請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79833完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王東美(Tong-Mei Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yung-Hsiang Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張詠翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:13:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-09 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:13:08Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-08-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Laird MF, Vogel ER, Pontzer H. Chewing efficiency and occlusal functional morphology in modern humans. J Hum Evol. 2016;93:1-11. 2. Fan J, Caton JG. Occlusal trauma and excessive occlusal forces: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. Journal of Periodontology. 2018;89:S214-S22. 3. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 2005;14:108-16. 4. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:97-113. 5. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. 2007. 6. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:e1-e105. 7. Manfredini D. Occlusal Equilibration for the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30:257-64. 8. Le Bell Y, Jämsä T, Korri S, Niemi PM, Alanen P. Effect of artificial occlusal interferences depends on previous experience of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60:219-22. 9. Choudhary A. Occlusal Indicators- Chasing Blue Marks?: A Review. TMU J.Dent Vol 1, Issue 3, July- Sept 2014. TMU Jdent. 2014;01. 10. Gonzalez Y, Iwasaki LR, McCall WD, Jr., Ohrbach R, Lozier E, Nickel JC. Reliability of electromyographic activity vs. bite-force from human masticatory muscles. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119:219-24. 11. Yen CI, Mao SH, Chen CH, Chen CT, Lee MY. The correlation between surface electromyography and bite force of mastication muscles in Asian young adults. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74 Suppl 2:S168-72. 12. Bakke M, Michler L, Han K, Möller E. Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:539-51. 13. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia GM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004;32:451-7. 14. McNeill C. Science and Practice of Occlusion.: Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 1997. 15. Babu R, Nayar S. Occlusion indicators: A review. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2007;7. 16. Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K, Gupta B, Rajora V. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:e48-53. 17. Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85:18-22. 18. Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4:7-12. 19. Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators. A descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:1280-6; quiz 319. 20. Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J. 2007;1:1-7. 21. Saraçoğlu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:522-6. 22. Bausch. Bausch Articulating and Occlusion Test Materials. 2020. 23. Harper KA, Setchell DJ. The use of shimstock to assess occlusal contacts: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:347-52. 24. Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording pattern of occlusal indicators. I. Influence of indicator thickness, pressure, and surface morphology. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989;44:90-3. 25. Ehrlich J, Taicher S. Intercuspal contacts of the natural dentition in centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:419-21. 26. Millstein PL, Clark RE, Kronman JH. Determination of the accuracy of wax interocclusal registrations. II. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:40-5. 27. Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Al-Ani MZ, Sloan P, Worthington H. Inter- and intra-operator reliability of the recording of occlusal contacts using 'occlusal sketch' acetate technique. British Dental Journal. 2002;193:397-400. 28. Davies S, Al-Ani Z, Jeremiah H, Winston D, Smith P. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:458-61. 29. Gazit E, Fitzig S, Lieberman MA. Reproducibility of occlusal marking techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:505-9. 30. Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:206-10. 31. Ingervall B. Tooth contacts on the functional and nonfunctional side in children and young adults. Arch Oral Biol. 1972;17:191-200. 32. Tejo SK, Kumar AG, Kattimani VS, Desai PD, Nalla S, Chaitanya K K. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Head Face Medicine. 2012;8:27. 33. Imamura Y, Sato Y, Kitagawa N, Uchida K, Osawa T, Omori M et al. Influence of occlusal loading force on occlusal contacts in natural dentition. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59:113-20. 34. Ziebert GJ, Donegan SJ. Tooth contacts and stability before and after occlusal adjustment. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42:276-81. 35. Malta Barbosa J, Urtula AB, Hirata R, Caramês J. Thickness evaluation of articulating papers and foils. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30:70-2. 36. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132. 37. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:26-35. 38. Trulsson M, Gunne HS. Food-holding and -biting behavior in human subjects lacking periodontal receptors. J Dent Res. 1998;77:574-82. 39. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, Bürgin W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:345-53. 40. Misch CE, Bides MW. Implant-protected occlusion. Int J Dent Symp. 1994;2:32-7. 41. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prostheses: Implant-protective occlusion. Dental Implant Prosthetics2005. p. 472-510. 42. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization. 2015;7:S27-S33. 43. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics.2015. 44. Sato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:15-21. 45. Chen Y-Y, Kuan C-L, Wang Y-B. Implant occlusion: biomechanical considerations for implant-supported prostheses. Journal of dental sciences. 2008;3:65-74. 46. Verma TP, Kumathalli KI, Jain V, Kumar R. Bite Force Recording Devices - A Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:Ze01-ze5. 47. Tzakis MG, Osterberg T, Carlsson GE. A study of some masticatory functions in 90-year old subjects. Gerodontology. 1994;11:25-9. 48. Kogawa EM, Calderon PS, Lauris JR, Araujo CR, Conti PC. Evaluation of maximal bite force in temporomandibular disorders patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:559-65. 49. Gonçalves TMSV, Vasconcelos LMRD, Silva WJD, Del Bel Cury AA, Garcia RCMR. Influence of female hormonal fluctuation on maximum occlusal force. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2011;22:497-501. 50. Gomes SG, Custodio W, Faot F, Cury AA, Garcia RC. Chewing side, bite force symmetry, and occlusal contact area of subjects with different facial vertical patterns. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:446-52. 51. Lyons MF, Sharkey SW, Lamey PJ. An evaluation of the T-Scan computerised occlusal analysis system. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5:166-72. 52. Khan SIR, Rao D, Ramachandran A, Ashok BV. Influence of personality traits on the intensity of maximum voluntary bite force in adults. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:706-11. 53. Lyons MF, Baxendale RH. A preliminary electromyographic study of bite force and jaw-closing muscle fatigue in human subjects with advanced tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17:311-8. 54. Braun S, Bantleon HP, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Johnson BE. A study of bite force, part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:367-72. 55. Winocur E, Davidov I, Gazit E, Brosh T, Vardimon AD. Centric slide, bite force and muscle tenderness changes over 6 months following fixed orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:254-9. 56. Hirao A, Murata S, Murata J, Kubo A, Hachiya M, Asami T. Relationships between the Occlusal Force and Physical/Cognitive Functions of Elderly Females Living in the Community. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:1279-82. 57. Rentes AM, Gavião MB, Amaral JR. Bite force determination in children with primary dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:1174-80. 58. Suzuki T, Watanabe T, Yoshitomi N, Ishinabe S, Kumagai H, Uchida T et al. Evaluation of a New Measuring System for Occlusal Force with Pressure Sensitive Sheet. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;38:966-73. 59. Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Morii K, Nokubi T, Ettinger RL. The relationship between oral function and body mass index among independently living older Japanese people. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:539-46. 60. Shiga H, Komino M, Uesugi H, Sano M, Yokoyama M, Nakajima K et al. Comparison of two dental prescale systems used for the measurement of occlusal force. Odontology. 2020;108:676-80. 61. Horibe Y, Matsuo K, Ikebe K, Minakuchi S, Sato Y, Sakurai K et al. Relationship between two pressure-sensitive films for testing reduced occlusal force in diagnostic criteria for oral hypofunction. Gerodontology. 2021. 62. Hidaka O, Iwasaki M, Saito M, Morimoto T. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1336-44. 63. Kon K, Shiota M, Sakuyama A, Ozeki M, Kozuma W, Kawakami S et al. Evaluation of the Alteration of Occlusal Distribution in Unilateral Free-End and Intermediate Missing Cases. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:3-7. 64. Motegi E, Nomura M, Tachiki C, Miyazaki H, Takeuchi F, Takaku S et al. Occlusal force in people in their sixties attending college for elderly. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2009;50:135-40. 65. Kono R. Relationship between occlusal force and preventive factors for disability among community-dwelling elderly persons. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2009;46:55-62. 66. Aras K, Hasanreisoğlu U, Shinogaya T. Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:204-9. 67. Makino E, Nomura M, Motegi E, Iijima Y, Ishii T, Koizumi Y et al. Effect of orthodontic treatment on occlusal condition and masticatory function. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2014;55:185-97. 68. Hwang S, Choi YJ, Jung S, Kim S, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Posterior dental compensation and occlusal function in adults with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions. Korean J Orthod. 2020;50:98-107. 69. Iwase M, Ohashi M, Tachibana H, Toyoshima T, Nagumo M. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:1102-7. 70. Moroi A, Yoshizawa K, Iguchi R, Ikawa H, Kosaka A, Hotta A et al. The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:1743-8. 71. Adachi K, Yamamoto H, Watanabe R, Iwahori M, Miyao M, Yamauchi M. Reproducibility of the Newly Developed Dental Prescale II System and Bite Force Analyzer for Occlusal Measurements. J Gifu Dent Soc. 2020;46:123-6. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79833 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | "實驗目的： 本研究的目的在於了解Dental Prescale II (DPS II, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan)於不同狀況下，記錄所受力量之數值變化，並且觀察其所呈現數值與實際受力大小之相關性。 材料與方法： 體外測試： 使用萬能試驗機(Instron 5566, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA)對DPS II以一12mm2圓形平面進行三項壓縮試驗，再以EPSON Perfection V600 Photo掃描機，搭配Bite Force Analyzer (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan)進行力量(N)、面積(mm2)、平均壓力(MPa)及最大壓力(MPa)數值分析。三項試驗分別為： 1. 以Instron對DPS II以300 N進行壓縮，包含兩組，樣本數均為10張：(1) 壓縮第1次後立即掃描，並間隔1分鐘後進行第2次壓縮及掃描，重複進行至第11次壓縮及掃描後結束，其第1壓縮點與第11壓縮點間隔10分鐘；(2) 壓縮第1次後置於原包裝袋中避免光照，並間隔1分鐘後進行第2次壓縮，重複進行至第11次壓縮後立即掃描，其第1壓縮點與第11壓縮點間隔10分鐘。 2. 以Instron對DPS II以100 N ~ 800 N (中間間隔100N) 進行壓縮，三組測試狀況分別為: (1) 施壓時間3秒；(2) 施壓時間5秒；(3) 施壓時間5秒，並以樹脂板與橡皮障模擬自然牙硬度與牙周韌帶。每組均壓縮第1次後立即掃描，並間隔1分鐘後進行第2次壓縮及掃描，重複進行至第11次壓縮及掃描後結束，其第1壓縮點與第11壓縮點間隔10分鐘，樣本數均為10張： 3. 以Instron對DPS II以1Hz的頻率在300 N ~ 500 N之間模擬施力過程中力量大小無法維持恆定而有高低變化，壓縮時間5秒，壓縮第一次後立即掃描，並間隔1分鐘後進行第2次壓縮及掃描，重複進行至第11次壓縮及掃描後結束，其第1點與第11點間隔10分鐘，樣本數為1張。 體內測試： 實驗包含10位20歲以上健康受試者(男女比1:1)，以主觀感覺咬牛排之力量咬住DPS II三秒鐘後進行掃描，掃描時機點為立即(設為0分鐘)至10分鐘(間隔1分鐘)、15分鐘、20分鐘、25分鐘、30分鐘、60分鐘、90分鐘、120分鐘。 統計分析： 實驗數據資料以 Excel 分類建檔後，使用統計軟體(IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27, USA)做分析，顯著值定在 p＜0.05。若各組間有顯著差異，以Scheffé 法進行事後檢定。 體外測試： 1. 使用變異數分析，觀察不同光照次數、時間對DPS II的數值的影響 2. 使用變異數分析，觀察不同壓縮時間或是否模擬牙周韌帶，對DPS II數值的影響 3. 使用簡單線性回歸，觀察試驗機實際施力大小以及DPS II顯示數值之關係 體內測試： 使用變異數分析，觀察時間對DPS II數值的影響 實驗結果： 體外測試1： 1. 光照次數(1次與11次)不影響DPS II呈現之力量(p=0.939)、面積(p=0.785)、平均壓力(p=0.481)及最大壓力(p=0.900)四項數值。 2. 掃描延遲時間(0至10分鐘)對DPS II呈現之面積無顯著差異(p=1.000)，力量、平均壓力、最大壓力則有顯著差異(p<0.05) 3. 對DPS II光照11次後之力量標準化，以0分鐘標準化後，增加1分上升9.7%，2分上升13.2%，至10分上升23.7%；以2分鐘標準化後，增加1分上升1.7%，2分上升3.2%，至8分增加9.6%。 體外測試2： 1. 施壓3秒與施壓5秒組別之間(p<0.001) 於力量數值有顯著差異，於面積、平均壓力與最大壓力數值無顯著差異、施壓5秒與施壓5秒並模擬自然牙組別之間(p<0.001)於四項數值有顯著差異。 2. 施壓3秒組別力量數值約為Instron數值之0.652倍(R2=0.981)，去除最大壓力120MPa的資料後為0.693倍(R2=0.987)；施壓5秒組別力量數值約為Instron數值之0.638倍(R2=0.966)，去除最大壓力120MPa的資料後為0.655倍(R2=0.977)；施壓5秒並模擬自然牙組別力量數值約為Instron數值之0.794倍(R2=0.991)。 體外測試3： 以300N~500N力量模擬施力過程中力量大小無法維持恆定而有高低變化之組別，與300N(p=0.000)、400N(p=0.000)、500N(p=0.024)組別均有顯著差異。 體內測試： 1. 力量以0分鐘數值標準化後，0分至60分組內無顯著差異，1分至120分組內無顯著差異。觀察上升比例時，0分至2分的變化量約為6%，至10分鐘時約13%，至120分鐘時約27%。 2. 面積以0分鐘數值標準化後，0分至120分組內無顯著差異。 3. 平均壓力以0分鐘數值標準化後，0分至90分組內無顯著差異，1分至120分組內無顯著差異。 4. 最大壓力以0分鐘數值標準化後，0分至15分組內無顯著差異，1分至60分組內無顯著差異，2分至120分組內無顯著差異。 結論： 1. 光照次數在11次以內不會對DPS II顯示之力量、面積、平均壓力及最大壓力有影響。 2. 掃描延遲時間對於DPS II顯示力量、平均壓力及最大壓力有影響，對面積則無影響。 3. 掃描延遲時間以2分鐘後的力量變化較0~2分鐘的數值穩定。 4. DPS II顯示力量數值與受壓時間有關。 5. DPS II顯示力量與實際力量相比，需一係數轉換，此係數視情況可能介於0.6至0.8之間。 6. DPS II顯示力量，若在最大壓力120MPa的狀況下，會有低估實際力量的情形。 7. 不論施力期間是否永遠保持最大力量，DPS II顯示力量仍會是最大力量。 8. 臨床或研究上使用，以測試後放置10分鐘的數值會比較穩定。" | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:13:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0508202100191400.pdf: 6763381 bytes, checksum: 7ccf2d2a43d16e74ff9be77cc4f49b99 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "口試委員會審定書 I 誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT vii 目錄 xii 表目錄 xv 圖目錄 xvi Chapter 1 緒論 1 1.1 引言 1 1.2 文獻回顧 7 1.2.1 自然牙的咬合調整 7 1.2.2 咬合指示工具(occlusal indicator) 9 1.2.3 定性咬合指示工具(qualitative occlusal indicator) 9 1.2.4 自然牙與植體的差異 14 1.2.5 植體贋復物的咬合調整 15 1.2.6 定量咬合指示工具(quantitative occlusal indicator) 16 1.2.7 非電子式定量咬合指示工具The Dental Prescale System 18 Chapter 2 研究目的 21 2.1 研究假說 21 Chapter 3 材料與方法 22 3.1 測試工具 22 3.1.1 Dental Prescale II (DPS II, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) 22 3.1.2 萬能試驗機Universal Testing Machine (Instron 5566, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) 22 3.2 體外測試 22 3.2.1 光照與掃描延遲時間對於DPS II顯示數值之影響 22 3.2.2 觀察DPS II顯示數值與Instron施力數值之關係 23 3.2.3 觀察模擬施力過程中力量大小無法維持恆定而有高低變化時，DPS II顯示數值之關係 24 3.3 體內測試 24 3.4 統計分析 26 Chapter 4 實驗結果 27 4.1 光照次數與掃描延遲時間對DPS II數值影響 27 4.1.1 光照次數 27 4.1.2 掃描延遲時間 27 4.1.3 標準化力量與掃描延遲時間 28 4.2 不同施力時間、有無橡皮障與DPS II數值 28 4.3 模擬施力過程中力量大小無法維持恆定而有高低變化狀況DPS II力量數值 29 4.4 體內測試 29 Chapter 5 討論 31 5.1 樣本數設定 31 5.2 光照次數與掃描延遲時間對DPS II數值影響 31 5.3 不同壓縮時間以及是否有緩衝對DPS II數值影響 33 5.3.1 壓縮時間影響 33 5.3.2 牙周韌帶影響 33 5.3.3 DPS II測量壓力範圍之影響 34 5.4 模擬施力過程中力量大小無法維持恆定而有高低變化狀況下的DPS II力量數值 35 5.5 體內測試 35 Chapter 6 總結 36 Chapter 7 實驗設計之限制與未來展望 37 7.1 以平面或以標準齒模進行實驗的考量 37 7.2 實驗數值的樣本數 37 7.3 未來展望 37 參考文獻 93 附錄 100" | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 自然牙與植體贋復物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Dental Prescale II (DPS II) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 咬合力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 掃描延遲時間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 咬合指示工具 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 咬合調整 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Dental Prescale II (DPS II) | en |
| dc.subject | nature tooth and implant prostheses | en |
| dc.subject | occlusal adjustment | en |
| dc.subject | occlusal indicator | en |
| dc.subject | scan delay | en |
| dc.subject | bite force | en |
| dc.title | 影響Dental Prescale II 測量值之因子探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigation of factors affecting Dental Prescale II measurements | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林立德(Hsin-Tsai Liu),洪志遠(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Dental Prescale II (DPS II),咬合力,掃描延遲時間,咬合指示工具,咬合調整,自然牙與植體贋復物, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Dental Prescale II (DPS II),bite force,scan delay,occlusal indicator,occlusal adjustment,nature tooth and implant prostheses, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 108 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102098 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-08-09 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0508202100191400.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2026-08-09 | 6.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。