請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79882完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 羅思嘉(Szu-Chia Lo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Yu Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱珮瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:15:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-31 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:15:09Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-02-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Babbie, E.（2006）。研究方法：基礎理論與技巧（邱泯科譯；2版）。湯姆生。 Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. （2010）。混合方法研究導論（謝志偉、王慧玉譯；初版）。心理。 Lu, Wenjie.（2015年3月4日）。ChemDraw的使用方法。化學空間-服務科研工作者。https://cn.chem-station.com/%E5%8C%96%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E8%AE%B0/chemtool/2015/03/post-4045.html Steve, POINTING.（2004）。何謂天體生物學?。香港太空館，04(4)。https://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/archive/AstroNews/c_astronews_04Apr.htm 中央研究院調查研究專題中心（n.d.）。學術調查研究資料庫。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/about.php 王文科（1986）。教育研究法。五南圖書。 王兵（2019年9月25日）。IBM 数据治理成熟度评估模型。腾讯云。https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/article/1513239 王梅玲（2015年1月14日）。研究數據管理服務。技術服務小百科。http://techserviceslibrary.blogspot.com/2015/01/research-data-management-services.html 李丹丹、吴振新（2012）。研究数据管理服务综析。图书馆学研究，9，54-69。http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/6049 柯雲娥（2012年10月）。調查法survey method。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678715/ 國立臺灣大學圖書館（2021）。研究資料管理學習指引。https://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/events/2022_RDMLA_class/ 國家發展委員（2011）。政府資料開放。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=9B973A5871579AC7 教育部（2019）。高等教育深耕計畫。https://sprout.moe.edu.tw/SproutWeb/Project/ReviewSchoolAndBudget 淡江大學資訊概論教學團隊（2014）。資訊概論。碁峰資訊。 陳雪華、陳光華（2012）。e-Research : 學術圖書館創新服務。臺大出版中心。 陸怡靖（2019）。大專校院及研究機構學者研究資料使用管理與分享認知及行為之研究 [碩士論文]。臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/110176 彭慰（1995年12月）。研究方法Research Methods。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681976/ 智庫百科（2014年11月4日）。成熟度。https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E6%88%90%E7%86%9F%E5%BA%A6 黃慕萱、張郁蔚（2005）。從研究產出探討人文社會學者學術評鑑之特性，圖書資訊學刊，2(4)。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2005.2(3.4).001 魏令芳、李明錦（2018年7月1日）。淺談「研究資料管理」。中華民國圖書館學會電子報，189。https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/123456789/403832/2/LAROC189-201807-RDM.pdf Antell, K., Foote, J. B., Turner, J., Shults, B. (2014). Dealing with data: Science librarians’ participation in data management at Association of Research Libraries institutions. College Research Libraries, 75(4), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.75.4.557 Australian National Data Service. (2018, March 23). Creating a data management framework. https://www.ands.org.au/guides/creating-a-data-management-framework Belghith, O., Skhiri, S., Zitoun, S., Ferjaoui, S. (2021, May 13-15). A survey of maturity models in data management [proceeding paper]. International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), pp.298–309. Cape Town, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmimt52186.2021.9476197 Bititci, U. S., Garengo, P., Ates, A., Nudurupati, S. S.. (2015). Value of maturity models in performance measurement. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3062–3085. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970709 Brewerton, A. (2012). Re-skilling for research: Investigating the needs of researchers and how library staff can best support them. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2012.665718 Bryant, R., Brian L., Constance M.. (2017). A tour of the research data management (RDM) service space. The Realities of Research Data Management, part 1. OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/C3PG8J. Carlson, J. (2012). Demystifying the data interview: Developing a foundation for reference librarians to talk with researchers about their data. Reference Services Review,40(7-23). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321211203603 Carlson, S. (2006, June 23). Lost in a sea of science data. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://chronicle.com/article/Lost-in-a-Sea-of-Science-Data/9136 Chawinga, W. D., Zinn, S. (2020). Research data management at an African medical university: Implications for academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(4), 102161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102161 ISACA. (n.d.). What is CMMI®?. https://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi/intro Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age. (2009). Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age. National Academies Press. Cook, C. E., Bergman, M. T., Cochrane, G., Apweiler, R., Birney, E. (2018). The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2017: data coordination and integration. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D21-D29. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1154 Corrall, S. (2012). Roles and responsibilities: Libraries, librarians and data. In Pryor, G. (Ed.), Managing research data, (1st ed. pp.105–133). Facet Publishing. http://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048910.007 Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., Pinfield, S. (2017). Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2182-2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781 Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., Pinfield, S., Sbaffi, L. (2019). Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1432-1462. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-12-2018-0211 Das, A., Banerjee, S. (2021). Optimising research support services through libraries: A review of practices. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-43. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/optimising-research-support-services-through/docview/2552129765/se-2?accountid=14229 Fearon, D. Jr., Betsy G., Sherry L., Barbara E. Pr., Andrew L. S. (2013). SPEC kit 334: Research data management services (July 2013). Association of Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.29242/spec.334 Firican, G. (2018, October 3). Gartner data governance maturity model. https://www.lightsondata.com/data-governance-maturity-models-gartner/ Fry, J., Lockyer, S., Oppenheim, C., Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B. (2008). Identifying benefits arising from the curation and open sharing of research data produced.UK Higher Education and research institutes. Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/4600. Government of Canada. (2021, March 15). Research Data Management. https://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_547652FB.html Gowen, E. Meier, J. J. (2020) Research Data Management Services and strategic planning in libraries today: A longitudinal study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8(1), 2336. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2336 Haddow, G., Mamtora, J. (2017). Research support in Australian academic libraries: services, resources, and relationships. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2-3), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1318765 Heidorn, P. Bryan. (2011). The emerging role of libraries in data curation and E-science. Journal of Library Administration, 51, 662-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.601269 Hey, A. J. G., Tansley, S., Tolle, K. M. (Eds.) (2009). The fourth paradigm data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research. Hey, T., Hey, J. (2006). E‐Science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech, 24, 515–528. http://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610 Higman, R., Pinfield, S. (2015). Research data management and openness: The role of data sharing in developing institutional policies and practices. Program : Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(4), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0005 Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). Policy Statement on public access to data resulting from IES funded grants. https://ies.ed.gov/funding/datasharing_policy.asp Interest, C., Council, N., Sciences, D., Commission on Physical Sciences, M., National Academy of Sciences. (1999). Importance and Use of Scientific and Technical Databases. In National Research Council (Eds.), A question of balance: private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases, (1st ed. pp.14–39) National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9692 Jones, S. (2012). Research data policies: Principles, requirements and trends. In Pryor, G. (Ed.), Managing Research Data, (1st ed. pp.47-66). Facet Publishing. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048910.004 Joo, S., Schmidt, G. M. (2021). Research data services from the perspective of academic librarians. Digital Library Perspectives, 37(3), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-10-2020-0106 Kenney, A.R., McGovern, N.Y. (2003). The five organizational stages of digital preservation. In P. Hodges, M. Sandler, M. Bonn, J.P. Wilkin. (Eds.), Digital libraries: A vision for the 21st century. University of Michigan Scholarly Publishing Office. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/spobooks.bbv9812.0001.001 Lavoie, B.F. (2012). Sustainable research data. In Pryor, G. (Ed.), Managing research data, (1st ed. pp.67-82). Facet Publishing. http://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048910.005 Lyon, L. (2009, June 9). Open science at web‐scale: Optimising participation and predictive potential consultative report ( V1.0).Jisc. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/re Lyon, L., Brenner, A. (2015). Bridging the data talent gap: positioning the iSchool as an agent for change. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.349 MacMillan, D. (2015). Developing data literacy competencies to enhance faculty collaborations. LIBER Quarterly, 24(3), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9868 Mani, N. S., Cawley, M., Henley, A., Triumph, T., Williams, J. M. (2021). Creating a data science framework: A model for academic research libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 61(3), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1883366 Mayernik, M.S., Thompson, C.A., Williams, V., Allard, S., Palmer, C.L., Tenopir, C. (2015). Enriching education with exemplars in practice: Iterative development of data curation internships. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10, 123–134. http://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.350 McLure, M., Level, A.V., Cranston, C.L., Oehlerts, B., Culbertson, M. (2014). Data curation: A study of researcher practices and Needs. Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0009 Murray, M., O'Donnell, M., Laufersweiler, M., Novak, J., Rozum, B., Thompson, S. (2019). A survey of the state of research data services in 35 U.S. academic libraries, or Wow what a sweeping question. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 5. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e48809 National Endowment for the Humanities. (2018, June). Data management plans for NEH office of digital humanities. https://www.neh.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/data_management_plans_2018.pdf National Science Foundation. (2018). Data Management for NSF SBE Directorate Proposals and Awards. https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/DMP/SBE_DataMgmtPlanPolicy_RevisedApril2018.pdf National Science Foundation. (2020, June 1). Dissemination and sharing of research results. Other post award requirements and considerations (Chapter XI.D.4.). https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/pappg_11.jsp#XID4 Ogier AL, Stamper MJ.(2018) Data visualization as a library service: Embedding visualization services in the library research lifecycle. Journal of eScience Librarianship,7(1): e1126. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2018.1126. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V. (1993). Capability maturity model version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10, 18–27. http://doi.org/10.1109/52.219617 Pinfield, S., Cox, A.M., Smith, J. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLoS One, 9, e114734. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0 Pryor, G. (Ed.). (2012). Managing Research Data. Facet Publishing. http://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048910 Pryor, G., Jones, S., Whyte, A. (Eds.). (2014). Delivering research data management services: Fundamentals of good practice. Facet Publishing. Qin, J., Crowston, K., Kirkland, A. (2017). Pursuing best performance in research data management by using the capability maturity model and rubrics. Journal of escience librarianship, 6(2), e1113. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2017.1113 Ray, J. (Ed.). (2014). Research data management: Practical strategies for information professionals. Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq34t Saunders, L. (2020). Core knowledge and specialized skills in academic libraries. College Research Libraries, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.2.288 Si, L., Xing, W., Zhuang, X., Hua, X., Zhou, L. (2015). Investigation and analysis of research data services in university libraries. The Electronic Library, 33(3), 417-449. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2013-0130 Si, L., Zeng, Y., Guo, S., Zhuang, X. (2019). Investigation and analysis of research support services in academic libraries. The Electronic Library, 37(2), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2018-0125 Stéphane, D. (2017, October 24). Gartner's enterprise information management maturity model. https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/maturity_models/blob/master/examples/eim/Gartner_EIM_Maturity_Model.md Stones, S. (1982). Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation, 38(4), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026734 Surkis, A., Read, K. (2015). Research data management. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 154-156. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.011 Tammaro, A. M., Matusiak, K. K., Sposito, F. A., Casarosa, V. (2019). Data curator’s roles and responsibilities: An international perspective. Libri, 69(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2018-0090 Tenopir C, Hughes D, Allard S, Frame M, Birch B, Baird L, Sandusky R, Langseth M., Lundeen A. (2015). Research data services in academic libraries: Data intensive roles for the future. Journal of eScience Librarianship;4(2): e1085. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085 Tenopir, C., Birch, B., Allard, S. (2012). Academic libraries and research data services: Current practices and plans for the future. Association of College and Research Libraries. Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R. J., Allard, S., Birch, B. (2013). Academic librarians and research data services: Preparation and attitudes. IFLA Journal, 39(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035212473089 Tenopir, C., Talja, S., Horstmann, W., Late, E., Hughes, D., Pollock, D., Allard, S. (2017). Research data services in European academic research libraries. LIBER Quarterly, 27(1), 23-44. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10180 UK Research and Innovation. (2021, September 3). Common principles on data policy. https://www.ukri.org/funding/information-for-award-holders/data-policy/common-principles-on-data-policy/ UK Research and Innovation. (n.d.). Research data lifecycle. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-data/lifecycle United States Government Publishing Office. (2013). 2 CFR 215.36 Intangible property. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2010-title2-vol1/CFR-2010-title2-vol1-sec215-36/summary Varvel, V.E., Bammerlin. E.J., Palmer, C.L. (2012, February 7). Education for data professionals: A study of current courses and programs [proceeding paper]. Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, pp.527–529. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2132176.2132275 Walters, W. H. (2020). Data journals: Incentivizing data access and documentation within the scholarly communication system. Insights, 33(1), 18. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.510 Whyte, A., Getler, M. (2018a). Building the capabilities for a professional RDM support service. Danish forum RDM workshop, p.31. https://slideplayer.com/slide/14755415/ Whyte, A., Getler, M. (2018b). Building the capabilities for a professional RDM support service. Danish forum RDM workshop, p.28. https://slideplayer.com/slide/14755415/ Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 Yoon, A., Schultz, T. (2017). Research data management services in academic libraries in the US: A content analysis of libraries’ websites. College Research Libraries, 78(7). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.920 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79882 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 學術研究機構透過科學研究尋找掌握未知事物的線索以及可以推動社會進步的關鍵知識，研究過程中所產生的研究資料若能夠與後續研究共享並再利用，將可使投入研究資源的使用產生最大化，亦可讓研究發展更具效能與效率。研究資料管理服務被視為是推動研究資料共享與再利用的關鍵因素，也在研究機構社群中逐漸形成重要議題。近十多年來，國外研究社群已對於研究資料的管理與開放進行諸多討論，並建議具體作法；臺灣則有官方所建立的資料開放平台、生物與自然和人文領域研究資料的徵集典藏庫，推動開放資料的使用，而研究機構多自行統籌發展研究資料管理服務，對於整體發展以及從機構層面探討研究資料管理現況與議題的相關實徵研究則著墨較少。本研究以國內學術研究機構對象，透過所建構之成熟度量表，了解分析調查機構推動與發展研究資料管理服務的現況。 研究從機構角度出發，採調查法設計，藉由網站內容分析、問卷量表及訪談蒐集資料，分析國內17所大專校院、43所研究機構，研究資料管理服務概況與成熟度，並與國外實施狀況相比較，期能對國內研究資料管理服務發展提出建議。研究所使用的量表以國外發展的成熟度模型為基礎，結合國內外研究資料管理服務相關文獻所提出之觀點所建構，內容包含支撐、核心、環境三大因素，區分為政策與程序、基礎設施、研究資料服務、研究資料管理、機構態度、人員態度等六構面。 研究結果發現調查的單位中研究機構研究資料管理服務的平均成熟度高於大專校院的平均成熟度。整體來說，研究所調查之機構，在服務與管理上已推出相關的服務項目，並展開推動策略，且在資訊軟硬體設施上有一定的基礎建設與資料處理能力，但政策、機構與人員之態度還處於發展初期，未臻成熟，多未訂定完整的發展政策與推動策略，單位人員對研究資料管理之認知有限，不清楚研究資料管理之意義與可能帶來之助益，而機構與職責單位也還未充分了解研究人員之潛在需求，故在計畫與實施上勢必還需更加努力理解研究資料管理對機構發展之效益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:15:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2701202214534700.pdf: 2622258 bytes, checksum: 05179c9212d380f577831f6bc5e234c4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 iii 摘要 v Abstract vii 目 次 ix 圖目次 xi 表目次 xii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 研究貢獻 4 第五節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 成熟度模型與相關應用 7 第二節 研究資料定義與內涵 27 第三節 研究資料管理服務 31 第三章 研究方法 43 第一節 研究架構與設計 43 第二節 研究範圍與對象 49 第三節 研究資料蒐集與工具 52 第四節 研究資料整理與分析 58 第五節 研究實施流程 63 第四章 研究結果 67 第一節 研究涵蓋之學術研究機構分布與描述 67 第二節 學術研究機構學術服務之現況 69 第三節 學術研究機構服務成熟度之分析 85 第四節 提供研究資料管理服務之挑戰與影響 99 第五節 綜合討論 106 第五章 結論與建議 113 第一節 結論 113 第二節 建議 115 參考文獻 119 附錄一 成熟度問卷之設計構面與程度：大專校院 128 附錄二 成熟度問卷設計構面與程度：研究機構 133 附錄三 研究資料服務調查問卷：大專校院 139 附錄四 研究資料服務調查問卷：研究機構 146 附錄五 訪談編碼表 153 附錄六 研究資料服務訪談大綱：大專校院 160 附錄七 研究資料服務訪談大綱：研究機構 161 附錄八 研究資料服務訪談大綱：研究者版本 162 附錄九 研究資料服務電話訪問大綱 167 圖2-1 數位化保存三腳凳 10 圖2-2 IBM資料治理能力要素 13 圖2-3 IBM成熟度演進路線範例 14 圖2-4 研究資料管理能力成熟度模型之關鍵過程區域與關鍵實踐 21 圖2-5 研究資料管理能力成熟度級別 22 圖2-6 研究資料管理景觀成熟度模型 24 圖2-7 研究資料管理景觀成熟度模型之修改 24 圖2-8 研究資料生命週期 30 圖2-9 研究資料管理服務內涵 34 圖3-1 研究架構 44 圖3-2-A 研究流程 65 圖3-2-B 研究實施步驟 66 圖4-1 填答機構分布概況 68 圖4-2 研究資料服務項目分布 74 圖4-3 學術研究機構研究資料服務平均成熟度表現 86 表2-1 研究資料管理框架 20 表2-2 建構成熟度量表元素之參考 25 表2-3 成熟度模型統整 26 表3-1 成熟度等級涵義 46 表3-2 問卷設計之六構面定義 47 表3-3 17所大專校院 50 表3-4 43所研究機構 51 表3-5 成熟度問卷之設計構面與程度範例：大專校院 54 表3-6 題項與成熟度計算對照 56 表3-7 研究資料服務訪談大綱：大專校院 57 表3-8 編碼定義 61 表3-9 編碼範例 62 表4-1 學術研究機構研究支援服務 70 表4-2 學術研究機構研究資料服務 75 表4-3 學術研究機構研究資料服務成熟度分數與標的分組 86 表4-4 政策程序構面 87 表4-5 基礎設施構面：資訊硬體設施可滿足全機構之需求 87 表4-6 基礎設施構面：設置研究計畫管理資訊系統 87 表4-7 研究資料服務構面：提供服務 88 表4-8 研究資料管理構面：專屬研究資料管理系統 89 表4-9 研究資料管理構面：資料隱私處理 89 表4-10 研究資料管理構面：訂定詮釋資料欄位 89 表4-11 機構態度構面 89 表4-12 人員態度與認知構面：所屬單位對研究資料管理服務之想法 90 表4-13 人員態度與認知構面：工作人員對研究資料管理服務之想法 90 表4-14 成熟度問卷之信度分析 91 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 服務成熟度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研究資料管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研究資料管理服務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研究資料服務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | service maturity levels | en |
| dc.subject | research data management | en |
| dc.subject | research data management services | en |
| dc.subject | research data services | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣學術研究機構研究資料管理服務成熟度研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Maturity Levels of Research Data Management Services of Taiwan Academic Research Institutes | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳光華(Meng-Hsiao Meng),鄭瑋(Po-Huang Liang),(Ching-Tsan Huang),(Li-Chu Tsai) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | ,鄭瑋(0000-0003-1207-5256) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 研究資料管理,研究資料管理服務,研究資料服務,服務成熟度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | research data management,research data management services,research data services,service maturity levels, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 167 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200231 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-02-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-12-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2701202214534700.pdf | 2.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。