請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79266完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周先捷(Nihel Jhou) | |
| dc.contributor.author | CHENG-YEN YEH | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 葉承彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T08:56:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T08:56:59Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-01-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bernstein, S. (2015). Nowhere Man: Time Travel and Spatial Location. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), 158-168. Bernstein, S. (2017). Time Travel and the Movable Present. In J. Keller (Ed.), Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen (pp. 80-94). Oxford University Press UK. Carroll, J. W., Markosian, N. (2010). An Introduction to Metaphysics: Cambridge University Press. Effingham, N. (2020). Time Travel: Probability and Impossibility: Oxford University Press. Hudson, H., Wasserman, R. (2010). Van Inwagen on Time Travel and Changing the Past. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 5(5), 41-49. Keller, S., Nelson, M. (2010). Presentists Should Believe in Time-Travel. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79(3), 333-345. Kiourti, I. (2008a). Killing Baby Suzy. Philosophical Studies, 139, 343-352. Kiourti, I. (2008b). Killing Baby Suzy. Philosophical Studies, 139(3), 343-352. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9121-0 Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals: Oxford: Blackwell. Lewis, D. (1976). The Paradoxes of Time Travel. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13(2), 145-152. Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 455-476. doi:10.2307/2215339 Loss, R. (2015). How to Change the Past in One‐Dimensional Time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(1), 1-11. doi:10.1111/papq.12059 Lowe, E. J. (2002). A Survey of Metaphysics: Oxford University Press. Morris, M. S., Thorne, K. S., Yurtsever, U. (1988). Wormholes,TimeMachines, and the Weak Energy Condition. Physical Review Letters, 61, 1446-1449. Poidevin, R. L. (2005). The Cheshire Cat Problem and Other Spatial Obstacles to Backwards Time Travel. The Monist, 88(3), 336-352. Rea, M. C. (2015). Time Travelers Are Not Free. Journal of Philosophy, 112(5), 266-279. doi:10.5840/jphil2015112516 Richmond, A. (2018). Time travel, hyperspace and Cheshire Cats. Synthese, 195(11), 5037-5058. Sider, T. (2002). Time travel, coincidences and counterfactuals. Philosophical Studies, 110(2), 115-138. doi:10.1023/A:1020205802833 Skow, B. (2015). Objective Becoming: Oxford University Press UK. Slater, M. H. (2005). The Necessity of Time Travel. The Monist, 88(3), 362-369. Stalnaker, R. C. (1968). A Theory of Conditionals. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in Logical Theory: Oxford: Blackwell. van Inwagen, P. (2010). Changing the Past. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics(5), 3-40. Vihvelin, K. (1996). What time travelers cannot do. Philosophical Studies, 81(2-3), 315-330. doi:10.1007/BF00372789 Vihvelin, K. (2020). Killing Time Again. The Monist, 103(3), 312-327. doi:10.1093/monist/onaa006 Vranas, P. (2009). Can I Kill My Younger Self? Time Travel and the Retrosuicide Paradox. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 90, 520-534. Wasserman, R. (2018). Paradoxes of time travel. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79266 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 時間旅行一直都是為人所津津樂道的話題。其中回到過去的時間旅行特別讓人感興趣，而其中一個原因就是我們想要有改變過去的能力。然而，改變過去會遇到許多如祖父悖論的難題。一種解方是透過分析能力與自由意志的方式來處理這個問題；有些人則籍由第二維度的時間來嘗試提供改變過去的能力。 因此，本篇論文中將會分成兩個主要段落。第一個段落會在一維時間模型下處理祖父悖論中關於能力與自由意志的問題，第二個段落則會在二維時間模型中處理改變過去的意義，並以時間樹枝理論(the branching time theory)以及超時間理論(the hypertime theory)為主要討論標的。 我認為兩種解方都無法提供完全讓人滿意的答案。一維時間旅行無法讓人真正改變過去，因此我們需要第二維度的時間；然而，如果我們仔細爬梳想要改變過去的理由，就會發現二維時間旅行也難以讓人接受，最後還是會回到一維時間旅行。 因此，無論一維時間旅行還是二維時間旅行都無法提供一個完美的答案。我認為這是因為當一個人想要改變某個過去的事物時，這就已經預設了該事物的存在。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T08:56:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0301202216423100.pdf: 2411784 bytes, checksum: c7ce741412e300498f32665875204cde (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "口試委員會審定書 i Acknowledgement ii 摘要 iv Abstract v Table of Contents vi List of Figures viii Introduction 1 1. Three Models of Time about Past, Present, and Future 1 2. Definition of Time Travel 5 Chapter One One-Dimensional Time Travel 7 1. Time Travel in Different Time Models 7 (1) The Presentist Time Travel 7 (2) The Eternalist Time Travel 8 (3) The Growing Block Time Travel 11 2. The Grandfather Paradox 16 (1) Introduction 16 (2) Literature 24 (3) Proposal 44 3. Conclusion 54 4. Appendix: Effingham and the Impossible 56 Chapter Two Two-Dimensional Time Travel 60 1. Branching Time Theory 60 2. Hypertime Theory 62 (1) Hypertime Theory with Growing Block Theory 63 (2) Hypertime Theory with Eternalism 66 (3) MOP Eternalism 67 (4) MOP Presentism 69 (5) MOP Growing Block Theory 70 3. The Future-Fact Problem in MOP Theory 71 (1) Causation 72 4. The Wrong Target 74 5. Conclusion 75 Chapter Three Why Change The Past? 76 1. From the Time Traveler’s Perspective 76 2. Erasing the Past Record 77 3. The Dilemma of Two-Dimensional Time Travel 78 4. Changing the Past in One-Dimensional Time 81 (1) Wasserman’s A-Model 81 (2) Without Time Traveling 83 (3) No Difference from the Time Traveler’s Perspective 84 5. Conclusion 84 Conclusion 86 Reference 88 Figure 0.1 2 Figure 0.2 2 Figure 0.3 2 Figure 0.4 3 Figure 0.5 3 Figure 0.6 3 Figure 0.7 4 Figure 0.8 4 Figure 0.9 4 Figure 0.10 5 Figure 1.1 8 Figure 1.2 8 Figure 1.3 10 Figure 1.4 12 Figure 1.5 14 Figure 1.6 15 Figure 1.7 17 Figure 1.8 19 Figure 1.9 19 Figure 1.10 20 Figure 1.11 20 Figure 1.12 20 Figure 1.13 20 Figure 1.14 21 Figure 1.15 21 Figure 1.16 21 Figure 1.17 34 Figure 1.18 34 Figure 1.19 34 Figure 1.20 35 Figure 1.21 36 Figure 1.22 36 Figure 1.23 39 Figure 1.24 41 Figure 1.25 42 Figure 1.26 44 Figure 2.1 61 Figure 2.2 62 Figure 2.3 62 Figure 2.4 63 Figure 2.5 63 Figure 2.6 63 Figure 2.7 64 Figure 2.8 65 Figure 2.9 65 Figure 2.10 66 Figure 2.11 68 Figure 2.12 70 Figure 2.13 71 Figure 2.14 71 Figure 2.15 72 Figure 2.16 72 Figure 2.17 72 Figure 2.18 73 Figure 2.19 73 Figure 2.20 74 Figure 3.1 76 Figure 3.2 77 Figure 3.3 77 Figure 3.4 79 Figure 3.5 81 Figure 3.6 82 Figure 3.7 83 Figure 3.8 83" | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 時間旅行：從祖父悖論到改變過去 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Time Travel: From the Grandfather Paradox to Changing the Past | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄧敦民(Hsin-Tsai Liu),蔡承志(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 時間旅行,祖父悖論,改變過去,時間形上學,時間存有學,自由意志,因果,時間樹枝理論,超時間理論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Time Travel,The Grandfather Paradox,Changing the Past,Temporal Ontology,The Metaphysics of Time,Causation,Free Will,The Branching Time Theory,The Hypertime Theory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200002 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-01-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 哲學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0301202216423100.pdf | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。