請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78284完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林水龍(Shuei-Liong Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Jhen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳昱臻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T14:49:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-05 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Knepper M, Burg M. Organization of nephron function. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 1983;244(6):F579-F89. 2. Jacobson HR. Functional segmentation of the mammalian nephron. Am J Physiol. 1981;241(3):F203-18. 3. Chawla LS, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: an integrated clinical syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82(5):516-24. 4. Sharfuddin AA, Molitoris BA. Pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7(4):189-200. 5. Ishimoto Y, Tanaka T, Yoshida Y, Inagi R. Physiological and pathophysiological role of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in the kidney. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2018;45(11):1097-105. 6. Sutton TA. Alteration of microvascular permeability in acute kidney injury. Microvasc Res. 2009;77(1):4-7. 7. Munshi R, Hsu C, Himmelfarb J. Advances in understanding ischemic acute kidney injury. BMC Medicine. 2011;9(1):11. 8. Venkatachalam MA, Weinberg JM, Kriz W, Bidani AK. Failed Tubule Recovery, AKI-CKD Transition, and Kidney Disease Progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(8):1765-76. 9. Bohle A, Wehrmann M, Mackensen-Haen S, Gise H, Mickeler E, Xiao TC, et al. Pathogenesis of chronic renal failure in primary glomerulopathies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9 Suppl 3:4-12. 10. Tanaka T, Nangaku M. The role of hypoxia, increased oxygen consumption, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha in progression of chronic kidney disease. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension. 2010;19(1):43-50. 11. Xiao L, Zhou D, Tan RJ, Fu H, Zhou L, Hou FF, et al. Sustained Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Drives AKI to CKD Progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(6):1727-40. 12. Le Clef N, Verhulst A, D'Haese PC, Vervaet BA. Unilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion as a Robust Model for Acute to Chronic Kidney Injury in Mice. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152153. 13. Wei Q, Dong Z. Mouse model of ischemic acute kidney injury: technical notes and tricks. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;303(11):F1487-94. 14. Lech M, Gröbmayr R, Ryu M, Lorenz G, Hartter I, Mulay SR, et al. Macrophage phenotype controls long-term AKI outcomes--kidney regeneration versus atrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(2):292-304. 15. Lech M, Römmele C, Gröbmayr R, Eka Susanti H, Kulkarni OP, Wang S, et al. Endogenous and exogenous pentraxin-3 limits postischemic acute and chronic kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2013;83(4):647-61. 16. Yang L, Besschetnova TY, Brooks CR, Shah JV, Bonventre JV. Epithelial cell cycle arrest in G2/M mediates kidney fibrosis after injury. Nat Med. 2010;16(5):535-43, 1p following 143. 17. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266. 18. Wald R, Quinn RR, Luo J, Li P, Scales DC, Mamdani MM, et al. Chronic dialysis and death among survivors of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. Jama. 2009;302(11):1179-85. 19. Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Amodeo S, Kimmel PL, Palant CE. The severity of acute kidney injury predicts progression to chronic kidney disease. Kidney International. 2011;79(12):1361-9. 20. Ishani A, Xue JL, Himmelfarb J, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Molitoris BA, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Increases Risk of ESRD among Elderly. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2009;20(1):223-8. 21. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238-52. 22. Schrimpf C, Duffield JS. Mechanisms of fibrosis: the role of the pericyte. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension. 2011;20(3):297-305. 23. Lin SL, Castaño AP, Nowlin BT, Lupher ML, Jr., Duffield JS. Bone marrow Ly6Chigh monocytes are selectively recruited to injured kidney and differentiate into functionally distinct populations. J Immunol. 2009;183(10):6733-43. 24. Ricardo SD, van Goor H, Eddy AA. Macrophage diversity in renal injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(11):3522-30. 25. Meng X-m, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. TGF-β: the master regulator of fibrosis. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2016;12(6):325. 26. Lin S-L, Kisseleva T, Brenner DA, Duffield JS. Pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts are the primary source of collagen-producing cells in obstructive fibrosis of the kidney. The American journal of pathology. 2008;173(6):1617-27. 27. Genovese F, Manresa AA, Leeming DJ, Karsdal MA, Boor P. The extracellular matrix in the kidney: a source of novel non-invasive biomarkers of kidney fibrosis? Fibrogenesis tissue repair. 2014;7(1):4. 28. Liu Y. Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int. 2006;69(2):213-7. 29. Catania JM, Chen G, Parrish AR. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in renal pathophysiologies. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2007;292(3):F905-F11. 30. Inkinen KA, Soots AP, Krogerus LA, Lautenschlager IT, Ahonen JP. Fibrosis and matrix metalloproteinases in rat renal allografts. Transplant international. 2005;18(5):506-12. 31. Piedagnel R, Murphy G, Ronco PM, Lelongt B. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 are produced by kidney collecting duct principal cells but are differentially regulated by SV40 large-T, arginine vasopressin, and epidermal growth factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(3):1614-20. 32. Schaefer L, Han X, Gertz N, Häfner C, Meier K, Matzkies F, et al. Tubular gelatinase A (MMP-2) and its tissue inhibitors in polycystic kidney disease in the Han: SPRD rat. Kidney international. 1996;49(1):75-81. 33. Tomita M, Koike H, Han GD, Shimizu F, Kawachi H. Decreased collagen-degrading activity could be a marker of prolonged mesangial matrix expansion. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Nephrology. 2004;8(1):17-26. 34. Ogbureke KU, Fisher LW. Renal expression of SIBLING proteins and their partner matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Kidney international. 2005;68(1):155-66. 35. Suzuki D, Miyazaki M, Jinde K, Koji T, Yagame M, Endoh M, et al. In situ hybridization studies of matrix metalloproteinase-3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and type IV collagen in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney international. 1997;52(1):111-9. 36. Kuroda T, Yoshida Y, Kamiie J, Kovalenko P, Nameta M, Fujinaka H, et al. Expression of MMP-9 in mesangial cells and its changes in anti-GBM glomerulonephritis in WKY rats. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Nephrology. 2004;8(3):206-15. 37. McMillan JI, Riordan JW, Couser WG, Pollock AS, Lovett DH. Characterization of a glomerular epithelial cell metalloproteinase as matrix metalloproteinase-9 with enhanced expression in a model of membranous nephropathy. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1996;97(4):1094-101. 38. Obermüller N, Morente N, Kränzlin B, Gretz N, Witzgall R. A possible role for metalloproteinases in renal cyst development. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2001;280(3):F540-F50. 39. Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circulation research. 2003;92(8):827-39. 40. Eddy AA, Kim H, López-Guisa J, Oda T, Soloway PD, McCulloch L, et al. Interstitial fibrosis in mice with overload proteinuria: deficiency of TIMP-1 is not protective. Kidney international. 2000;58(2):618-28. 41. Wu I, Moses MA. Cloning and expression of the cDNA encoding rat tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP-3). Gene. 1996;168(2):243-6. 42. Eddy AA. Molecular basis of renal fibrosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;15(3-4):290-301. 43. LENZ O, ELLIOT SJ, STETLER-STEVENSON WG. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Renal Development and Disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2000;11(3):574-81. 44. Hu K, Yang J, Tanaka S, Gonias SL, Mars WM, Liu Y. Tissue-type plasminogen activator acts as a cytokine that triggers intracellular signal transduction and induces matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(4):2120-7. 45. Yang J, Shultz RW, Mars WM, Wegner RE, Li Y, Dai C, et al. Disruption of tissue-type plasminogen activator gene in mice reduces renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;110(10):1525-38. 46. Vincenti F, Fervenza FC, Campbell KN, Diaz M, Gesualdo L, Nelson P, et al. A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of fresolimumab in patients with steroid-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney international reports. 2017;2(5):800-10. 47. Cho ME, Smith DC, Branton MH, Penzak SR, Kopp JB. Pirfenidone Slows Renal Function Decline in Patients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2007;2(5):906-13. 48. Adler SG, Schwartz S, Williams ME, Arauz-Pacheco C, Bolton WK, Lee T, et al. Phase 1 Study of Anti-CTGF Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Diabetes and Microalbuminuria. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2010;5(8):1420-8. 49. Zatz R, Dunn BR, Meyer TW, Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Prevention of diabetic glomerulopathy by pharmacological amelioration of glomerular capillary hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1986;77(6):1925-30. 50. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(20):1456-62. 51. Fried LF, Emanuele N, Zhang JH, Brophy M, Conner TA, Duckworth W, et al. Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(20):1892-903. 52. Yale JF, Bakris G, Cariou B, Nieto J, David‐Neto E, Yue D, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2014;16(10):1016-27. 53. Vallon V, Gerasimova M, Rose MA, Masuda T, Satriano J, Mayoux E, et al. SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduces renal growth and albuminuria in proportion to hyperglycemia and prevents glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetic Akita mice. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2014;306(2):F194-F204. 54. Gembardt F, Bartaun C, Jarzebska N, Mayoux E, Todorov VT, Hohenstein B, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin ameliorates early features of diabetic nephropathy in BTBR ob/ob type 2 diabetic mice with and without hypertension. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2014;307(3):F317-F25. 55. Sullivan DC, Huminiecki L, Moore JW, Boyle JJ, Poulsom R, Creamer D, et al. EndoPDI, a novel protein-disulfide isomerase-like protein that is preferentially expressed in endothelial cells acts as a stress survival factor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(47):47079-88. 56. Horna-Terrón E, Pradilla-Dieste A, Sánchez-de-Diego C, Osada J. TXNDC5, a newly discovered disulfide isomerase with a key role in cell physiology and pathology. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(12):23501-18. 57. Gulerez IE, Kozlov G, Rosenauer A, Gehring K. Structure of the third catalytic domain of the protein disulfide isomerase ERp46. Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications. 2012;68(4):378-81. 58. Funkner A, Parthier C, Schutkowski M, Zerweck J, Lilie H, Gyrych N, et al. Peptide binding by catalytic domains of the protein disulfide isomerase-related protein ERp46. Journal of molecular biology. 2013;425(8):1340-62. 59. Chawsheen HA, Ying Q, Jiang H, Wei Q. A critical role of the thioredoxin domain containing protein 5 (TXNDC5) in redox homeostasis and cancer development. Genes Dis. 2018;5(4):312-22. 60. Duivenvoorden WC, Paschos A, Hopmans SN, Austin RC, Pinthus JH. Endoplasmic reticulum protein ERp46 in renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90389. 61. Wang L, Song G, Chang X, Tan W, Pan J, Zhu X, et al. The role of TXNDC5 in castration-resistant prostate cancer—involvement of androgen receptor signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2015;34(36):4735-45. 62. Zhang L, Hou Y, Li N, Wu K, Zhai J. The influence of TXNDC5 gene on gastric cancer cell. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2010;136(10):1497-505. 63. Chang X, Cui Y, Zong M, Zhao Y, Yan X, Chen Y, et al. Identification of proteins with increased expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissues. The Journal of rheumatology. 2009;36(5):872-80. 64. Jin Y, Sharma A, Bai S, Davis C, Liu H, Hopkins D, et al. Risk of type 1 diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive children can be further stratified using expression patterns of multiple genes implicated in peripheral blood lymphocyte activation and function. Diabetes. 2014;63(7):2506-15. 65. Knoblach B, Keller BO, Groenendyk J, Aldred S, Zheng J, Lemire BD, et al. ERp19 and ERp46, New Members of the Thioredoxin Family of Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteins. Molecular amp; Cellular Proteomics. 2003;2(10):1104-19. 66. Kojima R, Okumura M, Masui S, Kanemura S, Inoue M, Saiki M, et al. Radically different thioredoxin domain arrangement of ERp46, an efficient disulfide bond introducer of the mammalian PDI family. Structure. 2014;22(3):431-43. 67. Gu M-X, Fu Y, Sun X-L, Ding Y-Z, Li C-H, Pang W, et al. Proteomic analysis of endothelial lipid rafts reveals a novel role of statins in antioxidation. Journal of proteome research. 2012;11(4):2365-73. 68. de Lucca Camargo L, Babelova A, Mieth A, Weigert A, Mooz J, Rajalingam K, et al. Endo-PDI is required for TNFα-induced angiogenesis. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2013;65:1398-407. 69. Shih YC, Chen CL, Zhang Y, Mellor RL, Kanter EM, Fang Y, et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein TXNDC5 Augments Myocardial Fibrosis by Facilitating Extracellular Matrix Protein Folding and Redox-Sensitive Cardiac Fibroblast Activation. Circ Res. 2018;122(8):1052-68. 70. Xu B, Li J, Liu X, Li C, Chang X. TXNDC5 is a cervical tumor susceptibility gene that stimulates cell migration, vasculogenic mimicry and angiogenesis by down-regulating SERPINF1 and TRAF1 expression. Oncotarget. 2017;8(53):91009-24. 71. Weibel ER, Kistler GS, Scherle WF. Practical stereological methods for morphometric cytology. J Cell Biol. 1966;30(1):23-38. 72. Guan Y, Nakano D, Zhang Y, Li L, Tian Y, Nishiyama A. A mouse model of renal fibrosis to overcome the technical variability in ischaemia/reperfusion injury among operators. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10435. 73. Scott RP, Quaggin SE. The cell biology of renal filtration. Journal of Cell Biology. 2015;209(2):199-210. 74. Polichnowski AJ, Griffin KA, Licea-Vargas H, Lan R, Picken MM, Long J, et al. Pathophysiology of unilateral ischemia-reperfusion injury: importance of renal counterbalance and implications for the AKI-CKD transition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020;318(5):F1086-F99. 75. Luo G, Hofmann C, Bronckers AL, Sohocki M, Bradley A, Karsenty G. BMP-7 is an inducer of nephrogenesis, and is also required for eye development and skeletal patterning. Genes Dev. 1995;9(22):2808-20. 76. Feil R, Brocard J, Mascrez B, LeMeur M, Metzger D, Chambon P. Ligand-activated site-specific recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(20):10887-90. 77. van Bommel EF, Pelkmans LG, van Damme H, Hendriksz TR. Long-term safety and efficacy of a tamoxifen-based treatment strategy for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(5):444-50. 78. Korte MR, Fieren MW, Sampimon DE, Lingsma HF, Weimar W, Betjes MG. Tamoxifen is associated with lower mortality of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: results of the Dutch Multicentre EPS Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(2):691-7. 79. Zhang P, Zhang M, Wan M, Huang X, Jiang Y, Xu S, et al. Tamoxifen Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide/Galactosamine-induced Acute Liver Failure by Antagonizing Hepatic Inflammation and Apoptosis. Immunol Invest. 2017;46(3):284-94. 80. Hansmann A, Adolph C, Vogel T, Unger A, Moeslein G. High-dose tamoxifen and sulindac as first-line treatment for desmoid tumors. Cancer. 2004;100(3):612-20. 81. Ichimura T, Bonventre JV, Bailly V, Wei H, Hession CA, Cate RL, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), a putative epithelial cell adhesion molecule containing a novel immunoglobulin domain, is up-regulated in renal cells after injury. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273(7):4135-42. 82. Bailly V, Zhang Z, Meier W, Cate R, Sanicola M, Bonventre JV. Shedding of kidney injury molecule-1, a putative adhesion protein involved in renal regeneration. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(42):39739-48. 83. Zhang Z, Humphreys BD, Bonventre JV. Shedding of the urinary biomarker kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is regulated by MAP kinases and juxtamembrane region. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2007;18(10):2704-14. 84. Ichimura T, Asseldonk EJ, Humphreys BD, Gunaratnam L, Duffield JS, Bonventre JV. Kidney injury molecule–1 is a phosphatidylserine receptor that confers a phagocytic phenotype on epithelial cells. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(5):1657-68. 85. Ismail OZ, Zhang X, Wei J, Haig A, Denker BM, Suri RS, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 protects against Gα12 activation and tissue damage in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. The American journal of pathology. 2015;185(5):1207-15. 86. Zhang Z, Cai CX. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) mediates renal epithelial cell repair via ERK MAPK signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2016;416(1-2):109-16. 87. Witzgall R, Brown D, Schwarz C, Bonventre JV. Localization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the postischemic kidney. Evidence for a heterogenous genetic response among nephron segments, and a large pool of mitotically active and dedifferentiated cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(5):2175-88. 88. Bonventre JV. Mechanisms of ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney international. 1993;43(5):1160-78. 89. Basile DP, Fredrich K, Weihrauch D, Hattan N, Chilian WM. Angiostatin and matrix metalloprotease expression following ischemic acute renal failure. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2004;286(5):F893-F902. 90. Basile DP, Martin DR, Hammerman MR. Extracellular matrix-related genes in kidney after ischemic injury: potential role for TGF-β in repair. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 1998;275(6):F894-F903. 91. Ren J, Zhang J, Rudemiller NP, Griffiths R, Wen Y, Lu X, et al. Twist1 in Infiltrating Macrophages Attenuates Kidney Fibrosis via Matrix Metallopeptidase 13-Mediated Matrix Degradation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(9):1674-85. 92. Zhang X, Chen L. Effects of CoCl(2)-simulated hypoxia on the expression levels of matrix metalloproteinases in renal adenocarcinoma cells and renal tubular epithelial cells. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):1454-60. 93. Miao Z, Ding Y, Bi Y, Chen M, Cao X, Wang F. Staphylococcus aureus on the effect of expression of MMPs/TIMPs and uPA system in bovine mammary fibroblasts. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019. 94. Mo R, Peng J, Xiao J, Ma J, Li W, Wang J, et al. High TXNDC5 expression predicts poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(7):9797-806. 95. Xu B, Li J, Wu C, Liu C, Yan X, Chang X. CXCL10 and TRAIL Are Upregulated by TXNDC5 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(3):335-40. 96. Lee TH, Yeh CF, Lee YT, Shih YC, Chen YT, Hung CT, et al. Fibroblast-enriched endoplasmic reticulum protein TXNDC5 promotes pulmonary fibrosis by augmenting TGFβ signaling through TGFBR1 stabilization. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4254. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78284 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 腎臟纖維化一直是腎病患者最難以痊癒的主因,也往往會導致器官衰竭與死亡。因此近年來有越來越多的研究投入在相關的領域當中,根據之前的研究發現,兩週後切除對側腎臟會對原本受到缺血再灌流的受損腎臟有反轉纖維化的效果。另一篇研究中主張在單側缺血再灌流之後一週摘除對側腎臟,觀察到腎功能變差,且在八週後可看到腎臟纖維化的情形,但由於缺血再灌流與摘除對側腎臟等兩個手術時間點只相隔一週,我們發現會造成小鼠高死亡率,因此在我們進一步的研究中選擇在左側腎臟進行缺血再灌流傷害四週後再摘除對側腎臟,藉此來探討腎臟摘除對缺血再灌流傷害的腎臟產生的影響。 我們使用11週大的C57BL/6公鼠來進行實驗,疾病組小鼠在利用加熱板維持小鼠體溫在37度下,使用動脈夾夾住小鼠左側腎動脈及腎靜脈25-26分鐘後再移除動脈夾,使小鼠左腎受到缺血再灌流的損害,損害四週後再將右腎摘除。左腎假手術及四週後右腎假手術的C57BL/6小鼠則做為對照組。 我們收集並檢驗同一批疾病組與對照組C57BL/6小鼠,在不同時間點的血液檢體,發現血中尿素氮和肌酸酐在對側腎臟摘除後第7天明顯升高,在往後至第126天的各時間點也持續顯著高於對照組,無法回復到對側腎臟摘除前(即第0天)的數值。以尿液白蛋白/肌酸酐比例分析發現疾病組的尿液白蛋白排洩有比對照組低的趨勢,且在摘除右側腎臟後第18天與第53天達到統計差異。疾病組的尿液中KIM-1/肌酸酐比例在摘除右側腎臟前顯著高於對照組,雖然摘除右側腎臟後第4天仍然顯著高於對照組,但之後就下降至兩組相當的程度。我們接著進行另一批對照實驗,在進行對側腎臟摘除前(第0天)與對側腎臟摘除後(第7、14、與28天)犧牲小鼠,並以第一次假手術四週後小鼠的左側腎臟作為對照組(相當於疾病組在摘除對側腎臟前的時間點)。從Periodic Acid-Schiff染色的腎臟組織切片中發現經過缺血再灌流的左腎腎絲球大小,在摘除右側腎臟前後都與對照組沒有差異,摘除右腎前後各時間點之間也無差異。以Periodic Acid-Schiff染色的腎臟組織切片評估腎小管間質傷害,發現疾病組經過缺血再灌流的左腎明顯增加腎小管間質傷害,但在右腎摘除的前後並未發現腎小管間質傷害有所改變。在以Picrosirius red染色的腎臟組織切片中發現疾病組經過缺血再灌流的左腎明顯增加纖維化,但在右腎摘除的前後並沒有看到纖維化明顯改變。於是我們比較對照組腎臟,疾病組經過缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟在右側腎臟摘除前,摘除後14天與摘除後28天的基因表現。包括促進腎臟纖維化的基因(Acta2, Col1a1, Col3a1, Timp2),促進細胞外基質水解的基因(Mmp2, Mmp3, Mmp9)等都在缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟在右側腎臟摘除前達到表現量的最高點,右側腎臟摘除後可觀察到Col3a1, Mmp2與Mmp9的表現量顯著的下降,但Acta2, Col1a1與Mmp3的表現量下降都未達到統計上的差異。促進腎臟纖維化的基因Timp3在缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟則比對照組腎臟表現量低。過去文獻上發現表現於巨嗜細胞且能促進細胞外基質水解的Mmp13在缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟則比對照組腎臟表現量低,右側腎臟摘除後第28天可觀察到Mmp13的表現量回升至相當於對照組腎臟的水準。同樣也是促進細胞外基質水解的基因Tpa和Upa則在右側腎臟摘除後第14天表現量最低。具有促進腎小管再生與抑制發炎的基因Bmp7則在缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟降低表現,摘除右側腎臟並未影響Bmp7的表現。但代表細胞增生的Ki67,巨嗜細胞的Adgre1與代表腎小管傷害的Havcr1等基因則都在缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟持續增加表現。與纖維母細胞活化及細胞外基質蛋白折疊相關的Txndc5表現量則都沒有差異。我們延長觀察疾病組至術後6個月,在與同時進行假手術的對照組相比之下,發現缺血再灌流傷害的左側腎臟仍有顯著的纖維化與腎小管間質損傷,而且腎絲球變大達到統計差異。因此左腎經過缺血後缺血後再灌注手術的C57BL/6小鼠,在四週後摘除右腎,表現出持續升高的血中尿素氮與肌酸酐、腎臟纖維化、腎小管與間質損傷、發炎等慢性腎病特徵。 因為過去的研究發現硫氧還蛋白域蛋白5(TXNDC5)可經由促進纖維母細胞活化、細胞外基質摺疊與穩定乙型轉化生長因子受體以促進器官的纖維化,因此我們利用兩種不同的誘導型基因剔除小鼠來誘發左側腎臟缺血再灌流傷害並在四週後摘除右側腎臟以進行研究,包括可誘導全身細胞剔除Txndc5的Ubc-CreERT2Tg;Txndc5F/F小鼠與可誘導出腎臟周細胞剔除Txndc5的Gli1CreERT2/+;Txndc5F/F小鼠。我們發現將Txndc5 剔除後可減輕缺血再灌流傷害腎臟的血中尿素氮與肌酸酐上升,而且因缺血再灌流傷害升高的纖維化相關基因包含Acta2, Col1a1與Col3a1等的表現也會在Txndc5 剔除後顯著減少下來。 因此本研究成功建立一小鼠在缺血再灌流手術誘發急性腎損傷之後轉變為可評估腎功能的慢性腎病模式。在進行缺血再灌流手術之前誘導在全身細胞或血管周細胞剔除Txndc5可以減輕腎功能的惡化。未來對於本急性腎損傷產生慢性腎病的機轉應進一步釐清,尤其是右側腎臟摘除後引起在經缺血再灌流傷害後腎臟的變化,例如腎小管的再生與再分化,腎臟間質炎性細胞浸潤的變化,腎臟周細胞的活化等。剔除或抑制TXNDC5是否能促進已纖維化的腎臟進行細胞外基質的減少或腎小管細胞的再生與再分化也可利用本小鼠模式釐清。過去臨床報告指出,發生急性腎損傷的病患,即使在治療後恢復了腎功能,但其轉變為慢性腎病的機率仍比正常人高,且臨床上大多數的慢性腎病患者在開始治療前即已有顯著的腎臟纖維化。因此我們期待本研究開發的小鼠模式可作為開發新穎治療的重要工具。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Renal fibrosis, which often leads to organ failure and death, is the main challenge for patients with kidney disease. A previous study shows the rescuing effect on kidney fibrosis by removing the contralateral kidney two weeks after unilateral ischemia-reperfusion injury(uIRI). In another study, they remove the contralateral kidney one week after uIRI, which investigates the worse of kidney function and fibrosis eight weeks after uIRI. However, we found high mortality in mice undergoing contralateral nephrectomy (Nx) one week after uIRI. Therefore, we deferred Nx to four weeks after uIRI. We used a homeothermic blanket system to maintain the body temperature of 11-week-old wild type male C57BL/6 mice at 37 oC. Left renal artery and vein was clamped for 25 or 26 minutes with a nontraumatic microaneurysm clip to induce uIRI and then the right kidney was removed four weeks after uIRI surgery in the disease group. We found that plasma levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Creatinine increased and peaked at day 7 after Nx, and continued to be significantly higher than those in the control group through the whole period to day 126 after Nx. The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was lower in the disease group after Nx. The urinary KIM-1/creatinine ratios in the disease group 5 days before Nx and 4 days after Nx were notably higher than in the control group, but they decreased to comparable levels afterward. We then collected the left kidneys at day 0, day 7, day 14 and day 28 after Nx. The volumes of glomeruli were not different between the kidneys assessed in the tissue sections. The percentage of kidney sections with tubulointerstitial injury and fibrosis increased significantly in the kidney four weeks after uIRI when compared with the control kidney. To detect any trivial change in the kidney after uIRI happening after Nx, we compared gene expression in the control kidney and the disease kidney at day 0, day 14, and day 28 after Nx. The expression of Acta2, Col1a1, Col3a1, Timp2, Mmp2, Mmp3 and Mmp9 was the highest in the uIRI kidney before Nx. The expression of Col3a1, Mmp2, and Mmp9 decreased significantly after Nx. Compared with the control kidney, the profibrotic gene Timp3 decreased in uIRI kidney. We found that Mmp13 expression decreased in the uIRI kidneys, but it increased to the levels of the control kidney at day 28 after Nx. The expression of Tpa and Upa was lowest at day 14 after Nx, but returned to the levels of the control kidney at day 28 after Nx. The expression of Bmp7 decreased in the uIRI kidney and did not change after Nx. The expression of genes involved in Ki67, Adgre1 and Havcr1 all increased in the uIRI kidneys and continued after Nx. There was no difference in the expression of Txndc5. We then extended observation to 6 months after Nx, and found persistent fibrosis and tubulointerstitial injury in the uIRI kidneys. Furthermore, increased glomerular volumes were demonstrated when compared with the control kidney. We then focused on the role of thioredoxin domain-containing 5 (TXNDC5), which has been proved to promote fibroblast activation, extracellular matrix protein folding and stabilization of TGF-β receptor signaling, in organ fibrosis. We induced Txndc5 knockout four weeks before uIRI in two mouse lines with Ubc-CreERT2Tg;Txndc5F/F and Gli1CreERT2/+;Txndc5F/F, and then performed right Nx four weeks after uIRI. We found that Txndc5 deficiency attenuated the increase of plasma BUN and Creatinine at day 2 after Nx. Besides, we also found that the profibrotic gene expression was downregulated in Txndc5 knockout mice. In conclusion, we have successfully established a murine model of acute kidney injury (AKI)- chronic kidney disease (CKD) transition. Inducing Txndc5 knockout in all cells or pericytes before uIRI could prevent renal fibrosis and attenuate renal function deterioration. In the future, we would further clarify the cellular response in the uIRI kidney after Nx, including tubular epithelial cells, inflammatory cells and pericytes. Moreover, we will use this model to study whether Txndc5 knockout promotes extracellular matrix protein degradation or tubule regeneration and re-differentiation in fibrotic kidney. Evidence has shown that AKI patients, even with functional recovery after treatment, will experience increased risk for progression to CKD. Furthermore, patients usually suffer from significant renal fibrosis before treatments. Overall, we will use this murine model as a tool to discover novel therapies for kidney fibrosis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T14:49:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0102202121565200.pdf: 3376205 bytes, checksum: 12459967957c471c68894b4494f968d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract vi 目錄 ix 圖目錄 xii 表目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1腎臟及其病理 1 1.1.1 腎臟簡介 1 1.1.2 急性腎損傷(Acute Kidney Injury;AKI) 1 1.1.3 慢性腎病(Chronic Kidney Disease;CKD) 3 1.1.4 腎臟纖維化 4 1.1.5 目前證實有效的減緩腎臟纖維化的治療 6 1.1.6 臨床上未解決的問題(unmet clinical needs) 8 1.2 硫氧還蛋白域蛋白5(TXNDC5) 8 1.2.1 TXNDC5的發現與蛋白質結構 8 1.2.2 TXNDC5的表現 9 1.2.3 TXNDC5的功能 9 1.3實驗目的 11 第二章 材料與方法 12 2.1 材料 12 2.1.1實驗動物 12 2.1.2他莫昔芬 13 2.1.3藥品與試劑 13 2.1.4溶液 16 2.2 方法 18 2.2.1小鼠基因型鑑定 18 2.2.2小鼠模型 18 2.2.3檢體採集 19 2.2.4 RNA萃取 20 2.2.5反轉錄及即時聚合酶連鎖反應 21 2.2.6 Picrosirius Red染色 21 2.2.7 PAS染色 22 2.2.8腎絲球體積計算 22 2.2.9統計分析 22 第三章 實驗結果 23 3.1建立急性腎損傷轉變成慢性腎病的小鼠模式 23 3.2摘除對側腎臟促進缺血再灌流腎臟腎小管復原,但不影響腎絲球 23 3.3摘除對側腎臟對纖維化的影響 24 3.4 uIRI+Nx影響相關基因之表現 25 3.5 uIRI+Nx六個月後可觀察到慢性腎病的情形 26 3.6 uIRI+Nx小鼠模式可用來研究新穎治療對於腎臟纖維化與腎功能的保護效果 27 第四章 討論 29 4.1術後六個月才看到腎絲球的體積變化 29 4.2 KIM-1在尿中與腎臟中表現趨勢不一致 29 4.3腎臟摘除是否會造成纖維化的減少 30 4.4腎臟中蛋白酶相關變化之探討 31 4.5探討腎臟摘除後是否影響細胞增生 32 4.6 探討巨噬細胞在不同時期的分化 32 4.7 Txndc5基因含量在uIRI後四週未有顯著變化 33 4.8 探討Txndc5 KO後腎功能改善的原因 33 4.9未來可進行的相關實驗 33 第五章 結論與未來展望 35 圖表 36 第六章 參考文獻 64 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 慢性腎病 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腎臟纖維化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 急性腎損傷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腎功能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 硫氧還蛋白域蛋白5 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Acute Kidney Injury(AKI) | en |
| dc.subject | Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD) | en |
| dc.subject | renal fibrosis | en |
| dc.subject | kidney function | en |
| dc.subject | Txndc5 | en |
| dc.title | 建立小鼠急性腎損傷後產生慢性腎病模式以研究新穎治療 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Establish a murine model of acute kidney injury-chronic kidney disease transition for the study of novel therapies | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周鈺翔(Yu-Hsiang Chou),楊鎧鍵(Kai-Chien Yang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 急性腎損傷,慢性腎病,腎臟纖維化,腎功能,硫氧還蛋白域蛋白5, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Acute Kidney Injury(AKI),Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD),renal fibrosis,kidney function,Txndc5, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 71 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100349 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-02-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生理學科所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0102202121565200.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
