請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80561完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗(Yu-Tzung Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Andreas Loew | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 獅安德 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:09:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:09:24Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-02-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abbey, Enoch J., et al. 2020. “The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.” PloS one 15(10): e0239398. Bermeo, Nancy and Larry Bartels. 2014. Mass politics in tough times: opinions, votes and protest in the Great Recession. Oxford University Press. Billah, Arif, Mamun Miah, and Nuruzzaman Khan. 2020. “Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence.” PloS one 15(11): e0242128. Brooks, Eleanor, Anniek de Ruijter, and Scott L. Greer. 2021. “The European Union Confronts COVID-19: Another European Rescue of the Nation State?” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 235-248. Coppedge, Michael. 1999. “Thickening thin concepts and theories: combining large N and small in comparative politics.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 465-476. Czypionka Thomas and Mariam Reiss. 2021. In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 295-319. Dahl, Robert Alan. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Dubin, Kenneth A. 2021. “Spain’s Response to COVID-19.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 339-360. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Ferguson, Neil, et al. 2020. “Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand.” https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/77482 . Gould, Andrew C., and Peter J. Baker. 2002. “Democracy and taxation.” Annual Review of Political Science 5(1): 87-110. Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative responses to international economic crises. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Greer, Scott L., et al. 2020. “The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.” Global public health 15(9): 1413-1416. Greer, Scott L., et al. 2021. Coronavirus Politics: The Comparative Politics and Policy of COVID-19. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Haider, Najmul, et al. 2020. “The Global Health Security index and Joint External Evaluation score for health preparedness are not correlated with countries' COVID-19 detection response time and mortality outcome.” Epidemiology Infection 148. Hale, Thomas, et al. 2021. “A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).” Nature Human Behaviour 5(4): 529-538. Harris, Joseph. 2021. “Confronting Legacies and Charting a New Course? The Politics of Coronavirus Response in South Africa.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 580-599. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3207/3207-h/3207-h.htm . Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Jarman, Holly. 2021. “State Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Governance, Surveillance, Coercion, and Social Policy.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 51-66. Jefferies, Sarah, et al. 2020. “COVID-19 in New Zealand and the impact of the national response: a descriptive epidemiological study.” The Lancet Public Health 5(11): e612-e623. Kavanagh, Matthew M., Renu Singh, and Mara Pillinger. 2021. “Playing Politics: The World Health Organization’s Response to COVID-19.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 34-50. Keynes, John Maynard. A tract on monetary reform. London, Macmillan, 1923. King, Elizabeth J., Victoria I. Dudina. 2021. “.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 436-458. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2003. “Accounting for post-communist regime diversity: What Counts as a Good Cause?” In Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule, eds. Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Stephen E. Hanson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49-88. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kung, Stacey, et al. 2021. “Underestimation of COVID-19 mortality during the pandemic.” ERJ open research 7(1). Kvalsvig, Amanda, and Michael G. Baker. 2021. “How Aotearoa New Zealand rapidly revised its Covid-19 response strategy: lessons for the next pandemic plan.” Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 51(sup1): S143-S166. Lecours, André, et al. 2021. “Explaining Intergovernmental Conflict in the COVID-19 Crisis: The United States, Canada, and Australia.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51(4): 513-536. Liu, Xiaoyue, et al. 2021. “The role of seasonality in the spread of COVID-19 pandemic.” Environmental research 195: 110874. Mahoney, James. 2010. “After KKV: The new methodology of qualitative research.” World Politics 62(1): 120-147. Mueller, John. 1990. “The obsolescence of major war.” Bulletin of Peace Proposals 21(3): 321-328. Nagata, Takashi, et al. 2021. “Fighting COVID-19 in Japan: A Success Story?” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 146-162. Neuhauser, Hannelore, et al. 2021. “Germany's low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence confirms effective containment in 2020: Results of the nationwide RKI-SOEP study.” medRxiv. Ng, Ta-Chou, et al. 2021. “Comparison of estimated effectiveness of case-based and population-based interventions on COVID-19 containment in Taiwan.” JAMA internal medicine 181(7):913-921. Oneal, John R. and Bruce Russett. 1999. “The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992.” World politics 52(1): 1-37. Ornston, Darius. 2021. “Denmark’s Response to COVID-19: A Participatory Approach to Policy Innovation.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 249-263. Özçürümez Saime. 2021. “COVID-19 in Turkey: Public Health Centralism.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 393-412. Park, June. 2021. “Institutions Matter in Fighting COVID-19: Public Health, Social Policies, and the Control Tower in South Korea.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 105-126. Peralta-Santos André, Luis Saboga-Nunes, and Pedro C. Magalhães. 2021. “A Tale of Two Pandemics in Three Countries: Portugal, Spain, and Italy.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 361-378. Pierre, Jon. 2020. “Nudges against pandemics: Sweden’s COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective.” Policy and Society 39(3): 478-493. Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The new politics of the welfare state.” World politics 48(2): 143-179. Raj, Minakshi. 2021. “India’s Response to COVID-19.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 178-195. Rajan, Selina, Jonathan D. Cylus, and Martin Mckee. 2020. “What do countries need to do to implement effective ‘find, test, trace, isolate and support’systems?.” Journal of the Royal Society of medicine 113(7): 245-250. Rajatanavin, Nattadhanai, et al. 2021. “Responding to the COVID-19 second wave in Thailand by diversifying and adapting lessons from the first wave.” BMJ Global Health 6(7): e006178 Rozenblum, Sarah D. 2021. “France’s Multidimensional COVID-19 Response: Ad Hoc Committees and Sidelining of Public Health Agencies.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 264-279. Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept misformation in comparative politics.” American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033-1053. Schnabel, Johanna, and Yvonne Hegele. 2021. “Explaining intergovernmental coordination during the COVID-19 pandemic: Responses in Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51(4): 537-569. Sebhatu, Abiel, et al. 2020. “Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(35): 21201-21208. Shih, Victor. 2021. “China’s Leninist Response to COVID-19: From Information Repression to Total Mobilization.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 215-234. Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2008. “The mechanisms of policy diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840-857. Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, eds. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-43. Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling down: The subnational comparative method.” Studies in comparative international development 36(1): 93-110. Summers, Jennifer, et al. 2020. “Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.” The Lancet Regional Health-Western Pacific 4: 100044. Tilly, Charles. 1985. “War making and state making as organized crime.” In Bringing the State Back In, eds. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169-191. Vampa, Davide. 2021. “COVID-19 and Territorial Policy Dynamics in Western Europe: Comparing France, Spain, Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51(4): 601-626. Weiss, Linda. 2005. “The state-augmenting effects of globalisation.” New Political Economy 10(3): 345-353. Williams, Gemma A., Selina Rajan, and Jonathan D. Cylus. 2021. “COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: How Austerity and a Loss of State Capacity Undermined the Crisis Response.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 215-234. Willoughby, Emma. 2021. “Unified, Preventive, Low-cost Government Response to COVID-19 in Viet Nam.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 127-145. Worsnop, Catherine Z. 2017. “Domestic politics and the WHO’s International Health Regulations: explaining the use of trade and travel barriers during disease outbreaks.” The Review of International Organizations 12(3): 365-395. Yamanis, Thespina, Ruth Carlitz, and Henry A. Mollel. 2021. “Adapting COVID-19 Containment in Africa: Lessons from Tanzania.” In Coronavirus Politics, eds. Scott L. Greer. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 560-579. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80561 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文分析國家在新冠肺炎危機下的高級政策戰略。分析框架分別三種類的大規模防疫戰略，放手政策，遏制政策與清零政策。國家的策略選擇的自由被兩個方面限制，即國家的廣義國家能力與邊境管理能力。以此兩個因素為出發點，便可以建立一個根據所謂選擇集為單位的２ｘ２類型，而按照這類型進行比較分析。 接下來，本文主張重建選擇者在關鍵時刻面對的情況爲了瞭解決策結果。此重建包括事情發生的時間點，順序與背景。在兩個個案研究裏的重建依賴選擇者在公共平臺的發表。表示疫情的嚴重度與人民的行爲反應的時間序列數據進一步補充重建。 個案研究包括紐西蘭與澳洲。兩個案子一開始都選擇清零政策，但是他們的不同政府制度還是關鍵的干預變量。紐西蘭是單一政府，政策戰略一律也是被中央政府決定，而澳洲才是聯邦政府，關鍵的抉擇者倒是州政府。接下來，Ｄｅｌｔａ變異株的出現與快速增加的疫苗率改變情況，使得兩個國家放棄清零政策，但是政府制度的因素仍然發揮效果，仍然導致不同的出口路綫。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:09:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1002202206573700.pdf: 2317156 bytes, checksum: 803e1b06a1b6941962cd2749f731ea48 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "謝辭 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review 10 2.1 Explaining COVID-19 Public Policy Responses 10 2.1.1 Coronavirus Politics’s Analytical Framework 11 2.1.2 Coronavirus Politics’s Hypotheses 14 2.2 Research Methodology 20 Chapter 3: Concepts Arguments 24 3.1 Classifying Countries’ Macro-Policy Responses 26 3.1.1 hands-off 28 3.1.2 containment 32 3.1.3 zero-COVID 35 3.2 Macro-Policy Response as Choice 38 3.3 State Border Control Capacity as Structural Determinants of the MPR Choice Set 42 3.3.1 Territory in Time 43 3.3.2 Bringing Territory Back In 46 3.3.3 2×2 Typology 48 3.3.4 Effects of Exogenous Shocks 57 3.4 Beyond Structure: Actors, Timing, and Context 60 3.4.1 Actors 60 3.4.2 Timing 68 3.4.3 Context 77 Chapter 4: Research Design 83 4.1 Case Studies and Comparisons 83 4.2 Data Sources 84 Chapter 5: Case Studies 86 5.1 New Zealand 86 5.1.1 Entry to zero-COVID 86 5.1.2 Staying on zero-COVID 94 5.1.3 The Delta Outbreak and Exit from zero-COVID 98 5.1.4 Discussion 101 5.2 Australia 108 5.2.1 Establishment of the Sub-National zero-COVID paradigm 111 5.2.2 The Canadian Twin 115 5.2.3 Discussion 116 Chapter 6: Conclusion 119 Bibliography 122" | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 聯邦制度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 比較政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新冠肺炎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 清零政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 澳洲 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 紐西蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | New Zealand | en |
| dc.subject | Federalism | en |
| dc.subject | Zero-COVID | en |
| dc.subject | Policy Making Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Australia | en |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.title | 新冠肺炎與民主國家清零的防疫政策：紐西蘭與澳洲的分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "The Zero-COVID Approach under Democracy: Analysis of New Zealand, Australia" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 童涵浦(Hsu-Chun Yen),張文揚(Shi-Chung Chang),(Hsueh-I Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 比較政治,決策分析,新冠肺炎,清零政策,澳洲,紐西蘭,聯邦制度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Policy Making Analysis,COVID-19,Australia,New Zealand,Zero-COVID,Federalism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 129 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200505 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-02-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1002202206573700.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。