請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78986
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 金傳春 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chwan-Chuen King | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳鈺棠 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Tang Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T15:34:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-28 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-10-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed MS, Jacques LC, et al. Cross-reactive immunity against influenza viruses in children and adults following 2009 pandemic H1N1 infection. Antiviral Res 2015; 114: 106-112.
Belongia EA, Simpson MD, et al. Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16: 942-951. Bresson JL, Perronne C, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine: phase I randomised trial. The Lancet 2006; 367: 1657-1664. Centers for Disease Control, Taiwan. Sero-surveillance for avian and swine flu among domestic animal workers. Taipei: Centers for Disease Control, Taiwan, 2004. Chambers C, Skowronski DM, et al. Interim estimates of 2015/16 vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, Canada, February 2016. Euro Surveill 2016; 21: 30168. Chen JH, Weng ZJ, et al. Analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus distribution in serum of occupational exposed population and environment in Yiwu. Chin J Health Lab Tec 2014; 24: 1328-1333. Chiu C, Wrammert J, et al. Cross-reactive humoral responses to influenza and their implications for a universal vaccine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2013; 1283: 13-21. Dabrera G, Zhao H, et al. Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy in preventing influenza infection in infants, England, 2013/14. Euro Surveill 2014; 19: 20959. Ellebedy AH, Ahmed R. Re-engaging cross-reactive memory B cells: the influenza puzzle. Front Immunol 2012; 3: 53. Ellebedy AH, Krammer F, et al. Induction of broadly cross-reactive antibody responses to the influenza HA stem region following H5N1 vaccination in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014; 111: 13133-13138. Flannery B, Chung JR, et al. Interim estimates of 2017–18 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness—United States, February 2018. Am J Transplant 2018; 18: 1020-1025. Flannery B, Chung JR, et al. Interim Estimates of 2016-17 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness-United States, February 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017; 66: 167-171. Flannery B, Clippard J, et al. Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness-United States, January 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2015; 64: 10-15. Flannery B, Thaker SN, et al. Interim estimates of 2013-14 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness-United States, February 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 2014; 63: 137-142. Gomaa MR, Kayed AS, et al. Avian influenza A(H5N1) and A(H9N2) seroprevalence and risk factors for infection among Egyptians: a prospective, controlled seroepidemiological study. J Infect Dis 2015; 211: 1399-1407. Gostic KM, Ambrose M, et al. Potent protection against H5N1 and H7N9 influenza via childhood hemagglutinin imprinting. Science 2017; 354: 722-726. Hancock K. Serologic detection of human influenza virus infections by hemagglutination-inhibition assay using turkey RBCs. New York, Centers for Disease Control, US, 2009. Haq K, McElhaney JE. Immunosenescence: Influenza vaccination and the elderly. Curr Opin Immunol 2014; 29: 38-42. Horm SV, Tarantola A, et al. Intense circulation of A/H5N1 and other avian influenza viruses in Cambodian live-bird markets with serological evidence of sub-clinical human infections. Emerg Microbes Infect 2016; 5: e70. Hu MH, Wu JW, et al. Infection of the avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in poultry farm and poplation. Modern Preventive Medicine 2015; 42: 915-941. Huang SY, Yang JR, et al. Serological comparison of antibodies to avian influenza viruses, subtypes H5N2, H6N1, H7N3 and H7N9 between poultry workers and non-poultry workers in Taiwan in 2012. Epidemiol Infect 2015; 143: 2965-2974. Jackson ML, Chung JR, et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States during the 2015-2016 Season. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 534-543. Krammer F, Margine I, et al. H3 stalk-based chimeric hemagglutinin influenza virus constructs protect mice from H7N9 challenge. J Virol 2014; 88: 2340-2343. Lee CC, Zhu H, et al. The emergence and evolution of avian H5N2 influenza viruses in chickens in Taiwan. J Virol 2014; 88: 5677-5686. Li GM, Chiu C, et al. Pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine induces a recall response in humans that favors broadly cross-reactive memory B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012; 109: 9047-9052. Lin CY, Chia MY, et al. Assessment of pathogenicity and antigenicity of American lineage influenza H5N2 viruses in Taiwan. Virology 2017; 508: 159-163. Lin HT, Wang CH, et al. Influenza A(H6N1) Virus in Dogs, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 2015; 21: 2154-2157. Lu EJ, Liu Y, et al. Analysis on avian influenza surveillance in occupational population in Guangzhou in 2006. J Trop Med 2007; 7: 923-924. Lee MS, Chang PC, et al. Genetic and pathogenic characterization of H6N1 avian influenza viruses isolated in Taiwan between 1972 and 2005. Avian Diseases 2006; (50): 561-571. Madhi SA, Cutland CL, et al. Influenza vaccination of pregnant women and protection of their infants. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 918-931. Mahallawi WH, Kasbekar AV, et al. Infection with 2009 H1N1 influenza virus primes for immunological memory in human nose-associated lymphoid tissue, offering cross-reactive immunity to H1N1 and avian H5N1 viruses. J Virol 2013; 87: 5331-5339. Pebody R, Warburton F, et al. Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care in the United Kingdom: 2014/15 end of season results. Euro Surveill 2015; 20. Pebody R, Warburton F, et al. Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care in the United Kingdom: 2015/16 mid-season results. Euro Surveill 2016; 21. Pebody R, Warburton F, et al. End-of-season influenza vaccine effectiveness in adults and children, United Kingdom, 2016/17. Euro Surveill 2017; 22. Qi LV, Bao LL, et al. Analysis of cross-protective immunity of neutralizing antibodies to H7N9 influenza virus raised in sera vaccinated with seasonal influenza vaccine. Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine 2014; 24: 59-61. Qin YF, Xu K, et al. Analysis on antibody level of occupational population exposed to highly pathogenic avain influenza H5N1 in Jiangsu Province from 2011 to 2012. Jiangsu J Prev Med 2013; 24: 6-8. Rondy M, Kissling E, et al. Interim 2017/18 influenza seasonal vaccine effectiveness: combined results from five European studies. Euro Surveill 2018; 23. Skowronski D, Chambers C, et al. Interim estimates of 2014/15 vaccine effectiveness against influenza A (H3N2) from Canada’s Sentinel Physician Surveillance Network, January 2015. Euro Surveill 2015; 20: 21022. Skowronski D, Chambers C, et al. Interim estimates of 2013/14 vaccine effectiveness against influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 from Canada’s sentinel surveillance network, January 2014. Euro Surveill 2014; 19: 20690. Skowronski DM, Chambers C, et al. Early season co-circulation of influenza A (H3N2) and B (Yamagata): interim estimates of 2017/18 vaccine effectiveness, Canada, January 2018. Euro Surveill 2018; 23. Skowronski DM, Chambers C, et al. Interim estimates of 2016/17 vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2), Canada, January 2017. Euro Surveill 2017; 22. Spackman E. Animal Influenza Virus. 2rd ed. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014. Smith GJD, Vijaykrishna D, et al. Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature 2009; 459: 1122–1125. To KK, Hung IF, et al. Ongoing transmission of avian influenza A viruses in Hong Kong despite very comprehensive poultry control measures: A prospective seroepidemiology study. J Infect 2016; 72: 207-213. Tsou TP, Su CP, et al. Influenza A(H3N2) virus variants and patient characteristics during a summer influenza epidemic in Taiwan, 2017. Euro Surveill 2017; 22. Uyeki TM, Nguyen DC, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies to avian Influenza A (H5) and A (H9) viruses among market poultry workers, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2001. PLoS One 2012; 7: e43948. Venter M, Treurnicht FK, et al. Risk of Human Infections With Highly Pathogenic H5N2 and Low Pathogenic H7N1 Avian Influenza Strains During Outbreaks in Ostriches in South Africa. J Infect Dis 2017; 216: S512-S519. World Health Organization. Serological diagnosis of influenza by microneutralization assay. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. World Health Organization. Monthly Risk Assessment Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. Wang L, Naijimiding P, et al. Live poultry market environment and avian influenza infection status of occupational exposure population in Kashi Area of Xinjiang. Occup and Health 2016; 32. Wei SH, Yang JR, et al. Human infection with avian influenza A H6N1 virus: an epidemiological analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 771-778. Wrammert J, Koutsonanos D, et al. Broadly cross-reactive antibodies dominate the human B cell response against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection. J Exp Med 2011; 208: 181-193. Wu CY, Yeh YC, et al. A VLP vaccine induces broad-spectrum cross-protective antibody immunity against H5N1 and H1N1 subtypes of influenza A virus. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42363. Wu HS, Yang JR, et al. Influenza A(H5N2) virus antibodies in humans after contact with infected poultry, Taiwan, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis 2014; 20: 857-860. Ye XL, Lei YL, et al. Serological survey of avian influenza in occupational exposure population in Lishui,Zhejiang. Chin J Health Lab Tec 2016; 26: 2703-2705. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121-130. 秦讓山、張宏山等:甘肅省武威市職業暴露人群血清學和環境高致病性禽流感監測分析。疾病預防控制通報 2016;31。 黃思怡、陳昶勳等:2012年H5N2高病原性禽流感疫情人員防治綜論。疫情報導 2013;29:250-258。 黃惠珣、黃婉婷等:2013-2014年流感季流感疫苗保護效力評估初探。疫情報導 2014;30:428-433。 衛生福利部疾病管制署:1909-2014 台灣百年公立疫苗製造史。台北:衛生福利部疾病管制署,2014。 衛生福利部疾病管制署:建立流感A/H5N1中和抗體測試方法及評估疫苗接種後之抗體反應。台北:衛生福利部疾病管制署,2015。 顏哲傑:1998~2004年台灣地區流感疫苗進口使用探討。疫情報導 2005;21:408-418。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78986 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 禽流感病毒在合宜情況可經由禽鳥傳到人。在2015-2016年,韓國、中國、歐洲及台灣等地均爆發禽流感病毒在禽類間大流行。由於不斷傳出禽流感病毒感染人的病例,本研究主要試圖評估動物工作者的高危險群感染禽流感病毒的實況。為了確認此感染的準確性與打疫苗的影響,必須探究接種季節性人流感疫苗者所產生的抗體是否對於禽流感H5與H6亞型病毒會產生交叉反應。
本研究自2016年10月至2017年7月間,在台灣的台北與雲林地區分別以三時間點招募198位禽類工作者(暴露組)與176位健康成人(非暴露組):(1)接種季節性流感疫苗前(第一時間點,T1)、(2)接種季節性流感疫苗後一個月(第二時間點,T2)以及(3)流感季節結束後(第三時間點,T3)。T1的血清可提供上個流感季節所殘留抗體的訊息;T2的血清可提供T1至T2間內,因接種疫苗或自然感染所引起抗體的數據;T3的血清可提供抗體因正常情況衰退或受到自然感染提高的資訊。本研究先以血球凝集抑制試驗[hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay]來檢測血清中的抗體效價,凡對禽流感H6病毒此抗體呈陽性的血清,再以微中和試驗[micro-neutralization (MN) assay]進行二次確認。使用的病毒抗原包含2016年度季節性人流感H1與H3疫苗株(由國光生物科技公司提供)及台灣禽流感H5與H6病毒株。單變項分析以T檢定和卡方檢定比較暴露組與非暴露組之間及接踵季節性流感疫苗與否的差異;多變項分析是以廣義估計方程式了解影響HI抗體效價之多項因素。 結果發現暴露組在男性、身體質量指數、有2016與2009-2015年間的流感疫苗接種史與沒至他地旅遊,均顯著高於非暴露組。約90%與22.3%的暴露組在T1各暴露於雞及兩種禽類,且31-43%的禽流感相關知識不足,但54-85%工作時有保護行為。整體來看,受試者的H1N1與H3N2的HI抗體血清盛行率在T1時各為63%與55.5%[幾何平均效價(GMT):46與28.9];在T2時各為67.3%與54.6% (GMT:52.2與35.1);於T3時各下降為54.5%與48.4%(GMT: 33.1與28.6)。在評估疫苗效力上,藉由T3與T2的HI抗體比值,估計2016年人流感H1N1與H3N2疫苗效力各為28.5%及41.6%;顯示此2016-17年季節性人流感仍有保護之效。最後,再以廣義估計方程式的模型比較,發現流感疫苗接種史為H1N1與H3N2 HI 抗體陽性的主要影響因素。 在異亞型的測試,發現對台灣低致病性禽流感H5的HI抗體全為陰性(0/374),但10位受試者對低致病性鴨流感H6的HI抗體呈陽性,其中5位為健檢中心人員,但有1位資料不全。因此血清低致病性鴨流感H6N1的HI抗體盛行率,以健檢中心人員為最高(14.7%,5/34),其次是禽類工作者(1.52%,3/198),最低是健康對照組(0.7%,1/142);且這10位受試者中有4位健檢中心人員(2位有接種流感疫苗)的配對血清之MN抗體均為陽性,推測可能由感染引起或存有交叉反應。此外,H1和H6的HI抗體效價間存有顯著正相關(r=0.21, p <0.0001)。 本研究提供科學實證基礎與方向,以因應未來禽流感的公共衛生決策,包括:(1)針對禽類工作者及其相關高危險群進行規律性的禽流感抗體監測;(2)健檢中心人員可能是潛在的高危險群,需對其推動衛生教育以預防感染;及(3)未來將以分子流行病學與血清流行病學研究,加強監測禽流感病毒變遷,並於高危險區定期追蹤哺乳類動物與人感染動物流感病毒的實況,藉此降低動物流感對大眾的威脅。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) have potential to transmit from avian species to humans under appropriate epidemiological conditions leading to zoonotic diseases. The pandemic of avian influenza in avian hosts affected Korea, China, European countries, and Taiwan in 2015 and 2016. Since human infection of AIV has been reported continuously, this study attempts to estimate the prevalence of AIV infection in high risk poultry-related workers. To precisely measure this prevalence, we investigated whether there would be possible presence of cross-reactive antibody (Ab) against H5 and H6 AIV subtypes after receiving human seasonal influenza vaccine.
This seroepidemiologic cohort study recruited 198 poultry-related workers (exposure group) and 176 healthy adults without exposure to poultry (non-exposure group) in Taiwan from October, 2016 to July, 2017. Serum samples were collected at the three time points [pre-vaccination (T1) providing information of residual Abs from the last influenza season, 1-month post-vaccination (T2) offering data of elicited Abs from vaccination or natural infection from T1 to T2, and after the ending of flu season (T3) measuring the results of Ab waning or natural infection from T2 to T3]. Seroprevalence rates and serotiters of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) Ab were firstly screened, using viral antigens from the 2016 human seasonal influenza vaccine of A (H1N1/pdm09) and A(H3N2) provided by Adimmune Corp. and Taiwan H5/H6 subtypes. The seropositive ones of anti-H6 HI Ab were then reconfirmed by microneutralization (MN) assays. Univariate analysis was conducted to compare differences between the exposure and non-exposure groups, using Student T test and Chi-square test. To control the important confounders, Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used for multivariate analysis to find the factors that may influence the seroprevalence of HI-Ab. The participants in the exposure group showed statistically higher males, body mass index, vaccination frequencies in 2009-2016 and without going abroad. At T1, about 90% and 22.3% of the exposure subjects had exposed to chickens, and two kinds of poultry, respectively. And 31-43% of them had insufficient knowledge of AIVs, but 54-85% had the protective practices at working time. The overall seroprevalence rates against H1N1/pdm09 and H3N2 viruses were 63% and 55.5% [geometric mean titers (GMTs): 46 and 28.9] at T1; 67.3% and 54.6% [GMTs: 52.2 and 35.1] at T2; and declined to 54.5% and 48.4% [GMTs: 33.1 and 28.6] at T3. The vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated by the ratio of HI-serotiters at T3 and T2. The VE against influenza A (H1N1)/pdm09 and A(H3N2) were 28.5% and 41.6%, respectively. It indicates that the 2016 human flu vaccine should have protection for seasonal flu during 2016-2017. The GEE model showed that flu vaccination history was a dominant factor for HI Abs seropositive against both subtypes of H1N1/pdm09 and H3N2. In cross-reactivity test, all of the study subjects were anti-H5 HI-Ab(-) (0/374). However, 10 subjects were anti-H6 HI-Ab(+) [5 were health-care personnel, but one had incomplete information]. Therefore, seroprevalence rate against duck LPAI H6N1 among all study subjects was the highest in health-care personnel (14.7%, 5/34), followed by the poultry-related workers (1.52%, 3/198) and healthy control group (0.7%, 1/142). All of the 4 subjects (2 vaccinated), who showed anti-H6N1 HI&MN-Ab(+) were health-care personnel, implying that their Abs might be induced by natural infection or produced from cross-reactive Abs. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between HI serotiters of H1 and H6 (r=0.21, p <0.0001). Based on this study, future effort in evidence-based public health policies for preparing pandemics includes: (1) establishing a regular AIV sero-surveillance for poultry-related workers and other high risk groups; (2) implementing health education for health-care personnel to prevent infection of animal flu viruses, and (3) conducting molecular and seroepidemiological studies to monitor viral changes and Abs to minimize infection of animal flu viruses and potential public health threat. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:34:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05849009-1.pdf: 4104989 bytes, checksum: f9a9ac11682a30792a396cc4bf27c35e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Preface 序…………………………………………………………………………….............. I
Chinese Abstract 中文摘要 ……………………………………………………........ II English Abstract …………………………………………………………………........... IV Contents ……………………………………………………………….................... VII Figure Contents ………………………………………………………................ X Table Contents ……………………………………………………………………............ XII Chapter 1 Introduction ………………………………………….............. 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review ……………………………………………………..... 4 2.1 Influenza Viruses ………………………………………………………………....... 4 2.1.1 Outbreaks of Avian Influenza Viruses in Taiwan 5 2.1.2 Human cases of Avian Influenza Viruses …………………… 6 2.2 Development and Effectiveness of Influenza Virus Vaccines………………....................................... 7 2.3 Seroepidemiology of avian influenza viruses infection in human high-risk groups ………………………………………............ 10 2.4 Cross-immunity among different subtypes of Influenza Viruses …………......................................... 13 Chapter 3 Objective, Specific Aims and Hypotheses ……… 17 3.1 Objective ………………………………………………………………………............ 17 3.2 Specific Aims ………………………………………………………………........... 17 3.3 Hypotheses ……………………………………………………………………............ 18 Chapter 4 Materials and Methods …………………………………………….... 19 4.1 Study Design ………………………………………………………………............ 19 4.2 Study Populations …………………………………………………………......... 20 4.2.1 Poultry-related High Risk Populations ……………………… 20 4.2.2 Unexposed Healthy Populations ………………….......... 21 4.3 Sources of the viral antigens ………………………………………………… 21 4.3.1 Human influenza vaccine antigens……………………………………. 21 4.3.2 Avian influenza antigens ……………………………………………….... 21 4.4 Laboratory Methods …………………………………………………………........ 22 4.4.1 Hemagglutination assay………………………………………………....... 22 4.4.2 Hemagglutination-Inhibition assay…………………………………… 23 4.4.3 Tissue culture Infective Dose (TCID50) …………………… 23 4.4.4 Microneutralization (MN) assay ………………………..…………… 24 4.5 Anti-influenza viruses Antibody Definitions……………… 24 4.6 Data Analyses and Statistical tests ………………………………… 26 Chapter 5 Results ………………………………………………..………………......... 27 5.1 Descriptive Epidemiology of the Study Subjects …. 27 5.2 Seroepidemiology of Human Influenza Viruses …………… 29 5.2.1 Seasonal human influenza A H1N1/pdm09 and H3N2/HongKong 2014 viruses ……………………………………………………………….. 29 5.2.2 Univariate Analyse ………………………………………………………....... 30 5.2.3 Multivariate Analyses …………………………………………………...... 30 5.3 Vaccine Effectiveness of the 2016 Seasonal Human Influenza Virus Vaccine ……………………………………………………………………….. 31 5.4 Seroepidemiology of Avian Influenza Viruses in Human Study Subjects ….................................................... 33 5.5 Cross-reactivities among different subtypes of Influenza Viruses ………................................ 34 Chapter 6 Discussion ……………………………………………….……………........ 35 6.1 Effectiveness of Human Seasonal Influenza Vaccine ………………………............................................ 35 6.2 Comparison in Seroepidemiological Studies of Avian Influenza Viruses among Different Countries ……………………… 37 6.3 Cross-reactivity among different subtypes of Influenza Viruses ………................................ 38 6.4 Limitations ……………………………………………………………………........... 40 6.5 Recommendations and Future Perspectives ……………………… 41 Reference …………………………………………………………….................... 43 Figures ………………………………………………………………..................... 52 Tables ……………………………………………………………...……………….............. 64 Appendix ………………………………………………………...…….................. 80 Autobiography …………………………………………………...……............... 96 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 2016至2017年台灣禽類工作者血清流行病學世代研究-探究人流感疫苗抗體對H5與H6兩亞型的交叉反應 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Seroepidemiological Cohort Study in Taiwan Poultry-related Workers, 2016-2017: Investigating on Cross-reactive Antibodies against the H5 and H6 Subtypes Following Human Influenza Vaccination | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 方啟泰 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Chi-Tai Fang | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何美鄉;林菀俞;李秉穎;王儷蒨;張淑媛;李昌駿 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Mei-Shang Ho;Wan-Yu Lin;Ping-Ing Lee;Chi-Tai Fang;Sui-Yuan Chang;Chang-Chun David Lee | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 流感病毒,禽畜業者,血清流行病學,流感疫苗效力,流感病毒抗體交叉反應,人畜共通傳染病,台灣, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | influenza virus,poultry-related workers,seroepidemiology,influenza vaccine effectiveness,cross-reactive antibodies,zoonotic diseases,Taiwan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803499 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-15 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2023-10-09 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。