003). Statnet: Software Tools for the Statistical Modeling of Network Data. WA: Statnet Project. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from http://statnetproject.org/ Hellsten, I., Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Automated Analysis of Actor-topic Networks on Twitter: New Approaches to the Analysis of Socio‐semantic Networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 0(0), 1-13. Hertog, J. K., McLeod, D. M. (2001). A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Horlings, L. G., Marsden, T. K. (2011). Towards the Real Green Revolution? Exploring the Conceptual Dimensions of a New Ecological Modernisation of Agriculture That Could ‘Feed the World’. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 441-452. Horsti, K. (2008). Hope and Despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in News Coverage of ‘Migration Crisis’. Communication Studies, 3, 125-156. ISAAA. (2018). ISAAA in 2018 Accomplishment Report. Retrieved July 23, 2019, from http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/annualreport/2018/pdf/ISAAA-Accomplishment_Report-2018.pdf ISAAA. (2019). Current Donors. Retrieved July 23, 2019, from http://www.isaaa.org/inbrief/pdf/isaaa-brochure.pdf Jacobs, N. (2002). Co‐term Network Analysis as a Means of Describing the Information Landscapes of Knowledge Communities Across Sectors. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 548-562. Jiang, K., Anderton, B. N., Ronald, P. C., Barnett, G. A. (2017). Semantic Network Analysis Reveals Opposing Online Representations of the Search Term “GMO”. Global Challenges, 2(1), 1700082. Jiang, K., Barnett, G. A., Taylor, L. D. (2016). Dynamics of Culture Frames in International News Coverage: A Semantic Network Analysis. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3710-3736. Kapuściński, G., Richards, B. (2016). News Framing Effects on Destination Risk Perception. Tourism Management, 57, 234-244. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., Ratick, S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. Kearns, P., Mayers, P. (1999). Substantial Equivalence is a Useful Tool. Nature, 401, 640. Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP Partialling as a Test of Spuriousness. Social Networks, 9(2), 171-186. Kwon, K., Barnett, G. A., Chen, H. (2009). Assessing Cultural Differences in Translations: A Semantic Network Analysis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 107-138. Larcinese, V., Puglisi, R., Snyder, J. M. (2011). Partisan Bias in Economic News: Evidence on the Agenda-setting Behavior of US Newspapers. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1178-1189. Latour, B. (1996). On Actor-network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(S), 369-381. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. MA: Harvard Unity Press. Latour, B., Jensen, P., Venturini, T., Grauwin, S., Boullier, D. (2012). The Whole is Always Smaller Than its Parts’. A Digital Test of Gabriel Tarde’s Monads. British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 590-615. Law, J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (3 ed., pp. 141-158). Oxford: Blackwell. Law, J., Hassard, J. (1999). Actor Network and After. Oxford: Blackwell. Lore, T. A., Imungi, J. K., Mubuu, K. (2013). A Framing Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Genetically Modified Crops in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Food Information, 14(2), 132-150. Lück, J., Wessler, H., Wozniak, A., Lycarião, D. (2016). Counterbalancing Global Media Frames with Nationally Colored Narratives: A Comparative Study of News Narratives and News Framing in the Climate Change Coverage of Five Countries. Journalism, 19(12), 1635-1656. Maeseele, P. (2011). On News Media and Democratic Debate: Framing Agricultural Biotechnology in Northern Belgium. The International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 83-105. Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a Frame? A Content Analysis of Media Framing Studies in the World's Leading Communication Journals, 1990-2005. Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349-367. McCombs, M. (2005). A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, Present and Future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557. Meadows, M., Oldham, C. (1991). Racism and the Dominant Ideology Aborigines, Television News and the Bicentenary. Media Information Australia, 60(1), 30-40. Miller, M. M. (1997). Frame Mapping and Analysis of News Coverage of Contentious Issues. Social Science Computer Review, 15(4), 367-378. Millstone, E., Brunner, E., Mayer, S. (1999). Beyond ‘Substantial Equivalence’. Nature, 401, 525-526. Morse, S. (2016). They Can Read All About it: An Analysis of Global Newspaper Reporting of Genetically Modified Crop Varieties Between 1996 and 2013. Outlook on Agriculture, 45(1), 7-17. Nestle, M. (2003). Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. CA: University of California Press. Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and Community Structure in Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. Newman, M. E. J. (2008). The Mathematics of Networks. In L. E. Blume S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2 ed., pp. 4059-4064). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Newman, M. E. J., Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. Nossek, H. (2008). ‘News Media’-Media Events: Terrorist Acts as Media Events. Communications, 33(3), 313-330. Pan, Z., Kosicki, G. (1993). Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75. Pouteau, S. (2002). The Food Debate: Ethical Versus Substantial Equivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15(3), 291-303. R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://www.R-project.org/ R Studio, Inc. (2019). R Studio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://rstudio.com/ Reese, S. D. (2007). The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148–154. Sage, C. (2014). The Transition Movement and Food Sovereignty: From Local Resilience to Global Engagement in Food System Transformation. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 254-275. Scheufele, D. A., Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. Semetko, H. A., Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. Shapin, S. (1979). The Politics of Observation: Cerebral Anatomy and Social Interests in the Edinburgh Phrenology Disputes. The Sociological Review, 27(1), 139-178. Shim, J., Park, C., Wilding, M. (2015). Identifying Policy Frames Through Semantic Network Analysis: An Examination of Nuclear Energy Policy Across Six Countries. Policy Science, 48, 51-83. Singer, E., Endreny, P. M. (1993). Reporting on Risk: How the Mass Media Portray Accidents, Diseases, and Other Hazards. NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Sneyd, L. Q., Legwegoh, A., Fraser, E. D. G. (2013). Food Riots: Media Perspectives on the Causes of Food Protest in Africa. Food Security, 5(4), 485-497. Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R. Corrigall-Brown, C. (2007). Framing the French Riots: A Comparative Study of Frame Variation. Social Forces, 86(2), 385-415. Tan, Y., Shaw, P. (2018). Attribute-priming Effects on Presidential Approval: The Role of Risk Perception and Trust in Government Regulation. Issues Studies, 54(3), 1840004. Taylor, S. L., Hefle, S. L. (1999). Seeking Clarity in the Debate Over the Safety of GM Foods. Nature, 402, 575. Teil, G., Latour, B. (1995). The Hume Machine: Can Association Networks Do More Than Formal Rules?. Stanford Humanities Review, 4(2), 47-66. Tester, M. (1999). Seeking Clarity in the Debate Over the Safety of GM Foods. Nature, 402, 575. Touri, M., Koteyko, N. (2014). Using Corpus Linguistic Software in the Extraction of News Frames: Towards a Dynamic Process of Frame Analysis in Journalistic Texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 601-616. Trewavas, A., Leaver, C. J. (1999). Conventional Crops are the Test of GM Prejudice. Nature, 401, 640. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press. Veltri, G. A., Suerdem, A. K. (2011). Worldviews and Discursive Construction of GMO-related Risk Perceptions in Turkey. Public Understanding of Science, 22(2), 137-154. Vicsek, L. M., Kiraly, G., Konya, H. (2016). Networks in the Social Sciences: Comparing Actor-network Theory and Social Network Analysis. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 7(2), 77-102. Vilella-Vila, M., Costa-Font, J. (2008). Press Media Reporting Effects on Risk Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified (GM) Food. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 2095–2106. Vliegenthart, R., van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the Frame: Bringing Sociology Back to Frame Analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. von Braun, J. (2009). Addressing the Food Crisis: Governance, Market Functioning, and Investment in Public Goods. Food Security, 1(1), 9-15. Weingart, P., Engels, A., Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics, and the Mass Media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261-283. Wheeler, T., von Braun, J. (2013). Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security. Science, 341, 508-513. Wildavsky, A. B. (1987). Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. American Political Science Review, 81, 3–21. Williams, R. (1983). Culture and Society, 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press. Winston, M. (2002). Travels in the Genetically Modified Zone. MA: Harvard University Press. Yang, J., Xu, K., Rodriguez, L. (2014). The Rejection of Science Frames in the News Coverage of the Golden Rice Experiment in Hunan, China. Health, Risk Society, 16(4), 339-354. 中研院(2013)。中央研究院現代漢語標記語料庫4.0版簡介。上網日期:2019年11月27日,取自:http://asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw 方瑀紳、李隆盛(2014)。臺灣數位學習的成效與研究:2000-2011年間國內外研究文獻的回顧與綜整。教育資料與圖書館學,51,27-56。 台北市媒體服務代理商協會(2018)。2018年台灣媒體白皮書。上網日期:2019年11月27日,取自:https://maataipei.org/download/2018媒體白皮書/?wpdmdl=2335 ind=1534324440862 任燿廷(2012)。世界糧食危機與國際的共同因應。國際關係學報,33,67-101。 李美賢、闕河嘉(2018)。台灣「東南亞新二代」的形象建構。傳播、文化與政治,7,133-174。 李素華(2001)。由聯合國及歐盟基因改造食品管理標示規範趨勢研析我國基因改造食品相關法制。科技法律透析,13(9、10),49-62、24-35。 周桂田(2002)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口——遲滯型高科技風險社會。台灣社會研究季刊,(45),69-122。 林文源(2007)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技醫療與社會,(4),65-108。 林俊成、王培蓉、詹為巽(2018)。運用共詞與社會網絡分析探討2008~2017年臺灣林學研究期刊重點主題與結構。中華林學季刊,51(3),217-229。 邱玉蟬(2009)。看誰在說話?醫療糾紛的新聞報導分析。中華傳播學刊,(15),217-248。 食品藥物管理署(2014)。基因改造食品管理專區。上網日期:2019年11月15日,取自http://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/site.aspx?sid=3950 食品藥物管理署(2015)。強化我國基因改造食品標示管理。上網日期:2019年11月23日,取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2648-20157-1.html 徐源泰(2000)。生物安全議定書及其影響。科學月刊,8,692-697。 校園午餐搞非基(2015)。基改食材退出校園午餐行動事件簿。上網日期:2019年11月15日,取自https://nogmolunch.wordpress.com/新聞事件/基改食材退出校園午餐行動事件簿/ 校園午餐搞非基(2019)。近況更新|2019年5月1日台灣核准進口基改原料增至147項。上網日期:2019年7月25日,取自https://nogmolunch.wordpress.com/2019/05/01/近況更新|2019年5月1日-台灣核准進口基改原料增至147項/ 翁順裕(2010)。 探討技術網絡之社群結構與位置關係——以保險商業方法專利為例。管理學報,27(5),437-458。 張春炎、蕭崑杉(2013)。新聞媒體作為風險建構的公共競技場:以聯合報的氣候風險新聞論述為例(1988年~2010年)。傳播文化,12,1-36。 張卿卿、陶振超、俞蘋、王嵩音、吳重禮、吳齊殷、林淑芳、賴至慧(2018)。臺灣傳播調查資料庫第二期第二次調查計畫執行報告。科技部專題研究成果報告(編號:MOST 105-2420-H-004-035-SS3)。台北市:國立政治大學傳播學院。 郭文平(2017)。緩慢開展的危害再現:媒介報導中的旱災,風險及氣候變遷論述之語料分析。傳播研究與實踐,7(1),37-70。 郭華仁、周桂田(2004)。基改作物的全球經驗。載於郭華仁、牛惠之(主編),基因改造議題——從紛爭到展望(頁120-157)。台北:行政院農委會動植物防疫檢疫局。 陳宏(2014)。從「陸生健保」論述探討社會權力關係:以《聯合報》與《自由時報》為例。傳播文化,13 陳映均、李松濤(2017)。社會性科學議題新聞的框架分析——以基因改造新聞為例。科學教育學刊,25(S),439-462。 陳儒瑋、黃嘉琳(2016)。基改追追追:揭露全球基改作物入侵生活的真相。新北:幸福文化。 陳靜茹、蔡美瑛(2009)。全球暖化與京都議定書議題框架之研究——以2001-2007年紐約時報新聞為例。新聞學研究,100,253-295。 陳韻如(2011)。保護誰的生命?秘魯「婦女運動」公共議題的新聞框架。新聞學研究,109,121-166。 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2006)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈:構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究,86,135-170。 楊意菁(2017)。商業雜誌與企業公民訊息:一個縱貫性的媒體再現與框架分析。新聞學研究,130,141-186。 臧國仁、鍾蔚文(1997)。框架概念與公共關係策略——有關運用媒介框架的探析。廣告學研究,(9),99-130。 潘子明(2016)。台灣地區基因改造食品之安全評估與查驗登記。上網日期:2019年11月23日,取自http://www.croplifetaiwan.org/forDownload/台灣地區基因改造食品之安全評估與查驗登記.pdf 潘若琳、顏良恭、吳德美(2009)。全球治理對台灣基因改造食品管制政策制定的影響。行政暨政策學報,(48),1-62。 盧安邦、鄭宇君(2017)。用方法說故事:探析電腦輔助文本分析工具在框架研究之應用。傳播研究與實踐,7(2),145-178。 謝吉隆、楊苾淳(2018)。從「應變自然」到「社會應變」:以文字探勘方法檢視國內風災新聞的報導演變。教育資料與圖書館學,55(3),285-318。 謝君蔚、徐美苓(2011)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變:以基因改造食品新聞為例。中華傳播學刊,(20),143-179。 鍾布、黃煜、周一凝(2014)。新媒體時代的網路新聞研究前沿。傳播與社會學刊,29,235-265。 闕河嘉、陳光華(2016)。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。載於項潔(主編),數位人文研究與技藝第六輯(頁285-313)。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8322 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究欲檢視國內主流媒體在報導基改議題時,有無使用特定的態度或傾向報導特定的子議題。大眾媒體是民眾接收資訊的重要管道,檢視其新聞內容有其必要性。本研究的研究旨趣為透過探討基改新聞中潛藏的「框架」,以及組成框架的「行動者」背後所連結的社會意義,藉此了解媒體的報導如何建構基改議題的形象,以及給予社會大眾什麼樣的認知與態度。本研究以語詞網絡分析為核心,佐以模組化分析、QAP與特徵向量中心性等研究途徑分析2005-2018年的四大報基改議題新聞。具體焦點為:(1)檢視基改報導中潛藏的框架。(2)檢視不同時間點之下媒體慣用的框架是否有所差異,又是因為哪些因素改變框架。(3)探討組成框架的行動者如何影響框架所展現的意義。
在研究結果上,本研究有三個主要發現。首先,台灣的基改報導風格以2012年為界,在2012年以前基改報導主要採用的框架為「基改作物」、「美國出口」、「作物種植」等物質面向的框架,框架內涵多為事實呈現,報導較無偏向特定態度;2012年之後的框架則以「可能危害」、「食品標示」、「校園午餐」等人文社會方面的論述為主,且報導對基改作物和基改食品的態度漸趨負面。再者,台灣的基改論述並不完全隨社會中的重大事件有所更迭,僅發生在國內的在地事件對媒體報導內容有較大的影響力。最後,隨著報導內容的改變,基改論述漸趨在地化、社會化,以及去科學化。和早年以知識傳遞為主的內容相比,基改報導現已變為以閱聽眾的偏好與觀點為主要消息來源。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the attitude the mass media display and the issues they prefer to report in the news of genetically modified organisms (GMO). Since mass media are one of the channels which are audiences receive information from, the contents which they display must be examined. This study discusses “the frames” in the news discourses and “the actors” which comprise the frames to understand how the mass media construct the representation of the GMO and what recognitions and attitudes are communicated to the audiences. This study uses semantic network analysis featuring modularity, QAP and eigenvector centrality to analyze the four mainstream newspapers’ GMO news in 2005-2018 in Taiwan. This study aims to: 1) examine the frames in the GMO news; 2) examine the differences between the frames of different eras and figure out what factors affected the media changing the frames they used; 3) discuss how the actors of the frames affect the meanings of the frames.
This study has three findings. First, the mass media changed their attitude in reporting GMO news in 2012. Before 2012, the “genetic-modified crops, “imports from USA”, and “forage crops” frames were used in the media discourses the most. These frames are material-oriented and do not show specific attitudes. After 2012, the most-dominated frames were “potential hazards”, “food marks” and “lunch in school”, which were more society-oriented and showed negative attitude toward GMO. Second, the timing of the GMO news discourses changing did not always follow serious incident in the world but serious incident in Taiwan. Last, the GMO news discourses became more localized, socialized and de-scientific as time goes by. Unlike the content which was oriented by information-communicating before, the audiences’ preferences and perspectives are becoming the main news sources. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:52:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0502202115223900.pdf: 3943176 bytes, checksum: 1d8bf4575d75fb387bbc39002eabbcd1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識 1 第二節 研究重要性 7 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 框架理論的起源與發展 10 第二節 行動者網絡理論的起源與發展 17 第三節 基改科技與基改爭議 25 第三章 研究方法 38 第一節 研究設計 38 第二節 方法論 40 第三節 操作步驟 45 第四章 研究發現 51 第五章 各媒體焦點的反映——檢視基改新聞框架的樣貌 64 第一節 台灣基改新聞報導傾向 64 第二節 框架意義的變遷 68 第三節 小結 72 第六章 媒體論述轉變的關鍵時間點——以QAP進行網絡比較 76 第一節 2008-2009年的基改論述 77 第二節 2010-2011年的論述差異 79 第三節 2012年以降的高同質性基改論述 80 第四節 小結 83 第七章 重要行動者的指認——以特徵向量中心性檢視關鍵詞彙 86 第一節 行動者所建構的報導再現 87 第二節 詞彙所屬框架的演變歷程 91 第三節 小結 95 第八章 結論 98 第一節 研究結論 98 第二節 研究貢獻 100 第三節 研究限制與未來方向 101 參考文獻 103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣在地的基改新聞框架:一個語詞網絡分析研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the GMO News Frames of Taiwan: A Semantic Network Analysis
| en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang),陳慧蓉(Hue-Rong Chen),祝平次(Ping-Tzu Chu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 基因改造,報紙新聞,大眾媒體,框架,語詞網絡分析,行動者網絡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Genetically Modified Organisms,Newspapers,Mass Media,Frames,Semantic Network Analysis,Actor Network Theory, | en |
dc.relation.page | 115 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100593 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0502202115223900.pdf | 3.85 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。