請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80442完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huan-Yu Shiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許桓瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:06:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-11-22 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:06:46Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-02-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-01-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | ADB Asia Water Development Outlook 2013 (2013) ADB, Manila, Philippines. ADB Asia Water Development Outlook 2016 (2016) ADB, Manila, Philippines. Aldaco, R., Butnar, I., Margallo, M., Laso, J., Rumayor, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., Irabien, A., Dodds, P. E. (2019). Bringing value to the chemical industry from capture, storage and use of CO2: A dynamic LCA of formic acid production. Science of The Total Environment, 663, 738-753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.395 Alifujiang, Y., Abuduwaili, J., Ma, L., Samat, A. and Groll, M. (2017). System dynamics modeling of water level variations of lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan. Water 9(12), 989. doi: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/12/989/htm Alnouri, S.Y., Linke, P., El-Halwagi, M. (2015) A synthesis approach for industrial city water reuse networks considering central and distributed treatment systems. Journal of Cleaner Production. 89, 231-250. Amores, M.J., Meneses, M., Pasqualino, J., Antón, A. Castells, F. (2013) Environmental assessment of urban water cycle on Mediterranean conditions by LCA approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 43(0), 84-92. Atilgan, B., Azapagic, A. (2015). Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 555-564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.046 Bare, J. C., Hofstetter, P., Pennington, D. W., de Haes, H. A. U. (2000). Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6), 319. doi:10.1007/BF02978665 Barrios, R., Siebel, M., van der Helm, A., Bosklopper, K. and Gijzen, H. (2008). Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(4), 471-476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.052 Banat, F., Jwaied, N., Rommel, M., Koschikowski, J., Wieghaus, M. (2007). Desalination by a “compact SMADES” autonomous solarpowered membrane distillation unit. Desalination, 217(1), 29-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.11.028 Brown, R.R., Keath, N., Wong., T.H.F. (2009) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Science Technology., 59 (5), 847-855. Choi, Y., Cho, H., Shin, Y., Jang, Y., Lee, S. (2016). Economic evaluation of a hybrid desalination system combining forward and reverse osmosis. Membranes, 6(1), 3. doi:10.3390/membranes6010003 Chen, Y.-H., Yu, C.-C. (2001). Dynamical properties of product life cycles: implications to the design and operation of industrial processes. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(11), 2452-2459. doi:10.1021/ie000814o Collinge, W. O., Landis, A. E., Jones, A. K., Schaefer, L. A., Bilec, M. M. (2013). Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3), 538-552. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0528-2 Collinge, W. O., Rickenbacker, H. J., Landis, A. E., Thiel, C. L., Bilec, M. M. (2018). Dynamic life cycle assessments of a conventional green building and a net zero energy building: exploration of static, dynamic, attributional, and consequential electricity grid models. Environmental Science Technology, 52(19), 11429-11438. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06535 Curran, M. A. (2013). Life cycle assessment: a review of the methodology and its application to sustainability. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2(3), 273-277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.02.002 Djukic, M., Jovanoski, I., Ivanovic, O. M., Lazic, M., Bodroza, D. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis of an infrastructure project and a cost-reflective tariff: A case study for investment in wastewater treatment plant in Serbia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1419-1425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.050 Dong, Y., Miraglia, S., Manzo, S., Georgiadis, S., Sørup, H. J. D., Boriani, E., Hald, T., Thöns, S., Hauschild, M. Z. (2018). Environmental sustainable decision making– The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis. Environmental Science Policy, 87, 33-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.018 Emmerson, R.H.C., Morse, G.K., Lester, J.N. and Edge, D.R. (1995) The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes. Water and Environment Journal 9(3), 317-325. Fenner, R.A. (2017) water: an essential resource and a critical hazard. Building Sustainable Cities of the Future, 75-97. Feng, X., Wu, Z., Chen, X. (2007). Removal of metal ions from electroplating effluent by EDI process and recycle of purified water. Separation and Purification Technology, 57(2), 257-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.014 Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 Ford, D.N. (2019). A system dynamics glossary. System Dynamics Review 35(4), 369-379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1641 Galvez-Martos, J.-L., Schoenberger, H. (2014). An analysis of the use of life cycle assessment for waste co-incineration in cement kilns. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86, 118-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.009 Gao, J., You, F. (2018). Dynamic material flow analysis-based life cycle optimization framework and application to sustainable design of shale gas energy systems. ACS Sustainable Chemistry Engineering, 6(9), 11734-11752. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01983 Haupt, M., Kägi, T., Hellweg, S. (2018). Modular life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management. Waste Management, 79, 815-827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.035 Hao, X., Wang, X., Liu, R., Li, S., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. and Jiang, H. (2019). Environmental impacts of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants. Water Research 160, 268-277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.068 Hawks, S. A., Ramachandran, A., Porada, S., Campbell, P. G., Suss, M. E., Biesheuvel, P. M., Santiago, J.G., Stadermann, M. (2019). Performance metrics for the objective assessment of capacitive deionization systems. Water Research, 152, 126-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.074 Hong, J., Otaki, M. and Jolliet, O. (2009). Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Management 29(2), 696-703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.026 Hospido, A., Moreira, M.T., Fernández-Couto, M. and Feijoo, G. (2004). Environmental performance of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(4), 261. doi:10.1007/BF02978602 Hsien, C., Choong Low, J.S., Chan Fuchen, S. and Han, T.W. (2019). Life cycle assessment of water supply in Singapore — A water-scarce urban city with multiple water sources. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 151, 104476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104476 Hu, J., Fang, Z., Jiang, X., Li, T. and Chen, X. (2015). Membrane-free electrodeionization using strong-type resins for high purity water production. Separation and Purification Technology, 144, 90-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.02.023 ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management-Life cycle assassment Principles and Framework. Standardization, I.O.f. (ed). Jensen, O. and Wu, H. (2018) Urban water security indicators: Development and pilot. Environmental Science Policy., 83, 33-45. Katz, D. (2021). Desalination and hydrodiplomacy: Refreshening transboundary water negotiations or adding salt to the wounds? Environmental Science Policy 116, 171-180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.012 Kendall, A. (2012). Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 1042-1049. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0436-5 Kendall, A. and Price, L. (2012). Incorporating time-corrected life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in vehicle regulations. Environmental Science Technology, 46(5), 2557-2563. doi:10.1021/es203098j Kirshen, P., Aytur, S., Hecht, J., Walker, A., Burdick, D., Jones, S., Fennessey, N., Bourdeau, R. and Mather, L. (2018). Integrated urban water management applied to adaptation to climate change. Urban Climate 24, 247-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.03.005 Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 89. doi:10.1065/lca2008.02.376 Koop, S.H.A. and Leeuwen, CJ. (2015) Application of the improved City blueprint framework in 45 municipalities and regions. Water Resource Management, 29 (13), 4629-4647 Lam, C.-M., Lee, P.-H. and Hsu, S.-C. (2016). Eco-efficiency analysis of sludge treatment scenarios in urban cities: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, 3028-3039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.125 Lee, M., Fan, C.S., Chen, Y.W., Chang, K.C. Chiueh, P.T. and Hou, C.H. (2019). Membrane capacitive deionization for low-salinity desalination in reclamation of domestic wastewater eddluents: Technical evaluation and energy implications. Chemosphere, 235, 413-422. Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Deschênes, L. and Samson, R. (2010). Considering time in LCA: dynamic lca and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environmental Science Technology, 44(8), 3169-3174. doi:10.1021/es9030003 Lehtonen, M. (2012) Indicators as an appraisal technology: framework for analysing the policy influence of the UK energy sector indicators. Sustainable development, evaluation and policy making. 175-208. doi:10.4337/9781781953525.00020 Loubet, P., Roux, P., Guérin-Schneider, L. and Bellon-Maurel, V. (2016) Life cycle assessment of forecasting scenarios for urban water management: A first implementation of the WaLA model on Paris suburban area. Water Research 90, 128-140. Machuca, L. and Fara , V. (2014). Combination of Electrodialysis and Electrodeionization for Treatment of Condensate from Ammonium Nitrate Production. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 8(6), 485-487. McGinnis, R. L. and Elimelech, M. (2007). Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination, 207(1), 370-382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.012 Meindersma, G. W., Guijt, C. M. and de Haan, A. B. (2006). Desalination and water recycling by air gap membrane distillation. Desalination, 187(1), 291-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.088 Miller, S. A. and Keoleian, G. A. (2015). Framework for analyzing transformative technologies in life cycle assessment. Environmental Science Technology, 49(5), 3067-3075. doi:10.1021/es505217a Naamane, S., Rais, Z. and Taleb, M. (2016). The effectiveness of the incineration of sewage sludge on the evolution of physicochemical and mechanical properties of Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials 112, 783-789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.121 Negishi, K., Tiruta-Barna, L., Schiopu, N., Lebert, A. and Chevalier, J. (2018). An operational methodology for applying dynamic Life Cycle Assessment to buildings. Building and Environment, 144, 611-621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.005 Meneses, M., Pasqualino, J.C. and Castells, F. (2010) Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: Treatment alternatives and applications. Chemosphere 81(2), 266-272. Mo, W., Wang, R. and Zimmerman, J.B. (2014) Energy–Water nexus analysis of enhanced water supply scenarios: A regional comparison of Tampa Bay, Florida, and San Diego, California. Environmental Science Technology 48(10), 5883-5891. Muñoz, I., Rodríguez, A., Rosal, R. and Fernandez-Alba, A.R. (2009). Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater reuse with ozonation as tertiary treatment: a focus on toxicity-related impacts. Science of The Total Environment. 407, 1245e1256. Pasta, M., Wessells, C.D., Cui, Y. and La Mantia, F. (2012) A desalination battery. Nano Lett., 12, 839-843. Penn, R., Friedler, E. and Ostfeld, A. (2013) Multi-objective evolutionary optimization for greywater reuse in municipal sewer systems. Water Research, 47(15), 5911-5920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.012 Porada, S., Zhao, R., van der Wal, A., Presser, V. and Biesheuvel, P. M. (2013). Review on the science and technology of water desalination by capacitive deionization. Progress in Materials Science, 58(8), 1388-1442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.005 Purwanto, A., Sušnik, J., Suryadi, F.X. and Fraiture, C. (2021). Quantitative simulation of the water-energy-food (WEF) security nexus in a local planning context in Indonesia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 2352-5509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.009 Raluy, R. G., Schwantes, R., Subiela, V. J., Peñate, B., Melián, G. and Betancort, J. R. (2012). Operational experience of a solar membrane distillation demonstration plant in Pozo Izquierdo-Gran Canaria Island (Spain). Desalination, 290, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.01.003 Roeleveld, P. J., Klapwijk, A., Eggels, P. G., Rulkens, W. H. and van Starkenburg, W. (1997). Sustainability of municipal waste water treatment. Water Science and Technology, 35(10), 221-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00199-6 Sitzenfrei, R., Möderl, M. and Rauch, W. (2013) Assessing the impact of transitions from centralised to decentralised water solutions on existing infrastructures – Integrated city-scale analysis with VIBe. Water Research. 47(20) 7251-7263. Smith, K.C. and Dmello, R. (2016). Na-ion desalination (NID) enabled by Na-blocking membranes and symmetric Na-intercalation: porus-electrode modeling. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 163, A530-A539. Srinivasan, V., Konar, M. and Sivapalan, M. (2017) A dynamic framework for water security. Water Security, 1, 12-20. Su, W., Pan, R., Xiao, Y. and Chen, X. (2013). Membrane-free electrodeionization for high purity water production. Desalination, 329, 86-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.013 Tang, W., Liang, J., He, D., Gong, J., Tang, L., Liu, Z.,Wang, D. and Zeng, G. (2019). Various cell architectures of capacitive deionization: Recent advances and future trends. Water Research, 150, 225-251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.064 Tong, L., Liu, X., Liu, X., Yuan, Z. and Zhang, Q. (2013). Life cycle assessment of water reuse systems in an industrial park. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 471-478. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.018 UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). Integrated Water Resources Management Planning Approach for Small Island Developing States. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: apps.unep.org/redirect.php?file=/publications/pmtdocuments//pdf/sids.pdf United Nations World Water Assessment Programme. (2015) The UN World Water Development Report 2105: Water for a Sustainable World, UNESCO, Paris van der Hoek, J.P., de Fooij, H. and Struker, A. (2016). Wastewater as a resource: Strategies to recover resources from Amsterdam’s wastewater. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 113, 53-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.012 Walters, J. P., Javernick-Will, A. N. (2015). Long-term functionality of rural water services in developing countries: a system dynamics approach to understanding the dynamic interaction of factors. Environmental Science Technology, 49(8), 5035-5043. doi:10.1021/es505975h Wang, Y., Levis, J. W., and Barlaz, M. A. (2020). An assessment of the dynamic global warming impact associated with long-term emissions from landfills. Environmental Science Technology, 54(3), 1304-1313. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04066 Wender, B. A., Foley, R. W., Prado-Lopez, V., Ravikumar, D., Eisenberg, D. A., Hottle, T. A., Sadowski, J., Flanagan, W.P., Fisher, A., Laurin, L., Bates, M. E., Linkov, I., Seager, T. P., Fraser, M. P. and Guston, D. H. (2014). Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies. Environmental Science Technology, 48(18), 10531-10538. doi:10.1021/es5016923 Willuweit, L., and O'Sullivan, J.J. (2013) A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: Presenting the Dynamic Urban Water Simulation Model. Water Research. 47(20), 7206-7220. Xu, Z., Yao, L. and Chen, X. (2020). Urban water supply system optimization and planning: Bi-objective optimization and system dynamics methods. Computers Industrial Engineering 142, 106373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106373 Yang, Y., Yang, J., Zuo, J., Li, Y., He, S., Yang, X. and Zhang, K. (2011). Study on two operating conditions of a full-scale oxidation ditch for optimization of energy consumption and effluent quality by using CFD model. Water Research, 45(11), 3439-3452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.007 Yangali-Quintanilla, V., Li, Z., Valladares, R., Li, Q., and Amy, G. (2011). Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination, 280(1), 160-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.066 Yearworth, M. (2014). A Brief Introduction to System Dynamics Modelling. University of Bristol. You, S., Wang, W., Dai, Y., Tong, Y.W. and Wang, C.-H. (2016). Comparison of the co-gasification of sewage sludge and food wastes and cost-benefit analysis of gasification- and incineration-based waste treatment schemes. Bioresource Technology 218, 595-605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.017 Yu, T.-H., Shiu, H.-Y., Lee, M., Chiueh, P.-T., and Hou, C.-H. (2016). Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and energy demand for capacitive deionization technology. Desalination, 399, 53-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.08.007 Yuan, C., Wang, E., Zhai, Q., and Yang, F. (2015). Temporal discounting in life cycle assessment: A critical review and theoretical framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 51, 23-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.01.001 Zarghami, M., and Akbariyeh, S. (2012). System dynamics modeling for complex urban water systems: Application to the city of Tabriz, Iran. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60, 99-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.11.008 Zhai, P., and Williams, E. D. (2010). Dynamic hybrid life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(20), 7950-7955. doi:10.1021/es1026695 Zhou, J., Chang, V. W. C., and Fane, A. G. (2014). Life cycle assessment for desalination: a review on methodology feasibility and reliability. Water Research, 61, 210-223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.017 謝長宏，1980，系統動態學—理論、方法與應用—，中興管理顧問公司，台北 劉弘雁 (1998) 高雄都會區水資源之系統動力學研究，國立中山大學，碩士論文 陶在樸，1999，系統動態學，五南圖書出版社 水利署 (2005) 台灣地區水資源永續發展指標綜合性評估 楊朝仲，張良正，葉欣誠，陳昶憲，葉昭憲 (2007) 系統動力學—思維與應用，五南圖書出版 經建會，行政院經濟建設委員會 (2008) 公共建設計畫經濟效益評估及財務計畫作業手冊(97年版) 水利署 ，經濟部水利署 (2009) 廢污水廠放流水再利用潛勢推動策略，財團法人中興工程顧問社 水利署 ，經濟部水利署 (2009) 金門地區水再生利用規劃及試辦計畫成果資料，社團法人成大研究發展基金會 環保署 ，行政院環保署 (2010) 金門低碳島建設規劃專案計畫，財團法人工業技術研究院 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2011)自來水事業碳足跡評估與減碳策略之先期研究，環科工程顧問股份有限公司 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2012) 金門地區增建海水淡化廠調查規劃總報告，艾奕康工程顧問股份有限公司 金門縣自來水廠 (2012) 金門縣自來水廠統計年報，金門 金門縣自來水廠 (2013) 金門縣自來水廠統計年報，金門 溫麗琪和陳翰輝 (2015) 金門地區水資源供給與水質改善之成本效益分析，經濟前瞻，頁24-28 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2015)金門地區水資源運用調整策略規劃(2)，巨廷工程顧問股份有限公司 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2016) 低耗能水再生利用技術之發展與環境友善性研析，國立臺灣大學 金門縣政府 (2016) 金門縣政府民政處1221-00-01-2公務統計報表 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2018) 貯能型再生水系統，國立臺灣大學 陳鶴文 (2018) 環境規劃與管理，五南圖書出版股份有限公司 水利署，經濟部水利署 (2019) 貯能型再生水技術系統整合精進與研析，國立臺灣大學 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80442 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | " 生命週期評估 (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) 是常見的環境衝擊評估方法，用來量化產品於原料開採、製程、使用及廢棄階段對環境的影響。傳統的LCA著重於產品的環境衝擊比較、環境衝擊熱點分析，以供決策者改善建議。然而對於長壽命設施之使用會隨著時間變化，傳統LCA缺乏時間因子，無法呈現隨時間而異的盤查分析及相對應之衝擊變化，因此本研究導入考量時間之動態生命週期評估方法(Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment, DLCA)，量化具有長期使用年限特徵之城市水系統，分析供水及污水處理的環境衝擊。相較於傳統LCA，DLCA記錄時間軸上城市水系統操作之能源與資源使用狀態，追蹤環境衝擊變化。本研究以金門縣水系統為案例，以DLCA方法評估各個水處理設施之長期衝擊動態變化，在技術進步、節水、能源政策、政治風險等情境下，城市水服務之衝擊變化，比傳統LCA更可看到設施環境衝擊變化之趨勢。 傳統LCA的衝擊評估結果指出，衝擊最高為紅山淨水場(標準化數值2.18E-11)，一般來說衝擊最高為海水淡化(標準化數值2.41E-12)，其次為再生水(標準化數值2.75E-13)、淨水(標準化數值2.39E-13)，最低是境外引水(標準化數值1.88E-14)，但這之中，紅山淨水廠能源效率和基礎建設使用率都低，使紅山淨水場的衝擊為所有設施中最高。傳統LCA結果於多個水處理設施中低估或高估了衝擊，主要原因可能來自於傳統LCA方法，挑選某一年做為評估基準，而該年度代表了設施壽命的水處理衝擊結果。 DLCA分析了城市水系統隨時間變動時對環境衝擊的影響，並展示不同水處理設施每1m3衝擊變化趨勢，淨水廠衝擊與供水量穩定度有關，而污水處理處理水量逐年增加，其處理效率上升使衝擊經攤提而降低。DLCA計算城市水系統服務1m3水之動態的衝擊變化結果，基礎情境境外引水為主要供水水源，平均環境衝擊之標準化值為4.16E-13；水再生技術發展情境之平均標準化數值為4.39E-13，相較於基礎情境，增加水處理設備使衝擊增加22%，但是可以為工業提供了更高品質的再生水；節水情境中，設定每人每日用水量降低10%，平均環境衝擊之標準化值為4.16E-13，儘管節水可以降低能源與藥品等資源使用量，但是此供水量降低使供水設施的使用效率並且改變了城市水處理設施的服務比率，相較於基礎情境每噸水增加了0.4%衝擊，若計算壽命總衝擊時則是衝擊最低的情境；能源政策情境對整體結果相較於基礎情境小於0.1%，在能源衝擊的管理上，優先考慮降低能源耗用；考慮金門面對政治風險而無法使用境外引水的情況下，政治風險情境之平均標準化衝擊數值為7.03E-13，儘管2019年污水廠擴建，提高再生水使用在此情境中些微降低衝擊，但隨著逐年增加之用水需求，對於海水淡化的依賴越高。整體而言，DLCA提供了時間維度的環境衝擊結果，使衝擊量化可以隨著不同時間給予實際狀態之評估結果，發展為具有長期時間維度之衝擊管理工具。 " | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:06:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1412202110425300.pdf: 4647857 bytes, checksum: ccd104dd205c34904659f7f1df309fff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract V 著作聲明 VII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 5 1.3 研究架構 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 2.1 城市水資源永續發展 8 2.1.1 城市水資源永續發展目標 8 2.1.2 水資源安全指標 12 2.2 環境衝擊量化分析 16 2.2.1 傳統生命週期評估方法 16 2.2.2 動態生命週期評估方法 18 2.3 水資源管理系統之決策工具 23 2.3.1 系統動力學模式 24 2.3.2 生命週期評估應用於水處理系統 28 2.3.3 水處理設施成本效益分析 30 第三章 研究方法 33 3.1 研究流程 33 3.2 城市水資源系統之生命週期評估方法 34 3.3 系統動力學建模方法 37 3.4 城市水系統之動態生命週期評估方法 39 第四章 傳統生命週期評估與動態生命週期評估模型建立 42 4.1 研究案例—金門城市水系統 42 4.1.1 金門地區水資源概況 42 4.1.2 再生水技術發展與金門水資源類別發展趨勢 43 4.1.3 電容去離子水再生技術發展趨勢 44 4.1.4 金門地區電力組合 46 4.2 傳統生命週期評估模型建立 49 4.2.1 金門地區供水與污水處理之生命週期評估 49 4.2.2 金門地區污水與污泥再生利用之生命週期評估 50 4.2.3 低耗能水再生技術之生命週期評估 54 4.3 動態生命週期評估模型建立 57 4.3.1 金門地區城市水系統之因果關係模型 57 4.3.2 金門地區城市水系統之量化模型 58 4.3.3 金門地區城市水系統量化模型之使用數據說明 65 4.3.4 金門地區水資源管理情境設計 71 第五章 結果與討論 73 5.1 金門地區水資源供給與需求分析 73 5.2 傳統生命週期評估分析結果 75 5.2.1 金門地區供水與污水處理之生命週期評估結果 75 5.2.2 金門地區污水與污泥再生利用之生命週期評估結果 78 5.2.3 低耗能水再生技術之生命週期評估結果 80 5.3 動態生命週期評估分析結果 85 5.4 動態生命週期評估情境分析結果 88 第六章 結論與建議 93 6.1 結論 93 6.2 建議 96 參考文獻 97 附錄 107 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 動態生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 城市水資源系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能源組合衝擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 技術發展衝擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 時間變化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Temporal variation | en |
| dc.subject | Dynamic life cycle assessment | en |
| dc.subject | Urban water system | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental impact of energy structure | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental impact of technology development | en |
| dc.title | 城市水系統之動態生命週期評估—以金門為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "A tracking dynamic life cycle assessment tool for water treatment facilities in Kinmen islands, Taiwan " | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張揚祺(Hsin-Tsai Liu),駱尚廉(Chih-Yang Tseng),馬鴻文,侯嘉洪,李公哲 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 動態生命週期評估,城市水資源系統,能源組合衝擊,技術發展衝擊,時間變化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Dynamic life cycle assessment,Urban water system,Environmental impact of energy structure,Environmental impact of technology development,Temporal variation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 118 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202104534 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-01-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-11-22 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1412202110425300.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.54 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。