請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8119
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周素卿(Sue-Ching Jou) | |
dc.contributor.author | ZIHLING HUANG | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃紫翎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:49:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:49:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adell, G. (1999). Literature review: theories and models of the peri-urban interface: a changing conceptual landscape. Retrieved from Allen, P., Sachs, C. (1993). Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability, 139-167. Barlett, P. F., Conger, K. J. (2004). Three visions of masculine success on American farms. Men and Masculinities, 7(2), 205-227. Bock, B. (2017). 2 Gender and Mobility. Gender and Rural Globalization: International Perspectives on Gender and Rural Development, 8. Bruce, A. B., Castellano, R. L. S. (2016). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1-14. Bruce, A. B., Castellano, R. L. S. (2017). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 32(5), 403-416. Carney, J. A. (1992). Peasant women and economic transformation in the Gambia. Development and Change, 23(2), 67-90. Corbett, M. (2007). All kinds of potential: Women and out-migration in an Atlantic Canadian coastal community. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 430-442. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage. Dempsey, K. (1992). A man's town: inequality between women and men in rural Australia: Oxford University Press. Deutsch, T. (2011). Memories of Mothers in the Kitchen Local Foods, History, and Women's Work. Radical History Review, 2011(110), 167-177. Elmhirst, R. (2015). Feminist political ecology. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 82-90): Routledge. Halfacree, K. (1997). Contrasting roles for the post-productivist countryside. In: Cloke, P. and Little, J (eds.) Contested Countryside Culture.: London: Routledge. Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309-336. Halfacree, K. (2007a). Back-To-The-Land In The Twenty-First Century - Making Connections With Rurality. . Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, No. 1,, 3-8. Halfacree, K. (2007b). Back‐to‐the‐land in the twenty‐first century–making connections with rurality. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 3-8. Halfacree, K. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter‐urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, space and place, 18(2), 209-224. Halfacree, K. J. P., space, place. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter‐urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. 18(2), 209-224. Hambleton, R. (2008). Annie's project: An educator's thoughts. Small farm digest. Haraway, D. (1991). Animal sociology and a natural economy of the body politic: A political physiology of dominance. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge. Harcourt, W. (2017). Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(4), 1007-1019. Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism: Cornell University Press. Harris, L. (2015). Hegemonic waters and rethinking natures otherwise. Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the green economy, ed. W. Harcourt, and IL Nelson, 157-181. Hassanein, N. (1999). Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement (Vol. 12): U of Nebraska Press. Hayes-Conroy, J., Hayes-Conroy, A. (2013). Veggies and visceralities: A political ecology of food and feeling. Emotion, Space and Society, 6, 81-90. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage. Jansen, K. (2000). Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe. Biological agriculture horticulture, 17(3), 247-278. Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231-244. Jarosz, L. (2011). Nourishing women: toward a feminist political ecology of community supported agriculture in the United States. Gender, Place Culture, 18(3), 307-326. Jochimsen, M., Knobloch, U. (1997). Making the hidden visible: the importance of caring activities and their principles for any economy. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 107-112. Johnston, J., Baker, L. (2005). Eating outside the box: FoodShare’s good food box and the challenge of scale. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 313-325. Liepins, R. (1998). “Women of Broad Vision”: Nature and Gender in the Environmental Activism of Australia's ‘Women in Agriculture’Movement. Environment and Planning A, 30(7), 1179-1196. Little, J. (2013). Pampering, well-being and women's bodies in the therapeutic spaces of the spa. Social Cultural Geography, 14(1), 41-58. Little, J. (2015). Nature, wellbeing and the transformational self. The geographical journal, 181(2), 121-128. Little, J., Panelli, R. (2003). Gender research in rural geography. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10(3), 281-289. Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism (Vol. 632): Indiana University Press. Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks- a New Paradigm of Rural Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 407-419. Pedersen, K. B., Kjærgård, B. (2004). Do we have room for shining eyes and cows as comrades? Gender perspectives on organic farming in Denmark. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(4), 373-394. Pilgeram, R., Amos, B. (2015). Beyond “Inherit It or Marry It”: Exploring How Women Engaged in Sustainable Agriculture Access Farmland. Rural Sociology, 80(1), 16-38. Sheller, M., Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10-25. Shisler, R. C., Sbicca, J. (2019). Agriculture as carework: The contradictions of performing femininity in a male-dominated occupation. Society Natural resources, 32(8), 875-892. Som Castellano, R. L. (2016). Alternative Food Networks and the Labor of Food Provisioning: A Third Shift? Rural Sociology, 81(3), 445-469. Sundberg, J. (2017). Feminist political ecology. The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Trauger, A. (2004). ‘Because they can do the work’: Women farmers in sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Gender, Place Culture, 11(2), 289-307. Watts, D. C., Ilbery, B., Maye, D. (2005). Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 22-40. WHATMORE, S. (1991). Farming Women: gender work and family labour. In: Baskingstoke, Macmillan. Wilbur, A. (2014). Back-to-the-house? Gender, domesticity and (dis) empowerment among back-to-the-land migrants in Northern Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 1-10. Wilbur, A. M. (2012). Seeding Alternatives: Back-to-the-land Migration and Alternative Agro-food Networks in Northern Italy: University of Glasgow. Wylie, J. (2005). A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 30(2), 234-247. 方怡茹. (2009). 我國農民對農地功能與價值認知研究-鄉村類型化差異比較. 臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系學位論文(2009 年), 1-117. 金惠雯. (2018). 另類農業體系與團結經濟: 以 [部落 e 購] 為例. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 85-105. 孫治本. (2004). 個人化與生活風格社群: 唐山. 梁炳琨. (2008). 農業食物在地化:台東縣池上鄉米食產業的探討. 地理學報, 53, 85-117. 廖哲強,蕭崑杉. (2010). 西方另類食物網絡文獻回顧及其地方意涵. 臺灣鄉村研究, 127-150. 劉克智, 董安琪. (2003). 台灣都市發展的演進―歷史的回顧與展望. 鄭鈺琳. (2007). 種出綠色生活圈:志願務農者的生活方式選擇與農耕生活風格社群之形成. 蕭崑杉. (2007). 聯合報漂鳥文化之旅座談會[線上資料〕. 謝琇玲, 侯韋光, 吳靜萍, 施廣南. (2018). 知遇之恩, 湧泉相報? 社會支持的效應分析-中介式調節模式探討. 商管科技季刊, 19(2), 223-255. 鍾怡婷. (2018). 永續轉型觀點下的食農教育: 以二個學童種稻體驗活動為例. 台灣鄉村研究(13), 35-55. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8119 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在台灣當代的新農返土浪潮中,可以發現為數不少的農業移居社群,憑藉著 在鄉村農業生活中感悟的生活,重新轉譯與反轉農業在鄉村作為糧食生產的價值, 不僅在環境教育、環境倫理與永續生活上開發與賦予新的意涵,更讓人重新學習 人與自然合作共處的可能。 除了農業的價值被創新開發,更有為數不少的都會女性,不同於以往的離農 女性,反其道而行移居鄉村。但是在鄉村傳統異性戀結構與在地社群的階層化下, 女性不僅在空間分工上受到傳統的規範,公共參與尚有少有決策影響力。而當代 多數鄉村的主流意見,仍以經濟開發、工業化生產的角度來治理鄉村,未充分考 慮到受高等教育的世代,已傾向後工業社會的生活方式和價值觀,移居女性來此 如何安居就成為了從私領域到公領域的大哉問。 當女性移居者,透過移居鄉村生活,習得與自然共處並透過自耕自食滋養自 我、甚至在鄉村與自然中自得其樂,結社共享、自處或養育下一代。「返土歸農」 在以血緣為基礎的非都會生活中,更顯得社會變遷的特殊性。本研究在返土運動 的政治經濟脈絡下,關注與「返土歸農」女性互動的鄉村社會,以及城鄉關係的 轉變。研究以「女性主義政治生態學」作為研究途徑,透過深度訪談與參與觀察 理解此返土實踐的動力。研究中發現,「返土歸農」女性與自然、返土社群的共 處合作,在另類農食網絡的脈絡下透過積極參與環境、食安相關的社會倡議、農 食教育,甚至是體制外的實驗教育,找回原先在都市生活中失去的健康福祉,並 在公共領域上增加其影響力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research examines the motivations of the women of “back-to-the-land” migrants and sustainable smallholder farmers self-identified as “friendly farming” how they actively involved in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan. Contemporary back-to-the-land women migrants in Yilan embody a wide spectrum of personal and professional backgrounds, complicating attempts to generalize their tendency for adopting farming and their later experiences in rural areas. Certain commonalit ies endure, notwithstanding, including a discomfort with city life and the hope of health, well-being and greater freedom in the countryside. Drawing from interviews with “back-to-the-land” women migrants situated between a metropolitan and rural area of Taiwan, it argues that they learn to live with nature and nourish themselves by starting up their business with alternative agri-food networks. 'Back-to-the-land' lifestyle in the rural based on blood relation, are more particular than urban life in Taiwan. In this context, this study focuses on the rural society interacting with 'back-tothe- land' women migrants and the transformation of urban-rural relations. The study uses 'feminist political ecology' as a research approach, and understands the motivation of “back-to-the-land” movement through in-depth interviews and participation observation. Drawing from Foucault’s ethics of self-care, these motivations express a liberatory transformation of self that is also radically responsible to others and expressive of a post-capitalist politics. Feminist care ethics contributes to feminist political ecology by focusing upon the social relations of caring practice, and also revealing how self-care is ethically embodied and politically transformative in the case of 'back-to-the-land' women migrants active in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:49:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試論文審定書............................................................................................................. i 謝辭................................................................................................................................ ii 中文摘要........................................................................................................................iii Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iv 圖目次………………………………………………………………………………vii 表目次...........................................................................................................................vii 第一章 緒論..................................................................................................................1 第一節研究背景 .................................................................................................... 1 第二節研究意識 ...................................................................................................... 3 第二章文獻回顧............................................................................................................6 第一節城鄉中的性別與移動/居............................................................................. 6 第二節另類農食網絡與全球化 ............................................................................ 12 第三節另類農食網絡中的照護與性別分工 ........................................................ 15 第三章研究問題與研究方法....................................................................................21 第一節研究發問 .................................................................................................... 21 第二節研究取徑:女性主義政治生態學 ............................................................ 23 第三節研究方法 .................................................................................................... 31 第四章宜蘭地區的永續農業的社群與脈絡............................................................39 第一節自然與人文條件 .......................................................................................... 39 第二節另類農食網絡在台灣的發展脈絡 ............................................................ 41 第三節另類農食網絡社群組織在宜蘭 ................................................................ 45 第四節女性移居者在宜蘭歸土移民的類型............................................................ 49 第五章移動/居與性別:多層次的分析..................................................................52 第一節移居推/拉力的類型................................................................................... 52 第二節體現與感知: 透過食物與鄉村療癒疾病、育兒所需 .......................... 55 第六章另類農食網絡中的性別與永續生計............................................................70 第一節出走都市,照護自我的生計發展 ............................................................ 70 第二節移居中的社群參與合作 ............................................................................ 78 第三節另類農食網絡的永續生計創建 ................................................................ 81 第七章結論:城鄉之間移動空間的串聯與分隔....................................................86 第一節疏離化的都市、親密性的鄉村:另類農食網絡中自我關懷的重新連 結………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..86 第二節鄉村異性戀父權秩序鬆動的契機?移動空間帶來的性別角力與挑戰 91 第三節返土歸農中的女性政治生態學 ................................................................ 92 參考文獻......................................................................................................................95 附錄一:田野筆記之一..............................................................................................99 附錄二:紮跟理論分析的理論編碼取樣................................................................103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 移居女農的情感與身體體現: 宜蘭另類農食網絡下的返土歸農 | zh_TW |
dc.title | I-turn Female Farmers: Emotion, Embodiment, and Alternative Agri-food Network in Ilan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張聖琳(Shenglin Chang),王驥懋(Chimao Wang),宋郁玲(Yuling Song),洪伯邑(Poyi Hong) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 返土歸農,另類農食網絡,女性主義政治生態學,關懷倫理,女性移居者, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | back-to-the-land,alternative agri-food networks,feminist political ecology,self-care,back-to-the-land women, | en |
dc.relation.page | 107 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004132 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。