Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業管理組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79080
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳思寬(Shi-Kuan Chen)
dc.contributor.authorHsiu-Hua Tiaoen
dc.contributor.author刁秀華zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-11T15:42:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-21
dc.date.copyright2018-08-21
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-08-11
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
1. 方俊琪,2011,台灣地區廢棄物焚化處理之生命週期評估與不確定分析,嘉南藥理科技大學環境工程與科學系碩士論文
2. 立法院,2013,法律提案:廢棄物資源循環利用法草案
3. 行政院環保署,2012,垃圾處理政策評估說明書
4. 吳盛忠,2015,廢棄物管理未來展望:從資源循環到循環經濟,綠基會通訊
5. 洪志銘,2017,循環經濟與綠色經濟促成經濟轉型
6. 孫世勤,2017,循環經濟下之都市廢棄物清理,環興科技股份有限公司
7. 潘文炎,2014,資源循環經濟與產業發展,財團法人中技社
8. 潘文炎,2015,循環經濟的發展趨勢與關鍵議題,財團法人中技社
9. 蔡弦均,2017,探討價值與環保意識對循環經濟平台使用意圖之影響
10. 賴瑩瑩,2018,推動循環經濟-廢棄物資源化,行政院第3587次院會
英文文獻
1. Agarwal, S. and Ramaswami, S. N. 1992. Choice of Foreign Market Entry Model: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors. Journal of International Business Studies.
2. Barnard, C.S. 1976.Farm Planning and Control Action (2nd ed.). Cambridge New York.
3. Czinkoata, M. R., Ronkainen, I. A. and Moffett, M. H. 1977. International Business (5th ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
4. Davis and Dunn. 2002. Building the Brand-Driven Business, Jossey-Bass.
5. Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (1st). Don Mills. CA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Hill, Charles W. and Jones, Gareth R. 1989 .Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., p192.
7. Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Ireland, R.D. 1994. A Mid-range Theory of the Interactive Effects of International and Product Diversification on Innovation and Performance. Journal of Management.
8. Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M. 1995. The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2).
9. Hymer, S. H. 1960. The International Operations of National Firms: A study of Direct Foreign Investment. MIT Press.
10. Hymer, S. H., 1976. The International Corporation of National Firms, Cambridge. MIT Press.
11. International Trade Administration. 2017. Environmental Technologies Top Markets Report.
12. Jain, A. 2017. Waste Management in Asian Countries. UN Environment.
13. Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3).
14. Kaleka, A. 2011. When Exporting Manufacturers Compete on the Basis of Service: Resources and Marketing Capabilities Driving Service Advantage and Performance, Journal of International Marketing, 19(1).
15. Kefalas, A. G. 1992. The global corporation. National Forum, 72(4).
16. Lacy, P., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Rutqvist, J., Haglund, T., Cui, M., … Buddemeier, P. 2014. Circular Advantage: Innovation Business Models and Technologies to Create Value in a World without Limits to Growth. Chicago, IL: Accenture.
17. Lawrence and Luostarinen. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of Concept.
18. Madsen, T. K. and Servais, P. 1997. The Internationalization of Born Globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6).
19. Ministry of Environment and Forests. 2016. Solid Waste Management Rules Revised After 16 Years; Rules Now Extend to Urban and Industrial Areas.
20. Murray, A., Skene, K. and Haynes, K. 2015. The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-12.
21. Pan, Y. and Tse, D. K. 2000. The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 538.
22. Porter, M. E. 1986. Changing Patterns of International Competition. California Management Review.
23. Porter, M.E. and Fuller M. B. 1986. Coalitions and Global Strategy. In Porter, M.E. (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries.
24. Samson, Danny and Terziovski M. 1999. The Relationship Between Total Quality Management Practices and Operational Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 17.
25. Simon, C.J. and Sulivan, M.W. 1993. The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach. Marketing Science, Winter.
26. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L. and Christensen, H. K. 2001. The Resource-based View and 80 Marketing: The Role of Market-based Assets in Gaining Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6).
27. Teece, D. J. 1977. Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how. The Eco-nomic Journal, 87(June).
28. Thailand State of Pollution Report 2015
29. Vernon, R. 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
30. Vezzoli, C.A. and Manzini, E. 2008. Design for Environmental Sustainability: Springer Science & Business Media.
31. Wong, H. and Merrilees, B. 2005. A Brand Orientation Typology for SMEs: A Case Research Approach. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14:3.
32. Zainu, Z. A. and Songip, A. R. 2017. Policies, Challenges and Strategies for Municipal Waste Management in Malaysia.
網路資源
1. 中華民國行政院環境保護署焚化營運管理資訊系統
https://swims.epa.gov.tw/swims/swims_net/index.aspx
2. 中華民國行政院環保署資源回收管理基金管理會網站
https://recycle.epa.gov.tw/epa/ShowPage2.aspx?sno=1010
3. 中華民國環境保護統計年報
https://www.epa.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=31088&mp=epa
4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Circular Economy System Diagram
https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/interactive-diagram
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79080-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在分析了解臺灣循環經濟產業跨入新興市場之進入策略,研究目的包括:(1)探討循環經濟產業在進行產業輸出之動機與目的,(2)探討循環經濟產業在進行產業輸出關鍵成功因素,(3)探討循環經濟產業在進行產業輸出時所採取之模式,(4)提供未來推動循環經濟產業及政府訂定各項政策參考。本研究採用質性研究之專家問卷訪談法,為兼顧方向性與彈性,選定了半結構式問卷法,研究對象包括廢棄物焚化發電與回收再利用二個領域,共有廢棄物焚化發電、溶劑、塑膠容器、輪胎、紙容器、燈管及電池、資訊物品及電子電器(四機一腦)等八家廠商,產業輸出範圍鎖定於新興國家。本研究的主要結果如下:
一、循環經濟產業最主要輸出動機考量有三項:政策、市場規模及文化,若無政策與制度之支撐,如臺灣基管會的回收基金制度,廠商不敢貿然進入市場,也無法順利推展成功。
二、循環經濟產業於進行產業輸出之前三項成功關鍵因素為技術、當地關係、符合當地需求之整合管理能力,技術能力為廠商最引以為傲之優勢,好的技術能力能帶來更多業務發展機會。關於品牌及廠商經濟規模之重要性,於廢棄物焚化發電及回收再利用領域之結果存在差異,前者主要服務對象為政府單位,又其設施規模及處理技術要求相對高,品牌能為其創造優勢,增加業務機會。
三、循環經濟產業進行產業輸出時所採用之主要二個策略模式為合資及技術服務,主要還是基於對外部環境不確定性之風險考量,傾向將資產、Know-how保留在公司內部,另在採合資模式時更會將取得控制權與否列為重要評估項目。
四、廠商對政府之期待與建議仍著重在實質獎勵機制或財務支持,但也有廠商表達,不會因政府優惠政策而影響其海外發展策略,認為政府在國際上的地位嚴峻,反而強調廠商間之上下游整合,共同進行產業輸出,提升創造優勢。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to analysis the strategy of stepping in emerging market for Taiwan circular economic industry. The purposes of this study are (1) to explore the motivation and purpose of exporting circular economy industry, (2) to explore the key success factors of exporting circular economy industry, (3) to explore the export model adopted by the circular economy industry and (4) to provide a reference for promoting the circular economy industry and the government to formulate policies in the future. In this study, a qualitative survey of interviews with experts was adopted and semi-structured questionnaire was used to ensure the research direction and flexibility. Two research objects, Energy from Waste and Resource Recycling, are chosen in this study and the information were collected from eight sectors, including energy from waste, solvent, plastic container, tire, paper container, lamp and battery, waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). The destination of exporting is emerging market. Below are the conclusions of this study:
1. There are three main export motivations for circular economy industry: Policy, market size and culture. If there is no policy or recycling fund to support it, companies are afraid of enter the market and don’t expect the business will be developed successfully.
2. The three key factors of success for the circular economy industry prior to export are technology, local relations, and the ability to meet local needs. The companies are proud of their technical capability and believe that the outstanding technical capability can bring more business development opportunities. Regarding the importance of brand and company size, the result shows that there is discrepancy between Energy from Waste and Resource Recycling sector. The former mainly serves the government, and its facilities scale and technical requirements are relatively high. The brand can create advantages and more business opportunities for them.
3. The two main strategic models adopted by the circular economy industry for exporting are joint ventures and technical services. Considering the uncertainty of the external environment companies tend to keep assets and know-how inside the company. In addition, when the joint venture model is adopted, the control authority will be listed as an important assessment item.
4. Companies' expectations and suggestions on the government still focus on real incentives or financial support. However, some companies have expressed that government policies will not affect their overseas development strategies. Because Taiwan’s awkward international status, they will more focus on vertical integration, and jointly carry out industry export to create the advantages.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:42:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-P04746006-1.pdf: 2790375 bytes, checksum: f22a40035d7182e9be6abd0a3dc65e5d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 II
謝辭 III
摘要 IV
THESIS ABSTRACT V
目錄 VII
圖目錄 X
表目錄 XI
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 研究架構與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 循環經濟定義 5
2.2 臺灣焚化發電產業及回收再利用產業政策發展歷程 7
2.2.1 焚化發電產業 7
2.2.2 回收再利用產業 9
2.3 臺灣焚化發電產業及回收再利用產業現況 11
2.3.1 焚化發電產業 11
2.3.2 臺灣回收再利用產業 16
2.4 產業輸出動機與模式 17
2.4.1 產業輸出動機與優勢 17
2.4.2 產業輸出之模式 19
第三章 研究方法 23
3.1 質性研究訪談法 23
3.1.1 結構式的訪談 23
3.1.2 無結構式的訪談 24
3.1.3 半結構的訪談 25
3.2 研究範圍與限制 25
3.2.1 研究範圍 26
3.2.2 研究限制 26
3.3 研究設計與方法 26
3.3.1 資料收集與訪談方式說明 26
3.3.2 研究架構 27
第四章 資料分析與研究結果 29
4.1 受訪者與編碼者背景資料 30
4.1.1 受訪者介紹 30
4.1.2 編碼員資料 33
4.2 訪談內容編碼彙整與分析 33
4.2.1 訪談內容編碼 33
4.2.2 編碼內容結果彙整與分析 49
4.3 綜合結果分析 50
4.3.1 輸出動機 50
4.3.2 成功關鍵因素 51
4.3.3 輸出模式分析 52
4.3.4 政府協助事項分析 52
第五章 結論與建議 54
5.1 結論 54
5.2 建議 55
5.2.1 給產業之建議 55
5.2.2 給政府之建議 56
5.2.3 未來研究方向 56
參考文獻 57
附錄 61

圖目錄
圖1- 1 研究流程圖 4
圖2- 1 循環經濟理念圖 6
圖2- 2 臺灣循環經濟產業範疇 8
圖2- 3 臺灣廢棄物管理與資源回收架構 11
圖2- 4 1998年至2016年廢棄物處理情形 14
圖2- 5 1998年臺灣地區廢棄物處理方式 14
圖2- 6 2016年臺灣地區廢棄物處理方式 15
圖2- 7 產業輸出模式 21
圖2- 8 企業國際化發展架構 22
圖3- 1 研究架構圖 28
圖4- 1 資料分析流程圖 29

表目錄
表2- 1 循環經濟RESOLVE的破壞性創新策略 7
表2- 2 臺灣歷年垃圾處理相關政策一覽表 9
表2- 3 臺灣24座焚化爐基本資料 12
表2- 4 1998年至2016廢棄物處理統計表 13
表2- 5 公告應回收類別及相對應處理廠商數目 16
表4- 1 訪談對象資料表 30
表4- 2分類表與編碼代號 34
表4- 3 A公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 35
表4- 4 B公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 37
表4- 5 C公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 39
表4- 6 D公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 41
表4- 7 E公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 43
表4- 8 F公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 45
表4- 9 G公司受訪者內容及資料編碼 47
表4- 10 受訪者內容編碼彙整表 49
表4- 11 受訪者訪談結果分析 50
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject回收再利用zh_TW
dc.subject循環經濟zh_TW
dc.subject廢棄物焚化發電zh_TW
dc.subject產業輸出模式zh_TW
dc.subject新興市場zh_TW
dc.subjectEmerging Marketen
dc.subjectEnergy from Waste(EfW)en
dc.subjectMarket Entry Modesen
dc.subjectCircular Economyen
dc.subjectResource Recyclingen
dc.title臺灣循環經濟產業跨入新興市場策略 – 以廢棄物焚化發電與回收再利用為例zh_TW
dc.titleStrategy of Stepping in Emerging Market for Taiwan Circular Economy Industry: Case Study for Energy from Waste and Resource Recyclingen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林俊昇(J. Chris Lin),黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang)
dc.subject.keyword循環經濟,廢棄物焚化發電,回收再利用,新興市場,產業輸出模式,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCircular Economy,Energy from Waste(EfW),Resource Recycling,Emerging Market,Market Entry Modes,en
dc.relation.page62
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201802079
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-08-13
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業管理組zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2023-08-21-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業管理組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-P04746006-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.72 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved