Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 藥學專業學院
  4. 臨床藥學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81888
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林淑文(Shu-Wen Lin)
dc.contributor.authorMan-Ching Hsuen
dc.contributor.author徐曼晴zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T03:05:52Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-26
dc.date.copyright2021-11-09
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-10-27
dc.identifier.citation1.Craig, W.A., Basic pharmacodynamics of antibacterials with clinical applications to the use of β-lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 2003. 17(3): p. 479-501. 2.Drusano, G.L., Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004. 2(4): p. 289-300. 3.Liu, C., et al., Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Adults and Children. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2011. 52(3): p. e18-e55. 4.Rybak, M.J., The Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Vancomycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006. 42(Supplement_1): p. S35-S39. 5.Kullar, R., et al., Impact of Vancomycin Exposure on Outcomes in Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Support for Consensus Guidelines Suggested Targets. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2011. 52(8): p. 975-981. 6.Rybak, M., et al., Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2009. 66(1): p. 82-98. 7.Pai, M.P., et al., Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2014. 77: p. 50-57. 8.Patel, N., et al., Vancomycin: We Can't Get There From Here. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2011. 52(8): p. 969-974. 9.Van Hal, S.J., D.L. Paterson, and T.P. Lodise, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity Associated with Dosing Schedules That Maintain Troughs between 15 and 20 Milligrams per Liter. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2013. 57(2): p. 734-744. 10.Rybak, M.J., et al., Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin for Serious Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Revised Consensus Guideline and Review by the American Society of Health-system Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020. 71(6): p. 1361-1364. 11.Vancomycin, in The Merck index: an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biological s1989. 12.E. Beauduy, C. and L.G. Winston, Beta-Lactam amp; Other Cell Wall- amp; Membrane-Active Antibiotics, in Basic amp; Clinical Pharmacology, 14e, B.G. Katzung, Editor. 2017, McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY. 13.McDanel, J.S., et al., Comparative Effectiveness of Beta-Lactams Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-SusceptibleStaphylococcus aureusBloodstream Infections Among 122 Hospitals. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2015. 61(3): p. 361-367. 14.Schweizer, M.L., et al., Comparative effectiveness of nafcillin or cefazolin versus vancomycin in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2011. 11(1): p. 279. 15.Wong, D., et al., Comparative effectiveness of β-lactam versus vancomycin empiric therapy in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2016. 15(1). 16.Ackerman, B.H., A.M. Vannier, and E.B. Eudy, Analysis of vancomycin time-kill studies with Staphylococcus species by using a curve stripping program to describe the relationship between concentration and pharmacodynamic response. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1992. 36(8): p. 1766-1769. 17.Duffull, S.B., et al., Efficacies of different vancomycin dosing regimens against Staphylococcus aureus determined with a dynamic in vitro model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1994. 38(10): p. 2480-2482. 18.Löwdin, E., I. Odenholt, and O. Cars, In vitro studies of pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1998. 42(10): p. 2739-2744. 19.Larsson, A.J., et al., The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1996. 38(4): p. 589-597. 20.Moise-Broder, P.A., et al., Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin and Other Antimicrobials in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2004. 43(13): p. 925-942. 21.Holmes, N.E., et al., Vancomycin AUC/MIC ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2013. 57(4): p. 1654-63. 22.Gawronski, K.M., et al., A stewardship program's retrospective evaluation of vancomycin AUC24/MIC and time to microbiological clearance in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis. Clin Ther, 2013. 35(6): p. 772-9. 23.Jung, Y., et al., Area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as a predictor of vancomycin treatment outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2014. 43(2): p. 179-83. 24.Lodise, T.P., et al., Vancomycin exposure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: how much is enough? Clin Infect Dis, 2014. 59(5): p. 666-75. 25.Casapao, A.M., et al., Association between vancomycin day 1 exposure profile and outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2015. 59(6): p. 2978-85. 26.Jumah, M.T.B., et al., Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Determinants of Vancomycin Efficacy in Enterococcal Bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2018. 62(3). 27.Mogle, B.T., et al., Implementation of a two-point pharmacokinetic AUC-based vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring approach in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2018. 52(6): p. 805-810. 28.Asín-Prieto, E., A. Rodríguez-Gascón, and A. Isla, Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 2015. 21(5): p. 319-329. 29.Morse, G.D., et al., Comparative study of intraperitoneal and intravenous vancomycin pharmacokinetics during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1987. 31(2): p. 173-177. 30.Nielsen, H.E., I. Sørensen, and H.E. Hansen, Peritoneal Transport of Vancomycin during Peritoneal Dialysis. Nephron, 1979. 24(6): p. 274-277. 31.Rodvold, K.A., et al., Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1988. 32(6): p. 848-852. 32.Matzke, G.R., et al., Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1984. 25(4): p. 433-437. 33.Blouin, R.A., et al., Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in normal and morbidly obese subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1982. 21(4): p. 575-580. 34.Rotschafer, J.C., et al., Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin: observations in 28 patients and dosage recommendations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1982. 22(3): p. 391-394. 35.Golper, T.A., et al., Vancomycin pharmacokinetics, renal handling, and nonrenal clearances in normal human subjects. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 1988. 43(5): p. 565-570. 36.Matzke, G.R., G.G. Zhanel, and D.R.P. Guay, Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 1986. 11(4): p. 257-282. 37.Ducharme, M.P., R.L. Slaughter, and D.J. Edwards, Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in a Patient Population: Effect of Age, Gender, and Body Weight. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1994. 16(5). 38.Aldaz, A., et al., Effects of Hepatic Function on Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Cancer. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2000. 22(3). 39.Kees, M.G., et al., Unbound fraction of vancomycin in intensive care unit patients. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2014. 54(3): p. 318-323. 40.Butterfield, J.M., et al., Refining Vancomycin Protein Binding Estimates: Identification of Clinical Factors That Influence Protein Binding. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2011. 55(9): p. 4277-4282. 41.Ampe, E., et al., Implementation of a protocol for administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicological aspects. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2013. 41(5): p. 439-446. 42.Stove, V., et al., Measuring Unbound Versus Total Vancomycin Concentrations in Serum and Plasma: Methodological Issues and Relevance. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2015. 37(2). 43.Berthoin, K., et al., Correlation between free and total vancomycin serum concentrations in patients treated for Gram-positive infections. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2009. 34(6): p. 555-560. 44.Crandon, J.L., S.H. Macvane, and D.P. Nicolau, Clinical Laboratory-Based Assay Methodologies May Underestimate and Increase Variability of Vancomycin Protein Binding in Hospitalized Patients. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2014. 34(2): p. 203-209. 45.Oyaert, M., et al., Factors Impacting Unbound Vancomycin Concentrations in Different Patient Populations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2015. 59(11): p. 7073-7079. 46.Brunetti, L., et al., The risk of vancomycin toxicity in patients with liver impairment. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2020. 19(1). 47.Filippone, E., W. Kraft, and J. Farber, The Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics, 2017. 102(3): p. 459-469. 48.Elyasi, S., et al., Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity: mechanism, incidence, risk factors and special populations. A literature review. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012. 68(9): p. 1243-1255. 49.Rutter, W.C., et al., Nephrotoxicity during Vancomycin Therapy in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2017. 61(2): p. AAC.02089-16. 50.Navalkele, B., et al., Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin–Tazobactam Compared to Those on Vancomycin and Cefepime. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2017. 64(2): p. 116-123. 51.黃莉茵, et al., Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin Alone and in Combination with an Aminoglycoside. The Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2007. 59(1): p. 1-8. 52.Hidayat, L.K., et al., High-Dose Vancomycin Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006. 166(19): p. 2138. 53.Malacarne, P., S. Bergamasco, and C. Donadio, Nephrotoxicity due to Combination Antibiotic Therapy with Vancomycin and Aminoglycosides in Septic Critically Ill Patients. Chemotherapy, 2006. 52(4): p. 178-184. 54.Vance-Bryan, K., et al., A comparative assessment of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in the young versus the elderly hospitalized patient. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1994. 33(4): p. 811-821. 55.Bellos, I., et al., Acute kidney injury following the concurrent administration of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin: a network meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2020. 26(6): p. 696-705. 56.Psevdos, G., Jr., E. Gonzalez, and V. Sharp, Acute renal failure in patients with AIDS on tenofovir while receiving prolonged vancomycin course for osteomyelitis. AIDS Read, 2009. 19(6): p. 245-8. 57.Minejima, E., et al., Applying New Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Kidney Injury To Facilitate Early Identification of Nephrotoxicity in Vancomycin-Treated Patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2011. 55(7): p. 3278-3283. 58.Neely, M.N., et al., Are Vancomycin Trough Concentrations Adequate for Optimal Dosing? Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2014. 58(1): p. 309-316. 59.Suzuki, Y., et al., Is Peak Concentration Needed in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin? A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Patients with Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusPneumonia. Chemotherapy, 2012. 58(4): p. 308-312. 60.Aljefri, D.M., et al., Vancomycin Area Under the Curve and Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2019. 69(11): p. 1881-1887. 61.Lodise, T.P., et al., Relationship between Initial Vancomycin Concentration‐Time Profile and Nephrotoxicity among Hospitalized Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009. 49(4): p. 507-514. 62.Zasowski, E.J., et al., Identification of Vancomycin Exposure-Toxicity Thresholds in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Intravenous Vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2018. 62(1). 63.Chavada, R., et al., Establishment of an AUC0-24 Threshold for Nephrotoxicity Is a Step towards Individualized Vancomycin Dosing for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017. 61(5). 64.Lodise, T.P., et al., The Emperor's New Clothes: PRospective Observational Evaluation of the Association Between Initial VancomycIn Exposure and Failure Rates Among ADult HospitalizEd Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections (PROVIDE). Clin Infect Dis, 2020. 70(8): p. 1536-1545. 65.Begg, E.J., M.L. Barclay, and S.B. Duffull, A suggested approach to once-daily aminoglycoside dosing. British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1995. 39(6): p. 605-609. 66.Lee, Y.-J. tdm a R package for therapeutic drug monitoring. [cited 2021 2/19]; Available from: http://pkpd.kmu.edu.tw/tdm/home.html. 67.Buelga, D.S., et al., Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Vancomycin in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2005. 49(12): p. 4934-4941. 68.陳妙婷, 利用OpenBUGS在R上建構一個治療藥品監測軟體-tdm, 臨床藥學研究所. 2007, 高雄醫學大學. 69.Turner, R.B., et al., Review and Validation of Bayesian Dose‐Optimizing Software and Equations for Calculation of the Vancomycin Area Under the Curve in Critically Ill Patients. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2018. 38(12): p. 1174-1183. 70.Oda, K., et al., Performance of Area under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimations of Vancomycin with Limited Sampling by a Newly Developed Web Application. Pharmaceutical Research, 2021. 38(4): p. 637-646. 71.Finch, N.A., et al., A Quasi-Experiment To Study the Impact of Vancomycin Area under the Concentration-Time Curve-Guided Dosing on Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. 61(12): p. e01293-17. 72.Neely, M.N., et al., Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2018. 62(2). 73.Oda, K., et al., Reduced nephrotoxicity with vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring guided by area under the concentration-time curve against a trough 15-20 mug/mL concentration. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2020. 56(4): p. 106109. 74.Tsutsuura, M., et al., The monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2021. 21(1). 75.Eads, A.V. and J.L. Cole, Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin Therapy After the Transition to AUC/MIC Monitoring in a Primary Facility. J Pharm Pract, 2021: p. 8971900211003439. 76.Meng, L., et al., Conversion from Vancomycin Trough Concentration–Guided Dosing to Area Under the Curve–Guided Dosing Using Two Sample Measurements in Adults: Implementation at an Academic Medical Center. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2019. 39(4): p. 433-442. 77.Glasheen, W.P., et al., Charlson Comorbidity Index: ICD-9 Update and ICD-10 Translation. Am Health Drug Benefits, 2019. 12(4): p. 188-197. 78.Vincent, J.L., et al., The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Medicine, 1996. 22(7): p. 707-710. 79.Grissom, C.K., et al., A Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Critical Care Triage. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2010. 4(4): p. 277-284. 80.Lambden, S., et al., The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Critical Care, 2019. 23(1). 81.Chotiprasitsakul, D., et al., Comparing the Outcomes of Adults With Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Receiving Short-Course Versus Prolonged-Course Antibiotic Therapy in a Multicenter, Propensity Score–Matched Cohort. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2018. 66(2): p. 172-177. 82.Nelson, A.N., et al., Optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative bloodstream infections. Infection, 2017. 45(5): p. 613-620. 83.Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group, KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney inter., 2012(2): p. 1-138.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81888-
dc.description.abstract"背景 Vancomycin是一種糖肽類抗生素,為抗藥性金黃色葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA)等多重抗藥性革蘭氏陽性菌感染症的第一線治療藥物。過去在嚴重MRSA感染病人進行vancomycin的療劑監測(therapeutic drug monitoring,TDM)目標為trough濃度15-20 mg/L,但近年來研究發現trough濃度15-20 mg/L為急性腎損傷(acute kidney injury,AKI)之獨立風險因子。2020年vancomycin治療監測指引將建議的療劑監測指標由谷濃度改為24小時血中濃度對時間曲線下面積(area under the curve, AUC)除以最小抑菌濃度(minimum inhibitory concentration,MIC)之比值,期望提高安全性並確保療效足夠,並推薦以貝氏軟體估算AUC。 目前直接比較AUC和trough做為監測指標之研究大多樣本數較小,並且著重於安全性的比較,對於療效的評估較少。AUC的最佳範圍也尚未有定論。2020年8月臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院(簡稱臺大醫院)開始進行vancomycin之AUC監測,因此本研究分析AUC和trough濃度兩種TDM方式之臨床結果。 研究目的 主要研究目的為比較以AUC和trough濃度進行TDM之安全性與療效差異。次要目的包括尋找與安全性和療效相關的AUC及trough濃度切點,以及比較臺灣貝氏軟體tdm for R與梯形面積法所估算出的AUC差異。 研究方法 本研究為回溯性研究,納入18歲以上於臺大醫院使用vancomycin至少3天並在開始用藥後7天內有TDM之病人。用藥期間在2018年8月1日至2019年4月30日間的病人為trough組,2020年8月1日至2021年4月30日間為AUC組。排除接受腎臟替代療法、外院轉入並於當天開始使用vancomycin、AUC組抽血時間錯誤及血中肌肝酸濃度缺失者。 資料來源包括臺大醫療體系醫療整合資料庫、電子病歷系統與紙本TDM紀錄,蒐集病人基本資料、使用vancomycin前後之實驗室檢驗值、生命徵象和併用藥物等。 主要研究結果為AKI發生率,依照KDIGO criteria判斷。療效結果包括感染MRSA病人之臨床治療結果、微生物學治療結果、30日和90日全原因死亡率和90日再住院率。 統計方法以Student’ s t test或Wilcoxon rank-sum Test比較連續變項,以Chi-square test或Fisher’s exact test比較類別變項。採用傾向分數配對(propensity score matching,PS matching)來降低兩組病人基本特徵的差異。以多變項羅吉斯迴歸分析與結果相關之因子。利用ROC曲線分析尋找與結果相關之AUC和trough濃度切點。 研究結果 本研究共納入691位使用vancomycin並接受療劑監測之病人,AUC組別共177人,trough組別514人。經配對後AKI發生率在AUC組為21.0%,在trough組為21.7%。以羅吉斯迴歸分析校正配對後兩組間仍有差異之因子後發現使用AUC或trough進行療劑監測對AKI風險無顯著影響。在TDM範圍符合指引建議、SOFA score > 2和AKI前有接受TDM的次族群中同樣未觀察到療劑監測方式對於AKI風險之影響。與AKI相關之顯著風險因子包括女性、較高之SOFA score、Charlson comorbidity index > 2、baseline收治於ICU和較高的trough濃度。 在療效結果方面,排除提早停用vancomcyin者後本研究共有90位具有MRSA培養證據的病人納入療效分析。經過配對後發現使用AUC或trough進行療劑監測對於臨床治療失敗風險、微生物治療失敗風險、30日及90日全原因死亡率和90日再住院率都沒有顯著影響。與臨床治療失敗相關的顯著風險因子為較高之SOFA score和較大的vancomycin MIC。沒有找到與微生物學治療失敗相關的風險因子。30日死亡率和90日死亡率皆與較高之SOFA score和免疫不全有關。 由ROC曲線分析找到的trough濃度適當範圍約為13-17 mg/L。與AKI相關之AUC切點為446.9 mg•h/L,與療效相關的切點約為500 mg•h/L但模型預測不理想。 以兩點濃度利用梯形面積法計算出之AUC做為基準與貝氏軟體tdm for R利用單點trough濃度估算之AUC比較,發現兩者估算結果相近,accuracy中位數為0.9(IQR:0.9-1.0),bias中位數為8.5(IQR:4.3-14.0)。羅吉斯迴歸分析發現年齡較小者和女性較容易出現bias > 20% 的情形。 結論 本研究觀察到以vancomycin AUC和trough濃度做為TDM指標之安全性和療效結果相近。未來可進行前瞻性研究進一步減少潛在干擾因子,並收入更多樣本數,期望能確認適當的AUC及AUC/MIC範圍。"zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-25T03:05:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2610202115281900.pdf: 3341119 bytes, checksum: bc6687995fb73a104ea53f3cb33ab3ff (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract vi 目錄 ix 表目錄 xii 圖目錄 xvii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 3 2.1 Vancomycin 基本性質 3 2.1.1簡介 3 2.1.2臨床用途 3 2.1.3藥效學 3 2.1.4藥品動態學特性 4 2.1.5副作用 5 2.2 Vancomycin 的療劑監測 7 2.2.1療劑監測指標 7 2.2.2 AUC與AUC24/MIC適當範圍 7 2.2.3 AUC估算方法 12 2.2.4 Trough濃度與AUC做為療劑監測指標之臨床研究 16 第三章 研究目的 19 第四章 研究方法 20 4.1研究架構 20 4.2研究對象 20 4.2.1納入條件 20 4.2.2排除條件 20 4.3資料收集 21 4.3.1資料來源 21 4.3.2基本資料 21 4.3.3實驗室檢驗資料 21 4.3.4生命徵象與病程紀錄 22 4.3.5 SOFA score 22 4.3.6用藥資訊 22 4.3.7免疫狀態 25 4.4梯形面積法AUC計算方式 25 4.5研究結果與評估方式 25 4.4.1安全性評估 25 4.4.2療效評估 26 4.4.3 Tdm for R與梯形面積法比較 27 4.6統計方法 28 第五章 研究結果 30 5.1收案流程 30 5.2病人基本特性 32 5.3 安全性結果 42 5.3.1 AKI發生率 42 5.3.2與AKI風險相關之因子 71 5.3.3與AKI風險相關之AUC和trough濃度切點 76 5.4療效結果 79 5.4.1療效分析病人基本特徵 79 5.4.2療效結果 84 5.4.3與療效相關之因子 89 5.4.4與療效相關之AUC、AUC/MIC及trough濃度切點 103 5.5 Tdm for R與梯形面積法之比較 108 第六章 討論 112 6.1安全性結果 112 6.1.1病人族群 112 6.1.2 AKI發生率 112 6.1.3 AKI風險因子 114 6.1.4與AKI風險相關之AUC與trough濃度切點 114 6.2療效結果 117 6.2.1病人族群 117 6.2.2療效結果 117 6.2.3療效結果相關風險因子 118 6.2.4與療效結果相關之AUC、AUC/MIC與trough濃度切點 118 6.3貝氏軟體tdm for R與梯形面積法之比較 118 6.4研究優勢與限制 119 6.4.1研究優勢 119 6.4.2研究限制 120 6.5未來展望 120 第七章 結論 122 參考文獻 124
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject貝氏zh_TW
dc.subjectVancomycinzh_TW
dc.subject療劑監測zh_TW
dc.subjectAUCzh_TW
dc.subject谷濃度zh_TW
dc.subject急性腎損傷zh_TW
dc.subjectVancomycinen
dc.subjectBayesianen
dc.subjectAcute kidney injuryen
dc.subjectTroughen
dc.subjectAUCen
dc.subjectTherapeutic drug monitoringen
dc.titleVancomycin血中濃度對時間曲線下面積(AUC)與谷濃度療劑監測之比較zh_TW
dc.titleComparison of Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Guided by Area under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) and Trough Concentrationen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王振泰(Hsin-Tsai Liu),戴志勳(Chih-Yang Tseng),吳建志,王繼娟
dc.subject.keywordVancomycin,療劑監測,AUC,谷濃度,急性腎損傷,貝氏,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordVancomycin,Therapeutic drug monitoring,AUC,Trough,Acute kidney injury,Bayesian,en
dc.relation.page130
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202104235
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2021-10-27
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床藥學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2026-10-26-
顯示於系所單位:臨床藥學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2610202115281900.pdf
  此日期後於網路公開 2026-10-26
3.26 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved