請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8271完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳柏臻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:51:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-01 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:51:04Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 Appelman, A., Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring Message Credibility. Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59-79. doi:10.1177/1077699015606057 Bakir, V., McStay, A. (2018). Fake News and The Economy of Emotions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645 Bakshy, E., Messing, S., Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 Berger, J. (2011). Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891-893. doi:10.1177/0956797611413294 Berger, J., Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of marketing research, 49(2), 192-205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353 Cahill, L., McGaugh, J. L. (1995). A Novel Demonstration of Enhanced Memory Associated with Emotional Arousal. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(4), 410-421. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1048 Carmines, E. G., Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17): Sage publications. Chen, Y., Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L. (2015). Misleading online content: Recognizing clickbait as false news. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection. Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218-225. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015 Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38. doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 Constant, D., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. (1994). What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information systems research, 5(4), 400-421. Dillard, J. P., Nabi, R. L. (2006). The Persuasive Influence of Emotion in Cancer Prevention and Detection Messages. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S123-S139. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00286.x Doherty, R. W. (1997). THE EMOTIONAL CONTAGION SCALE: AMEASURE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(2), 131-154. doi:10.1023/a:1024956003661 Drotner, K., Kobbernagel, C. (2014). Toppling hierarchies? Media and information literacies, ethnicity, and performative media practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(4), 409-428. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.964255 Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2): Stanford university press. Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences. Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374-378. doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 Håkansson, J., Montgomery, H. (2003). Empathy as an Interpersonal Phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(3), 267-284. doi:10.1177/0265407503020003001 Hasell, A., Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641-661. doi:10.1111/hcre.12092 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96-100. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953 Jensen, M. L., Averbeck, J. M., Zhang, Z., Wright, K. B. (2013). Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 293-324. Kim, M. (2015). Partisans and Controversial News Online: Comparing Perceptions of Bias and Credibility in News Content From Blogs and Mainstream Media. Mass Communication and Society, 18(1), 17-36. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.877486 Kircanski, K., Notthoff, N., DeLiema, M., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Shadel, D., Mottola, G., . . . Gotlib, I. H. (2018). Emotional arousal may increase susceptibility to fraud in older and younger adults. Psychology and aging, 33(2), 325. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A. (2015). Confirmation Bias in Online Searches: Impacts of Selective Exposure Before an Election on Political Attitude Strength and Shifts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 171-187. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12105 Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind:' Seizing' and' freezing.'. Psychological review, 103(2), 263. Lang, A., Dhillon, K., Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. 39(3), 313-327. doi:10.1080/08838159509364309 Lee, C. S., Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331-339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002 Lührmann, A., Lindberg, S. (2019). Democracy Facing Global Challenges: V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2019. In: Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. Mehrabian, A., Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology: the MIT Press. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012 Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? Communication Research, 009365021561313. doi:10.1177/0093650215613136 Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Nielsen, R. K. (2019). The Reuters institute digital news report 2019: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 Peters, K., Kashima, Y., Clark, A. (2009). Talking about others: Emotionality and the dissemination of social information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 207-222. doi:10.1002/ejsp.523 Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., Hong, Y.-y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 221-283): Elsevier. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90-94. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004 Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(6), 1161. Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278-287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008 Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., Macgregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333-1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 So, J. C., Bolloju, N. (2005). Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 30-41. Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150-160. doi:10.1177/0266382117722446 Storbeck, J., Clore, G. L. (2008). Affective Arousal as Information: How Affective Arousal Influences Judgments, Learning, and Memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1824-1843. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00138.x Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users' perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), JCMC836. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341-366. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x Thompson, N., Wang, X., Daya, P. (2019). Determinants of News Sharing Behavior on Social Media. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-9. Törnberg, P. (2018). Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0203958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203958 Vermeir, I., Van Kenhove, P. (2005). The influence of need for closure and perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a grocery shopping context. Psychology and Marketing, 22(1), 71-95. doi:10.1002/mar.20047 Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 Webster, D. M., Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(6), 1049. Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Turn a Blind Eye If You Care: Impacts of Attitude Consistency, Importance, and Credibility on Seeking of Political Information and Implications for Attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 432-453. doi:10.1111/jcom.12028 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8271 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著社群媒體的普及,社群媒體已經成為新聞最主要的來源之一,然而,它的特性也讓謠言、假新聞比以往傳播的更快、更遠。本研究的主要目的為探討讀者與訊息之間的態度一致性與訊息的情緒喚起程度如何影響社群平台使用者對於線上謠言的感知可信度和分享意圖。我們希望透過此研究,釐清態度一致性與情緒喚起對於線上謠言判斷的影響,並了解是什麼樣心理特質的人容易受到這些因素所影響。在過去的研究中發現,人們傾向於選擇閱讀與自己有著相同立場的訊息,學者認為這是基於確認偏誤(confirmation bias)所產生的現象。在本研究中我們推測,人們對於線上謠言的感知可信度和分享意圖也會受到確認偏誤的影響,當人們與訊息的態度一致性越高,感知可信度和分享意圖也會越高。我們也推測這樣的現象對於認知閉合需求(need for cognitive closure)高的人會更加明顯。另一方面,情緒喚起(emotional arousal)是媒體常用來吸引讀者的策略,高情緒喚起的媒體在網路上有更強的傳播力。因此我們推測,當線上謠言的情緒喚起程度越高,人們的感知可信度和分享意圖也會越高。另外我們也推測這樣的效果對於情緒感染易感性(susceptibility to emotional contagion)高的人會更強。本研究採用實驗法來驗證我們的假設,實驗一的結果顯示,態度一致性越高,感知可信度和分享意圖也會越高,而且認知閉合需求高的人在高態度一致性時會比認知閉合需求低的人產生更高的感知可信度。實驗二的結果則顯示,情緒喚起對於感知可信度和分享意圖並沒有顯著的影響,這樣的結果並不符合我們的假設,因此在內文中我們也會針對這個現象來做解釋。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the popularity of social media, social media have become one of the main sources of news. However, the characteristics of social platforms also let rumors and fake news spread faster and farther. Online rumors and fake news often edited with specific stance and emotional writing style. Individuals’ judgements of messages may be affected by the consistency between their prior attitudes and messages stances toward the issue, namely attitudinal congruence between individual and message. The emotional arousal of messages, that is, the degree of which messages trigger individuals’ emotion, may also affected individual’s judgements of messages. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of attitudinal congruence between readers and messages and the effect of emotional arousal of messages on readers’ perceived credibility and sharing intention. Several researchers find people tend to exposure to attitude-consistent news, we proposed that people’s credibility evaluation and sharing intention of online messages would show similar phenomenon because of attitudinal congruence between people and messages. Additionally, we proposed need for cognitive closure as a moderator on the effect of attitudinal congruence. Moreover, we proposed that people tend to trust and share online rumor with high level of emotional arousal. We also proposed that people with high susceptibility to emotional contagion would be affected by emotional arousal more greatly. We adopted experimental method to test our hypotheses. The empirical results show that under high attitudinal congruence condition, perceived credibility and share intention were higher, and the effect of attitudinal congruence on perceived credibility would be stronger for high need for cognitive closure people. Unexpectedly, we find emotional arousal did not affect both perceived credibility and share intention, we have explained these results in this paper. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:51:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1008202015411300.pdf: 1504291 bytes, checksum: 30dc19e29d61a323b46cdb8ef75e1b83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 # 誌謝 1 中文摘要 2 ABSTRACT 3 CONTENTS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 7 LIST OF TABLES 8 Chapter 1 Introduction 9 Chapter 2 Literature Review 12 2.1 Attitudinal congruence 12 2.1.1 The effect of attitudinal congruence 12 2.1.2 The moderating effect of need for cognitive closure 14 2.2 Emotional arousal 15 2.2.1 The effect of emotional arousal 15 2.2.2 The moderating effect of susceptibility to emotional contagion 18 2.3 Research model 19 Chapter 3 Study 1 20 3.1 Research Methodology 20 3.1.1 Experimental design 20 3.1.2 Test material of the independent variables 20 3.1.3 Measurements of the dependent variables 21 3.1.4 Manipulation check 22 3.1.5 Participants 22 3.1.6 Procedure 24 3.2 Empirical results 25 3.2.1 Reliability of measurements 25 3.2.2 Manipulation check 25 3.2.3 Test of hypotheses 25 Chapter 4 Study 2 28 4.1 Research Methodology 28 4.1.1 Experimental design 28 4.1.2 Test material of the independent variables 28 4.1.3 Measurements of the dependent variables 29 4.1.4 Manipulation check 29 4.1.5 Participants 29 4.1.6 Procedure 31 4.2 Empirical results 31 4.2.1 Reliability of measurements 31 4.2.2 Manipulation check 31 4.2.3 Test of hypotheses 32 Chapter 5 Conclusion 34 5.1 Conclusion and Implications 34 5.2 Limitations and Future Work 35 References 37 Appendix A 40 Appendix B 44 Appendix C 46 Appendix D 48 Appendix E 49 Appendix F 52 Appendix G 55 Appendix H 56 Appendix I 59 Appendix J 60 Appendix K 62 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 態度一致性與情緒喚起對線上謠言判斷之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Impacts of attitudinal congruence and emotional arousal on evaluation of online rumor | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 盧希鵬(Hsi-Peng Lu),謝俊霖(Choon-Ling Sia) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 線上謠言,態度一致性,情緒喚起,認知閉合需求,情緒感染易感性,感知可信度,分享意圖, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | online rumor,attitudinal congruence,emotional arousal,need for cognitive closure,susceptibility to emotional contagion,perceived credibility,intention to share, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002821 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1008202015411300.pdf | 1.47 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
