請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8161完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 盧道杰(Dau-Jye Lu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pin-Ho Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳品何 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:49:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-18 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:49:26Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王文科 (2001)，「教育研究法--教育研究的理論與實務」，台北市：五南。 何立德 (2009)，地景多樣性與地景保育，「科學發展」，第439期，第22-29頁。 何宗宜、劉政榮 (2006)，公眾參與地理信息系統在我國的發展初探，「測繪通報」，第8期，第33-37頁。 吳昀蓉 (2015)，誰來參與共管─巴壟部落、都歷部落和望鄉部落的共管經驗，國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所學位論文。 吳振發、詹士樑 (2003)，常態化差異植生指數應用於都市綠地品質管制之探討，「台灣土地研究」，第6卷，第2期，第17-42頁。 呂欣蕙 (2007)，布農族望鄉部落生態旅遊發展之研究，靜宜大學碩士論文。 李光中 (2012)，「花蓮縣富里鄉豐南村水圳與梯田文化景觀登錄先期作業暨管理維護計畫」，花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告。 李光中 (2013)，「花蓮縣文化景觀富里鄉豐南村吉哈拉艾保存維護計畫」，花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告。 李光中 (2014)，農業濕地保育與里山倡議，「科學發展」，第497期，第28-35頁。 李光中 (2016)，「花蓮縣富里鄉豐南村吉哈拉艾文化景觀環境回復力指標研究計畫」，花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告。 李宇松 (2009)，基於PPGIS之社區災害管理研究--以汐止市長青里為例，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文。 李秀彬 (1996)，全球環境變化研究的核心領域──土地利用/土地覆被變化的國際研究動向，「地理學報」，第63卷，第6期，第553-558頁。 李孟倫 (2013)，東谷沙飛：一個布農族部落「望鄉」的想像與實踐，國立暨南大學人類學研究所學位論文。 李欣怡 (2014)，透過公共參與及群眾資源進行生態系統服務社會價值模擬──以大屯溪流域為例，臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文 林俊強、張長義、蔡博文、李建堂、丁志堅、李玉亭 (2005)，運用公眾參與地理資訊系統於原住民族傳統領域之研究，「地理學報」，第41期，第65-82頁。 林書楷 (2013)，PPGIS促進溝通之成效-美濃國家自然公園案例分析，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文。 林務局 (2017)，社區林業中心今日揭牌 邁入社區林業2.0時代 完整建構里山根經濟，「林務局全球資訊網」，https://www.forest.gov.tw/forest-news/0061623，2019年5月10日。 林靖修 (2017), 基礎設施, 水利社會與行動者的交織: 陳有蘭溪流域 Kalibuan 社區共同灌溉系統建造與營運，「臺灣人類學刊」，第15卷，第2期，第97-146頁。 林澤富 (2008)，日治時期南投地區布農族的集團移住，國立成功大學碩士論文。 花蓮縣文化局 (2016)，花蓮縣富里鄉豐南村吉哈拉艾文化景觀，「花蓮縣文化局」，https://www.hccc.gov.tw/zh-tw/CulturalHeritage/Detail/133，2019年5月10日。 施保旭 (2000)，「地理資訊系統」，台北市：儒林。 施添福 (1979)，臺灣人口長成及其空間集中過程，「地理研究報告」，第5期，第159-181頁。 胡幼慧 (1996)，「質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例」，臺北市 : 巨流。 徐中芃、王淑瑩、邱祈榮 (2017)，從數字看日本的里地里山，「林業研究專訊」，第24卷，第5期，第51-54頁。 財團法人農業工程研究中心 (2017)，「花蓮縣富里鄉豐南村吉哈拉艾文化景觀水路系統調查研究計畫」，花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告。 張乃文 (2018)，文化、儀式與觀光：望鄉布農人的項鍊嬰兒祭，國立臺灣大學人類學研究所學位論文。 張育銓 (2016)，全球重要農業遺產系統的主體性與真實性建構：臺東池上水圳耕作區與花蓮壽豐河川地種植的案例分析，「民俗曲藝」，第193期，第129-219頁。 畢恆達 (1995)，生活經驗研究的反省：詮釋學的觀點，「本土心理學研究」，第4期，第224-259頁。 莊永忠、廖學誠 (2011)，PPGIS與傳統民眾參與方式在社區議題討論與居民參與程度上之比較研究：以宜蘭縣龜山島社區為例，「地理研究」，第55期，第89-120頁。 陳亦馨 (2016)，參與式工作坊使用地理資訊對於地震防災意識提升之研究，成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。 陳美惠、林穎楨 (2017)，整合協同經營與里山倡議的森林治理－以阿禮與大武部落生態旅遊及資源保育為例，「臺灣林業科學」，第32卷，第4期，第299-316頁。 彭立沛 (2015)，「農村鑲嵌景觀保存之文化生態系統服務評估—社區營造觀點」，科技部委托研究報告。 彭安琪 (2011)，宜蘭縣無尾港水鳥保護區社區監測的施行與研究，國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所學位論文。 楊婉如 (2005)，金門島地景變遷監測與分析—1995, 2000, 2001年，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文。 董景生 (2017)，尋訪里山生態系，「科學發展」，第529期，第42-46頁。 鄒川雄 (2003)，生活世界與默會知識：詮釋學觀點的質性研究，齊力 林本炫 (Eds.)「質性研究方法與資料分析」，第19-53頁。嘉義: 南華教育社會研究所。 趙榮台 (2011)，里山倡議，「大自然季刊」，第110期，第64-67頁。 趙榮台 (2015)，何謂「里山地景」？，「林業研究專訊」，第22卷，第5期，第41-43頁。 蔡博文 (2005)，土地變遷研究之回顧與展望，「全球變遷通訊雜誌」，第48期，第21-24頁。 鄭晃二、陳亮全 (1999)，「社區動力遊戲 : 工作坊使社區活起來」。台北市 : 遠流。 鍾明光、盧道杰 (2018)，失落的里山：臺灣淺山客家聚落的發展歷程與環境資源保育，「國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告」，第 32卷，第4期，第249-258頁。 邊瑞芬 (1991)，台灣地區縣市社經發展與人口遷移的關係，「人口學刊」，第14期，第83-108頁。 IPSI 事務局 (2020)，SATOYAMA イニシアティブ国際パートナーシップ（IPSI）自然共生社会の実現に向けて，国連大学サステイナビリティ高等研究所。 日本都市計画家協会 (2003)，都市・農村の新しい土地利用戦略: 変貌した線引き制度の可能性を探る，京都.：学芸出版社。 木下勇 (2007)，ワークショップ: 住民主体のまちづくりへの方法論，京都：学芸出版社。 四手井綱英 (2000)，里山のこと，関西自然保護機構会報，22(1): 71-77。 田村俊和、山本博、吉岡慎一 (1983)，大規模地形改変の全国的把握，地理学評論，56(4): 223-242。 守山弘 (1997)，むらの自然をいかす，東京: 岩波書店。 辻雅男 (1983)，集落主体の農村計画，農村計画学会誌，2(2): 13-18,71。 所三男 (1980)，近世林業史の研究 (Studies in the history of early modern forestry)，東京: 吉川弘文館。 武内和彦、鷲谷いづみ、恒川篤史 (2001)，里山の環境学，東京：東京大学出版会。 藤本信義 (1982)，農村計画と住民参加，農村計画学会誌， 1(3): 10-18, 62。 Alessa, L., A. Kliskey, and G. Brown. (2008). Social-ecological Hotspots Mapping: A Spatial Approach for Identifying Coupled Social-ecological Space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1): 27-39. Anderson, O., Crow, T.R., Lietz, S.M., Stearns, F. (1996). Transformation of a landscape in the upper mid-west, USA: the history of the lower St. Croix river valley, 1830 to present. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35: 247-267. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70: 21-34. Antrop, M. (2006). Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75: 187-197. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224. Ball, J. (2002). Towards a methodology for mapping ‘regions for sustainability’ using PPGIS. Progress in Planning, 58: 81-140. Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. Black, A. E., Strand, E., Wright, R. G., Scott, J. M., Morgan P., and Watson, C. (1998). Land use history at multiple scales: Implications for conservation planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 43: 49-63. Bouma, J., Varallyay, G., Batjes, N.H. (1998). Principal land use changes anticipated in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 67: 103-119. Bradley, D., Schneider, H. (2004). Participatory approaches: A facilitator’s guide. VSO. Retrieved on July, 10, 2012. Brown, G. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied geography, 34: 289-294. Brown, G. G., Pullar, D. V. (2012). An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International journal of geographical information science, 26(2), 231-246. Brown, G., Donovan, S. (2014). Measuring change in place values for environmental and natural resource planning using public participation GIS (PPGIS): results and challenges for longitudinal research. Society Natural Resources, 27(1), 36-54. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied geography, 46, 122-136. Brown, G., Reed, P. (2012). Values compatibility analysis: integrating public values in a forest planning decision support system. Applied spatial analysis and policy, 5(4), 317-332. Brown, G., Brabyn, L. (2012). An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3): 317-331. Brown, G., Fagerholm, F. (2015). Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13: 119-133. Brown, G., Weber, D., de Bie, K. (2015). Is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning. Land Use Policy, 43: 228-238. Burke, E. (1979). A Participatory Approach to Urban Planning, Human Sciences Press, New York. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13: 3-21. Cosgrove, D., Daniels, S. (1988). The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments. Cambridge University Press. Cosgrove, D., Jackson, P. (1987). New directions in cultural geography. Area, 19: 95-101. Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5): 616-637. Duraiappah, A. K., Nakamura, K., Takeuchi, K., Watanabe, M., Nishi, M. (2012). Satoyama–Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes of Japan. UNU Press. Eetvelde, V. V., Antrop, M. (2004). Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes—two examples from Southern France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67: 79-95. Elwood, S. A. (2002). GIS use in community planning: a multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning, 34: 905-922. Fischer, J., Hartel, T., Kuemmerle, T. (2012). Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters, 5: 167-175. Frazier, T. G., Wood, N., Yarnal, B. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Applied Geography, 30: 506-517. Fukamachi, K., Oku, H., Nakashizuka, T., (2001). The change of a satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, between 1970 and 1995. Landscape Ecology, 16: 703-717. Geist, H. J. (2009). The Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) project. Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Sciences, 1: Land Cover, Land Use and the Global Change, 209. Ichikawa, K., Okubo, N., Okubo, S., Takeuchi, K. (2006). Transition of the satoyama landscape in the urban fringe of the Tokyo metropolitan area from 1880 to 2001. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 398-410. International HIV/AIDS Alliance (IHAA). (2001). A facilitators' guide to participatory workshops with NGOs/CBOs responding to HIV/AIDS. International HIV/AIDS Alliance press. IPSI Secretariat (2016) The International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI): Information Booklet and 2016 Annual Report. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability. Tokyo. Jewkes R., Murcott A., (1996). Meanings of community. Soc. Sci. Med. 43(4): 555-563. Kadoya, T., Washitani, I. (2011). The Satoyama Index: A biodiversity indicator for agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, ecosystems environment, 140(1-2), 20-26. Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Schulz, N. B., Erb, K. H., Darge, E., Gaube, V. (2003). Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria—Part I: driving forces of land-use change: 1950–1995. Land Use Policy, 20:1-20. Krueger, Richard A. (2003). 焦點團體訪談 (洪志成、廖梅花譯)。嘉義市：濤石。(原著出版於1988) Kyem, P. A. K. (2000). Embedding GIS applications into resource management and planning activities of local and indigenous communities: A desirable innovation or a destabilizing enterprise?. Journal of planning education and research, 20(2), 176-186. Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J. (Eds.). (2008). Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer Science Business Media. Lambin, E. F., Baulies X, Bockst ael N. (1999). Land use and land cover change. Implementation Strategy. IGBP report No. 48, IHDP report No. 10. Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual review of environment and resources, 28(1): 205-241. Laverty, S.M., (2003). Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3): 21-35. Lawas, P. Thaddeus Maria Stella, Tirol R. Cardenas, Virginia Jamias, Serlie. (2009). Communication Resource Mapping for Coastal Resources Management of Barangay Malabrigo, Lobo, Batangas, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 12. 38-56. Leemans, R., De Groot, R. S. (2003). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island press. Lewis, P. B. (1979). Axioms for reading the landscape: Some guides to the American scene. In Meinig, D.W. (ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 11–32. Liu, J., Deng, X. (2010). Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(14), 1354-1362. Loikkanen T, Simojoki T, Wallenius P. (1999). Participatory approach to natural resource management. A guide book. Finnish Forest and Park Service, Suomen Graafiset Pavelut Oy Ltd., Kuopio, Finland. Long, H., Tang, G., Li, X., Heilig, G. K. (2007). Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 83: 351-364. McNeill, J., Alves, D., Arizpe, L., Bykova, O., Galvin, K., Kelmelis, J., ... Riebsame, W. (1994). Toward a typology and regionalization of land-cover and land-use change: Report of working group B. Changes in land use and land cover: A global perspective, 4, 55-71. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Morgan, D. l. (1988). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Morimoto, J., Yoshida, H. (2005) Dynamic changes of native Rhododendron colonies in the urban fringe of Kyoto city in Japan: detecting the long-term dynamism for conservation of secondary nature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70: 195-204. O’Rourke, E. (2005). Socio-natural interaction and landscape dynamics in the Burren, Ireland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70: 69-83. Obermeyer, N. (1998). The evolution of public participation GIS, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25 (2): 65- 66. Ostrom, E. (2002). Common-pool resources and institutions: Toward a revised theory. Handbook of agricultural economics, 2: 1315-1339. Parcerisas, L.,Marull. J., Pino J., Tello, E., Coll, F., Basnou C. (2012). Land use changes, landscape ecology and their socioeconomic driving forces in the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme County, 1850–2005). Environmental Science Policy, 23: 120-132. Pocewicz, A., Nielsen‐Pincus, M., Brown, G., Schnitzer, R. (2012). An Evaluation of Internet Versus Paper‐based Methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS, 16(1), 39-53. Rall, E. Hansen, R. and Pauleit, S. (2019). The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 40: 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.016. Ramirez-Gomez, S. O. I., Brown, G., Verweij, P. A., Boot R. (2016). Participatory mapping to identify indigenous community use zones: Implications for conservation planning in southern Suriname. Journal for Nature Conservation, 29: 69-78. Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., ... Kasperson, R. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. Santos, G.S. Arantes Gomes, R. and dos Santos, E.A. (2018). PPGIS as an urban planning tool around airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 69: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.07.005. Sarjakoski, T. (1998). Networked GIS for Public Participation— Emphasis on Utilizing Image Data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(4): 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00031-3. Serraa, P., Ponsa, X., Saurı´, D. (2008). Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: A spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors. Applied Geography, 28: 189-209. Seto, K. C., and Kaufmann, R. K. (2003). Modeling the Drivers of Urban Land Use Change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating Remote Sensing with Socioeconomic Data. Land Economics, 79(1): 106-121. Sewell, W., Coppock, J. (1977). A perspective on public participation in planning. In W. Sewell J. Coppock (Eds.), Public participation in planning (pp. 1-14). London: John Wiley and Sons. Sieber, R. E. (2003). Public participation geographic information systems across borders, The Canadian Geographer, 43 (1): 50-61. Sieber, R. E. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework, Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 6(3): 1-18. Strickland-Munro, J., Kobryn, H., Brown, G. and Moore, S.A. (2016). Marine spatial planning for the future: Using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform the human dimension for large marine parks, Marine Policy, 73:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.011. Takeuchi, K. (2002). The nature of Satoyama landscape. In K. Takeuchi, R. D. Brown, I. Washitani, A. Tsunekawa, M. Yokohari (Eds.), Satoyama: The traditional rural landscape of Japan (pp. 9-39). Tokyo: Springer. Takeuchi, K. (2010). Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative. Ecological Research, 25: 891-897. Takeuchi, K., Ichikawa, K., and Elmqvist, T. (2016). Satoyama landscape as social–ecological system: historical changes and future perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 19: 30-39. Tsai, B. W., Lu, D. J., Chung, M. K., Lien, M. C. (2013). Evaluation of PPGIS empowerment—A case study of Meinong Yellow Butterfly Valley in Taiwan. Journal of environmental management, 116: 204-212. Tulloch, D. (2008). Public participation GIS (PPGIS). In K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science (pp. 352-355). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications UNU-IAS and IGES (eds.) (2016). Mainstreaming concepts and approaches of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes into policy and decision-making (Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol. 2), United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Tokyo. Verburg, P. H., Schot, P. P., Dijst, M. J., Veldkamp, A. (2004). Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 61: 309-324. Xie, Y., Mei, Y., Guangjin, T., Xuerong, X. (2005). Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: A case study of Wuxian City, China. Global Environmental Change, 15: 238-252. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8161 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著里山倡議在臺灣的蓬勃發展與實踐，里山地景變遷機制的了解也逐漸受到重視；然而過往聚焦於地景變遷機制的土地利用與地表覆蓋變遷 (Land-Use and Land-Cover Change , LUCC) 方法，應用在里山地景變遷的分析上，卻仍存在缺乏公眾參與、難以將土地利用變化與其驅動力連結、尺度差異等課題。為了回應這些研究課題，本研究嘗試應用公眾參與地理資訊系統 (Public Participation Geographic Information System, PPGIS)，提出一新的里山地景分析取徑：藉由在兩個案地點，分別操作大量應用地理資訊系統 (Geographic Information System, GIS) 的LUCC分析方法，及PPGIS兩種取徑，進行里山地景變遷的空間分析；並針對兩者在各個操作階段的程序、需求、與成果，兩相比較分析，探討應用PPGIS於里山地景研究的優點、挑戰、及潛力。 本研究所聚焦的PPGIS方法，採用質性研究法，於個案地點操作的同時也配合文獻回顧及焦點團體 (參與式工作坊)，統整記錄與分析整個過程與結果。在花蓮縣富里鄉吉哈拉艾部落和南投縣信義鄉望鄉部落兩個案中，PPGIS方法引進參與式研究的取徑，考量社會界線劃定研究範圍，以鑲嵌地景中的個別地景單元為主體，配合文獻回顧，透過PPGIS工作坊收集以地主與土地使用者為主的報導人意見，描繪與討論地景的變遷及其驅動力。 從吉哈拉艾和望鄉兩個案中顯示，應用PPGIS，能夠產製適用於里山地景變遷分析的圖資，提高空間資訊的準確度 (Accuracy)，建立地景變遷驅動力與個別地景單元間的連結，在過程中達到促進公眾參與的效果。應用於臺灣里山地景保育與地景分析，有其利便性。挑戰在於此方法成本較高，且需與地主及土地使用者等權益關係人緊密互動，且需留意空間資訊的精確度 (Precision)。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the promotion and vigorous development of the Satoyama Initiative in Taiwan in recent years, it has been attracted more and more attentions for understanding the Satoyama landscapes change mechanism. Since there were few analysis methods that can be used to analyze detailed land use and its driving forces to interpret landscape change in Satoyama landsape, which are special in scale and land use types, this paper tried to apply Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) as a Satoyama landscape change analysis approach, and took the Ciharaay cultural landscapes in Fengnan Village, Hualien County, and Kalibuan in Sinyi Township, Nantou County as two case studies, and applied both Geographic Information System (GIS) method which used to apply in LUCC researches and PPGIS method in Satoyama landscape analysis, then compared these two method. PPGIS was applied by qualitative methods such as literature review and participatory workshops. This method adopted mainly a participatory research approach, and put social boundary into consideration to demarcate the cultural landscapes as the scope of Satoyama. Then it introduced detailed information on land use of mosaics, accompany with mapping and literature review, to map and discuss landscape change and the driving forces behind. Then this paper took PPGIS method comparing with GIS method which used to apply in LUCC researches. The results of the two cases showed, with the ability to increase accuracy of special information, dealing with geospatial information, and promoting local participation and empowering local people, PPGIS could help mapping landscape change cross time and analyze delicately its land use and driving forces beyond by working with informants. This proved the feasibility to apply PPGIS in landscapes analysis and Satoyama conservation in Taiwan. This method was especially suitable to Satoyama landscapes of human scale and close interactions with human activities. Its weaknesses might include lower precision of special information, time and human resource consuming, and the necessity to interact closely with local stakeholders, particularly landowners and users. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:49:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1708202014515000.pdf: 7490286 bytes, checksum: 42c129a372d7631574e98d99264d9785 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 、緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景 1 第二節、 研究動機與目的 4 第三節、 研究提問 6 第二章 、文獻回顧 7 第一節、 里山地景 7 第二節、 地景變遷分析 12 第三節、 公眾參與地理資訊系統 20 第三章 、研究區域與方法 29 第一節、 研究區域 29 第二節、 研究方法 34 第四章 、應用GIS於里山地景變遷分析 36 第一節、 操作流程與方法 36 第二節、 個案研究 39 第五章、 應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析 47 第一節、 操作流程與方法 47 第二節、 個案研究 53 第六章、 應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析之比較 80 第一節、 應用GIS及PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析之比較 80 第二節、 應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析之優點與挑戰 84 第七章、 結論與建議 91 第一節、 結論 91 第二節、 研究限制與應注意事項 93 參考文獻 94 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 公眾參與地理資訊系統於里山地景變遷分析的應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Applying PPGIS in Satoyama Landscape Change Analysis | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡博文(Bor-Wen Tsai),李素馨(Su-hsin Lee),彭立沛(Li-Pei Peng),王忠融(Chung-Jung Wang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 土地利用與地表覆蓋變遷,參與式研究,公眾參與地理資訊系統,里山, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC),participatory research,Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS),Satoyama, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003757 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1708202014515000.pdf | 7.31 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。