請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78273完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chieh Kao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 高語婕 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T14:48:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-08 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-03-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 江彥政, 張俊彥, 歐聖榮. (2011). 森林步道環境特性對心理評價反應之影響. 戶外遊憩研究, 24(2), 75-100. 林穎萱, 彭淑芳, 張俊彥. (2014). 不只是綠: 比較觀看山景或海景的效果. 建築學報, 87, 175-186. Beedie, C., Terry, P., Lane, A. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition Emotion, 19(6), 847-878. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological science, 19(12), 1207-1212. Desmet, P. M., Xue, H., Fokkinga, S. F. (2019). The same person is never the same: Introducing mood-stimulated thought/action tendencies for user-centered design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(3), 167-187. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. Fredrickson, L. M., Anderson, D. H. (1999). A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 21-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0110 Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(3), 225-241. Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(1), 27-43. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., Montada, L. (1999). Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056 Korpela, K. M. (1989). Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(3), 241-256. Korpela, K. M. (1992). Adolescents' favourite places and environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 249-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80139-2 Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health Place, 14(4), 636-652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008 Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., Silvennoinen, H. (2010). Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promotion International, 25(2), 200-209. doi:10.1093/heapro/daq007 Laumann, K., GÄRling, T., Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale meadures of restorative components of environments.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0179 Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 Mealey, L., Theis, P. (1995). The relationship between mood and preferences among natural landscapes: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(3), 247-256. Müller, M. M., Kals, E., Pansa, R. (2009). Adolescents’ emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 59-69. Nesse, R. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human nature, 1(3), 261-289. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A. (2008). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals' Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748 Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Tyrväinen, L., Tiittanen, P., Lanki, T. (2019). Restorative effects of urban green environments and the role of urban-nature orientedness and noise sensitivity: A field experiment. Health Place, 55, 59-70. Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R., Peron, E. M., Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 195-209. Purcell, T., Peron, E., Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 93-106. Ratcliffe, E., Korpela, K. M. (2016). Memory and place attachment as predictors of imagined restorative perceptions of favourite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 120-130. Ratcliffe, E., Korpela, K. M. (2018). Time-and self-related memories predict restorative perceptions of favorite places via place identity. Environment and Behavior, 50(6), 690-720. Regan, C. L., Horn, S. A. (2005). To nature or not to nature: Associations between environmental preferences, mood states and demographic factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 57-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.001 Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145 Russell, J. A., Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311-322. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311 Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M., . . . Tam, J. (2013). Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473-502. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061-1086. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1061 Shaw, B., Coyle, A., Gatersleben, B., Ungar, S. (2015). Exploring nature experiences of people with visual impairments/Vivir la naturaleza con una discapacidad visual. Psyecology, 6(3), 287-327. Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871. Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J. (2004). Inspiration: Core Characteristics, Component Processes, Antecedents, and Function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957-973. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957 Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E. (2010). Inspiration and the promotion of well-being: Tests of causality and mediation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 488-506. doi:10.1037/a0017906 Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta‐analysis. European Journal of social psychology, 26(4), 557-580. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78273 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在不同的事件與情況下,情緒每天有不同的波動。在面臨不同的情緒來臨時, 我們透過原先過往經驗、回憶與認知想法,抑或是情緒上的自我調節,去尋求不同 的有助益的行為。過去有大部分的研究證實對大眾提供自然環境是相對於人工都 市環境更讓人有恢復效益的,透過環境的知覺刺激而讓人有感知,以由下而上的認 知模式獲得恢復效益。但少部份是從有上而下的認知模式進行探討,以個人的需求 面與認知去了解,我們在這個情緒想要前往的環境是什麼?而在過往的研究文獻 中也指出在每個人喜歡的地點(Favorite Place)其恢復經驗是更較為顯著的,可能會 透過提取不同的回憶和認知,而憑藉其情緒和感受去這個地方尋求恢復效益。因此 本研究欲從首先欲探討在不同的情緒導向下,我們所渴求的環境會不會依據不同 情緒狀態而有所傾向。再探討滿足其需求面所提供的景觀環境之後,其心理效益益 是否有所提升。 本研究採用照片問卷調查,首先以 Pratt Russell 所提及的情緒體驗中兩條軸 線—愉悅(Pleasant)與喚起(Arousal)中提取四種情緒:興奮(Exciting) 、放鬆 (Relaxing) 、憂鬱(Gloomy)、煩亂(Distressing), 並以情境故事導入上述情緒。受 測者以此情緒進行對於不同景觀類型:自然樹林景觀、自然水體景觀、都市景觀、 鄉村景觀等,進行情緒導向下對於景觀傾向的評分,並請受測者填寫自評式心理問 卷以了解在受測者在此情緒下,若能體驗到所需求的景觀環境,其知覺恢復力、情 緒體驗、靈感啟發、回憶及偏好等所會獲得的心理效益,並在最後階段蒐集其個人 特質與基本資料。 本研究以線上問卷進行發放,共發放 810 份問卷,而其中有效樣本為 653 份。 本研究發現為受測者對於景觀類型的傾向會受到情緒而有差異。在我們在放鬆情 緒時,比憂鬱情緒的人,更會選擇傾向去自然樹林環境;在感到放鬆時,比起煩躁 的情緒,更會傾向去鄉村景觀環境;而在含有正向情緒興奮和放鬆時會比負向情緒:煩躁和憂鬱的情緒更會傾向前往都市環境。而對於青少年時期的居住地、自然導向、自然休閒興趣跟生理狀況等個人特質會影響其對景觀類型的傾向程度。而且 研究也證實在越傾向的景觀環境中,其與所獲得的心理效益呈正相關。在未來若能 從使用者的需求面出發,以了解不同情緒所需求的景觀環境,必能更近一步了解人 與自然的相互關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Emotion has been recognized as a central element of human behavior. Under different incidents or situations, emotion fluctuated daily. When facing different emotions, we will try to regulate our emotions by doing some instrumental action, maybe relying on the experience, memories, or cognition that we used to get the psychological assistant. Most of the research suggested that the natural environment is more helpful for human- being relative to the urban environment. We got from the perceptual stimulation of the environment, the bottom-up processing, for psychological benefits. However, less research back to the user-oriented to discuss what kind of environment I want to experience from now in this emotion. So, in this research, we try to explore what does the landscape types tendency that we want to experience in this momentary emotion. Furthermore, will the benefits increase when we meet the demand? The research used the questionnaire method to explore four kinds of emotion— exciting, relaxing, gloomy, and distressing to landscape tendencies. The landscape types are about nature water, nature tree, rural landscape, and urban landscape. respondents were asked to fill out a self-evaluation psychological questionnaire to understand the perceived restoration, emotional experience, and inspiration scale, memories, and preference. After rendering all the landscape photos, we collect the personal characteristics and basic information in the final stage. The research distributed the survey online. A total of 810 questionnaires were distributed, of which 653 were valid samples. This study found that the subject’s tendency towards landscape types will be restrained by emotions. When we feel relaxed, we tend to go to the natural forest environment more than people who feel gloomy. While we feel relaxed, we tend to go to the rural landscape environment than the distressing mood. More surprising, in contrast to the person in negative emotion-gloomy and distressing, the people in positive emotion-excitement and relaxation, tend to travel to urban environments. Personal characteristics such as residential area, nature orientation, natural leisure interest, and physiological conditions in adolescence will affect the degree of inclination towards landscape types. And research also confirmed that the more tendencies in different kinds of landscape environment, it is positively correlated with the psychological benefits obtained. In the future, if we consider user-oriented to understand the landscape environment requirement by different emotions, we will be able to understand the relationship between man and nature more closely. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T14:48:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0202202121141500.pdf: 18476363 bytes, checksum: 4a10ad566ce496e7c0b5587a1d273c3f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 誌謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V 目錄 VII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍、限制與重要性 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 情緒 4 一、情緒與行為 4 二、情緒情節 5 三、情緒的分類 5 四、情緒的誘導 6 五、小結 6 第二節 情緒對行為的影響 8 一、情緒對景觀類型的影響 8 二、由上而下的認知模式(top-down processing) 的恢復效益 9 三、 小結 9 第三節 景觀類型對心理的影響 11 一、景觀類型之分類方式 11 二、不同景觀類型對心理效益的相關研究 14 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究架構與假設 20 第二節 研究變項 23 一、 情緒類型 23 二、 景觀類型 23 三、 心理效益 23 四、 個人特質 24 第三節 實驗設計 26 一、 情緒文本的撰寫 26 二、 景觀類型 26 三、 心理效益的量測工具 29 第四節 研究操作與分析方法 32 一、 研究的流程 32 二、 資料的搜集 33 三、 資料搜集後分析方法 33 第四章 研究結果與討論 34 第一節 樣本特性分析 34 一、 受測者特性分析 35 二、 量表信度分析 37 第二節 研究假設之檢定 44 一、 不同情緒會對不同體驗前的景觀類型傾向不同 44 二、 當下情緒及個人特質對不同景觀類型體驗前的傾向程度不同 50 三、 對景觀類型體驗後傾向程度與心理效益具正相關 68 第五章 結論與建議 77 第一節 結論與討論 77 一、 在不同的當下情緒下對不同景觀環境類型的傾向程度 77 二、 當下情緒與個人特性對不同景觀環境類型的傾向程度影響 78 三、 對越傾向的景觀類型其所獲得的心理效益會越高 84 第二節 研究的重要性與應用 85 第三節 後續研究建議 86 一、 情緒的探討 86 二、 其他景觀類型的探討 86 三、 不同心理效益的探討 86 四、 受測者的代表性 87 五、 實驗方法的建議 87 附錄一 參考文獻 88 附錄二 情境文本 91 附錄三 研究問卷 95 附錄四 實驗照片114 附錄五 重要文獻原文摘要 118 附錄六 研究倫理委員會計畫核定 124 附錄七 受測者知情同意書 125 附錄八 量表信度分析 130 附錄九 體驗後景觀類型傾向對於心理效益的相關圖表 132 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 心理效益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀類型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行為傾向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個人特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Action tendencies | en |
| dc.subject | Landscape types | en |
| dc.subject | Emotions | en |
| dc.subject | Psychological benefits | en |
| dc.subject | Personal traits | en |
| dc.title | 不同情緒下對景觀類型傾向及其心理效益之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Tendencies of Landscape Types and Psychological Benefits under Different Emotions. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州(Yen-Chou Lin),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),周宛俞(Wan-Yu Chou),張伯茹(Po-Ju Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 情緒,景觀類型,行為傾向,心理效益,個人特質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Emotions,Landscape types,Action tendencies,Personal traits,Psychological benefits, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 133 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100413 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-02-08 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0202202121141500.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 18.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
