請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79804完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊正民(Cheng-Min Chuang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yu Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉佳郁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:11:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-11 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:11:58Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陳律睿, 周盛德, 鄭天秀. (2016) 跨國籍企業子公司自主權對子公司績效之影響. 中華管理評論, 19(2) 廖明坤, 于卓民, 司徒達賢DH. (2003). 台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究 政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文]. 蔡政安, 廖明坤. (2010). 多國籍企業子公司自主權與績效關係: 台商大陸子公司興業精神中介效果之實證研究. 中山管理評論, 18(1), 41-65. Ambos, B., Asakawa, K., Ambos, T. C. (2011). A dynamic perspective on subsidiary autonomy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3‐4), 301-316. Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U., Birkinshaw, J. (2010). What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of international business studies, 41(7), 1099-1118. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., Holm, U. (2015). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. In Knowledge, Networks and Power (pp. 393-420). Springer. Aylmer, R. J. (1970). Who makes marketing decisions in the multinational firm? Journal of Marketing, 34(4), 25-30. Bartlett, C. A., Beamish, P. W. (2018). Transnational management. Cambridge University Press. Bartlett, C. A., Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Harvard Business Press. Beechler, S., Yang, J. Z. (1994). The transfer of Japanese-style management to American subsidiaries: Constraints, and competencies. Journal of international business studies, 25(3), 467-491. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm‐specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-242. Brooke, M. Z. (1984). Centralization and autonomy: A study in organization behaviour. Praeger Publishers. Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109-1128. Chu, W.-Y., Chuang, C.-M. (1999). Decision-Making Autonomy and Divisional Effectiveness in Multibusiness Firms: From Contingency Perspective to Cultural Control Perspective. Asia Pacific Management Review, 4(4), 345-356. De Bodinat, H. R. (1976). Influence in the multinational corporation: The case of manufacturing. de Jong, G., Van Dut, V., Jindra, B., Marek, P. (2015). Does country context distance determine subsidiary decision-making autonomy? Theory and evidence from European transition economies. International Business Review, 24(5), 874-889. Doz, Y., Prahalad, C. (1981). An approach to strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Review, 22(4), 5-13. Doz, Y. L., Bartlett, C. A., Prahalad, C. K. (1981). Global competitive pressures and host country demands managing tensions in MNCs. California Management Review, 23(3), 63-74. Edwards, R., Ahmad, A., Moss, S. (2002). Subsidiary autonomy: The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia. Journal of international business studies, 33(1), 183-191. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550. Ferner, A., Edwards, P. (1995). Power and the diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1(2), 229-257. Foss, N. J., Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67. Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of management review, 15(4), 603-626. Ghoshal, S., Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 323-337. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of management review, 16(4), 768-792. Hedlund, G. (1979). Autonomy of subsidiaries and formalization of headquarters-subsidiary relationships in Swedish MNCs. Stockholm school of economics, Institute of international business. Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Routledge. Jarillo, J. C., Martíanez, J. I. (1990). Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 501-512. Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Readings in international business: a decision approach, 249, 249-252. Levitt, T. (1993). The globalization of markets. Readings in international business: a decision approach, 249, 249-252. Malnight, T. W. (1995). Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 119-141. Malnight, T. W. (1996). The transition from decentralized to network-based MNC structures: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of international business studies, 27(1), 43-65. Martinez, J. I., Jarillo, J. C. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of international business studies, 20(3), 489-514. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Minichiello, V. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Longman Cheshire. Mudambi, R., Navarra, P. (2015). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. In The eclectic paradigm (pp. 157-191). Springer. Nohria, N., Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491-502. Nohria, N., Ghoshal, S. (1997). The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Peccei, R., Warner, M. (1976). Decision-making in a multi-national firm. Journal of General Management, 4(1), 66-71. Peng, G. Z., Beamish, P. W. (2014). MNC subsidiary size and expatriate control: Resource-dependence and learning perspectives. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 51-62. Permutter, H. V. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4(1), p9-18. Picard, J. (1977). How European companies control marketing decisions abroad. Columbia Journal of World Business, 12(2), 113-121. Prahalad, C. K. (1975). The strategic process in a multinational corporation. Harvard University. Prahalad, C. K., Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. Simon and Schuster. Vachani, S. (1999). Global diversification's effect on multinational subsidiaries' autonomy. International Business Review, 8(5-6), 535-560. Westney, D. E. (1993). Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In Organization theory and the multinational corporation (pp. 53-76). Springer. Wind, Y., Douglas, S. P., Perlmutter, H. V. (1973). Guidelines for developing international marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 37(2), 14-23. Young, S., Tavares, A. T. (2004). Centralization and autonomy: back to the future. International Business Review, 13(2), 215-237. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79804 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究透過個案分析法研究兩岸外商子公司自主性的發展過程，與促成其演進的影響因素。除了收集二手資料外，本研究也針對個案公司的高階主管進行問卷調查，分析兩岸子公司在五年前、目前，與五年後的表現，藉以針對過去文獻中自主性的影響因素進行驗證和延伸，並加入多元化的自主性評估指標、長期動態變化的分析，讓子公司的自主性發展可以有更立體而全面性的討論。 研究發現兩岸子公司在業務自主性與決策權的表現具有正向的相關性，且同時受到經營策略、價值鏈活動，以及子公司內外部因素所影響：當子公司在地回應程度高、產業環境競爭激烈、創新能力優秀，以及在執行策略層面的價值鏈活動時，會被賦予較多的業務自主性；而當子公司全球整合程度高、法規環境友善、營收表現亮眼，以及在執行營運層面的價值鏈活動時，會讓子公司被賦予較佳的決策權。而在長期動態變化的分析中，這些影響因素也與單一時間點的靜態分析結果不盡相同。 雖然整體而言中國子公司的自主性優於臺灣子公司，而且根據未來五年的發展預測，這個趨勢很有可能仍會維持甚至擴大，不過，臺灣子公司其實具備了許多獲取自主性的優良條件，若臺灣子公司的經營者能善用在地資源，發揮子公司的創新能力與知識共享能力，將能為臺灣子公司爭取更多自主性成長的空間。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:11:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0808202115423300.pdf: 1970986 bytes, checksum: b681c92e8c6146a0d2fc10096c91e8b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 5 第四節 研究流程與章節架構 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 跨國企業面臨之外在壓力 8 第二節 國際企業經營策略 11 第三節 子公司自主性 15 第四節 文獻與本研究之關聯性 19 第三章 研究設計 20 第一節 研究架構與步驟 20 第二節 研究方法 21 第三節 實地訪談 23 第四節 個案選定與簡介 26 第五節 問卷資料蒐集與分析方法 29 第四章 研究結果 33 第一節 子公司自主性表現 33 第二節 國際經營策略與自主性 38 第三節 價值鏈活動與自主性 57 第四節 子公司內外部環境與自主性 64 第五章 結論與建議 72 第一節 理論意涵 72 第二節 管理意涵 77 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 78 參考文獻 80 附錄 84 附錄一 問卷 84 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 業務自主性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 子公司自主性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際經營策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 價值鏈活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | subsidiary autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | decision-making autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | business autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | global strategy | en |
| dc.subject | value chain activities | en |
| dc.title | 子公司自主性演進與影響因素研究：以兩岸外商子公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Evolution and Determinants of Subsidiary Autonomy of MNEs: The Cases in Taiwan and China | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 連勇智(Hsin-Tsai Liu),吳政衞(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 子公司自主性,業務自主性,決策權,國際經營策略,價值鏈活動, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | subsidiary autonomy,business autonomy,decision-making autonomy,global strategy,value chain activities, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 90 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102186 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0808202115423300.pdf | 1.92 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。