Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/820
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee)
dc.contributor.authorLin-Yu Kungen
dc.contributor.author孔令玉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T05:07:49Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-19
dc.date.available2021-05-11T05:07:49Z-
dc.date.copyright2019-02-19
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-02-14
dc.identifier.citationAhuja, G., & Novelli, E. 2016. Redirecting research efforts on the diversification–performance linkage: The search for synergy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 342-390.
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science, 20(2): 410-421.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Bergh, D. D., Johnson, R. A., & Dewitt, R.-L. 2008. Restructuring through spin-off or sell-off: transforming information asymmetries into financial gain. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 133-148.
Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. N.-K. 2008. Learning how to restructure: absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6): 593-616.
Brauer, M. F., & Wiersema, M. F. 2012. Industry divestiture waves: How a firm's position influences investor returns. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1472-1492.
Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2009. Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3): 206-220.
Carton, A. M., Murphy, C., & Clark, J. R. 2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1544-1570.
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of american industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453-469.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Daley, L., Mehrotra, V., & Sivakumar, R. 1997. Corporate focus and value creation evidence from spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2): 257-281.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
Geroski, P. A. 2005. Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2): 129-138.
Gertner, R., Powers, E., & Scharfstein, D. 2002. Learning about Internal Capital Markets from Corporate Spin-offs. Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2479-2506.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2007. The Penrose effect: “Excess” expatriates in multinational enterprises. Management International Review, 47(2): 221-239.
Grant, R. M. 2002. Corporate strategy: Managing scope and strategy content. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management: chapter 4, 72-97. London, UK: Sage.
Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 16: 171-214. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334-343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193-206.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3): 63-78.
Helfat, C. E., Fankelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hite, G. L., & Owers, J. E. 1983. Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(4): 409-436.
Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. 2009. Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1): 19-46.
Ito, K. 1995. Japanese spinoffs: Unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6): 431-446.
Ito, K., & Rose, E. L. 1994. The genealogical structure of Japanese firms: Parent-subsidiary relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 35-51.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2000. Penrose's resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1): 109-139.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5): 489-496.
Kotter, J. P. 2007. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 85(1): 96-103.
Krishnaswami, S., & Subramaniam, V. 1999. Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1): 73-112.
Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1): 1-22.
Lechner, C., & Kreutzer, M. 2010. Coordinating growth initiatives in multi-unit firms. Long Range Planning, 43(1): 6-32.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. 2008. Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 557-576.
Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. 2011. Organic and Acquisitive Growth: Re-examining, Testing and Extending Penrose's Growth Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 48-74.
López Iturriaga, F., & Martín Cruz, N. 2008. Antecedents of corporate spin-offs in Spain: A resource-based approach. Research Policy, 37(6-7): 1047-1056.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380.
Martin, J. A. 2011. Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: The role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups. Organization Science, 22(1): 118-140.
Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2010. Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2): 265-301.
Maxwell, W. F., & Rao, R. P. 2003. Do Spin-offs Expropriate Wealth from Bondholders? Journal of Finance, 58(5): 2087-2108.
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1): 91-103.
Miles, J. A., & Rosenfeld, J. D. 1983. The Effect of Voluntary Spin-off Announcements on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Finance, 38(5): 1597-1606.
Moschieri, C. 2011. The implementation and structuring of divestitures: The unit's perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 32(4): 368-401.
Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. 2003. From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32(3): 463-481.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rubera, G., & Tellis, G. J. 2014. Spinoffs versus buyouts: Profitability of alternate routes for commercializing innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13): 2043-2052.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2002. Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 769-780.
Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. 2004. Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6): 809-829.
Schipper, K., & Smith, A. 1983. Effects of recontracting on shareholder wealth : The case of voluntary spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(4): 437-467.
Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2011. Examining the performance effects of post spin‐off links to parent firms: Should the apron strings be cut? Strategic Management Journal, 32(10): 1083-1098.
Seward, J. K., & Walsh, J. P. 1996. The governance and control of voluntary corporate spin-offs. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 25-39.
Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science, 16(3): 259-274.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 69-84.
Slater, M. 1980. The managerial limitation to the growth of firms. Economic Journal, 90(359): 520-528.
Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2): 113-127.
Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2007. The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in U.S. industries: The Penrose effect. Management International Review, 47(2): 259-279.
Thompson, R. S. 1994. The franchise life cycle and the Penrose effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(2): 207-218.
Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2): 179-190.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476.
Vijh, A. M. 1994. The Spinoff and Merger Ex-Date Effects. Journal of Finance, 49(2): 581-609.
Villalonga, B., & McGahan, A. M. 2005. The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13): 1183-1208.
Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Daellenbach, U. S. 1992. Spin-off performance: A case of overstated expectations? Strategic Management Journal, 13(6): 433-447.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3): 339-351.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/820-
dc.description.abstract關於企業高階管理團隊所應展現的管理能力,相關研究業已進行數十餘載,各式理論架構所解析的精髓,如何運用於管理實務,對於企業管理者而言,難免因各家所言相去甚遠而無所適從。尤其,創造組織成長,高階管理者必須掌握環境所出現的機會,結合內外部相關資源方能達成。因此,高階管理團隊所展現的管理能力,與組織成長著實密不可分。
有鑑於此,本論文聚焦於探討組織管理能力如何展現,以及管理能力如何影響組織成長。首先,本研究藉由回顧相關理論,釐清企業組織所屬資源與能力的本質,探討管理能力的本質與成效;進而提出由三組面向剖析高階管理團隊的特質,分別為成員組合、協調分工與激勵因素,並討論這些面向的調整,將如何影響高階管理團隊所展現的管理能力與成效。再者,依據前述三組面向,本研究分別舉出相對應的三項特質,並闡述藉由改變此三項特質,如何有助於克服組織成長過程中,因缺乏管理能力而導致成長受限的問題,亦即所謂潘若斯效應(Penrose Effect)。最後,本研究探討企業以分拆(spin-off)作為組織成長策略時,外部環境的成長機會與企業內部資源的支持,如何影響分拆後新事業體的經營績效。
透過上述三篇研究,本論文期望對於管理能力的本質,以及管理能力如何影響組織成長提出新解;並解析潘若斯效應的消長,藉以啟迪後續實證研究,延伸至更多組織成長的相關議題。此外,本論文建議企業擬以分拆作為組織發展策略時,應同時參酌內部及外部因素,並採用涵蓋新舊事業體的整體經營績效作為評估依據。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe nature of managerial competence has been studied for decades. However, different frameworks of developing managerial competences make research propositions divergent and practitioners confused when applying these concepts in creating organizational growth. Furthermore, managerial competences and environmental opportunities interact to support firms to pursue continuous growth, which necessitates the importance of managerial competences in organizational growth.
In light of the research needs, this dissertation proposes the fundamental outcomes of managerial competences and their impact on organizational growth. The first essay clarifies the nature of competence and resources. It recognizes the fundamental managerial outcomes and their relations to corporate growth and the principal dimensions of managerial teams. The next essay adopts the stated arguments to explore the relationship between managerial outcomes and the Penrose effect. The influence of collective managerial characteristics on organizational growth is then explicated. Finally, the last study focuses on spin-offs, a special mode of corporate divestiture and growth. The roles of external opportunities and internal supportive endowments in determining the spun-off firm’s performance are investigated.
The first essay provides new insight about the nature of managerial competence and its outcomes, and the managerial factors that increase the fundamental managerial outcome. It also suggests a positive relationship between the fundamental outcomes and organizational growth. By manifesting the role of entrepreneurial visions, which are the crucial outcome of managerial competences for corporate growth, the second essay sheds light on the debate of the existence of the Penrose effect and indicates a novel direction of elaborating the random rate of organizational growth. The last essay suggests that the evaluation of spin-offs requires consideration of the overall performance including the spun-off firm and the divesting firm from the internal and external perspectives when the firm intends to undertake spin-off approaches for restructuring its business or pursuing organizational growth.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-11T05:07:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-D96724004-1.pdf: 1074116 bytes, checksum: 2bb4996e367d511ff0a2ef429cd62638 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Managerial Competence and Outcome 5
2.1 Overview 5
2.2 Competence and Resource 7
2.3 Managerial Competence and Fundamental Outcome 8
2.4 Principal Dimension of Managerial Team and Organizational Growth 14
2.5 Discussion 22
2.6 Conclusion 24
Chapter 3 Entrepreneurial Vision and Penrose Effect: The Role of Managerial Characteristic in Organizational Growth 27
3.1 Overview 27
3.2 Penrose Effect and Organizational Growth 29
3.3 Entrepreneurial Vision and Managerial Competence 30
3.4 Reducing Managerial Limitation 32
3.5 Discussion 36
3.6 Conclusion 37
Chapter 4 Consequence of Spin-off: The Notable Role of Environmental Opportunity 39
4.1 Overview 39
4.2 Theory and Hypotheses 41
4.3 Methods 49
4.4 Results 52
4.5 Discussion 53
4.6 Conclusion 55
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Implication 62
Reference 64
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject分拆zh_TW
dc.subject管理能力zh_TW
dc.subject組織成長zh_TW
dc.subject高階管理團隊特質zh_TW
dc.subject潘若斯效應zh_TW
dc.subjectspin-offen
dc.subjectorganizational growthen
dc.subjectmanagerial competenceen
dc.subjectTMT characteristicsen
dc.subjectPenrose effecten
dc.title管理能力與組織成長之研究zh_TW
dc.titleThree Essays on Managerial Competence and Organizational Growthen
dc.date.schoolyear107-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee湯明哲(Ming-Je Tang),吳政衛(Cheng-Wei Wu),林舒柔(Shu-Jou Lin),王慧美
dc.subject.keyword管理能力,組織成長,高階管理團隊特質,潘若斯效應,分拆,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmanagerial competence,organizational growth,TMT characteristics,Penrose effect,spin-off,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201900541
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2019-02-14
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved