請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80977完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Qian Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王倩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:24:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:24:31Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 余英時（1984）：《從價值體系看中國文化的現代意義》。台北：時報出版公司。 李美枝（1993）：〈從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限〉。《本土心理學研究》，1，267-300。doi:10.6254/1993.1.267 姜定宇, 張菀真. (2010)：〈華人差序式領導與部屬效能〉。《本土心理學研究》, 33, 109-177. 姜定宇, 鄭伯壎. (2014)：〈華人差序式領導的本質與影響歷程〉。《本土心理學研究》, 42 , 285-357. 徐瑋伶, 鄭伯壎, 黃敏萍. (2002)：〈華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為〉。《本土心理學研究》, 18, 51-94. 黄光国. (1985)：〈人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲〉。見李亦園、楊國樞、文崇一（主編）：《現代化與中國化論集》。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 童志锋（2006）：〈信任的差序格局: 對鄉村社會人際信任的一種解釋——基於特殊主義與普遍主義信任的實證分析〉。《甘肅理論學刊》, 3, 59-63. 費孝通（1948）：《鄉土中國與鄉土重建》。上海：觀察社。 黃光國（2005）：《儒家關係主義：文化反思與典範重建》。 台北：國立臺灣大學出版中心。 楊中芳（1999）：〈人際關係與人際情感的構念化〉。《本土心理學研究》，12，105-179。 楊國樞（1971）：〈中國國民性與現代生活的適應〉。見葉英堃、曾炆煜（主編）：（1993）：《現代生活與心理衛生》。台北：水牛出版社。 楊國樞（1992）：〈中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點〉。見楊國樞、余安邦（主 編）：（1993）：《中國人的心理與行為—理念及方法篇（一九九二）》，頁 87-142。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳、姜定宇、鄭弘岳（2009）：〈領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行爲：權力距離之調節效果〉。《中華心理學刊》，51(1)，121-138 doi:10.6129/CJP.2009.5101.07 鄭伯壎（1995）：〈差序格局與華人組織行為〉。《本土心理學研究》，3，142-219。 鄭伯壎、王安智、黃敏萍（2009）：〈康莊大道與羊腸小道之間的抉擇: 提升華人管理研究的「局外人」 觀點〉。Management and Organization Review, 5(1), 85-99. 鄭伯壎、黃敏萍（2019）：〈實地研究中的案例研究〉。見陳曉萍、鄭伯壎、沈偉、黃敏萍（編）：《組織與管理研究的實證方法》，頁238-279。台北：華泰文化事業公司。 Adler, P. Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40. Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203-230. Amason, A. C., Shrader, R. C., Tompson, G. H. (2006). Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 125-148. Bird, B. J. (1989). Entrepreneur behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The market of symbolic goods. Poetics, 14(1-2), 13-44. Burt, R. Reagans, R. (1997). Homophily, legitimacy and competition. Unpublished working paper, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business. Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417-431. Carland, J., Hoy, F., Boulton, W., Jo Ann C. Carland. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review,9(2), 354-359. doi:10.2307/258448 Chen, C., Chen, X., Huang, S. (2013). Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1), 167-207. doi:10.1111/more.12010 Chen, R., Gong, J. (2018). Can self selection create high-performing teams?. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 148, 20-33. Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 727-746. Clarysse, B., Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55-79. Cohen, S. L. (2013). How to accelerate learning: Entrepreneurial ventures participating in accelerator programs (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Cooney, T. M. (2005). What is an entrepreneurial team. International Small Business Journal, 23, 226-235. Cooper, A.C. and Bruno, A.V. (1977), Success among high-technology firms. Business Horizons, 20(2), p. 16 Davidsson, P., Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 301-331. D'hont, L., Doern, R., García, J. B. D. (2016). The role of friendship in the formation and development of entrepreneurial teams and ventures. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(2), 528-561. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-02-2015-0027 Diakanastasi, E., Karagiannaki, A., Pramatari, K. (2018). Entrepreneurial team dynamics and new venture creation process: an exploratory study within a start-up incubator. Sage Open, 8(2), doi:10.1177/2158244018781446 Discua Cruz, A., Howorth, C., Hamilton, E. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 17-46. Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture: An introduction to theory, research, and practice. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32. Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization science, 9(4), 471-488. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503. Forbes, D. P., Borchert, P. S., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Sapienza, H. J. 2006. Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 1042–2587. Francis, D. H., Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 5-26. Gummesson, E. (1991). Qualitative methods in management research. London: Sage Guo, C., Miller, J. K. (2010). Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6(2), 267-291. Harper, D. A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 613–626. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045. Hu , H. C .（胡先縉）（1949）. Emotions , real and assumed , in Chinese society . Institute for Intercultural Studies , Columbia University , New York , NO. RCC-CH-PR4. Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309-341. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. Joshi, A., Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627. Jung, H., Vissa, B., Pich, M. (2017). How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions?. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 264-294. Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7-17. Karau, S. J., Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... Peterson, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. Close relationships, 20, 67. Knight, A. P., Greer, L. L., De Jong, B. (2020). Start-up teams: A multidimensional conceptualization, integrative review of past research, and future research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 231-266. Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Clarysse, B. (2011). The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science–based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 777-803. Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. London: Pearson Publisher. Lazar, M., Miron-Spektor, E., Agarwal, R., Erez, M., Goldfarb, B., Chen, G. (2020). Entrepreneurial team formation. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 29-59. Lazar, M., Miron-Spektor, E., Chen, G., Goldfarb, B., Erez, M., Agarwal, R. (2021). Forming entrepreneurial teams: Mixing business and friendship to create transactive memory systems for enhanced success. Academy of Management Journal, In-Press. doi:10.5465/amj.2020.0393 Lei Xu, Juan Ling Haemin Dennis Park (2021): Founding team homogeneity and network positioning: The moderating role of environmental and organizational factors. Journal of Small Business Management, doi:10.1080/00472778.2020.1867731 Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452. Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45. Moore, G., Davis, K. (2004). Learning the Silicon Valley Way. In T. Bresnahan A. Gambardella (Eds.), Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond (pp. 7-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511802911.004 Mosey, S., Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology–based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909-935. Olson, P. D. (1987). Entrepreneurship and management. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(3), 7. Peterson, R. (1988). Understanding and encouraging entrepreneurship internationally. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(2), 1. Pettigrew, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field research on change. Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes of organizational change, 1, 91. Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., Argote, L. (2016). Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance. Organization Science, 27(5), 1108-1124. Reich, R. B. (1987). Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero. Harvard Business Review, 65, 77-78. Ren, Y., Argote, L. 2011. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 189–229. Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 195-222. Rusbult, C. E., Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 351-375. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Sculley, J. and Byrne, J. A. (1988) Odyssey: Pepsi To Apple. London: Fontana Shah, S. K., Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R. (2019). Jewels in the crown: Exploring the motivations and team building processes of employee entrepreneurs. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1417-1452. Shane, S., Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170. Tsui, A. S. (2007). Taking stock and looking ahead: MOR and Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 3(3),327-334. Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24, 56-79. Visintin, F., Pittino, D. (2014). Founding team composition and early performance of university: Based spin-off companies. Technovation, 34(1), 31-43. Vohora, A., Wright, M., Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175. Wasserman, N. (2012). The founder's dilemmas: Anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Weber, R. A., Camerer, C. F. (2003). Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Science, 49(4), 400-415. West, P. G. (2007). Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 77-102. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00164.x Williams, K. Y., O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Zou, H., Chen, X., Ghauri, P. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of new venture growth strategy: An empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 393-421. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80977 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去文獻指出雙策略之於創業團隊的重要性，即在尋找團隊成員過程中，同時運用人際吸引策略與資源尋求策略以確保創業團隊的早期成功。然而這些觀點多以西方創業團隊做為探討對象，尚缺乏華人創業團隊的驗證。特別是，當雙策略中的人際吸引策略被運用到華人創業團隊時，是否因其具備更加豐富的內涵，進而對創業團隊績效產生出不同的影響。為了補足上述缺口，本研究在過去文獻的基礎上，將人際吸引策略中所運用的關係更加細膩地區分為既定關係與真正關係，並分別探討這兩種關係對於創業團隊績效的影響效果及作用機制。本研究採用質性研究的配對案例研究法，選取中國大陸的兩個創業團隊做為樣本，對於創業團隊的形成、動力與成敗進行了深入的理解與研究。結果顯示：既定關係是一種人際互動的規則，團隊成員會因既定關係建立出角色義務，並為了符合角色義務形塑出以個人利益為導向的認知，展現出相應的行為，削弱了成員在專業知識、能力與經驗等資源上具備的價值，對團隊的互動氛圍與創業結果產生不利影響；反之，真正關係則可以幫助團隊成員建立起以團隊利益為目標的想法與態度，進而在創業過程中充分展現出解決問題的意願與能力，發揮成員間專業知識、技能及經驗之綜效，最終幫助團隊取得成功。本研究揭示出雙策略對於華人創業團隊可能存在的潛在影響，為日後的團隊形成策略研究提出了新的發現。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:24:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0609202111030300.pdf: 3041228 bytes, checksum: 6d19ad7028e1eb1547a9ca3d59f49640 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 團隊形成策略 7 第二節 華人關係 16 第三節 華人關係與雙策略的關聯 18 第四節 小結 20 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究取向 21 第二節 案例選擇 22 第三節 資料蒐集與程序 23 第四節 資料分析 25 第四章 T 團隊研究結果 27 第一節 背景資料 27 第二節 創業團隊的起源 30 第三節 創業團隊的形成與動力 32 第四節 創業團隊的結果與成敗 41 第五章 Y 團隊研究結果 47 第一節 背景資料 47 第二節 創業團隊的起源 50 第三節 創業團隊的形成與動力 52 第四節 創業團隊的結果與成敗 64 第六章 討論與建議 75 第一節 雙創業團隊的發展與比較 75 第二節 理論對話與貢獻 87 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 90 參考文獻 91 附錄一 訪談大綱 99 附錄二 T 團隊內容分析 101 附錄三 Y 團隊內容分析 133 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 創業團隊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 華人關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 團隊形成策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | dual strategy | en |
| dc.subject | guanxi | en |
| dc.subject | team formation strategy | en |
| dc.subject | entrepreneurial team | en |
| dc.title | 「親緣」與「業緣」之間：創業團隊形成、動力與成敗 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "Between Ching-Yuan and Ye-Yuan: Entrepreneurial Team Formation, Dynamics and Performance" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃敏萍(Hsin-Tsai Liu),林姿葶(Chih-Yang Tseng),簡忠仁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 華人關係,雙策略,創業團隊,團隊形成策略, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | guanxi,dual strategy,entrepreneurial team,team formation strategy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 171 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103003 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0609202111030300.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。