請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7853
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葉德銘(Der-Ming Yeh,) | |
dc.contributor.author | Huan-Keng Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林煥耿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:56:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:56:03Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻(References)
呂學義. 2010. 日日春花器構造、花粉活力與微體繁殖再生系統之建立. 國立嘉義大學農學研究所碩士論文. 高典林. 2006. 現代作物育種學. 藝軒圖書出版社. 臺灣. 郭孟樺. 2012. 夏蓳與毛葉蝴蝶草種間雜交胚之拯救與多倍體化. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士倫文. 陳錦木. 2013. 重瓣日日春之花芽型態、花型遺傳及育種. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系博士論文. 陳錦木、李窓明、葉德銘. 2011. 臺灣的花壇植物產業現況與展望, p154-167. 綠色城市與花卉產業國際研討會論文集. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系編印, 臺北, 臺灣. 趙静媛、陳發棣、滕年軍、陳素梅. 2008. 地被菊匍匐性的遗傳分析與RAPD標記研究.中國農業科學42:734-741. 歐陽瑋、吳文希. 1998. 臺灣長春花病害之調查. 植物病理學會刊 7:147-149. 蔡淑華. 1990. 植物解剖學. 世界書局. 臺灣. 蔡淑華. 1992. 植物組織切片技術綱要. 茂昌圖書有限公司. 臺北. 盧守耕. 1961. 現代植物育種學. 臺大農學院出版社. Anderson, N.O. 2006. Flower breeding and genetics: Issues, challenge and opportunities for the 21st Century. Springer, London. Bailey, I.W. 1953. Evolution of the tracheary tissue of land plants. Amer. J. Bot 40:4-8. Ball, V. 1998. Ball redbook.16th ed. Ball Publ, Batavia, III. Boke, N.H. 1947. Development of the adult shoot apex and floral initiation in Vinca rosea L. Amer. J. Bot. 34:433-439. Boke, N.H. 1948. Development of the perianth in Vinca rosea L. Amer. J. Bot. 35:413-423. Chen, C.M., T.Y. Wei, and D.M. Yeh 2012. Morphology and inheritance of double floweredness in Catharanthus roseus. HortScience 47:1679-1681. Cosgrove, D.J., L.C. Li, and H.T. Cho. 2002. The growing world of expansins. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 1436–1444. Crivellaro, A., K. McCulloh, F.A. Jones, and B. Lachenbruch. 2012. Anatomy and mechanical and hydraulic needs of woody climbers contrasted with subshrubs on the island of Cyprus. IAWA J. 33:355–373. Cosgrove, D.J. 2000. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407: 321–326. Curry, H.A. 2012. Naturalising the exotic and exoticising the Naturalised: Hortuculture, natural history and the rosy periwinkle. Environ. History 18:243-365. East, E.M. 1933. Genetic observations on the genus Linaria. Genetics 18: 324-328. Ecker, R., A. Barzilay, and E. Osherenko. 1994. Linkage relationships of genes for leaf morphology and double flowering in Matthiola incana. Euphytica 74:133-136. Evert, R.F. 2006. Esau’s plant anatomy. 3th. ed. John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA. Fisher, J.B. and J.W. Stevenson. 1981. Occurrence of reaction wood in branches of dicotyledons and its role in tree architecture. Bot. Gaz. 142:82-95. Flory, W.S. 1944. Inheritance studies of flower color in periwinkle. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44: 525-526. Frey-Wyssling, A. 1976. The plant cell wall. In Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Band 3, Teil 4. Abt. Cytologie, 3rd rev. ed. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. Gere, J.M., and S.P. Timoshenko. 1997. Mechanics of materials. Thomson, Boston, MA, USA. Goodman A.M., and A.R. Ennos. 1997. The responses of field-grown sunfower and maize to mechanical support. Ann. Bot. 79: 703-711. Gorshkova, T., N. Brutch, B. Chabbert, M. Deyholos, T. Hayashi, S.L. Yadun, E.J. Mellerowicz, C. Morvan, G. Neutelings, and G. Pilate. 2012. Plant fiber formation: State of the art, recent and expected progress, and open questions. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 31:201-228. Hao H.U., Y. Liu, Y.P. Liu, R.J. Wu, B.G. Hua, Y.N. Wang. 2012. Cloning and expression analysis of PpNST1 and PpSND1 genes from Prunus persica L. Plant Physiol. J. 48: 589-596. Innes, R.L., and L.M. Len. 1991. A genetic analysis of self-incompatibility and double flowers in Potentilla fruticosa L. Euphytica 51:241-248. Isnard, S., T. Speck, and N.P. Rowe. 2003. Mechanical architecture and development in Clematis: Implications for canalised evolution of growth forms. Phytologist 158:543-559. Jacobsen A.L., F.W. Ewers, R.B. Pratt, W.A. Paddock III, and S.D. Davis. 2005. Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance? Plant Physiol. 139:546-556. Kato, K., H. Miura, and S. Sawada. 1999. QTL mapping of genes controlling ear emergence time and plant height on chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 472-477. Kartmazova, L.S. 1972. Anatomical investigations on Catharanthus roseus. Part 1 The structure of the vegetative organs. Rastitelʹnye resursy 8:263-274 Kokubun, H., T. Ando, S. Kohyama, H. Watanabe, T. Tsukamoto, and E. Marchesi. 2002. Variation of several morphological characters of Petunia axillaris in Uruguay. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci 71: 26-39. Kulkarni, R.N., K. Baskaran, and N. Suresh. 1999. Inheritance of characters in periwinkle: leaf pubescence and corolla colour. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 6: 85-88. Kulkarni, R.N., and K. Baskaran. 2008a. Inheritance of pollen-less anthers and ‘thrum’ and ‘pin’ flowers in periwinkle corolla. J. Hered. 99:426-431. Kulkarni, R.N., K. Baskaran, and Y. Sreevalli. 2008b. Genetics of corolla colour in periwinkle: Relationship between genes determining violet, orange-red and magenta corolla. J. Appl. Hort. 10:20-23. Kulkarni, R.N., K. Baskaran, and Y. Sreevalli. 2005. Genetics of novel corolla colours in periwinkle. Euphytica 144:101-107. Kulkarni, R.N., Y. Sreevalli, K. Baskaran, and S. Kumar. 2005. The mechanism and inheritance of intrafower self-pollination in self-pollinating variant strains of periwinkle. Plant Breeding 120:247-250. Lahaye, R., L. Civeyrel, T. Speck, and N. Rowe. 2005. Evolution of shrub-like growth forms in the lianoid sub family Secamoneas (Apocynaceae S. L.) of Madagascar: Phylogeny, biomechanics and development. Amer. J. Bot. 92:1381-1396. Levy, A. 1981. Catharanthus roseus, p.166-168. In: Halevy, A.H. (ed.).CRC handbook of flowering Vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Malaviya, D. R., A. K. Roy, P. Kaushal, B. Kumar, and A. Tiwari. 2004. Development and characterization of interspecific hybrids of Trifolium alexandrinum × T. apertum using embryo rescue. Plant Breed. 123:536-542. Milo, J., A. Levy, N. Akavia, A. Ashri, and D. Palevitch. 1985. Inheritance of corolla colour and anthocyanin pigments in periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus [L.] G. Don). ZPflanzenzuchtg 95: 352-360. Mirzaie-Nodoushan, H., I.L. Gordon, and W.B. Rumball. 1999. Inheritance of growth habit-related attributes in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). J. Hered. 90:550-553. Mitsuda, N., M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and M. O. Takagi. 2005. The NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST2 of Arabidopsis regulate secondary wall thickenings and are required for anther dehiscence. Plant Cell 17:2993–3006. Mitsuda, N., A. Iwase, H. Yamamoto, M. Yoshida, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and M.O. Takagi. 2007. NAC transcription factors, NST1 and NST3, are key regulators of the formation of secondary walls in woody tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:270–280. Miyajima, D. 2004. Pollination and seed set in vinca [Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don]. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 79:771-775. Nakagawa, K., A. Yoshinaga, and K. Takabe. 2012. Anatomy and lignin distribution in reaction phloem fibres of several Japanese hardwoods. Ann. Bot. 110: 897-904. Nanko, H. 1979. Studies on the development cell wall structure of sclerenchymatous elements in the secondary phloem of woody dicotyledons, conifers. Kyoto Univ., Japan. PhD Diss. Nguyen, P., K. Quesenberry, and D. Clark. 2008. Genetics of growth habit and development of new coleus [Solenostemon scutellarioides (L.) Codd] varieties with trailing habit and bright color. J. Hered. 99:573-580. Nugent, P.E., and R.J. Snyder. 1967. The inheritance of floret doubleness, floret center color, and plant habit in Pelargonium hortorum Bailey. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91:680-690. Pietsch, G.M., W.H. Carlson, R.D. Heins, and J.E. Faust. 1995. The effect of day and night temperature and irradiance on development of Catharanthus roseus ‘Grape Cooler’. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:877-881. Romberger, J. A., Z. Hejnowicz, and J.F. Hill. 1993. Plant structure: Function and development: A treatise on anatomy and vegetative development, with special reference to woody plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Rowe, N., S. Isnard, and T. Speck. 2004. Diversity of mechanical architectures in climbing plants: An evolutionary perspective. J. Plant Growth Regulat. 23:108-128. Saunders, E.R. 1917. Studies in the inheritance of doubleness in flowers. II Meconopsis, Althaea and Dianthus. J. Genet. 6:165-184. Scovel, G., H. Ben-Meir., M. Ovadis., H. Itzhaki, and A. Vainstein. 1998. RAPD and RFLP markers tightly linked to the locus controllong carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) flower type. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:117-122. Scurfield, G. 1964. The nature of reaction wood. IX. Anomalous cases of reaction anatomy. Aust. J. Bot. 12:173–184. Scurfield, G. 1965. The cankers of Exocarpos cupressiformis Labill. Aust. J. Bot. 13:235–243. Serrato, C.M.A. 1990. Contribution to study of marigold (Tagetes sp.) flower traits. Revista Chapingo 15:121-155. Sederoff, R., and H.M. Chang. 1991. Lignin biosynthesis, p. 263–285. In: M. Lewin and I. S. Goldstein (eds.). Wood structure and composition. Marcel Dekker, New York. Simmonds, N.W. 1960. Flower colour in Lochnera rosea. Heredity 14: 253-261. Sreevalli, Y., R.N. Kulkarni, and K. Baskaran. 2002. Inheritance of flower colour in periwinkle: Orange-red corolla and white eye. J. Hered. 93: 55-58. Uguru, M.I., and J. O. Uzo. 1991. Segregation pattern of decumbent, climbing and bushy growth habits in Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Plant Breed. 107:173-176 Van Bergen, M., and Snoeijer. 1996. Catharanthus G. Don. The Madagascar periwinkle and related species. Wagening Agr. Univ. Papers 96:1-120. Verma, M., R. Ghangal, R. Sharma, A.K. Sinha, and M. Jain. 2014. Transcriptome analysis of Catharanthus roseus for gene discovery and expression profiling. Plos One 9: e103583. Wilson, B.F., and R.R. Archer. 1977. Reaction wood: Induction and mechanical action. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:23-43. Yeung, E. 1998. A beginner’s guide to the study of plant structure, p. 125-142. In: S. J. Karcher, Editor. Tested studies for laboratory teaching. Univ. Calgary. Alberta, Canada. Zaho, Q., H. Wang, Y. Yin, Y. Xu, F. Chen, and R.A. Dixon. 2010. Syringyl lignin biosynthesis is directly regulated by a secondary cell wall master switch. PNAS 107:14496-14501. Zhu, Q. 1884. Studies on the growth habit of soybean 1. The substantial difference of different habits of soybean and their classification. Soybean Sci. 3:318-326. Zhong, R., C. Lee, and Z.H. Ye. 2010. Functional characterization of poplar wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 152:1044-1055. Zhong, R., C. Lee, J. Zhou, R.L. Mcarthy, and Z.H. Ye. 2008. A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall Bbosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:2763-2782. Zhong, R., E.A. Richardson, and Z.H. Ye. 2007. Two NAC domain transcription factors, SND1 and NST1, function redundantly in regulation of secondary wall synthesis in wall of Arabidopsis. Planta 225:1603–1611. Zhong, R., T. Demura, and Z.H. Ye. 2006. SND1, a NAC domain transcription factor, is a key regulator of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. Amer. Soc. Plant Biol. 18:3158–3170. Zhou, M.L., J.R. Shao, and Y.X. Tang. 2009. Production and metabolic engineering of terpenoid indole alkaloids in cell cultures of the medicinal plant Catharanthus G. Don (Madagascar periwinkle). Biotech. Appl. Biochem. 52:313-323. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7853 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要
日日春[Catharanthus roseus (L). G. Don]為夏季重要花壇與盆花作物,目前已選育重瓣日日春‘桃園’系列,但尚未有重瓣懸垂型品種。本研究採用重瓣直立型‘桃園’系列與單瓣懸垂型‘Cora Cascade’系列、 ‘Mediterranean’系列及‘Boa’系列闡述1)懸垂特性原因、2)懸垂與重瓣、花色等性狀遺傳模式與3)育成重瓣懸垂型新品種。 本研究以徒手切片法調查5種直立型日日春品種與懸垂型日日春‘Cora Cascade’系列、 ‘Mediterranean’系列及‘Boa’系列19品種莖部構造,結果顯示懸垂型品種韌皮纖維細胞無法合成次生細胞壁,停留於纖維始源細胞階段。另染色觀察直立型日日春‘Vitesse Pink’之莖部切片,顯示日日春韌皮纖維次生細胞壁木質素含量低、纖維素含量高,屬於膠質纖維。將‘Vitesse Pink’植株傾斜栽培28天後取彎曲部位莖段橫切面可觀察到張力側韌皮纖維細胞管徑與細胞壁厚度增加,顯示日日春纖維細胞具反應纖維特性,參與植株支持功能。 使用重瓣直立型‘桃園’系列三品種與單瓣懸垂型‘Cora Cascade’系列三品種及‘Mediterranean’系列兩品種雜交、自交與回交,並調查子代族群懸垂性狀,結果顯示F2族群直立型植株與懸垂型植株比例為3:1 (χ2 = 0-2.84),顯示直立型對於懸垂型為顯性,由一對主效基因控制。若同時觀察重瓣性狀。則F2族群單瓣直立型:單瓣懸垂型:重瓣直立型:重瓣懸垂型植株比例為9:3:3:1 (χ2 = 0.5-7.4),且回交結果也顯示懸垂基因座與重瓣基因座互相獨立不連鎖。 使用微強度試驗機檢測直立型 ‘Little Pinkie’、‘Vitesse Pink’與懸垂型品種‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’、‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’與‘Cora Cascade Magenta’之莖部彈性係數,以彈性係數與各節位中不同組織做相關性分析。結果顯示日日春懸垂性狀主要受到韌皮纖維有無影響,無纖維組織之枝條彈性係數較低,較易彎曲,使植株在生長過程中較易倒伏,於移植25天即產生懸垂性狀。而木質部在組織中之比例與近基部較成熟節位之彈性係數呈正相關,無韌皮纖維且木質部含量較低之日日春品種,彈性係數下降,枝條易彎曲且產生最大的彎曲角度與懸垂程度。 本研究使用日日春‘Cora Cascade’系列4品種、‘Mediterranean’系列2品種與‘桃園’系列3品種分析後代族群花色、無花粉雄不稔等性狀之遺傳模式。以帶有杏色花瓣基因之粉紅色花瓣‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’與白色花瓣‘Mediterranean Polka Dot’雜交,其子代粉紅色花瓣與杏色花瓣分離比為1:1 (χ2 = 0.3),因子代中無白色花瓣個體出現,顯示粉紅色花瓣對於杏色花瓣與白色花瓣為顯性,且粉紅色花瓣由一對基因控制。使用帶有粉色花瓣基因櫻桃紅花瓣單株與杏色‘Cora Cascade Apricot’雜交,其子代櫻桃紅色花瓣與粉紅色花瓣分離比為1:1 (χ2 = 2.37),顯示櫻桃紅色花瓣對於粉紅色花瓣與杏色花瓣為顯性,且櫻桃紅色花瓣由一對基因控制。紫紅色花瓣‘桃園五號-紅娘’與紫紅色花瓣‘Cora Cascade Magenta’雜交,F2族群分離比紫紅色:粉紅色:白色為12:3:1 (χ2 = 0.01),顯示紫紅色花瓣對於粉紅色與白色花瓣為顯性,且由一對基因控制。 花冠筒上緣為紅色之 ‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’、‘Cora Cascade Apricot’、‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’、‘Cora Cascade Magenta’自交後代皆分離出黃色花冠筒上緣植株,且紅色花冠筒上緣與黃色花冠筒上緣植株分離比為3:1 (χ2 = 0.11-3.25),顯示黃色花冠筒上緣對於紅色花冠筒上緣為隱性,由一對基因控制。 中型紅眼圈‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’自交後代分離出小型紅眼圈植株,中型紅眼圈與小型紅眼圈分離比為3:1 (χ2 = 0.35),顯示中型紅眼圈性狀相對於小型紅眼圈為顯性,也由一對基因控制。 一代雜交商業品種‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’與‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’自交後代分離出無花粉雄不稔植株,花藥正常與無花粉雄不稔性狀分離比為3:1 (χ2 = 0.01-2),顯示日日春無花粉雄不稔性狀由一對隱性基因控制。 使用花瓣邊緣缺刻且呈波浪狀之‘Angel Tutu’與重瓣花型之‘桃園四號-夏雪’雜交,F1自交分析花瓣邊緣缺刻性狀與無花柱之性狀遺傳模式。其F2族群花瓣全緣與花瓣缺刻分離比為3:1 (χ2 = 0.33-3.02),顯示花瓣邊緣缺刻性狀由一對隱性基因所控制,且與無花柱性狀連鎖,在重瓣性狀表現之遺傳背景下會增強花瓣邊緣缺刻性狀表現,於異結合植株就可觀察到花瓣邊緣缺刻性狀。 以阿拉伯芥NAC Secondary wall thickening promoting factor 1 (NST1)基因為模板與日日春轉錄體做序列比對,顯示日日春有相似的基因序列表現。雖此基因之CDS (coding DNA secquence)序列於直立型‘Vitesse Pink’及懸垂型‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’之間無差異,但表現量以‘Vitesse Pink’較‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’高。 本研究由單瓣懸垂品種與重瓣直立品種雜交之F2族群中挑選植株強健、分支性佳之植株,選出3種常見花色單株營養繁殖固定,依日日春品種檢定方法及性狀調查表列之規定調查,選育出世界首見之重瓣懸垂日日春,並將申請品種權保護。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
Periwinkle [Catharanthus roseus (G.). Don] is an important summer bedding and potted plant species. Cultivar with both trailing and double-flower habits is presently limited. The study employs double-flowered and upright ‘Taoyuan’ series, and single-flowered and trailing ‘Cora Cascade’ series and ‘Mediterranean’ series to elucidate 1) mechanism of trailing habit, 2) inheritance of trailing and double-flower habits, and flower color, and 3) to breed new cultivars with both trailing and doulbe-flower habits. Free hand cross sections were made for upright and trailing cultivars at the first to the third internode above cotyledons. Results showed that all 5 upright cultivars had phloem fiber, but respective cells in trailing ‘Cora Cascade’ series, ‘Mediterranean’ series, and ‘Boa’ series did not have secondary wall. Internode below the second leaf pairs from top of upright ‘Vitesse Pink’ were also sectioned, and stained by phloroglucinol-HCl and iodine chloride to reveal lignin and cellulose. Results showed that secondary wall of phloem fiber had low lignin, and high cellulose content, and categorized as gelatinous fiber. Plants of ‘Vitesse Pink’ with 2-3 leaf pairs were tilted-cultivated for 28 days and cross sectioned at bending stems. Phloem fiber at tension side showed increased diameter and thickened secondary wall, indicating the phloem fiber is a reaction fiber and functions as upright growth support. Self-pollination, F1, F2, and backcross generation of upright and double-flowered ‘Taoyuan’ series, and trailing and single-flowered ‘Cora Cascade’ series and ‘Mediterranean’ series were made. Results showed that F1 population between upright and trailing cultivars were all upright, and the F2 population showed 3 : 1 segregation ratio among upright and trailing progenies (χ2 = 0 – 2.84). Trailing habit in periwinkle is recessive to upright habit, and is controlled by a single major gene. In addition, the F2 population showed 9 : 3 : 3 : 1 ratio among upright+single-flowered, trailing+single-flowered, upright+double-flowered, and trailing+double-flowered progenies (χ2 = 0.5 – 7.4). Loci responsible for upright/ trailing and single-/ double-flower habits in periwinkle are inherited independently. Modulus of elasticity (MOE) of upright ‘Little Pinkie’, ‘Vitesse Pink’, and trailing ‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’, ‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’, and ‘Cora Cascade Magenta’ were measured by microtester. Results of correlation coefficient analysis between MOE and tissue structure showed that trailing phenotype is governed by presence of phloem fiber. Plants that lack phloem fiber tend to have lower MOE and more likely to bend during growth and showed trailing phenotype of 25 days after potting. Moreover, xylem proportion of also contributed to MOE and trailing level, especially for basal stem and more mature position. Periwinkle cultivars without phloem fiber and lower xylem proportion had lower MOE, which had higher bending angle and more trailing level Four ‘Cora Cascade’ series cultivars, two ‘Mediterranean’ series cultivars, and three ‘Taoyuan’ series cultivars were used to study inheritance of flower color and pollen-less male steriling. Flower color of progenies from self-pollination, F1 and F2 population segregated and followed one gene model of dominant rules as: violet > cherry > pink > apricot > white. Progenies from self-pollination of cultivars with red receptacle segregated for 3 : 1 ratio among red and yellow receptacle (χ2 = 0.11 – 3.25). Red receptacle in periwinkle is dominant to yellow receptacle, and is controlled by single gene. Progenies of self-pollinated red medium-eyed ‘Cora Cascade Strawberry’ segregated for small- and medium-sized eye in 3 : 1 ratio (χ2 = 0.35). Red medium-sized eye in periwinkle is dominant to red small-sized eye, and is also controlled by single gene. Male steriling in periwinkle is recessive to fertile male, and is controlled by single gene. Lobules margined ‘Angel Tutu’ was pollinated with double-flowerd ‘Taoyuan No.4-Summer Snow’, and F2 population was made to study petal margin and style-less. Results showed that F1 population all had entire petal margin and style. Progenies of F2 population segregated for entire petal margin and lobules margin in 3 : 1 ratio (χ2 = 0.33-3.02). And style-less trait is linked with lobules margin. Double-flowered plants showed lobules margin even at heterozygous state. NAC secondary wall promoting factor 1 of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtNST1) was blsated with gene sequence of transciptome in periwinkle, and similar sequence was observed. However, coding DNA sequence of CrNST1 in upright ‘Vitesse Pink’ and trailing ‘Cora Cascade Polka Dot’ did not showed difference. CrNST1 expression level is more in ‘Vitesse Pink’than in Cora Cascade Polka Dot’stem. Three vigourous and well-branching double-flowered and trailing plants from F2 population were selected and cutting-propagated. DUS test following announced methods was made to breed first double-flowered and trailing periwinkle in the world. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:56:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03628106-1.pdf: 4732236 bytes, checksum: 292bd322cd65dd76d1d3e4959a6c371a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………i Abstract…………………………………………………………………………vi 目錄……………………………………………………………………………ix 表目錄………………………………………………………………………xi 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………xiii 第一章 前言………………………………………………………………………1 第二章 前人研究……………………………………………………………………3 一、 日日春分類與形態特徵……………………………………………………3 二、 日日春育種目標…………………………………………………………4 三、 重瓣花型遺傳模式…………………………………………………4 四、 懸垂性狀遺傳模式…………………………………………………5 五、 日日春花色遺傳模式…………………………………………………6 六、 日日春雄不稔性狀遺傳式……………………………………………8 七、 植物厚壁組織…………………………………………………………8 八、 反應材與反應纖維…………………………………………………9 九、 植物組織與形態、力學表現關係……………………………………10 十、 纖維細胞發育模式…………………………………………………10 十一、 纖維次生細胞壁形成主要基因……………………………………11 第三章 日日春懸垂型日日春之形態及莖解剖觀察……………………………13 摘要……………………………………………………………………13 Abstract………………………………………………………………13 前言(Introduction)……………………………………………………13 材料方法(Materials and Methods)……………………………………14 結果(Results)…………………………………………………………17 討論(Dissussion)………………………………………………………18 第四章 日日春之懸垂性狀遺傳……………………………………………27 摘要………………………………………………………………………27 Abstract………………………………………………………………27 前言(Introduction) .…………………………………………………………28 材料方法(Materials and Methods)……………………………………28 結果(Results)……………………………………………………………30 討論(Dissussion)………………………………………………………32 第五章 韌皮纖維與木質部對日日春懸垂性狀之貢獻……………………39 摘要…………………………………………………………………39 Abstract………………………………………………………………39 前言(Introduction) ……………………………………………………40 材料方法(Materials and Methods)……………………………………40 結果(Results)…………………………………………………………43 討論(Dissussion)……………………………………………………46 第六章 日日春花色遺傳……………………………………………………………69 摘要……………………………………………………………………69 Abstract………………………………………………………………69 前言(Introduction) ……………………………………………………70 材料方法(Materials and Methods)……………………………………70 結果(Results)…………………………………………………………73 討論(Dissussion)…………………………………………………80 第七章 日日春CrNST1基因選殖與表現量分析…………………………………97 摘要……………………………………………………………………97 Abstract………………………………………………………………97 前言(Introduction) ………………………………………………………97 材料方法(Materials and Methods)……………………………………98 結果(Results)…………………………………………………………99 討論(Dissussion) …………………………………………………99 第八章 重瓣懸垂型日日春品種選育………………………………………………105 摘要…………………………………………………………………………105 Abstract……………………………………………………………………105 前言(Introduction) …………………………………………………………105 材料方法(Materials and Methods)…………………………………………106 結果(Results)………………………………………………………………107 討論(Dissussion)………………………………………………………108 第九章 綜合討論與結論……………………………………………………………127 參考文獻(References)……………………………………………………………131 附錄(Appendix) ……………………………………………………………………138 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 重瓣懸垂日日春之育種 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Breeding of Double-flowered and Trailing Catharanthus
roseus | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳香君,陳仁治,沈榮壽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 長春花,匍匐性,韌皮纖維, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | vinca,prostrate,phloem fiber, | en |
dc.relation.page | 139 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603174 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 4.62 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。