Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81639
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳品豪(Pin-Hao Chen)
dc.contributor.authorKuan-Chih Tingen
dc.contributor.author丁冠芝zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T09:25:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T09:25:04Z-
dc.date.copyright2021-08-06
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-07-28
dc.identifier.citationBartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press. Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., Bargh, J. A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216662869 Chang, L., Sam, Jolly, E., Cheong, J. H., Burnashev, A., Chen, A., Clark, M., Frey, S., Fitzpatrick, P. (2021). cosanlab/nltools: 0.4.4. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4697499 Chen, P.-H. A., Jolly, E., Cheong, J. H., Chang, L. J. (2020). Intersubject representational similarity analysis reveals individual variations in affective experience when watching erotic movies. NeuroImage , 216, 116851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116851 Cheong, J. H., Molani, Z., Sadhukha, S., Chang, L. J. (2020). Synchronized affect in shared experiences strengthens social connection. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bd9wn Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Kopietz, R., Groll, S. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.3 Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x Echterhoff, G., Schmalbach, B. (2018). How shared reality is created in interpersonal communication. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.005 Goodman, R. L., Webb, T. L., Stewart, A. J. (2009). Communicating stereotype-relevant information: Is factual information subject to the same communication biases as fictional information? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209334780 Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., … Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 Higgins, E. T. (1992). Achieving’shared reality’in the communication game: A social action that create; meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(3), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X92113001 Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90032-X Hirst, W., Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340 Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science and Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Imada, T., Yussen, S. R. (2012). Reproduction of cultural values: A cross-cultural examination of stories people create and transmit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211421938 Jolly, E., Tamir, D. I., Burum, B., Mitchell, J. P. (2019). Wanting without enjoying: The social value of sharing experiences. PloS One, 14(4), e0215318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215318 Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., others. (2001). SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python. Kashima, Y. (2008). A social psychology of cultural dynamics: Examining how cultures are formed, maintained, and transformed. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00063.x Lyons, A., Kashima, Y. (2001). The reproduction of culture: Communication processes tend to maintain cultural stereotypes. Social Cognition, 19(3: Special issue), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.372.21470 Lyons, A., Kashima, Y. (2006). Maintaining stereotypes in communication: Investigating memory biases and coherence‐seeking in storytelling. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00184.x Markello, R. (2018). netneurotools: Tools for network neuroscience. Network Neuroscience Lab. https://netneurotools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Nastase, S. A., Gazzola, V., Hasson, U., Keysers, C. (2019). Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(6), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz037 Nastase, S. A., Goldstein, A., Hasson, U. (2020). Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage, 222, 117254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117254 Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net. Polletta, F., Lee, J. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100501 Popal, H., Wang, Y., Olson, I. R. (2020). A Guide to Representational Similarity Analysis for Social Neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(11), 1243–1253. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz099 Raschka, S. (2018). MLxtend: Providing machine learning and data science utilities and extensions to Python’s scientific computing stack. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(24), 638. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00638 Reback, J., McKinney, W., jbrockmendel, Bossche, J. van den, Augspurger, T., Cloud, P., Hawkins, S., gfyoung, Sinhrks, Roeschke, M., Klein, A., Petersen, T., Tratner, J., She, C., Ayd, W., Naveh, S., patrick, Garcia, M., Schendel, J., … h-vetinari. (2021). pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.2.4. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4681666 Schmalbach, B., Hennemuth, L., Echterhoff, G. (2019). A Tool for Assessing the Experience of Shared Reality: Validation of the German SR-T. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00832 Seabold, S., Perktold, J. (2010, June). Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (Vol. 57, p. 61). Stubbersfield, J. M., Dean, L. G., Sheikh, S., Laland, K. N., Cross, C. P. (2019). Social transmission favours the ‘morally good’over the ‘merely arousing.’ Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0269-y van Rossum, G., Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace. Waskom, M. L. (2021). seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3021. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81639-
dc.description.abstract本研究企圖了解,面對已形成社會爭議的話題,在既定立場的影響下,對話能否形成「共享真實」以產生觀點與記憶上的改變。研究者以精神障礙犯罪者的死刑裁量議題為例,以單人實驗進行初探研究。旨在了解參與者既有的死刑態度立場,會如何影響他們對影片中的角色解讀、角色印象和劇情記憶,以此建立未來互動實驗的對照資料。實驗內容是讓參與者觀賞一部80分鐘的影片,隨後描述劇情大意與個人看法,並填答問卷。實驗前後會測量參與者對於判處精神障礙犯罪者死刑的態度。研究發現:一、觀賞影片前後參與者的死刑態度沒有顯著差異。二、死刑態度與特定角色的解讀,以及角色印象有顯著相關,但和劇情記憶無關。三、受試者間表徵相似性分析的結果顯示,參與者彼此間的死刑態度和對角色的印象如果越相似,他們彼此對角色的解讀也會越相近。四、最後,迴歸分析顯示控制了角色印象的受試者間相似性後,死刑態度的受試者間相似性仍對角色解讀的受試者間相似性具有顯著的預測力。綜合上述結果,死刑態度為關鍵影響因子,在無共享經驗及對話的情況下,參與者之間原本的死刑立場相似度就已顯著影響他們對角色解讀的相似度。期待未來研究進一步探究死刑態度對共享經驗與人際對話的效果。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T09:25:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2807202109122300.pdf: 4270038 bytes, checksum: 4ef1c215c54c380d8f99fc14e16444b5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 「說了就相信效應」實驗派典 3 第二節 對話必須具有「共享真實」的溝通意圖 3 第三節 「共享真實」的定義 4 第四節 形成「共享真實」的內在動機 4 第五節 實驗材料的影響 5 第六節 小結與過去研究不足之處 5 第七節 研究目標與研究問題 7 第三章 研究方法 8 第一節 研究參與者 8 第二節 研究工具 8 第三節 研究流程 12 第四節 資料分析 12 第四章 研究結果 18 第一節 單人層次分析 18 第二節 雙人配對分析 22 第五章 討論與建議 26 第一節 結論與討論 26 第二節 研究貢獻 28 第三節 研究限制 28 第四節 未來研究建議 29 參考文獻 31 附錄 35 附錄一 精神障礙犯罪者死刑量表 35 附錄二 角色解讀問卷 37 附錄三 影片內容再認作業 38 附錄四 角色印象問卷 39 附錄五 各角色印象分量表主成分分析結果 40
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject受試者間表徵相似性分析zh_TW
dc.subject共享真實zh_TW
dc.subject死刑態度zh_TW
dc.subject受試者間相關分析zh_TW
dc.subjectintersubject correlationen
dc.subjectintersubject representational similarity analysisen
dc.subjectshared realityen
dc.subjectattitude toward capital punishmenten
dc.title以自然實驗派典探討共享真實zh_TW
dc.titleUsing Naturalistic Paradigm to Study Shared Realityen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee郭郡羽(Hsin-Tsai Liu),張仁和(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.subject.keyword共享真實,死刑態度,受試者間相關分析,受試者間表徵相似性分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordshared reality,attitude toward capital punishment,intersubject correlation,intersubject representational similarity analysis,en
dc.relation.page41
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202101831
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2021-07-28
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:心理學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
U0001-2807202109122300.pdf
  Restricted Access
4.17 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved