請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8159
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭年真(Nien-Chen Kuo) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jen-Hsiang Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭仁翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:49:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-27 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:49:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alkhenizan, A., Shaw, C. (2011). Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 31(4), 407-416. doi:10.4103/0256-4947.83204 Austin, J. M., Jha, A. K., Romano, P. S., Singer, S. J., Vogus, T. J., Wachter, R. M., Pronovost, P. J. (2015). National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity. Health Aff (Millwood), 34(3), 423-430. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0201 Bilimoria, K. Y., Barnard, C. (2016). The New CMS Hospital Quality Star Ratings: The Stars Are Not Aligned. JAMA, 316(17), 1761-1762. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13679 Bogh, S. B., Falstie-Jensen, A. M., Bartels, P., Hollnagel, E., Johnsen, S. P. (2015). Accreditation and improvement in process quality of care: a nationwide study. Int J Qual Health Care, 27(5), 336-343. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv053 Brubakk, K., Vist, G. E., Bukholm, G., Barach, P., Tjomsland, O. (2015). A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. Bmc Health Services Research, 15. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0933-x Campbell, S. M., Braspenning, J., Hutchinson, A., Marshall, M. N. (2003). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ, 326(7393), 816-819. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816 Casalino, L. P. (1999). The Unintended Consequences of Measuring Quality on the Quality of Medical Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(15), 1147-1150. doi:10.1056/nejm199910073411511 Chen, J., Rathore, S. S., Radford, M. J., Krumholz, H. M. (2003). JCAHO Accreditation And Quality Of Care For Acute Myocardial Infarction. Health Affairs, 22(2), 243-254. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.243 Cua, S., Moffatt-Bruce, S., White, S. (2017). Reputation and the Best Hospital Rankings: What Does It Really Mean? Am J Med Qual, 32(6), 632-637. doi:10.1177/1062860617691843 Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 83(4), 691-729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x Donabedian, A. (1988). The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743-1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 Falstie-Jensen, A. M., Bogh, S. B., Hollnagel, E., Johnsen, S. P. (2017). Compliance with accreditation and recommended hospital care-a Danish nationwide population-based study. Int J Qual Health Care, 29(5), 625-633. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzx104 Feinstein, A. R. (2002). Is quality of care being mislabeled or mismeasured? The American Journal of Medicine, 112(6), 472-478. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01043-4 Gagel, B. J. (1995). Health Care Quality Improvement Program: A New Approach. Health Care Financ Rev, 16(4), 9. Greenfield, D., Braithwaite, J. (2008). Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(3), 172-183. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn005 Griffith, J. R., Knutzen, S. R., Alexander, J. A. (2002). Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals: a comparison of Joint Commission and Medicare outcomes scores in hospitals. Quality Management in Healthcare, 10(2), 29-38. Kerr, E. A., Smith, D. M., Hogan, M. M., Hofer, T. P., Krein, S. L., Bermann, M., Hayward, R. A. (2003). Building a better quality measure: are some patients with 'poor quality' actually getting good care? Med Care, 41(10), 1173-1182. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000088453.57269.29 Lam, M. B., Figueroa, J. F., Feyman, Y., Reimold, K. E., Orav, E. J., Jha, A. K. (2018). Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study. BMJ, 363, k4011. doi:10.1136/bmj.k4011 Lee, R. I., Jones, L. W. (1933). The Fundamentals of Good Medical Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Manian, F. A., Gillman, M., Spitznagel, E. L. (2012). A Comparison Between Rankings of Top Hospitals by the U.S. News World Report and the Consumer Reports Patient Ratings: Clarity or Confusion for the Empowered Consumer? Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 16(2), 162-169. doi:10.1080/15398285.2012.673462 Menachemi, N., Chukmaitov, A., Brown, L. S., Saunders, C., Brooks, R. G. (2008). Quality of care in accredited and nonaccredited ambulatory surgical centers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 34(9), 546-551. Miller, M. R., Pronovost, P., Donithan, M., Zeger, S., Zhan, C., Morlock, L., Meyer, G. S. (2005). Relationship between performance measurement and accreditation: implications for quality of care and patient safety. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20(5), 239-252. Moore, L., Lavoie, A., Bourgeois, G., Lapointe, J. (2015). Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality of care model: Validation in an integrated trauma system. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 78(6), 1168-1175. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000663 Rothberg, M. B., Morsi, E., Benjamin, E. M., Pekow, P. S., Lindenauer, P. K. (2008). Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting. Health Aff (Millwood), 27(6), 1680-1687. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680 Schmaltz, S. P., Williams, S. C., Chassin, M. R., Loeb, J. M., Wachter, R. M. (2011). Hospital Performance Trends on National Quality Measures and the Association With Joint Commission Accreditation. J Hosp Med, 6(8), 454-461. doi:10.1002/jhm.905 Shahian, D., Friedberg, M., Hutter, M., Pronovost, P. (2016). Rating the Raters: The Inconsistent Quality of Health Care Performance Measurement. Ann Surg, 264. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001631 Shahian, D. M., Normand, S. L., Friedberg, M. W., Hutter, M. M., Pronovost, P. J. (2016). Rating the Raters: The Inconsistent Quality of Health Care Performance Measurement. Ann Surg, 264(1), 36-38. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001631 Shaw, C. D. (2004). Toolkit for Accreditation Programs. Retrieved from Australia: Sinaiko, A. D., Eastman, D., Rosenthal, a. M. B. (2012). How Report Cards On Physicians, Physician Groups, And Hospitals Can Have Greater Impact On Consumer Choices. Health Affairs, 31(3), 602-611. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1197 Weled, B. J., Adzhigirey, L. A., Hodgman, T. M., Brilli, R. J., Spevetz, A., Kline, A. M., . . . Wheeler, D. S. (2015). Critical Care Delivery: The Importance of Process of Care and ICU Structure to Improved Outcomes: An Update From the American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force on Models of Critical Care. Crit Care Med, 43(7), 1520-1525. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000978 World Health Organization, W. (2000). The World Health Report 2000: health systems: improving performance. Retrieved from Geneva: 中央健保署. (2020). 急性心肌梗塞-指標項目說明. 全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開網. Retrieved from http://www.nhi.gov.tw/mqinfo/Content.aspx?List=3 Type=AMI#oTable114 王文芬, 吳世望, 錢才瑋. (2015). 不同層級醫院三高處方用藥重複率改善結果的比較. [Evaluation of Therapeutic Duplication of Medication in Patients with High Blood Pressure, High Blood Sugar, and High Blood Lipids between Local Hospitals, Regional Hospitals, and Medical Centers in Taiwan]. 醫務管理期刊, 16(4), 279-293. doi:10.6174/jhm2015.16(4).279 王俊文, 葉德豐, 曾坤儀. (2003). 台灣醫院評鑑趨勢之探討. [The Meta-Analysis for the Trend of Hospital Accreditation in Taiwan]. 中山醫學雜誌, 14(4), 513-522. doi:10.30096/csmj.200312.0004 石曜堂. (1978). 醫療品質評估. 醫院, 11(2), 4. 石曜堂. (2006). 從全面品質管理觀點談醫療品質的提昇與醫病關係的建構. 源遠季刊, 17, 3. 吳肖琪. (1999). 評估醫院醫療品質指標. 台北: 行政院研究發展考核委員會. 李玉華. (2002). 醫院評鑑對護理品質之影響. (碩士論文), 高雄醫學大學, 高雄. 李志宏, 施肇榮. (2012). 醫院評鑑與健保支付(上):醫院評鑑的發展與醫院分類. 臺灣醫界, 55(6), 6. 李怡真. (2008). 醫院權屬別及層級別與醫院照護品質產出相關性之研究─以院內死亡、14天及30天內再入院為例. (碩士論文), 臺北醫學大學, 臺北. 林雨亭. (2018). 醫療專業人員與一般民眾在就醫機構層級選擇上的差異 ─以七種手術處置為例. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2018年) 林淑綿. (2010). 台灣醫院評鑑制度運作之研究. (碩士), 國立臺北大學, 臺北. 秦燕. (2009). 醫務社會工作. 新北市: 巨流圖書公司 張云孆, 許怡欣, 薛亞聖. (2006). 新制醫院評鑑推行現況之探討-六位專業人士之深入訪談分析. 醫護科技期刊, 8(4), 11. 張育嘉, 黎伊帆, 汪芳國, 鄭守夏. (2006). 全民健保實施總額預算制度之初步影響評估:以牙醫與西醫基層為例. [The Impact of Global Budgeting of National Health Insurance: A Preliminary Study on Dental and Primary Care Facilities]. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 25(2), 152-162. doi:10.6288/tjph2006-25-02-08 張耀懋, 白佳原. (2016). 民眾對健保醫療品質資訊公開內容觀感之評估. [Public assessment toward the disclosure of medical quality information]. 醫院雙月刊, 49(5), 10-21. 陳玉寧. (1996). 醫院評鑑對醫療品質之影響. 高雄醫學大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (1996年) 陳政志. (2016). 醫院評鑑對醫院產生預期與非預期效果之初探. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2016年) 陳淑如, 盧美秀, 陳靜敏, 沈宗奇. (2003). 醫院評鑑制度的探討. 台灣醫界, 46(11), 3. 傅立葉. (2007). 全民健保醫療品質資訊公開之社會效益評估. Retrieved from 傅蘭英. (2014). 醫院建立內控機制之探討. [A Study on the Establishment of Internal Control Mechanism in Hospitals]. 醫院雙月刊, 47(3), 61-71. 黃偉益. (2014). 子宮切除術與發生尿失禁相關因素之探討. (博士), 國立陽明大學, 台北. 黃莉蓉. (2011). 2007-2010年新制醫院評鑑結果初探. 醫療品質雜誌, 5(2). 黃聖堯. (2001). 醫院評鑑制度對外科系醫療品質之影響. 高雄醫學大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2001年) 楊漢湶, 王美芳. (1992). 我國醫院評鑑工作之回顧與展望. 醫院, 25(1), 25. 廖慧娟. (2007). 我國醫院評鑑之起源. 醫療品質雜誌, 1(3), 4. 劉彩卿, 吳佩璟. (2001). 全民健保下病患在各醫療層級間的就醫選擇-台北市小兒科病患為例. [The Choice of Medical Institutions under NHI-An Example of Pediatric Patients in Taipei]. 醫務管理期刊, 2(2), 87-108. doi:10.6174/jhm2001.2(2).87 衛生福利部. (2019). 醫院評鑑及教學醫院評鑑作業程序. 臺北市: 作者. 鍾國彪, 游宗憲. (2009). 醫療品質指標發展的挑戰與展望:我們還能做什麼?. [Challenges and Perspectives of Development in Quality of Care Indicators: What Else Can We Do?]. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 28(5), 345-360. doi:10.6288/tjph2009-28-05-01 韓揆. (1994). 醫療品質管理及門診服務品質定性指標. [A Review on Health Care Quality Management and a Proposal upon Indicators for Evaluating Hospital OPD Services]. 中華公共衛生雜誌, 13(1), 35-53. doi:10.6288/cjph1994-13-01-05 簡國鉉. (2002). 醫院評鑑制度對內科系醫療品質之影響. (碩士), 高雄醫學大學, 高雄. 醫策會. (2017年). 2017年醫策會簡介 [Press release] 魏玉容, 鍾國彪, 鄭守夏. (2005). 醫療品質評估的發展-從專業評鑑到報告卡系統. [The Evolution of Healthcare Quality Assessment: From Accreditation to Report Card System]. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 24(4), 275-283. doi:10.6288/tjph2005-24-04-01 蘇永裕. (2001). 醫院長期經營效率評估. (碩士), 高雄醫學大學, 高雄. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8159 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景: 為確保醫療院所之健康照護品質、促進醫療資源的有效利用,衛生福利部與醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會共同辦理了醫院評鑑及教學醫院評鑑,並依此評定各醫療院所之醫院評鑑層級。衛生福利部也於2008年陸續於醫療品質資訊公開網,公開各層級醫院之品質指標,以期使民眾有更公開透明的醫療院所品質資訊可以參考,進而增進民眾在選擇醫療院所時的選擇能力。過去文獻指出評鑑結果與未必能反映出較好的照護品質,以及品質公開系統之間的不一致會造成民眾就醫選擇的障礙。然而過去國內則較少有研究探討醫院評鑑與醫療品質資訊公開指標的關聯性。 研究目的: 探討醫院評鑑所反映的醫院層級,是否與醫療院所在醫療品質資訊公開指標上具有顯著的相關性。以及醫院層級的差異與醫院層級的變動是否也反映了各層級醫療院所在醫療品質上的差異與變動。 研究方法: 本研究採橫斷式研究法,以2008年到2018年間,醫療品質資訊公開網中所公布的三類疾病別與處置別:急性心肌梗塞、糖尿病、透析治療,以及醫院整體性指標共16項品質指標進行分析。資料分析分為兩個階段,第一階段透過多變項分析,在控制權屬別、分區別、年度別、教學等級等醫院特質後,探討醫院層級別在三類疾病別與處置別的品質指標中,是否有顯著差異。第二階段則是針對2008年到2018年間醫院層級有發生變動的醫院,並以13項指標,比較其與變動前後的醫院同儕間品質的差異,檢視其評鑑等級的變動是否也反映在其醫療品質的表現。 研究結果: 第一階段的研究結果顯示,在本研究挑選的16項疾病別品質指標中,共有10項指標於醫院層級別呈現顯著差異。其中共有7項急性心肌梗塞的指標在平均數的比較上,皆是醫學中心優於區域醫院,區域醫院又優於地區醫院,但在糖尿病與透析治療的相關指標中,則無顯著差異。第二階段的研究結果顯示,在醫院層級升格的11間醫院中,僅有3間醫院的品質表現是明顯優於原層級醫院群體,且與新層級醫院群體之品質表現相當。 結論與建議: 本研究結果顯示,醫院評鑑之結果,未必能反映不同層級醫院在部分常見疾病別與處置別照護品質之品質表現。針對醫院評鑑結果與醫療品質資訊公開指標的不一致性,建議未來應進一步探討品質資訊公開與醫院評鑑標準中對醫療品質的測量,是否能全面性反應個別醫院醫療品質之良窳。使得民眾在參考醫院評鑑結果或品質公開資訊進行就醫選擇時,能夠更清楚醫院的高照護品質,進而做出更合適的就醫選擇。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: In order to ensure the quality of healthcare in hospitals and facilitate the effective utilization of hospital resources, the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and the Joint Commission of Taiwan (JCT) conduct accreditations of hospitals and teaching hospitals. Based on the results of these evaluations, hospitals are then divided into different levels. The MOHW also developed the Public Reporting of Hospital Quality website in 2008, with the aim of providing more complete and transparent quality information to help members of the public choose a hospital appropriate for their needs. However, previous research has indicated that accreditations may not be consistent nor reflect better quality of care. Furthermore, few studies have assessed the association between the levels of hospitals and indicators of public reporting of quality. Objective: To investigate the association between hospital levels and indicators of hospital quality public reporting and to analyze whether performance changed in hospitals whose level changed. Methods: Sixteen quality indicators were derived from three types of diseases and treatments. Data for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), dialysis treatment and hospital outcome indicators from 2008 to 2018 were obtained from the Hospital Public Quality Reporting website. In phase 1, we used multi-variable analysis and controlled for ownership, areas, years, teaching hospital, and wards to examine differences in these 16 indicators among different levels of hospitals. In phase 2, we selected hospitals whose level had changed between 2008 to 2018 and compared their quality with hospitals in their original as well as new level. Results: The results of phase 1 demonstrated that 10 of the 16 indicators were significantly different among different hospital levels, and 7 out of these 10 were related to AMI. In these 7 indicators, the performance of medical centers was better than regional hospitals and district hospitals. We also found no differences in the other 6 indicators for DM and dialysis treatment. The results of phase 2 revealed that the quality performance of only 3 out of the 11 hospitals whose level of accreditation was raised was better than hospitals in their original level and was also similar with hospitals in their new level. Conclusions: This study showed that the results of hospital accreditation cannot completely reflect quality of care among different levels of hospitals. In order to rectify the inconsistency between hospital accreditation and the public reporting of quality, we suggest investigating if public reporting of quality as well as quality measurements in accreditation can accurately reflect the healthcare quality of hospitals. This would ensure that the public can make informed decisions in their choices for health services when referring to the results of hospital accreditation and the public reporting of quality in order to identify a “high quality hospital”. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:49:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1708202015230800.pdf: 1884326 bytes, checksum: c747d0cece9e0001734a9c8c69a441cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 I ABSTRACT III 目 錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第貳章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 醫院評鑑與醫院層級 5 第二節 全民健保醫療品質資訊公開網 10 第三節 醫療品質的定義與評估 12 第四節 醫院評鑑與醫院層級對醫療品質之影響 20 第參章 研究設計與方法 24 第一節 研究設計與架構 24 第二節 研究假說 26 第三節 研究對象 27 第四節 資料來源與處理流程 28 第五節 研究變項與操作型定義 30 第六節 統計分析方法 36 第肆章 研究結果 38 第一節 研究樣本描述性統計 38 第二節 醫院層級別與疾病別品質指標分析 42 第三節 多變項分析 47 第四節 層級變動醫院與醫院群體之品質比較 66 第伍章 討論 79 第一節 研究結果討論 79 第二節 研究方法討論 87 第三節 假說驗證 91 第四節 研究限制 93 第陸章 結論與建議 95 第一節 結論 95 第二節 建議 97 第柒章 參考文獻 99 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 醫院評鑑層級與醫療品質相關性之探討-以醫療品質資訊公開指標為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Association between Hospital’s Level of Accreditation and Healthcare Quality- Taking Public Reporting as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李偉強(Wui-Chiang Lee),游宗憲(Tsung-Hsien Yu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 醫院評鑑,醫院層級,醫療品質,醫療品質資訊公開,過程面指標,結果面指標, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Hospital accreditation,Hospital level,Healthcare Quality,Public reporting of quality,Process indicators,Outcome indicators, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003767 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1708202015230800.pdf | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。