請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8100
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yong-Qing Zhuang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 莊詠晴 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:48:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2026-02-19 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:48:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-03-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王逸群等人(民 100)。「參訪世界文化遺產天龍寺、金閣寺、清水寺、東大寺及大阪歷史博物館」考察計畫出國報告書。台北政府文化局,未出版。 王新衡、楊佩諭、西村幸夫(民 101)。日本川崎產業博物館之建構兼論臺灣民眾參與式糖業鐵道遺產保存。博物館學季刊, 26(4),頁 115-144。 何東波(民 91)。台灣地區需要整套的都市再生政策。國家政策論壇, 5,頁 159-160。 周佳樺(民 103)。「生態博物館」概念於法國源起之探源。博物館學季刊, 28(1),頁 31-49。 周慧瑜(民 107)。都市再生之推動:公私部門夥伴關係。土木水利雙月刊, 35(3),頁 119-125。 林文一(民 104)。文化創意導向都市再生、「新」都市治理的實踐及缺憾:以迪化街區為例。都市與計劃, 42(4),頁 423-454。 doi: 10.6128/cp.42.4.423 林政逸、辛晚教(民 98)。文化導向都市再生之策略模式:臺北市保安宮文化慶典與空間計畫的個案研究。都市與計劃, 36(3),頁 231-254。 doi: 10.6128/cp.36.3.231 范師齊、紀駿傑(民 104)。21 世紀生態博物館與參觀者的互動關係研究-以玻里尼西亞文化中心(Pcc)為例。科技博物, 19(3),頁 157-177。 柯文哲(民 107 年 10 月 11 日)。打開城市空間,翻轉社區想像-柯文哲的城市空間政策。民 109 年 10 月 2 日,取自 https://medium.com/%E6%88%91%E5%80%91%E7%9A%84%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E8%97%8D%E5%9C%96-our- blueprint/%E6%89%93%E9%96%8B%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E7%A9%BA%E9%96%93-%E7%BF%BB%E8%BD%89%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E6%83%B3%E5%83%8F-39c0ac226f14 張譽騰(民 85)。生態博物館的規劃理念與個案分析。博物館學季刊,10(1),頁 7-18。 張譽騰(民 93)。生態博物館 : 一個文化運動的興起 (首版))。台北市:五觀藝術管理公司。 曾小英(民 85)。英國的生態博物館舉隅-鐵橋谷博物館。博物館學季刊,10(1),頁 33-40。 黃衍明(民 101)。詔安客的自我描繪與建構──詔安客家文化生態博物館的萌生與實踐。博物館學季刊, 26(4),頁 167-181。 黃琬琇(民 103)。從公私協力夥伴關係探討臺中市中區發展。中興大學國家政策與公共事務研究所,台中市。 廖浚羽(民 104)。生態博物館建構歷程研究─以八煙聚落為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系,臺北市。 周志豪(民 101 年 4 月 19 日)。城市博物館擱置 議員:羞辱議會,聯合報。取自 http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=12 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MjAwMjAxMDErpOm0wTw9MjAxNDEyMzErs%2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2Fh8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2012-04-19 news_id=6305603 周志豪(民 103 年 7 月 24 日)。城市博物館 電台、流行館不納入,聯合報。取自 http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=4 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MjAxNDAxMDErpOm0wTw9MjAxOTA3MjArs%2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2Fh8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2016-10-16306 news_id=7603433 showUserSearch= firstFatherCateID= 許光廷、堀込憲二(民 100)。臺灣原住民聚落生態博物館規劃之研究:以魯凱族下三社為例。設計學研究, 14(S),頁 133-152。 doi:10.30105/jds.201106.0009 曾憲嫻、呂偉婷、倪佩君(民 96)。舊市中心再生計畫之研究 以台南市為例。環境與藝術研究季刊, 5,頁 41-54。 黃裕元(民 95 年 3 月 14 日)。城市博物館址,看中台鐵地,聯合報。 取自 http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=20 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MjAwMjAxMDErpOm0wTw9MjAxNDEyMzErs%2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2 Fh8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2012-04-19 news_id=3327211 showUserSearch= firstFatherCateID= 黃麗玲(民 101)。從公共化到產權化:都更城市淪亡記。文化研究(15),頁 206-219。 黃蘭燕(民 105)。一個文化治理的角度-大溪木藝生態博物館的籌備與誕生。博物館學季刊, 30(3),頁 81-97+99。 黃瑞茂等人(民 95)。台北城市博物館主題內容展示研究。台北市政府文獻委員會委託研究,未出版。 楊金嚴、陳志豪(民 91 年 11 月 6 日)。北市公辦政見會, 唱獨腳戲,聯合報。取自 http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=6 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MTk5ODAxMDErpOm0wTw9MjAwNjEyMzErs%2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2F h8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2002-11-26 news_id=1732089 臺北市政府 (民 107)。「中正萬華復興計畫」實施計畫。臺北市政府,https://uro.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=F17B2BE82E59F2D4 s=A92827A0B0381F66 錢震宇(民 95 年 11 月 28 日)。城市博物館 落腳地終搞定,聯合報。取自http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=19 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MjAwMjAxMDErpOm0wTw9MjAxNDEyMzErs%2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2Fh8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2006-11-28 news_id=3651143 魏莨伊(民 105 年 10 月 6 日)。城博解約恐賠近億,文化局:交仲裁,聯合報。取自http://udndata.com/ndapp/Story?no=1 page=1 udndbid=udndata SearchString=pXilX6uwpauz1aqrwF0rpOm0wT49MjAxNDAxMD ErpOm0wTw9MjAxOTA3MjArs2FinTz3BcKZYs%2Fh8uGfA2aTps%2Fh8wXCmWLHfs%2Fh8VXBhcGVy sharepage=20 select=1 kind=2 article_date=2016-10-06 news_id=8526310 賴炳樹(民 98)。都市再生、都市更新與舊城改造之比較分析。土地問題研究季刊, 8(3),頁 131-142。 doi: 10.29604/bgyy.200909.0011 Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032 Bianchini, F. (1993). Remaking European cities: the role of cultural policies. In F. Bianchini M. Parkinson (Eds.), Cultural policy and urban regeneration : the West European experience. Manchester ;: Manchester University Press. Booyens, I. (2012). Creative Industries, Inequality and Social Development: Developments, Impacts and Challenges in Cape Town. Urban Forum, 23(1), 43-60. doi: 10.1007/s12132-012-9140-6 Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x Coaffee, J., Healey, P. (2003). 'My Voice: My Place': Tracking Transformations in Urban Governance. Urban Studies, 40(10), 1979-1999. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000116077 Crosby, B. C., Bryson, J. M. (2005a). A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public Management Review, 7(2), 177-201. Crosby, B. C., Bryson, J. M. (2005b). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world (Vol. 264): John Wiley Sons. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework For Collaborative Governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011 Fernie, K., McCarthy, J. (2001). Partnership and Community Involvement: Institutional Morphing in Dundee. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 16(4), 299-311. doi: 10.1080/02690940110079877 Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. Ucla Law Review, 45(1), 1-98. García, B. (2004). Cultural Policy And Urban Regeneration In Western European Cities: Lessons From Experience, Prospects For The Future. Local Economy, 19(4), 312-326. doi: 10.1080/0269094042000286828 Gratton, C., Shibli, S., Coleman, R. (2005). Sport And Economic Regeneration In Cities. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 985-999. Gunay, Z., Dokmeci, V. (2012). Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley Project. Cities, 29(4), 213-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.010 Hall, T. (2006). Urban policy and regeneration Urban Geography (3 ed., pp. 57-76). London: Routledge. Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism To Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation In Urban Governance In Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3-17. doi: 10.2307/490503 Healey, P. (1998). Building Institutional Capacity Through Collaborative Approaches To Urban Planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531-1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531 Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C., Madanipour, A. Pendlebury, J. . (2003). Place, Identity and local politics: Analysing initiatives in deliberative governance. In M. Hajer, M. A. Hajer, H. Wagenaar, R. E. Goodin, B. Barry (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 60-87). New York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Huxham, C., Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: the theory and practise of collaborative advantage: Routledge. Innes, J. B., D. (2003). Collaborative policy making: Governance through dialogue. In M. Hajer, M. A. Hajer, H. Wagenaar, R. E. Goodin, B. Barry (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance In The Network Society. New York: Cambridge University Press. Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics. Planning Theory, 3(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1177/1473095204042315 Jones, P. S. (2003). Urban Regeneration's Poisoned Chalice: Is There An Impasse In (Community) Participation-Based Policy? Urban Studies, 40(3), 581-601. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000053932 Kanai, M., Ortega-Alcazar, I. (2009). The Prospects For Progressive Culture-Led Urban Regeneration In Latin America: Cases From Mexico City And Buenos Aires. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 483-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00865.x Law, C. M. (1992). Urban Tourism And Its Contribution To Economic Regeneration. Urban Studies, 29(3-4), 599-618. Madanipour, A. (2015). Unrevealing the Characteristics of Mandated Collaboration. In J. C. Morris K. Miller-Stevens (Eds.), Advancing Collaboration Theory: Models, Typologies, and Evidence(pp. 65-86): Routledge. Martin , M., Robert , K. (2015). The Previaling Elements of Public-Sector Collaboration In J. C. Morris K. Miller-Stevens (Eds.), Advancing collaboration theory: Models, typologies, and evidence (pp. 43-64): Routledge. Mcgregor, A., Mcconnachie, M. (1995). Social Exclusion, Urban Regeneration And Economic Reintegration. Urban Studies, 32(10), 1587-1600. doi: 10.1080/00420989550012249 McNamara, M. W. (2015). Collaborative Management and Leadership. In J. C. Morris K. Miller-Stevens (Eds.), Advancing collaboration theory: Models, typologies, and evidence (pp. 116-132): Routledge. Miles, S., Paddison, R. (2005). Introduction: The Rise And Rise Of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 833-839. doi: 10.1080/00420980500107508 Paddison, R. (1993). City Marketing, Image-Reconstruction And Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 30(2), 339-350. doi: 10.1080/00420989320080331 Pratt, A. C. (2009). Urban Regeneration: From The Arts 'Feel Good' Factor To The Cultural Economy: A Case Study Of Hoxton, London. Urban Studies, 46(5-6), 1041-1061. doi: 10.1177/0042098009103854 Raco, M. (2003). Remaking Place And Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration And The Strategies, Tactics And Practices Of Policing In The Uk. Urban Studies, 40(9), 1869-1887. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000106645 Ring, P. S., Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90. doi: 10.2307/258836 Roberts, P. (2000). The Evolution, Definition And Purpose Of Urban Regeneration In P. W. Roberts H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration : a handbook (pp. 9-34). London SAGE. Selin, S., Chevez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 19(2), 189-195. doi: 10.1007/bf02471990 Sullivan, H., Skelcher, C. (2003). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration In Public Services. Health Social Care in the Community, 11(2), 185-185. Tallon, A. (2010). Urban Regeneration In The Uk / Andrew Tallon. London ;: Routledge. Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside The Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x Van Meerkerk, I., Boonstra, B., Edelenbos, J. (2013). Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research. European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1630-1652. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722963 Ward, S. V. (1998). Selling Places: The Marketing And Promotion Of Towns And Cities, 1850-2000. London: E FN Spon. Wrigley, N., Guy, C., Lowe, M. (2002). Urban Regeneration, Social Inclusion And Large Store Development: The Seacroft Development In Context. Urban Studies, 39(11), 2101-2114. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000011380 Young, C., Lever, J. (1997). Place Promotion, Economic Location And The Consumption Of City Image. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 88(4), 332-341. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.1997.tb01628.x Degen, M., Garcia, M. (2012). The Transformation Of The 'Barcelona Model': An Analysis Of Culture, Urban Regeneration And Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(5), 1022-1038. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01152.x Gomez, M. V. (1998). Reflective Images: The Case Of Urban Regeneration In Glasgow And Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(1), 106-+. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00126 Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus Building And Complex Adaptive Systems - A Framework For Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412-423. doi: 10.1080/01944369908976071 Meegan, R., Mitchell, A. (2001). 'It's Not Community Round Here, It's Neighbourhood': Neighbourhood Change And Cohesion In Urban Regeneration Policies. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2167-2194. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087117 Sasaki, M. (2010). Urban Regeneration Through Cultural Creativity And Social Inclusion: Rethinking Creative City Theory Through A Japanese Case Study. Cities, 27, S3-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.002 Ball, M., Maginn, P. J. (2005). Urban Change And Conflict: Evaluating The Role Of Partnerships In Urban Regeneration In The Uk. Housing Studies, 20(1), 9-28. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000308705 Davies, J. S. (2002). The Governance Of Urban Regeneration: A Critique Of The 'Governing Without Government' Thesis. Public Administration, 80(2), 301-322. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00305 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8100 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去西方國家城市在二次世界大戰後快速發展,然而自1960年代開始,面臨全球化的壓力,工作機會開始快速外移到第三世界國家,都市開始產生公共建設老舊、失業率上升等問題,政府從一開始採用著重硬體更新的都市更新(Urban Renewal)手段試圖解決都市問題,然而,自1990年代開始,逐漸被強調長期性、策略性多元手段的都市再生(Urban Regeneration)所取代。雖台灣都市並無如西方都市遭遇快速衰敗的問題,然自1990年代開始亦面臨產業外移、工作機會流失等問題,而台北市是一個發展已久的都市,各區存在發展不均的問題,其中發展較早的西區面臨發展停滯,台北市政府採取一系列政策,如2015年的西區門戶計畫、2017年中正萬華復興計畫等,期望解決區域發展停滯的問題。在上述背景之下推出台北城市博物館政策,其選定五個台北市發展已久區域,期望以城市博物館作為平台投入市政計畫,達到區域再生的目標。 本研究選取艋舺城市博物館作為研究對象,以協力治理的觀點去分析跨部門利害關係人之互動對都市再生的影響。經研究發現,首先,對萬華的利害關係人而言,對地方的認同感成為其參與並持續的決定性因素,期望藉由參與此政策實踐發展萬華之願景。其次,既存網絡關係在協力中扮演重要角色,利害關係人若存在網絡關係之連結,將易於培養信任關係,有助於協力之進行。第三點發現領導扮演關鍵角色,領導者不僅扮演培養利害關係人信任、引進資源的角色,且政治領導者更運用權威促使政府部門的利害關係人參與協力,並建立政府跨局處溝通會議。第四點則發現目前政策缺乏促使利害關係人有效參與之制度,不僅利害關係人之範圍難以擴大,非政府部門的利害關係人亦無法參與在問題形成的過程。第五點則發現艋舺城博缺乏上位戰略目標,目前政策內容幾乎皆是局處既有計畫,並無創新之計畫,筆者認為須藉由不同部門之利害關係人持續溝通以釐清萬華再生之具體內容,方可使政策永續發展。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Cities of Western Countries have developed rapidly after World War II, but since the 1960s their growth has been stifled by various problems such as the challenges of globalization, infrastructure decay, rise of unemployment rate, and so on. Governments have since adopted strategies which focusing on renewing old infrastructures of cities trying to tackle those problems in their cities. However, those attempts were met with limited success, and as such, government attempted a modified strategy, known as urban regeneration since the 1990s. Urban regeneration emphasized in taking long-term, strategic perspective to solve fundamental urban issues. Taiwanese cities were largely exempt from similar issues until the 1990s, where they started to face issues such as industries shifting and lose of job opportunities. Taipei, the highly developed capital of Taiwan is facing additional concerns such as uneven development. To bring Taipei out of its stagnant development, the Taipei city government embarked upon projects such as the Western Gate Plan in 2015 and the Zhongzheng Wan Hua Renaissance Plan in 2017 to boost development in the West part of the city, the development of which has become increasingly stagnant. In addition to the two redevelopment projects, Taipei city government selected five developed districts as the location to implement Taipei City Museum policy, which included various projects to aiming at urban regeneration. This study focuses on one of the projects contained within Taipei City Museum plans: Monga City Museum in Wanhua, which locate in the West part of Taipei. This study aims to analyze various interactions between cross-sector stakeholders and understanding the impact of such interactions on successful urban regeneration. This study presents five research findings: Firstly, the sense of identity is a decisive factor that is constantly being felt in the collaborative process among participants of the project. Secondly, existing network played a crucial role during the collaborative governance process, it is easier to foster trust if there are existing networks between stakeholders and will positively impact the quality of collaborative governance. Thirdly, the quality of leadership plays an important role throughout the collaborative governance process; successful leaders are expected foster trust between stakeholders, acquire resources, and induce cooperation and participation from government officials from various departments. Fourthly, Monga City Museum currently was unable to establish an effective system to incentivize stakeholders to participate. In other words, the scope of stakeholders cannot expand, and non-government stakeholders cannot truly participate in the process of problem formulation. Finally, there are no coherent strategic objectives in Monga City Museum policy. The contents are rehashed from existing projects and did not provide substantial innovation. Based on these findings, the study argues that for the regeneration projects in Wanhua district to be successful, the stakeholders must communicate effectively and continuously with one-another to concretize plans for Wanhua’s regeneration, to achieve sustained policy goals. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:48:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1702202117360300.pdf: 5282401 bytes, checksum: 587870cf696f85a2bd9f6962ff357a82 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 …… ⅰ 謝辭 …… ⅱ 中文摘要 …… ⅲ 英文摘要 …… ⅳ 圖目次 …… ⅶ 第一章緒論 …… 1 第一節 研究背景 …… 1 第二節 研究動機 …… 3 第三節 研究目的與問題 …… 6 第四節 研究設計與方法 …… 7 第二章文獻回顧 …… 15 第一節 都市再生的意涵 …… 15 第二節 協力治理相關文獻 …… 30 第三節 城市博物館的發想起點 …… 33 第四節 小結 …… 36 第三節 台北城市博物館與艋舺城市博物館之背景脈絡及進程 …… 38 第一節 台北城市博物館之背景脈絡及進程 …… 38 第二節 艋舺城市博物館之背景脈絡及進程 …… 49 第三節 小結 …… 58 第四章 艋舺城市博物館之協力治理分析 …… 61 第一節 初始條件:從既存網絡關係開展的協力 …… 62 第二節 協力過程:共同願景塑造過程 …… 84 第三節 協力結果:新協力的開展可能 …… 118 第四節 小結 …… 122 第五章 結論 …… 125 第一節 研究發現 …… 125 第二節 協力治理理論之再檢視 …… 127 第三節 研究限制 …… 129 參考文獻 …… 130 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台北市艋舺城市博物館政策變遷之研究:協力治理的觀點 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Study on the Policy Change of Monga City Museum in Taipei City: A Collaborative Governance Perspective | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃瑞茂(Rui-Mo Huang),林文一(Wen-Yi Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 都市治理,協力治理,都市再生,社區,台北市, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | city governance,collaborative governance,urban regeneration,community,Taipei city, | en |
dc.relation.page | 136 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100724 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-02-19 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1702202117360300.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2026-02-19 | 5.16 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。