請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78777
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 牟中原(Chung-Yuan Mou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chien Ko | en |
dc.contributor.author | 柯宇謙 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T15:18:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-23 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Shang, H.; Zuo, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Li, Y., Ultrathin Graphdiyne Nanosheets Grown In Situ on Copper Nanowires and Their Performance as Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2018, 57, 774 –778.
2. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M., A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources 2013, 226, 272-288. 3. Bruce, B. G.; Freunberger, S. A.; Hardwick, L. J.; Tarascon, J. -M., Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nature Materials 2012, 11, 19–29. 4. Nie, P.; Shen, L.; Luo, H.; Li, H.; Xu, G.; Zhang, X., Synthesis of nanostructured materials by using metalcyanide coordination polymers and their lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 11087-11093. 5. Wang, L.; Schnepp, Z.; Titirici, M. M., Rice husk-derived carbon anodes for lithium ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2013, 1, 5269-5273. 6. Liu, J.; Zhang, J. –G.; Yang, Z.; Lemmon, J. P.; Imhoff, C.; Graff, G. L.; Li, L.; Hu, J.; Wang, C.; Xiao, J.; Xia, G.; Viswanathan, V. V.; Baskaran, S.; Sprenkle, V.; Li, X.; Shao, Y.; Schwenzer, B., Materials Science and Materials Chemistry for Large Scale Electrochemical Energy Storage: From Transportation to Electrical Grid. Advanced Functional Materials 2013, 23, 929–946. 7. Guo, Q,; Chen, L.; Shan, Z.; Lee, W. S. V.; Xiao, W.; Liu, Z.; Liang, J.; Yang, G.; Xue, J., High Lithium Insertion Voltage Single-Crystal H2Ti12O25 Nanorods as a High-Capacity and High-Rate Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 299 – 310. 8. Tarascon, J. –M.; Armand, M., Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367. 9. Li, X.; Guo, S.; Deng, H.; Jiang, K.; Qiao, Y,; Ishida, M.; Zhou, H., An ultrafast rechargeable lithium metal battery. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2018, 6, 15517-15522. 10. Zhang, G.; Peng, H. –J.; Zhao, C. –Z.; Chen, X.; Zhao, L. –D.; Li, P.; Huang, J. –Q.; Zhang, Q., The Radical Pathway Based on a Lithium-Metal-Compatible High-Dielectric Electrolyte for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2018, 57, 16732 –16736. 11. Zhang, J.; Huang, M.; Xi, B.; Mi, K.; Yuan, A.; Xiong, S., Systematic Study of Effect on Enhancing Specific Capacity and Electrochemical Behaviors of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 2018, 8, 1701330. 12. Chen, W.; Lei, T.; Wu, X.; Deng, M.; Gong, C.; Hu, K.; Ma, Y.; Dai, L.; Lv, W.; He, W.; Liu, X.; Xiong, J.; Yan, C., Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High-Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery. Advanced Energy Materials 2018, 8, 1702348. 13. Xu, R.; Lu, J.; Amine, K., Progress in Mechanistic Understanding and Characterization Techniques of Li-S Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 2015, 5, 1500408. 14. Lei, T.; Chen, W.; Huang, J.; Yan, C.; Sun, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Xiong, J., Multi-Functional Layered WS2 Nanosheets for Enhancing the Performance of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 2017, 7, 1601843. 15. Park, M. S.; Ma1, S. B.; Lee, D. J.; Im, D.; Doo, S. –G.; Yamamoto, Q., Scientific Reports 2014, 4, 3815. 16. Liu, W.; Lin, D.; Pei, A.; Cui, Y., Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes by Uniform Li-Ion Flux Distribution in Nanochannel Confinement. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016, 138, 15443−15450. 17. Liu, W.; Li, W.; Zhuo, D.; Zheng, G.; Lu, Z.; Liu, K.; Cui, Y., Core−Shell Nanoparticle Coating as an Interfacial Layer for Dendrite-Free Lithium Metal Anodes. ACS Central Science 2017, 3, 135−140. 18. Bugga, R. V.; Jones, S. C.; Pasalic, J.; Seu, C. S.; Jones, J. –P.; Torres, L., Metal Sulfide-Blended Sulfur Cathodes in High Energy Lithium-Sulfur Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2017, 164 (2) A265-A276. 19. Ding, N; Zhou, L.; Zhou, C.; Geng, D.; Yang, J.; Chien, S. W.; Liu, X.; Ng, M. –F.; Yu, A.; Hor, T. S. A.; Sullivan, M. B.; Zong, Y., Building better lithium-sulfur batteries: from LiNO3 to solidoxide catalyst. Scientific Reports 2016, 6, 33154. 20. Yim, T.; Park, M. –S.; Yu, J. –S.; Kim, K. J.; Im, K. Y.; Kim, J. –H.; Jeong, G.; Jo, Y. N.; Woo, S. –G.; Kang, K. S.; Lee, I.; Kim, Y. –J., Effect of chemical reactivity of polysulfide toward carbonate-basedelectrolyte on the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 107, 454– 460. 21. Liu, K.; Zhuo, D.; Lee, H. –W.; Liu, W.; Lin, D.; Lu, Y.; Cui, Y., Extending the Life of Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries by Reaction of Lithium Dendrites with a Novel Silica Nanoparticle Sandwiched Separator. Advanced Materials 2017, 29, 1603987. 22. Zhang, N.; Li, B.; Li, S.; Yang, S., Mesoporous Hybrid Electrolyte for Simultaneously Inhibiting Lithium Dendrites and Polysulfide Shuttle in Li–S Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 2018, 8, 1703124. 23. Cheng, L.; Curtiss, L. A.; Zavadil, K. R.; Gewirth, A. A.; Shao, Y.; Gallagher, K. G., Sparingly Solvating Electrolytes for High Energy Density Lithium−Sulfur Batteries. ACS Energy Letters 2016, 1, 503−509. 24. Suo, L.; Hu, Y. –S.; Li, H.; Armand, M.; Chen, L., A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries. Nature Communication 2013, 4, 1481. 25. Dokko, K.; Tachikawa, N.; Yamauchi, K,; Tsuchiya, M.; Yamazaki, A.; Takashima, E.; Park, J. –W.; Ueno, K.; Seki, S.; Serizawa, N.; Watanabe, M., Solvate Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for Li–S Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160 (8) A1304-A1310. 26. Cuisinier, M.; Cabelguen, P. –E.; Adams, B. D.; Garsuch, A.; Balasubramanian, M.; Nazar, L. F., Unique behaviour of nonsolvents for polysulphides in lithium–sulphur batteries. Energy & Environmental Science 2014, 7, 2697-2705. 27. Song, J.; Gordin, M. L.; Xu, T.; Chen, S.; Yu, Z.; Sohn, H.; Lu, J.; Ren, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, D., Strong Lithium Polysulfide Chemisorption on Electroactive Sites of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites For High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Battery Cathodes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2015, 54, 4325 –4329. 28. Zhu, Q.; Zhao, Q.; An, Y.; Anasori, B.; Wang, H.; Xu, B., Ultra-microporous carbons encapsulate small sulfur molecules for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 402-409. 29. Li, X.; Ding, K.; Gao, B.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhang, X.; Chu, P. K.; Huo, K., Freestanding carbon encapsulated mesoporous vanadium nitride nanowires enable highly stable sulfur cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 45, 655-662. 30. He, J.; Chen, Y.; Manthiram A., MOF-derived Cobalt Sulfide Grown on 3D Graphene Foam as an Efficient Sulfur Host for Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. iScience 2018, 4, 36-43. 31. Ji, X.; Lee, K. T.; Nazar, L. F., A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–Sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nature Materials 2009, 8, 500-506. 32. Borchardt, L.; Oschatz, M.; Kaskel, S., Carbon Materials for Lithium Sulfur Batteries—Ten Critical Questions. Chemistry - A European Journal 2016, 22, 7324 – 7351. 33. Wu, H. B.; Wei, S.; Zhang, L.; Xu, R.; Hng, H. H.; Lou, X. W. D., Embedding Sulfur in MOF-Derived Microporous Carbon Polyhedrons for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Chemistry - A European Journal 2013, 19, 10804 – 10808. 34. Guo, J.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C., Sulfur-Impregnated Disordered Carbon Nanotubes Cathode for Lithium_Sulfur Batteries. Nano Letters 2011, 11, 4288–4294. 35. Zou, Q.; Lu, Y. –C., Solvent-Dictated Lithium Sulfur Redox Reactions: An Operando UV−vis Spectroscopic Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2016, 7, 1518−1525. 36. Chen, K.; Sun, Z.; Fang, R.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, H. –M.; Li, F., Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs)-Derived Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Anchored on Graphene with Multifunctional Effects for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials 2013, 28, 1707592. 37. Qin, F.; Zhang, K.; Fang, J.; Lai, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J., High performance lithium sulfur batteries with a cassava-derived carbon sheet as a polysulfides inhibitor. New Journal of Chemistry 2014, 38, 4549-4554. 38. Markevich, E.; Salitra, G.; Talyosef, Y.; Chesneau, F.; Aurbach, D., Review—On the Mechanism of Quasi-Solid-State Lithiation of Sulfur Encapsulated in Microporous Carbons: Is the Existence of Small Sulfur Molecules Necessary? Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2017, 164 (1), A6244-A6253. 39. Kaiser, M. R.; Chou, S.; Liu, H. –K.; Dou, S. –X.; Wang, C.; Wang, J., Structure–Property Relationships of Organic Electrolytes and Their Effects on Li/S Battery Performance. Advanced Materials 2017, 29, 1700449. 40. Zhang, B.; Qin, X.; Lia, G. R.; Gao, X. P., Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. Energy & Environmental Science 2010, 3, 1531–1537. 41. Zhu, Q.; Zhao, Q.; An, Y.; Anasori, B.; Wanga, H.; Xu, B., Ultra-microporous carbons encapsulate small sulfur molecules for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 402-409. 42. Xin, S.; Gu, L.; Zhao, N. –H.; Yin, Y. –X.; Zhou, L. –J.; Guo, Y. –G.; Wan, L. –J., Smaller Sulfur Molecules Promise Better Lithium−Sulfur Batteries. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012, 134, 18510−18513. 43. Zhang, W.; Qiao, D.; Pan, J.; Cao, Y.; Yang, H.; Ai, X., A Li+-conductive microporous carbon–sulfur composite for Li-S batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 87, 497-502. 44. Chen, J. –J.; Yuan, R. –M.; Feng, J. –M.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, J. –X.; Fu, G.; Zheng, M. –S.; Ren, B.; Dong, Q. –F., Conductive Lewis Base Matrix to Recover the Missing Link of Li2S8 during the Sulfur Redox Cycle in Li−S Battery. Chemical of Materials 2015, 27, 2048−2055. 45. Zhu, W.; Paolella, A.; Kim, C. –S.; Liu, D.; Feng, Z.; Gagnon, C.; Trottier, J.; Vijh, A.; Guerfi, a.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C. M.; Armandd, M.; Zaghib, M., Investigation of the reaction mechanism of lithium sulfur batteries in different electrolyte systems by in situ Raman spectroscopy and in situ X-ray diffraction. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2017, 1, 737–747. 46. Hagen, M.; Schiffels, P.; Hammer, M.;D¨orfler, S.; T¨ubke, J.; Hoffmann, M. J.; Althues, H.; Kaskelc, S., In-Situ Raman Investigation of Polysulfide Formation in Li-S Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2013, 160 (8), A1205-A1214. 47. Wu, H. –L.; Huff, L. A.; Gewirth, A. A., In Situ Raman Spectroscopy of Sulfur Speciation in Lithium−Sulfur Batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7, 1709−1719. 48. Gorlin, Y.; Patel, M. U. M.; Freiberg, A.; He, Q.; Piana, M.; Tromp, M.; Gasteigera, H. A., Understanding the Charging Mechanism of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Using Spatially Resolved Operando X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2016, 163 (6), A930-A939. 49. Dominko, R.; Vizintin, A.; Aquilanti, G.; Stievano, L.; Helen, M. J.; Munnangi, A. R.; Fichtner, M.; Arcong, I., Polysulfides Formation in Different Electrolytes from the Perspective of X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2018, 165 (1), A5014-A5019. 50. Cuisinier, M.; Cabelguen, P. –E.; Evers, S.; He, G.; Kolbeck, M.; Garsuch, A.; Bolin, T.; Balasubramanian, M.; Nazar, L. F., Sulfur Speciation in Li−S Batteries Determined by Operando X‑ray Absorption Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2013, 4, 3227−3232. 51. Vizintin, A.; Chabanne, L.; Tchernychova, E.;Arcon, I. Stievano, L.; Aquilanti, G.; Antonietti, M.; Fellinger, T. –P.; Dominko, R., The mechanism of Li2S activation in lithium-sulfur batteries: Can we avoid the polysulfide formation? Journal of Power Sources 2017, 344, 208-217. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78777 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來隨著科技的進步,對於儲電元件的要求越來越高,科學家不斷的想發展具有高能力密度、高電容值與高工作電壓的電池,而鋰硫電池(Lithium sulfur batteries) 就是被視為下一世代的主要電池之一。原因在於相較於目前常見之鋰離子電池 (Lithium ion batteries),鋰硫電池有較高的電容量 (~1675 mAh/g) 與能量密度 (~2600 W h kg-1),且陰極端的硫為大自然中相當豐富的原料之一,因此可壓低電池的生產成本。但鋰硫電池同時也存在許多的問題以至於目前還無法大量的生產應用,其中一個問題於陰極端的硫在反應的過程中會生成許多的聚硫化物 (lithium polysulfides),而這些聚硫化物易溶於電解液中而導致活化物質 (active material) 的損失以及穿梭效應 (shuttle effect) 的產生,會導致電池之電容值以及穩定性隨充放電次數的增加而減少。另一個問題在於陽極端的鋰金屬為活性大的鹼金屬,在電池充放電的過程中容易因為表面的不平整或其他因素而產生鋰金屬樹枝狀結晶 (lithium dendrite),進一步刺破中間的隔離膜 (separator) 而與陰極端相觸導致短路,嚴重的話可能會引發爆炸,因此在安全上還有所疑慮,種種缺點導致目前鋰硫電池無法被商業化。
本論文主要從陰極端的材料改良下手,目的就是為了解決反應過程中聚硫化物易溶於電解液中的缺點。我們利用特殊孔洞結構之碳材來載入硫作為陰極材料,並在充放電過程中利用孔洞來保留住聚硫化物來避免產生穿梭效應。我們從國立成功大學林弘萍教授實驗室取得多種來源為生質原料或工業廢棄物的孔洞碳材,其中對於兩種原料為瀝青的碳材最感興趣,分別是純微孔的XU75以及同時具有微孔、中孔及大孔且孔洞間彼此為相互交錯的XU76,同時在實驗中我們將兩者與市面上常用於鋰硫電池的碳材,也同時具有微孔、中孔與大孔的Ketjen black (KB) 做比較。我們認為具有微孔、中孔及大孔且孔洞間彼此為相互交錯的XU76有利於硫、聚硫化物以及硫化鋰在孔洞間穿梭而能避免聚硫化物溶於電解液當中。 透過UV-Vis實驗也證實了以上的觀點,而在電池的表現上也發現XU75與XU76贏過Ketjen black (KB),其中又以XU76表現結果較佳,且XU76/S的厚度約為1.4 mg/cm2。因此碳材若能同時具備微孔、中孔及大孔的性質,且孔洞結構上能夠相互交織,就可以利用孔洞作為硫、聚硫化物以及硫化鋰的反應槽且吸附能力佳能避免其溶於電解液中,使得電池的電容值與循環穩定性變得更好。 本論文的最後也透過in situ的技術來探討不同的孔洞碳材對於鋰硫電池在反應過程中機制上差異,儘管XU75、XU76以及KB三種碳材在in situ Raman spectroscopy以及in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy的實驗結果對於聚硫化物的生成種類與相對量並沒有太大的不同,但我們還是可以從結果中得知鋰硫電池在反應過程中並非以兩兩電子接受的形式生成聚硫化物,電子在系統中為任意的轉移,又或者會產生歧化/解離反應 (Disproportionation/Dissociation reaction),因此在Raman數據中才會看到多種聚硫化物的產生。而在X-ray absorption圖譜中則是可以看到硫、聚硫化物以及硫化鋰隨充放電的過程中而有消長的趨勢。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, with the advance of technology, the requirements of energy storage components are getting higher and higher. Scientists are continually trying to develop the batteries with high energy density, high capacity and high working voltage, while lithium sulfur batteries are considered as one of the next generation batteries. Comparing with the lithium ion batteries, which are used for mobile phones or electric cars now, lithium sulfur batteries have higher capacity (~1675 mAh/g) and energy density (~2600 W h kg-1). Although sulfur-carbon cathode is one of the most abundant natural materials, lithium polysulfides formed during discharge process are soluble in the electrolyte and result in the active material loss and shuttle effect. The battery performance will decrease during cycling. In addition, the lithium metal anode is one of the high activity alkali metals, it will form lithium dendrite during charge and discharge process, mainly due to the surface uneven, resulting in a short circuit and safety issues.
In this thesis, I focus on improvement of the materials on the sulfur-carbon cathode to trap soluble polysulfides on the cathode composite during cycling. We report the use of porous carbon materials with different architectures to load sulfur as the active material on the sulfur-carbon cathode and preserve the polysulfides in the cathode composite during cycling. We get various porous carbon materials from National Cheng Kung University, Professor Lin Hong-Ping. XU75 and XU76 carbon materials synthesized by using asphalt which are from industrial wastes. XU75 contains micropores. XU76 contains micropores, mesopores and macropores, and they are interlaced together. For the comparison, the commercial carbon material, Ketjen black (KB) contains micropores, mesopores and macropores. We consider that XU76 has special hole structure, so the sulfur, polysulfides and lithium sulfide can flow between the pores and have the strong absorption to avoid them dissolve into the electrolyte. We use UV-Vis experiment to improve the above idea. Also, compared with the battery performance of XU75, XU76 and KB, XU75 and XU76 are better than KB, and XU76 performs best. The thickness of sulfur-XU76 composite is 1.4 mg/cm2. So we consider that the carbon contains micropores, mesoporoes and macropores, also staggered together to have special hole structure, the pores can be a reservoir and absorb sulfur, polysulfides and lithium sulfide to solve the problem that polysulfides are easily dissolved into the electrolyte and get better performance and stability of batteries. We also use in situ technique to research the mechanism of lithium sulfur batteries using different porous carbon material. Although the results of XU75, XU76 and KB in in situ Raman spectroscopy and in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy are almost the same, but we still use in situ Raman to know that polysulfides are not produced in the form of getting two electrons, electrons transfer randomly in the system, or it will generate disproportionation/dissociation reaction when charging and discharging, so we can find numerous signals of polysulfides in Raman spectroscopy. In X-ray absorption spectroscopy, we can also see the grown and decline of sulfur, polysulfides and lithium sulfide when going charge and discharge in lithium sulfur batteries. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:18:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06223132-1.pdf: 7599636 bytes, checksum: d969a476475ee838e4921a26177be783 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iv 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xiv 第一章、緒論 1 1-1. 現今電池的發展與未來趨勢 1 1-2. 鋰硫電池的運作原理與優缺點 3 1-2-1 隔離膜的改良 5 1-2-2 電解液的改良 11 1-2-3 陰極材料的改善 13 1-3. 研究動機 20 第二章、儀器原理與實驗方法 22 2-1. 實驗藥品 22 2-2. 鑑定儀器之原理與實驗方法 24 2-2-1. 熱重分析儀 25 2-2-2. 比表面積與孔隙度分析儀 25 2-2-3. 拉曼光譜分析儀 27 2-2-4. X光吸收光譜儀 30 2-2-5. X光繞射儀 32 2-2-6. 紫外-可見光吸收光譜儀 33 2-2-7. 穿透式電子顯微鏡 34 2-2-8. 掃描式電子顯微鏡 34 2-2-9. 孔洞碳材吸附聚硫化物 (polysulfide) 實驗 35 2-2-10. 陰極材料對硫之吸附力實驗 35 2-3. 電化學實驗方法 36 2-3-1. 電極製備 36 2-3-2. 電解液配置 37 2-3-3. 電池組裝 37 2-3-4. 循環伏安法 38 2-3-5 充放電測試 38 第三章、實驗結果與討論 39 3-1. 不同碳材之結構分析與吸附力測試 39 3-1-1. 比表面積與孔隙度測試 39 3-1-2 電子顯微鏡圖像 40 3-1-3. 孔洞碳材吸附力測試 43 3-2. 碳材作為陰極材料之鑑定與分析 47 3-2-1熱重分析 48 3-2-2. X光繞射分析 50 3-2-3. 可見光/紫外光吸收光譜 52 3-3. 碳材作為陰極材料在電池上的表現與反應機制 54 3-3-1. 電池循環伏安法測試 54 3-3-2. 電池充放電測試 56 3-3-3. 恆電流充放電曲線 (Galvanostatic discharge/charge profile) 58 3-3-4. 拉曼光譜分析 60 3-3-5. X-ray 吸收光譜分析 63 3-4. 後續發展與期望 67 3-4-1. 提高硫含量、硫負載量與電流密度 67 3-4-2. 運用MSTF/AAO作為鋰硫電池隔離膜 77 第四章、結論 84 參考文獻 86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 孔洞碳材在鋰硫電池中的應用及反應機制的探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Using Porous Carbon as Capture in Lithium Sulfur Batteries
and Studying about Its Mechanism | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳恆良(Heng-Liang Wu),林弘萍(Hong-Ping Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鋰硫電池,聚硫化物,穿梭效應,孔洞碳材,原位拉曼光譜,原位X光吸收光譜, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | lithium-sulfur batteries,polysulfides,porous carbon material,in situ Raman spectroscopy,in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 92 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901411 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 化學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-R06223132-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。