請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7776
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張睿詒(Ray-E Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | WEN-LONG LU | en |
dc.contributor.author | 盧文龍 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:53:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-08 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:53:11Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 期刊論文:
李智峰(1997)。健檢服務業現況與經營策略分析。長庚醫學暨工程學院碩士論文。 陳銘樹 (2001)。台灣地區退伍軍人「自費健康檢查」之消費行為行銷研究。國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。 洪婉菁(2003)。台灣六十歲以上老人健康檢查之相關因素。臺中健康暨管理學院健康管理研究所碩士論文。 蔡宗仁(2005)。台灣健檢產業創新商業模式研究。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 吳家勳(2005)。醫院自費醫療服務經營之研究調查。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。 張倩予(2005)。健檢中心顧客忠誠影響因素之探討。長庚大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。 吳怡芳(2006)。《服務創新模式-以健檢服務為例》。國立陽明大學碩士論文。 黃燕鳳(2008)。健檢機構之消費者需求與行銷策略之研究。國立台灣大學醫療機構與管理研究所碩士論文。 周宜慧(2008)。以健康信念模式探討女大學生執行乳房自我檢查認知與行為—以中部某大學大一為例。亞洲大學健康管理研究所碩士论文。 張宏名 (2008)。中部地區中老年人自費健康檢查之利用行為及其相關因素探討. 亞洲大學長期照護研究所學位論文。 郭育成(2009)。「健康服務產業創新服務之研究-以健檢中心為例」。政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。 錢政帄(2010)。高階影像健檢之服務品質與顧客滿意度、忠誠度關聯性研究。國立台灣大學醫療機構與管理研究所碩士論文。 江賢文(2012)。影響空軍官兵接受自費健康檢查之相關因素探討。長榮大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。 黃巧雈(2013)。觀光醫療商機中創新商業模式之探討:以健檢產業為例。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。 王俐婷(2014)。以健康信念模式探討銀髮族自費健檢行為之研究。中國文化大學新聞學系碩士論文。 李淑敏(2016)。影響澳門市民自費健康檢查的因素研究。 澳門科技大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。 劉映彤(2017)。兩岸健檢產業市場之探討與分析。淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士論文。 中文期刊 蔡慈儀, 李守義, 蔡憶文, & 郭耿南. (2010). 中文健康識能評估表的發展與測詴.醫學教育, 14(2), 122-136. 蔡宗仁. (1996). 健檢發展史. 中華民國醫檢會報, 11(3), 52-54. 高淑芬、蕭冰如、蔡秀敏、邱佩怡 (2000),老年人的健康促進生活形態與衛生教育。護理研究,47(1):13-18。 陳明豐. (2005). 健康檢查與健康管理. 健康世界(229 期), p82-86. 陳曉悌, 李怡娟, & 李汝禮. (2003). 健康信念模式之理論源起與應用. 臺灣醫學,7(4), 632-639. 陳毓隆. (2010). 矯正機構收容人自費健康檢查意願之研究-以中部某監獄為例. 中國醫藥大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2010 年) 許功餘, 王登峰, & 楊國樞. (2001). 台灣與大陸華人基本性格向度的比較.[Differences between Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese on Chinese Basic Personality Dimensions: A Preliminary Study]. 本土心理學研究(16), 185-224. 黃巧雈. (2013). 觀光醫療商機中創新商業模式之探討:以健檢產業為例. 李守義, 蔡慈儀, 蔡憶文, & 郭耿南. (2012). [中文健康識能評估量表] 簡式量表的發展與效度檢測. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌, 31(2), 184-194. 李守義, 周碧瑟, & 晏涵文. (1989). 健康信念模式的回顧與前瞻. 中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌, 9(3), 123-137. 李淑芬, 柯慧青, & 李美文. (2012). 影響民眾選擇自費健康檢查因素之研究. 澄清醫護管理雜誌, 8(3), 27-37. 林季緯, 何青蓉, 黃如薏, & 王維典. (2016). 健康識能的概念發展與實務應用. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌, 26(2), 65-76. 林為森, 馬事佐, & 楊純嫣. (2009). 四十歲以上民眾使用健康檢查行為及其相關影響因素之探討. 嘉南學報(人文類), 35, p.560-571. 劉岩. (2016). 美國人怎麼做健康體檢. 中國實用鄉村醫生雜誌, 23(8), 26-29. 沈婉帄, 呂昌明, 游麗惠, 高毓秀, & 黃久美. (2010). 運用健康信念模式探討成年民眾的口腔黏膜健康檢查行為意圖及相關因素. 健康生活與成功老化學刊, 2(1),12-25. 蘇哲能, 張淑鳳, & 潘豐泉. (2008). 台灣健康知能量表之初探性研究.台灣醫學,12(5), 25-36. 滕淑芬. (2015). 健檢商機起飛 五大現象搶先看. 遠見雜誌, 2015 特刊. 王敏容. (2005). 市場競爭程度對醫院開發自費醫療服務之影響。. 北市醫學雜誌,第二卷, 895-906. 王素真, 洪耀釧, & 林耀三. (2011). 影響民眾利用自費健康檢查之相關因素探討.工程科技與教育學刊, 8(2), 320-329. 王召帄, & 張愛莉. (2002). 日本健康體檢醫學的現狀. 上海預防醫學雜誌, 3(14),123-125. 吳晉祥, 黃盈翔, & 張智仁. (2007). 老年人的預防性健康照護-從指引到臨床實務. 吳統雄. (1985). 態度與行為研究的信度與效度: 理論, 應用, 反省. 民意學術專刊,夏季號, 25-53. 揚全斌. (2005). 日本「8020 運動」、「健康日本 21 計劃」與「健康增進法」簡介. 牙醫界, 24(3). 張成琪, 孟慶躍, 馮建利, & 唐芳. (2007). 健康體檢發展與健康管理的模式探討.中國衛生事業管理, 23(8), 510-513. 張恩忠. (1998). 自費健康檢查民眾生活型態與特質研究: 長庚大學. 張宏名. (2008). 中部地區中老年人自費健康檢查之利用行為及其相關因素探討. 亞洲大學長期照護研究所學位論文, 1-93. 英文期刊 Andrus, M. R., & Roth, M. T. (2002). Health literacy: a review. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 22(3), 282-302. Baker, D. W., DeWalt, D. A., Schillinger, D., Hawk, V., Ruo, B., Bibbins-Domingo, K., . . .Pignone, M. (2011). 'Teach to goal': theory and design principles of an intervention to improve heart failure self-management skills of patients with low health literacy. J Health Commun, 16 Suppl 3, 73-88. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.604379 Baur, C. (2010). The national action plan to improve health literacy. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and sick role behavior. Health education monographs, 2(4), 409-419. Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., Viera, A., Crotty, K., . . .Viswanathan, M. (2011). Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)(199), 1-941. Bhopal, R. S. (2002). Concepts of Epidemiology: An integrated introduction to the ideas,theories, principles and methods of epidemiology. Retrieved from http://skums.ac.ir/dorsapax/userfiles/file/Epidemiology_Concepts_2002.pdf C. J. TIDMARSH, M. A., M.D., C.M.,. (1928). PERIODICAL HEALTH EXAMINATIONS*. THE CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL. Chacko, K. M., & Anderson, R. J. (2007). The Annual Physical Examination: Important or Time to Abandon? The American Journal of Medicine, 120(7), 581-583. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.046 Conlin, K. K., & Schumann, L. (2002). Literacy in the health care system: a study on open heart surgery patients. J Am Acad Nurse Pract, 14(1), 38-42. Curtis, L. M., Wolf, M. S., Weiss, K. B., & Grammer, L. C. (2012). The Impact of Health Literacy and Socioeconomic Status on Asthma Disparities. J Asthma, 49(2), 178 183.doi:10.3109/02770903.2011.648297 Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E., George, R. B., Murphy, P. W., & Crouch, M. A. (1993). Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family medicine, 25(6), 391-395. Duong, V. T., Lin, I.-F., Sorensen, K., Pelikan, J. M., Van Den Broucke, S., Lin, Y.-C., & Chang, P. W. (2015). Health literacy in Taiwan: A population-based study. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(8), 871-880. Federman, A. D., Wisnivesky, J. P., Wolf, M. S., Leventhal, H., & Halm, E. A. (2010). Inadequate health literacy is associated with suboptimal health beliefs in older asthmatics. J Asthma, 47(6), 620-626. doi:10.3109/02770901003702816 Gazmararian, J. A., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Scott, T. L., Green, D.C., . . . Koplan, J. P. (1999). Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA, 281(6), 545-551. Grad, F. P. (2002). The Preamble of the Constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ, 80(12), 981-984. Harris, R. P., Helfand, M., Woolf, S. H., Lohr, K. N., Mulrow, C. D., Teutsch, S. M., . . .Force, S. T. (2001). Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. American journal of preventive medicine, 20(3), 21-35. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q, 11(1), 1-47. doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health education quarterly, 11(1), 1-47. Kickbusch, I., & Nutbeam, D. (1998). Health promotion glossary. Geneva: World Health Organization, 14. Lee, S. Y., Bender, D. E., Ruiz, R. E., & Cho, Y. I. (2006). Development of an easy-to-use Spanish Health Literacy test. Health Serv Res, 41(4 Pt 1), 1392-1412. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00532. Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the 'field at a given time.'. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292-310. doi:10.1037/h0062738 Lindau, S. T., Basu, A., & Leitsch, S. A. (2006). Health literacy as a predictor of follow‐up after an abnormal pap smear: A prospective study. J Gen Intern Med, 21(8), 829-834. Liu, Y. B., Chen, Y. L., Liu, L., & Li, Y. F. (2015). Relationship between Health Literacy, Health-Related Behaviors and Health Status: A Survey of Elderly Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 12(8), 9714-9725. doi:10.3390/ijerph120809714 Maiman, L. A., & Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model: Origins and correlates in psychological theory. Health Education & Behavior, 2(4), 336-353. Manganello, J. A. (2008). Health literacy and adolescents: a framework and agenda for future research. Health education research, 23(5), 840-847. Pandit, A. U., Tang, J. W., Bailey, S. C., Davis, T. C., Bocchini, M. V., Persell, S. D., . . .Wolf, M. S. (2009). Education, literacy, and health: Mediating effects on hypertension knowledge and control. Patient Educ Couns, 75(3), 381-385. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.006 Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults. J Gen Intern Med, 10(10), 537-541. Powell, C. K., Hill, E. G., & Clancy, D. E. (2007). The relationship between health literacy and diabetes knowledge and readiness to take health actions. The diabetes educator, 33(1),144-151. Report, T. F. (1979). The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J, 121(9), 1193-1254. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1704686/ Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health education monographs, 2(4), 328-335. SCHNEIDER, P. F. (1961). A Review of the Value of Periodic Health Examination. Occupational Medicine, 11(1), 27-36. Scott, T. L., Gazmararian, J. A., Williams, M. V., & Baker, D. W. (2002). Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization.Medical care, 40(5), 395-404. Simonds, S. K. (1974). Health education as social policy. Health Education Monograph, 2,1-25. Von Wagner, C., Steptoe, A., Wolf, M. S., & Wardle, J. (2009). Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology. Health Education & Behavior,36(5), 860-877. Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. (2006). Wide range achievement test (WRAT4).Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz. 書目 Leavell, H. R., & Clark, E. G. (1965). Preventive Medicine for the Doctor in HisCommunity: An Epidemiologic Approach: Blakiston Division, McGraw-Hill. 陳建仁. (2000). 流行病學:原理與方法. 臺北.聯經. 黃月桂, 李麗晶, 章樂綺, & 鄭鴻文. (2013). 健康管理. 華都, 一版. 網站資料 賴香如. (2000). 國家教育研究院雙語詞彙學術名詞暨辭書資訊網. Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/226049/ 內 政 部 統 計 處 . (2015). 內 政 部 統 計 資 料 . Retrieved from http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7776 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:當今,給民眾健康造成威脅的主要病因已由過去的傳染性疾病,轉變為與生活型態關係密切的慢性疾病及身體機能退化性病症為主。不論是在慢性疾病或是在傳染性疾病的防治上,最常被舉出的疾病預防觀念為三段式的疾病預防。其目的就是希望在疾病發生之前提早發現,及早治療,而健康檢查是提早發現疾病的最佳辦法。台灣過去已有開辦成人預防保健服務,但由於內容比較簡易,且有年齡上的限制,無法完全滿足民眾對健康的需求,許多民眾仍會考量使用自費的健康檢查服務。近年來,自費健康檢查產業的崛起不只是台灣現象。隨著中國大陸人口結構趨向高齡化,代謝症候群與許多慢性疾病有年輕化的趨勢,更是助長了自費健檢的熱潮。因此,瞭解民眾對健康檢查之需求、使用經驗及使用意願,以及了解民眾選擇使用自費健康檢查的相關影響因素顯得尤為重要。
目的: 1.探討兩岸不同人口學特質的民眾在健康素養、健康信念、自費健檢使用經驗及使用意願之差異。2.探討不同人口學特質民眾之健康素養、健康信念對民眾使用自費健康檢查經驗之影響。3.探討不同人口學特質民眾之健康素養、健康信念對民眾使用自費健康檢查意願之影響。 方法:本研究採用立意取樣法,在 2017 年 2 月至 2017 年 4 月期間,透過結構式問卷对大臺北地區某三家健檢機構以及大陸深圳地區某三家健檢機構之有使用自費健檢的民眾來蒐集資料。兩岸各發放 300 份問卷,共計發放問卷 600 份。大台北地區有效回收問卷 229 份,有效回收率 76.33%;大陸深圳地區有效回收問卷 288 份,有效回收率96.00%。 研究結果:(一)兩岸的研究結果都發現,健康素養水平不同的民眾在自費健檢的使用經驗與使用意願上有著顯著差異。此外,健康素養較好的民眾比健康素養較不好的民眾有更豐富的使用經驗以及更強的使用意願。(二)不同人口學特質之民眾在自費健檢的使用經驗與使用意願上有著顯著差異。(三)有使用意願者之自覺罹病性、自覺嚴重性、行動利益及行動線索的分數比沒有使用意願者高,行動障礙分數則比沒有使用意願者低。(四)影響台灣民眾選擇使用自費健檢的主要因素有「健檢方案的多樣化」、健檢機構的「環境」以及是否有「時間」;影響深圳地區民眾的主要因素則是健檢機構的「服務」、「環境」以及後續的「健康管理」。(五)透過羅吉斯迴歸分析發現性別、婚姻狀況、個人經濟狀況、健康素養及行動線索等變項是影響大臺北地區受訪民眾是否願意選擇使用自費健康檢查的重要預測變項。(六)透過羅吉斯迴歸分析發現年齡、健康素養、自覺嚴重性、行動障礙及行動線索等變項是深圳地區受訪民眾是否願意選擇使用自費健康檢查的重要預測變項。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Nowadays, the main factors that threaten people's health have changed from infectious diseases to lifestyle-related chronic diseases and physical degenerative diseases. The concept of three-stage disease prevention is highly applied in the prevention of both chronic disease and physical degenerative diseases, which aims to achieve early detection and treatment before onset of the disease. Accordingly, health examination is the most effective way to detect disease early. Meanwhile, The Preventive Health Care Services for Adults' has been established in Taiwan since 1996; however, its relatively simple content and age limitation can no longer meet the demands of the public. Therefore, many people would like to use self-paid health examination service. In recent years, the rise of self-paid health examination industry occurred in many other districts other than Taiwan. As the population structure of the mainland China tends to be aging, metabolic syndrome and many chronic diseases appeared earlier, people in mainland China tend to choose self-paid health examination as well. Therefore, it’s important to understand the public's demand for health examination, their experience and willingness to use, and the relevant factors that influence people’s choice of using self-paid health examination.
Objectives: To examine the differences of people’s health literacy, health beliefs,self-paid health examination experience and willingness between Taipei and Shenzhen ; so as to explore the demographic characteristics impact on people’s health literacy, health beliefs, self-paid health examination experience and willingness. Method: Purposive sampling was used in this study, conducted in February to April, 2017, using structured questionnaire to survey the people who have used self-paid health examination in the health inspection agency in both Taipei and Shenzhen. 600 questionnaires was totally distributed, including 229 effective questionnaires from Taipei and 289 effective questionnaires from Shenzhen. Results: Health literacy and health beliefs were significantly associated with self-paid health examination experience and willingness. People with higher health literacy scores were significantly more likely to undergo self-paid health examinations. People with different demographic characteristics have different self-paid health examination experience and willingness. The influencing factors of Taipei public’s preference on choosing self-paid health examination mainly include:health examination package diversification, health examination centers’environment, and whether they have time for a health examination. Furthermore, the factors affecting Shenzhen public’s preference of choosing self-paid health examinations mainly include: the service of physicians and nursing staff/medical personnel (eg. professional skills and polite attitudes), the environment of health examination center, and health management. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that sex, marital status, economic status, health literacy, and cues to action were important predictive factors of willingness utilize self-paid health examination among Taipei respondents. Also, this study found that age, health literacy, perceived seriousness, perceived barriers, and cues to action could significantly predict the willingness utilize self-paid health examination among Shenzhen respondents. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:53:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04848028-1.pdf: 2265739 bytes, checksum: 8ca8b17261338edda048afed58a262bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書····································· I 誌謝·············································· II 中文摘要··········································· IV 英文摘要··········································· VI 目錄············································· VIII 圖目錄············································ XI 表目錄·············································· XI 第一章 緒論 ········································· 1 第一節 研究背景與動機··································· 1 第二節 研究問題與研究目的······························· 2 第二章 文獻探討 ····································· 4 第一節 預防醫學與健康檢查······························· 4 2.1.1 疾病的自然史與疾病預防························· 4 2.1.2 健康檢查的發展史及意義························· 6 2.1.3 健康檢查各國準則······························· 7 2.1.4 兩岸政府單位提供之現有健康檢查種類············· 8 第二節 全球主要國家及兩岸健康檢查市場發展現況··········· 10 2.2.1 全球主要國家健康檢查市場發展現況··············· 10 2.2.2 台灣自費健康檢查市場發展現況··················· 12 2.2.3 中國大陸自費健康檢查市場發展現況··············· 14 第三節 健康信念模式····································· 16 2.3.1 健康信念模式起源及架構························· 16 2.3.2 健康信念模式之運用與限制······················· 18 2.3.3 健康信念模式與健康檢查之實證研究··············· 19 第四節 健康素養········································· 21 2.4.1 健康素養之定義································· 21 2.4.2 健康素養之測量································· 22 2.4.3 健康素養與健康行為之相關研究··················· 24 第五節 文獻小結········································· 25 第三章 研究方法············································ 26 第一節 研究流程與研究架構······························· 26 第二節 研究假說········································· 27 第三節 研究工具與操作型定義····························· 28 第四節 研究對象與資料蒐集······························· 33 第五節 信度與效度······································· 33 3.5.1 專家效度······································· 33 3.5.2 建構效度······································· 34 3.5.3 信度··········································· 37 第六節 統計分析方法····································· 38 第四章 研究結果 ············································ 39 第一節 研究樣本之基本特性描述性統計分析····················· 39 第二節 健康素養、自費健檢信念描述性統計分析············· 42 第三節 自費健檢使用情形描述性統計分析··················· 53 第四節 自費健檢使用情形與健康素養、健康信念之t檢定分析· 60 第五節 人口學基本特性與自費健檢使用情形雙變項卡方檢定··· 66 第六節 人口學特性與健康素養、自費健檢信念之差異性分析··· 70 第七節 自費健康檢查使用情形之羅吉斯迴歸分析············· 83 第五章 討論 ············································· 98 第一節 兩岸受訪民眾各個變項描述性及推論性統計分析 ······· 98 第二節 自費健檢使用意願及願付最高價格之預測因子········· 103 第三節 研究限制········································· 105 第六章 結論與建議 ········································· 107 第一節 研究結論 ········································· 107 第二節 建議 ············································· 110 參考文獻 ······················································· 112 期刊論文 ················································· 112中文期刊 ················································· 112 英文期刊·················································· 114 書目······················································ 116 網站資料·················································· 117 附錄 附錄一 台灣地區調查使用問卷······························· 118 附錄二 大陸深圳地區調查使用問卷 ··························· 122 圖目錄 圖2.1.1 疾病自然史與預防 ··································· 5 圖2.3.1 健康信念模式 ······································· 17 圖3.1.1 研究流程圖 ········································ 26 圖3.1.2 研究架構圖 ········································· 27 表目錄 表2.1.1 台灣部分政策性之常規健康檢查種類一覽 ··············· 8 表2.1.2 大陸政策性提供(補助)之常規健康檢查類型一覽 ······· 9 表2.2.1 全球主要國家健康檢查發展模式比較 ··················· 10 表2.2.2 不同類型健檢機構比較 ······························· 13 表2.3.1 健康信念模式與健康檢查相關研究彙整表 ··············· 20 表3.3.1 健康素養操作型定義 ································· 30 表3.3.2 健康信念量表操作型定義 ····························· 30 表3.3.3 自費健檢的經驗、使用意願操作型定義 ················· 31 表3.3.4 人口學基本資料操作型定義 ··························· 33 表3.5.1 自覺罹病性量表因素分析 ····························· 35 表3.5.2 自覺嚴重性與行動利益因素分析 ······················· 36 表3.5.3 行動障礙與行動線索因素分析 ························· 37 表3.5.4 兩岸問卷信度檢驗之Cronbach's α值 ··············· 38 表4.1.1 人口學基本資料描述性統計 ··························· 41 表4.2.1 台灣樣本健康素養總得分情形 ························· 43 表4.2.1 (續)大陸樣本健康素養總得分情形 ··················· 43 表4.2.2 台灣樣本健康素養各題得分情形 ······················· 44 表4.2.2 (續)大陸樣本健康素養各題得分情形 ················· 45 表4.2.3 台灣樣本之自覺罹病性描述性統計 ····················· 46 表4.2.3 (續)大陸樣本之自覺罹病性描述性統計 ··············· 47 表4.2.4 台灣樣本之自覺嚴重性描述性統計 ····················· 48 表4.2.4 (續)大陸樣本之自覺嚴重性描述性統計 ··············· 48 表4.2.5 台灣樣本之行動利益描述性統計 ······················· 49 表4.2.5 (續)大陸樣本之行動利益描述性統計 ················· 50 表4.2.6 台灣樣本之行動障礙描述性統計 ······················· 51 表4.2.6 (續)大陸樣本之行動障礙描述性統計 ················· 51 表4.2.7 台灣樣本之行動線索描述性統計 ······················· 52 表4.2.7 (續)大陸樣本之行動線索描述性統計 ················· 53 表4.3.1 兩岸樣本之自費健檢經驗與使用意願描述性統計 ········· 55 表4.3.2 影響民眾選擇自費健檢相關因素描述性統計(台灣) ····· 58 表4.3.2 (續)影響民眾選擇自費健檢相關因素描述性統計(大陸)· 59 表4.4.1 自費健檢使用情形與健康素養之t檢定分析(台灣) ······ 60 表4.4.1 (續)自費健檢使用情形與健康素養之t檢定分析(大陸)· 61 表4.4.2 自費健檢使用情形與自覺罹病性/自覺嚴重性之t檢定分析(台灣)······················································· 62 表4.4.2 (續)自費健檢使用情形與自覺罹病性/自覺嚴重性之t檢定 分析(大陸)················································ 62 表4.4.3 自費健檢使用情形與行動利益/行動障礙之t檢定分析(台灣)···························································· 63 表4.4.3 (續)自費健檢使用情形與行動利益/行動障礙之t檢定分析(大陸)···························································· 64 表4.4.4 自費健檢使用情形與行動線索之t檢定分析(台灣) ······ 65 表4.4.4 (續)自費健檢使用情形與行動線索之t檢定分析(大陸)· 65 表4.5.1 人口學變項與自費健檢使用情形雙變項卡方檢定(台灣)·· 67 表4.5.1 (續)人口學變項與自費健檢使用情形雙變項卡方檢定(大陸····························································69 表4.6.1 人口學特性與健康素養之關係(台灣) ················· 71 表4.6.1 (續)人口學特性與健康素養之關係(大陸) ··········· 72 表4.6.2 人口學特性及健康素養與自覺罹病性/自覺嚴重性之 關係(台灣)················································ 75 表4.6.2 (續)人口學特性及健康素養與自覺罹病性/自覺嚴重性之 關係(大陸)················································ 76 表4.6.3 人口學特性及健康素養與行動利益/行動障礙/行動線索之 關係(台灣)················································ 80 表4.6.3 (續)人口學特性及健康素養與行動利益/行動障礙/行動線索之關係(大陸)·············································· 81 表4.7.1 自費健康檢查使用意願之預測因數(台灣) ············ 90 表4.7.1 (續) 自費健康檢查使用意願之預測因數(大陸) ········ 92 表4.7.2 自費健檢願意給付的最高價格之預測因數(台灣) ······· 94 表4.7.2 (續) 自費健檢願意給付的最高價格之預測因數(大陸) ·· 96 表6.1.1 研究假設之檢定結果································· 107 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 兩岸民眾健康素養與健康信念對自費健檢的使用與使用意願影響之探討—以大臺北地區及深圳為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | People’s Health Literacy and Health Belief Effect on Utilization and Willingness to Use Self-paid Health Examination ---- The Case of Taipei Metropolis and Shenzhen City | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 譚醒朝,陳美芳,謝其政 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 健康素養,健康信念模式,自費健康檢查,使用經驗,使用意願, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Health Literacy,Health Belief Model,Self-paid Health Examination,User Experience,Willingness to Use, | en |
dc.relation.page | 125 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701431 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 2.21 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。