請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7907
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ching Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蘇意晴 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:58:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-24 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:58:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2005)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊(第二版)。 林楷(2014)。基督徒信仰對於生活品質的影響。休憩管理研究,1(2),頁1-12。 劉誥洋(2006)。Spa水療對憂鬱情緒及生活品質之影響-以台南地區Spa消費者為例。立德管理學院休閒管理研究所,台南市。 英文文獻 Aguayo, R., Pecino, C. V., de la Fuente Solana, E. I., & Fernández, L. M. L. (2011). A meta-analytic reliability generalization study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 11(2), 343-361. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Barnes, L. L., Harp, D., & Jung, W. S. (2002). Reliability generalization of scores on the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 603-618. Beretvas, S. N., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 570-589. Beretvas, S. N., & Pastor, D. A. (2003). Using mixed-effects models in reliability generalization studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(1), 75-95. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants. PloS one, 5(12), e14331. Botella, J., Suero, M., & Gambara, H. (2010). Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients. Psychological methods, 15(4), 386. Campbell, J. S., Pulos, S., Hogan, M., & Murry, F. (2005). Reliability generalization of the Psychopathy Checklist applied in youthful samples. Educational and psychological measurement, 65(4), 639-656. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-briggs type indicator score reliability across: Studies a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 590-602. Caruso, J. C. (2000). Reliability generalization of the NEO personality scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(2), 236-254. Caruso, J. C., Witkiewitz, K., Belcourt-Dittloff, A., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2001). Reliability of scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(4), 675-689. Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, R. L., & Thompson, B. (2001). Score reliability in Webor internet-based surveys: unnumbered graphic rating scales versus Likert-type scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(4), 697-706. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.78.1.98 Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. doi: 10.1007/bf02310555 Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row. Dimitrov, D. M. (2002). Reliability: Arguments for multiple perspectives and potential problems with generalization across studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(5), 783-801. Duhachek, A., & Iacobucci, D. (2004). Alpha's standard error (ASE): an accurate and precise confidence interval estimate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 792. Gleaves, D. H., Pearson, C. A., Ambwani, S., & Morey, L. C. (2014). Measuring eating disorder attitudes and behaviors: a reliability generalization study. Journal of eating disorders, 2(1), 1. Graham, J. M., & Christiansen, K. (2009). The reliability of romantic love: A reliability generalization meta‐analysis. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 49-66. Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological testing : history, principles, and applications. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. London: Collier Macmillan. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hanson, W. E., Curry, K. T., & Bandalos, D. L. (2002). Reliability generalization of working alliance inventory scale scores. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 659-673. Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(3), 404-420. Hogan, T. P., Benjamin, A., & Brezinski, K. L. (2000). Reliability methods: A note on the frequency of use of various types. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(4), 523-531. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis : correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. Kieffer, K. M., & Reese, R. J. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(6), 969-994. Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances1. Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, 2, 278-292. Mahapoonyanont, N., Krahomwong, R., Kochakornjarupong, D., & Rachasong, W. (2010). Critical thinking abilities assessment tools: reliability generalization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 434-438. Mason, C., Allam, R., & Brannick, M. T. (2007). How to Meta-Analyze Coefficient-of-Stability Estimates Some Recommendations Based on Monte Carlo Studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 67(5), 765-783. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1997). Psychological testing : principles and applications (4th ed ed.): Prentice Hall. Nilsson, J. E., Schmidt, C. K., & Meek, W. D. (2002). Reliability generalization: An examination of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 647-658. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: McGraw-Hill. O’rourke, N. (2004). Reliability generalization of responses by care providers to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 64(6), 973-990. Oaster, T. (1989). Number of alternatives per choice point and stability of Likert-type scales. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68(2), 549-550. Reese, R. J., Kieffer, K. M., & Briggs, B. K. (2002). A reliability generalization study of select measures of adult attachment style. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(4), 619-646. Ross, M. E., Blackburn, M., & Forbes, S. (2005). Reliability generalization of the patterns of adaptive learning survey goal orientation scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 65(3), 451-464. Rowley, G. L. (1976). The reliability of observational measures. American Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 51-59. Ryngala, D. J., Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2005). Reliability generalization of the revised children's manifest anxiety scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 65(2), 259-271. Sánchez‐Meca, J., López‐López, J. A., & López‐Pina, J. A. (2013). Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(3), 402-425. Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics bulletin, 2(6), 110-114. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529-540. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological assessment, 8(4), 350. Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2003). Reliability generalization of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(3), 404-413. Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2004). A reliability induction and reliability generalization study of the CAGE questionnaire. Educational and psychological measurement, 64(2), 254-270. Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and psychological measurement, 54, 837-847. Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(2), 174-195. Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 58(1), 6-20. Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L. R., Tani, C. R., & Woodall, R. A. (2001). Reliability generalization: Exploring variation of reliability coefficients of MMPI clinical scales scores. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(1), 45-59. Vacha-Haase, T., Tani, C. R., Kogan, L. R., Woodall, R. A., & Thompson, B. (2001). Reliability generalization: Exploring reliability variations on MMPI/MMPI-2 validity scale scores. Assessment, 8(4), 391-401. Vassar, M., & Crosby, J. W. (2008). A reliability generalization study of coefficient alpha for the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 601-607. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five Factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(2), 224-235. Welch, B. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 330-336. Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2000). Assessing the reliability of Beck Depression Inventory scores: Reliability generalization across studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(2), 201-223. Youngstrom, E. A., & Green, K. W. (2003). Reliability generalization of self-report of emotions when using the Differential Emotions Scale. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(2), 279-295. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7907 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 信度是屬於測驗分數結果的一項特質,而不是屬於測驗工具本身(Gronlund & Linn, 1990)。因此每個研究都應該報告自己的研究樣本所估計出的信度係數。但實際上許多研究都沒有報告自己的信度係數。有鑑於此,Vacha-Haase於1998年提出一種信度的整合分析法,稱為信度概化法(reliability generalization, RG),藉此整合使用同一個測量工具且有報告信度係數的許多研究。在台灣尚未有信度概化研究,因此本研究將針對台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷(台灣版WHOQOL-BREF)進行信度概化研究,同時也修正一些過去信度概化研究可能有的問題,目的是(一)討論題目、量尺等等各方面完全一樣的測量工具在不同研究中,不同群體的受試者產生的Cronbach's α有何變異。(二)這樣的變異可以用哪些和研究參與者有關的因素(例如:參與者性別、年齡)來預測。台灣版WHOQOL-BREF包含了生理、心理、社會關係和環境四個範疇。結果發現不管在整份問卷或四個範疇,Cronbach's α在不同研究的變異程度都不小,但大部分研究都有達到.7,一般認為可接受的信度數值。測驗分數的標準差對整份問卷和四個範疇的Cronbach's α都有顯著影響。若去除掉分數標準差的影響,平均年齡是最有影響的變項,平均年齡越大,生理範疇的Cronbach's α也會越大,但環境範疇的Cronbach's α會越小。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | “Reliability refers to the results obtained with an evaluation instrument and not to the instrument itself” (Gronlund & Linn, 1990). Therefore, all researchers should provide reliability form the data actually analyzed in their study. However, in the past many researchers didn’t report it. Hence Vacha-Haase (1998) proposed the reliability generalization (RG) method which is a meta-analytic procedure for synthesizing reliability estimates from different studies. Because there hasn’t been any reliability generalization study in Taiwan, we conduct a reliability generalization study of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version to explore the amount of variability in Cronbach's α across studies, and to examine the factors that may predict the variability in Cronbach's α. The WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version encompasses four domains: physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment. The results revealed that Cronbach's α for the complete questionnaire and four domains across studies were fairly variable, but most of them were higher than .7, an acceptable value for a measurement. Cronbach's α were substantially related to standard deviations of scores. After removing the effect of standard deviations of scores, mean age was the primary predictor of Cronbach's α. Higher mean age was associated with higher Cronbach's α for physical health domain, but lower Cronbach's α for environment domain. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:58:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02227117-1.pdf: 1734303 bytes, checksum: 87cd2281125e30614c606efe8539855a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 古典測驗理論與信度 2 第三節 影響信度的因素 4 第四節 信度概化法 7 第五節 信度概化法的相關研究 10 第二章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究對象 19 第二節 資料蒐集 24 第三節 研究變項說明 25 第四節 資料分析 29 第三章 研究結果 32 第一節 信度係數報告的情形 32 第二節 研究變項之描述統計 36 第三節 Cronbach's α的預測因子 40 第四節 Cronbach's α與獨變項兩兩變項間關係 47 第四章 討論與結論 52 第一節 信度係數報告的情形 52 第二節 不同研究中Cronbach's α的變異 53 第三節 影響Cronbach's α在不同研究中變異的因子 54 第四節 研究貢獻 56 第五節 研究限制與未來研究方向 57 參考文獻 59 附錄 研究變項的兩兩相關表 66 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷的信度概化研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Reliability Generalization of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張郁雯,游錦雲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 信度概化,生活品質,台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | reliability generalization,quality of life,WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602121 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。