請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80654完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉素玲(Su-Ling Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Chun Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡佳君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:11:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:11:54Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Awadh, F. H., Phenix, T., Antzaka, A., Lallier, M., Carreiras, M., Valdois, S. (2016). Cross-language modulation of visual attention span: An Arabic-French-Spanish comparison in skilled adult readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00307 Boduroglu, A., Shah, P., Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108331005 Boroditsky, L. (2001, Aug). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 Bouma, H. (1970, 1970/04/01). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226(5241), 177-178. https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0 Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., Nisbett, R. E. (2005, Aug 30). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12629-12633. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506162102 Cramer, E. S., Dusko, M. J., Rensink, R. A. (2016, Aug). Group-level differences in visual search asymmetry. Attention, Perception, Psychophysics, 78(6), 1585-1602. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1137-0 Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. W. (1989, Jul). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433-458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433 Gupta, S.K., Zhang, M., Wu, C., Wolfe, J., Kreiman, G. (2021). Visual search asymmetry: Deep nets and humans share similar inherent biases. ArXiv, abs/2106.02953 Inhoff, A. W., Liu, W. (1998, Feb). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20 Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., Larsen, J. T. (2003, May). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02432 Lai, V. T., Rodriguez, G. G., Narasimhan, B. (2013). Thinking-for-speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728913000151 Levi, D. M. (2008, Feb). Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48(5), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009 Levi, D. M., Hariharan, S., Klein, S. A. (2002). Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision, 2(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.2.3 Liu, T., Chuk, T. Y., Yeh, S. L., Hsiao, J. H. (2016, Nov). Transfer of perceptual expertise: The case of simplified and traditional Chinese character recognition. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 1941-1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12307 Macrae, C. N., Lewis, H. L. (2002, Mar). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13(2), 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00436 Malania, M., Herzog, M. H., Westheimer, G. (2007, Jan 29). Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 1 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.1 Masuda, T., Nisbett, R. E. (2001, Nov). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922-934. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.922 McConkie, G. W., Rayner, K. (1975, 1975/11/01). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception Psychophysics, 17(6), 578-586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203972 McKone, E., Aimola Davies, A., Fernando, D., Aalders, R., Leung, H., Wickramariyaratne, T., Platow, M. J. (2010, Jul 21). Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Research, 50(16), 1540-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.010 Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., Masuda, T. (2006, Feb). Culture and the physical environment. Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17(2), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x Moraglia, G. (1989). Visual search: Spatial frequency and orientation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(2), 675-689. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.69.2.675 Navon, D. (1977, 1977/07/01/). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353-383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 Nisbett, R. E., Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934527100 Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 12-12. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.12.12 Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 20-20. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.20 Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A. (1980, 1980/11/01). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception Psychophysics, 27(6), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198682 Rhode, A. K., Voyer, B. G., Gleibs, I. H. (2016, 2016-October-17). Does language matter? Exploring Chinese–Korean differences in holistic perception [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1508). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01508 Rosenholtz, R., Huang, J., Raj, A., Balas, B. J., Ilie, L. (2012). A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. Journal of Vision, 12(4), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.4.14 Stuart, G. W., Bossomaier, T. R., Johnson, S. (1993). Preattentive processing of object size: Implications for theories of size perception. Perception, 22(10), 1175-1193. https://doi.org/10.1068/p221175 Treisman, A., Gormican, S. (1988, Jan). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 15-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.15 Treisman, A., Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(3), 285-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.285 Treisman, A. M., Gelade, G. (1980, 1980/01/01/). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 Ueda, Y., Chen, L., Kopecky, J., Cramer, E. S., Rensink, R. A., Meyer, D. E., Kitayama, S., Saiki, J. (2018, Jan). Cultural differences in visual search for geometric figures. Cognitive Science, 42(1), 286-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12490 Wang, H., He, X., Legge, G. E. (2014, Jul 3). Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.6 Whitney, D., Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005 Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701644104 Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S. (2004, Jun). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411 Wolfs, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Bilsky, A. B. (1994, 1994/09/01). Parallel processing of park-whole information in visual search tasks. Perception Psychophysics, 55(5), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205311 Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038097 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80654 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | "視覺搜尋的不對稱性是指當一對刺激在視覺搜索作業中交替扮演目標物和干擾物時，搜尋效率產生變化之現象。先前採用西方受試者的研究發現，若目標物相較於干擾物具有較多或較明顯的特徵，則在干擾物之間搜尋目標物時，反應時間較快，且反應時間-刺激數量之函數圖形較為平緩；若目標物與干擾物之刺激角色互換，則搜尋會呈現較慢的反應時間及較陡的反應時間-刺激數量的函數圖形。上述現象可以用特徵整合理論 (Treisman Gelade, 1980) 來解釋。然而，視覺搜尋不對稱性可能受到各種因素的影響，例如目標物與干擾物間的可分辨性以及文化相關因素。本研究檢驗了臺灣受試者在執行長度視覺搜尋作業中是否存在視覺搜尋不對稱性，結果發現沒有視覺搜尋的不對稱性（實驗一）。爾後檢驗了影響視覺搜尋效率的可能因素，包含目標物及干擾物間的可分辨性（實驗二）、語言使用（實驗三）、以及認知風格（即整體式或解析式處理，實驗四）。結果發現，在本研究的大多數實驗中，皆沒有觀察到如西方受試者所具有之長線優勢的視覺搜尋不對稱性，此結果顯示沒有視覺搜尋不對稱性是臺灣受試者的穩定現象。更甚者，在促發整體式處理風格時，發現了短線優勢的視覺搜尋不對稱性（實驗4a）。本研究之結果無法用特徵整合理論解釋。視野周邊處理及長期文化經驗是導致缺乏視覺搜尋不對稱性甚至導致反向結果的原因。" | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:11:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2010202114484500.pdf: 2673872 bytes, checksum: 8c3f328f16be1948925bcddc2b3cc5f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1.Introduction …......………………………………………………………….... 1 2.Experiment 1 ……….…………………………………………………....... 8 2.1 Method .……………………...…………………………………...... 8 2.2 Results ...............……………………..……………………....…....... 10 2.3 Discussion ….....……………………………...………………….... 13 3.Experiment 2 ……….……………………………………………………... 14 3.1 Method .……………………...…………………………………….. 14 3.2 Results ...............……………………..…………………………….. 14 3.3 Discussion ….....……………………………...…………………….. 24 4.Experiment 3 ……….……………………………………………………... 26 4.1 Method .……………………...…………………………………….. 26 4.2 Results ...............……………………..…………………………….. 30 4.3 Discussion …....……………………………...…………………….. 37 5.Experiment 4 ……….……………………………………………………... 38 5.1 Method .……………………...…………………………………….. 38 5.2 Results ...............……………………..…………………………….. 41 5.3 Discussion …....……………………………...…………………….. 49 6.General discussion …………...……………………………...………….. 51 7.References ……………………………………………………………... 58 Appendix …………………………………………………………………..... 65 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 周邊視野 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 視覺搜尋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 特徵整合理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文化經驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 視覺搜尋不對稱性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | search asymmetry | en |
| dc.subject | Feature Integration Theory | en |
| dc.subject | cultural experience | en |
| dc.subject | visual search | en |
| dc.subject | peripheral vision | en |
| dc.title | 線段長短的視覺搜尋對稱性：以臺灣受試者為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Absence of Search Asymmetry in Line Length: The Case of Taiwanese | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李金鈴(Hsin-Tsai Liu),李怡青(Chih-Yang Tseng),上田祥行 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 視覺搜尋,視覺搜尋不對稱性,特徵整合理論,文化經驗,周邊視野, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | visual search,search asymmetry,Feature Integration Theory,cultural experience,peripheral vision, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 92 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103926 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2010202114484500.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。