Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 職業醫學與工業衛生研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77380
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳保中
dc.contributor.authorMei-Jyh Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳美志zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-10T21:59:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-10T21:59:03Z-
dc.date.copyright2019-08-28
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-07-04
dc.identifier.citation1. Blaser MJ. Hypothesis: the changing relationships of Helicobacter pylori and humans: implications for health and disease. J Infect Dis 1999;179:1523-30.
2. McColl KE. Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1597-604.
3. Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1175-86.
4. Ford AC, Forman D, Hunt RH, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic infected individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2014;348:g3174.
5. Liou JM, Lin JT, Chang CY, et al. Levofloxacin-based and clarithromycin-based triple therapies as first-line and second-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomised comparative trial with crossover design. Gut 2010;59:572-8.
6. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017;153:420-429.
7. Lin JT, Wang JT, Wang TH, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in a randomly selected population, healthy volunteers, and patients with gastric ulcer and gastric adenocarcinoma. A seroprevalence study in Taiwan. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:1067-72.
8. Chen TS, Chang FY. The prevalence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis among adult Chinese population in Taiwan. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41:819-22.
9. Lin YL, Chiang JK, Lin SM, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection concomitant with metabolic syndrome further increase risk of colorectal adenomas. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:3841-6.
10. Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori update: gastric cancer, reliable therapy, and possible benefits. Gastroenterology 2015;148:719-31 e3.
11. Gatta L, Vakil N, Vaira D, et al. Global eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential therapy. BMJ 2013;347:f4587.
12. Malfertheiner P, Bazzoli F, Delchier JC, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication with a capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus clarithromycin-based triple therapy: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:905-13.
13. Liou JM, Chen CC, Chen MJ, et al. Sequential versus triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2013;381:205-13.
14. Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, et al. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD008337.
15. Hsu PI, Wu DC, Chen WC, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing 7-day triple, 10-day sequential, and 7-day concomitant therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:5936-42.
16. Lee HJ, Kim JI, Lee JS, et al. Concomitant therapy achieved the best eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori among various treatment strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:351-9.
17. Georgopoulos S, Papastergiou V, Xirouchakis E, et al. Nonbismuth quadruple 'concomitant' therapy versus standard triple therapy, both of the duration of 10 days, for first-line H. pylori eradication: a randomized trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013;47:228-32.
18. Chung JW, Han JP, Kim KO, et al. Ten-day empirical sequential or concomitant therapy is more effective than triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A multicenter, prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2016;48:888-92.
19. Essa AS, Kramer JR, Graham DY, et al. Meta-analysis: four-drug, three-antibiotic, non-bismuth-containing 'concomitant therapy' versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Helicobacter 2009;14:109-18.
20. Gisbert JP, Calvet X. Update on non-bismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2012;5:23-34.
21. Greenberg ER, Anderson GL, Morgan DR, et al. 14-day triple, 5-day concomitant, and 10-day sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection in seven Latin American sites: a randomised trial. Lancet 2011;378:507-14.
22. Liou JM, Fang YJ, Chen CC, et al. Concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2016;388:2355-2365.
23. Vakil N, Megraud F. Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 2007;133:985-1001.
24. Kuo YT, Liou JM, El-Omar EM, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:707-715.
25. Fischbach L, Evans EL. Meta-analysis: the effect of antibiotic resistance status on the efficacy of triple and quadruple first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:343-57.
26. Lopez-Gongora S, Puig I, Calvet X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: susceptibility-guided versus empirical antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:2447-55.
27. Zhang W, Chen Q, Liang X, et al. Bismuth, lansoprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole or clarithromycin as first-line Helicobacter pylori therapy. Gut 2015;64:1715-20.
28. Georgopoulos SD, Xirouchakis E, Martinez-Gonzales B, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing ten day concomitant and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication in a high clarithromycin resistance area. Eur J Intern Med 2016;32:84-90.
29. Tepes B, Vujasinovic M, Seruga M, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing 10-day sequential, 7-day concomitant and 7-day standard triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;28:676-83.
30. Chen PY, Wu MS, Chen CY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy as the first- or second-line treatments of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016;44:427-37.
31. Graham DY, Lu H, Yamaoka Y. Therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection can be improved: sequential therapy and beyond. Drugs 2008;68:725-36.
32. Rimbara E, Noguchi N, Kawai T, et al. Mutations in penicillin-binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 are responsible for amoxicillin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:995-8.
33. Kim JM, Kim JS, Jung HC, et al. Distribution of antibiotic MICs for Helicobacter pylori strains over a 16-year period in patients from Seoul, South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:4843-7.
34. Song Z, Zhou L, Zhang J, et al. Hybrid Therapy as First-Line Regimen for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Populations with High Antibiotic Resistance Rates. Helicobacter 2016;21:382-8.
35. Ang TL, Fock KM, Ang D, et al. The Changing Profile of Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in Singapore: A 15-Year Study. Helicobacter 2016;21:261-5.
36. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32-5.
37. Adiloglu AK, Isler M, Goren I, et al. Quantitative correlation of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test with the severity of H. pylori-related gastritis. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007;212:159-67.
38. Pan BL, Huang CF, Chuah SK, et al. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and bone mineral density: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 2018;18:54.
39. Sheu BS, Shiesh SC, Yang HB, et al. Implications of Helicobacter pylori serological titer for the histological severity of antral gastritis. Endoscopy 1997;29:27-30.
40. National Health Insurance Research Institute. National Health Insurance Research Database. Available from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Default.aspx. Accessed December 2, 2018.
41. Hiroi S, Sugano K, Tanaka S, et al. Impact of health insurance coverage for Helicobacter pylori gastritis on the trends in eradication therapy in Japan: retrospective observational study and simulation study based on real-world data. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015855.
42. Goh KL, Chan WK, Shiota S, et al. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection and public health implications. Helicobacter 2011;16 Suppl 1:1-9.
43. Wu CY, Wu CH, Wu MS, et al. A nationwide population-based cohort study shows reduced hospitalization for peptic ulcer disease associated with H pylori eradication and proton pump inhibitor use. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:427-31.
44. Zamani M, Ebrahimtabar F, Zamani V, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:868-876.
45. Parkinson AJ, Gold BD, Bulkow L, et al. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the Alaska native population and association with low serum ferritin levels in young adults. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000;7:885-8.
46. Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG. Optimization strategies aimed to increase the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies. Helicobacter 2017;22.
47. Liou JM, Chen CC, Chang CY, et al. Sequential therapy for 10 days versus triple therapy for 14 days in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in the community and hospital populations: a randomised trial. Gut 2016;65:1784-1792.
48. Gisbert JP, Molina-Infante J, Harb Y, et al. Su1172 Non-Bismuth Quadruple (Concomitant) Therapy for Eradication of H. pylori: Standard vs. Optimized (14-Day, High-Dose PPI) Regimen. Gastroenterology;146:S-394-S-395.
49. Molina-Infante J, Lucendo AJ, Angueira T, et al. Optimised empiric triple and concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in clinical practice: the OPTRICON study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;41:581-9.
50. Graham DY. Illusions regarding Helicobacter pylori clinical trials and treatment guidelines. Gut 2017;66:2043-2046.
51. Megraud F, Coenen S, Versporten A, et al. Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics in Europe and its relationship to antibiotic consumption. Gut 2013;62:34-42.
52. Tai W-C, Liang C-M, Lee C-H, et al. Seven-Day Nonbismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy Could Achieve a Grade 'A' Success Rate for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication. BioMed Research International 2015;2015:7.
53. Okada M, Nishimura H, Kawashima M, et al. A new quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: influence of resistant strains on treatment outcome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:769-74.
54. Treiber G, Wittig J, Ammon S, et al. Clinical outcome and influencing factors of a new short-term quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized controlled trial (MACLOR study). Arch Intern Med 2002;162:153-60.
55. Wu DC, Hsu PI, Wu JY, et al. Sequential and concomitant therapy with four drugs is equally effective for eradication of H pylori infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:36-41 e1.
56. Molina-Infante J, Pazos-Pacheco C, Vinagre-Rodriguez G, et al. Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains. Helicobacter 2012;17:269-76.
57. Huang YK, Wu MC, Wang SS, et al. Lansoprazole-based sequential and concomitant therapy for the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Dig Dis 2012;13:232-8.
58. Georgopoulos SD, Xirouchakis E, Martinez-Gonzalez B, et al. Clinical evaluation of a ten-day regimen with esomeprazole, metronidazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a high clarithromycin resistance area. Helicobacter 2013;18:459-67.
59. Molina-Infante J, Romano M, Fernandez-Bermejo M, et al. Optimized nonbismuth quadruple therapies cure most patients with Helicobacter pylori infection in populations with high rates of antibiotic resistance. Gastroenterology 2013;145:121-128 e1.
60. Miendje Deyi VY, Bontems P, Vanderpas J, et al. Multicenter survey of routine determinations of resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antimicrobials over the last 20 years (1990 to 2009) in Belgium. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:2200-9.
61. Megraud F. H pylori antibiotic resistance: prevalence, importance, and advances in testing. Gut 2004;53:1374-84.
62. Camargo MC, Garcia A, Riquelme A, et al. The problem of Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics: a systematic review in Latin America. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:485-95.
63. De Francesco V, Giorgio F, Hassan C, et al. Worldwide H. pylori antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2010;19:409-14.
64. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Tsugawa H, et al. Enhancement of amoxicillin resistance after unsuccessful Helicobacter pylori eradication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3012-4.
65. Megraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007;20:280-322.
66. Kassim A, Omuse G, Premji Z, et al. Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2016;15:21.
67. Megraud F. Current recommendations for Helicobacter pylori therapies in a world of evolving resistance. Gut Microbes 2013;4:541-8.
68. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 7.0, valid from 2017-01-01.http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf.
69. Ang TL, Fock KM, Song M, et al. Ten-day triple therapy versus sequential therapy versus concomitant therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1134-9.
70. Liou JM, Chang CY, Sheng WH, et al. Genotypic resistance in Helicobacter pylori strains correlates with susceptibility test and treatment outcomes after levofloxacin- and clarithromycin-based therapies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:1123-9.
71. Liou JM, Chang CY, Chen MJ, et al. The Primary Resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan after the National Policy to Restrict Antibiotic Consumption and Its Relation to Virulence Factors-A Nationwide Study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124199.
72. Mihai C, Mihai B, Cardoneanu A, et al. First line Helicobacter pylori eradication in dyspeptic patients. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases 2017;26:62-63.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77380-
dc.description.abstract研究目的:
幽門螺旋桿菌已被證實是導致胃癌及消化性潰瘍的重要致病原因。台灣缺乏無症狀成人的幽門螺旋桿菌感染率的最新資料。我們希望通過使用碳13呼氣試驗(13C urea breath test; 13C UBT)和幽門螺旋桿菌糞便抗原(H. pylori stool antigen; HpSA)檢測來估計台灣無症狀受試者和消化不良患者幽門桿菌感染的年齡標準化患病率/人口。再者,如何優化治療療效和減少除菌治療的副作用也是很重要的,對於幽門桿菌的一線治療,非鉍劑四合一療法是否優於各種治療天數的傳統三合一療法仍存在爭議,我們希望比較非鉍劑四合一療法和不同天數的傳統三合一療法的療效與副作用,來當作臨床治療處方選擇的參考依據。此外,抗生素抗藥性對幽門桿菌的除菌效果有很大影響。安莫西林(Amoxicillin)、克拉黴素(Clarithromycin)、甲硝唑(Metronidazole)及左氧氟沙星(Levofloxacin)這四種抗生素都是用以做幽門螺旋桿菌除菌治療中常用且重要的抗生素。Clarithromycin、Metronidazole及Levofloxacin的抗藥性都已經被證實會影響除菌成功率,不過之前的研究卻很少關於Amoxicillin抗藥性對療效影響的研究,我們藉由綜合過往五個大型隨機分配試驗結果做事後分析,來了解含Amoxicillin的處方的療效是否會受Amoxicillin抗藥性的影響。
研究方法:
研究1:在2016-2017年間,使用13C UBT和HpSA對189位無症狀的成年受試者進行幽門螺旋桿菌篩檢。在2016-2018年間,針對145位有消化不良等症狀的病患,我們使用13C UBT、HpSA、血清抗體檢查、快速尿素酶試驗和切片組織學來調查幽門桿菌感染率。在這個盛行率研究中我們所使用的標準診斷工具為碳13呼氣試驗,我們藉此機會測定幽門桿菌糞便抗原【包括Diagnostec®HpSA ELISA和快速檢測試劑盒(HpSA Rapid)】的診斷準確度,以便於未來可應用於大規模幽門螺旋桿菌篩檢之用。
研究2:從PubMed,Cochran Library和Embase等資料庫進行檢索,找出合乎研究目的的隨機對照試驗,主題是比較5至14天非鉍劑四合一療法和傳統三合一療法治療一線幽門桿菌感染時的療效。利用統合分析(Meta-analysis)作為統計分析的方法,主要和次要結果分別是根據意向治療(Intention-to-treat)分析的除菌率和副作用。亞群分析則是針對這兩種處方的各種不同治療天數做療效比較。
研究3:對2007年至2016年間在台灣進行的5項大型隨機試驗做事後分析。納入所有接受含Amoxicillin治療處方的患者。使用統合分析評估Amoxicillin抗藥菌株與敏感菌株相比的除菌失敗風險比。我們進一步對使用含Clarithromycin及Amoxicillin三合一處方治療的患者進行分析,用以找出Amoxicillin抗藥性的最佳斷點。
研究結果:
研究1:幽門桿菌感染率在無症狀成人中為21.2%,在消化不良成人患者中則為37.9%(p <0.001)。台灣無症狀成人幽門桿菌的年齡標準化患病率為28.9%。做ROC分析時,HpSA ELISA測試曲線下面積為0.978,OD值的最佳斷點為0.03。 而HpSA ELISA的靈敏度,特異性和準確性分別為0.929、0.983和0.967。
研究2:做完系統回顧分析後,納入了 23個隨機對照試驗。經由統合分析,我們發現非鉍劑四合一療法優於三合一療法[風險比(RR):1.15; 95%信賴區間(CI):1.09-1.21; P <0.001]。然而,其中存在顯著的異質性(I2 = 74.0%,p <0.001)。在分組分析中,5天四合一治療優於5天三合一治療(RR:1.30; 95% CI:1.04-1.62; p = 0.02),5天或7天四合一治療優於7天三合一治療(RR:1.16; 95% CI:1.12-1.21; p <0.001),5天或7天或10天或14天四合一治療優於10天三合一治療(RR:1.15; 95% CI:1.08-1.23; p <0.001)。然而,5天或10天四合一治療並未優於14天三合一治療(RR:1.02; 95% CI:0.89-1.16; p = 0.796)。四合一治療的副作用發生率顯著高於三合一治療(RR:1.19; 95% CI:1.06-1.34; P = 0.004)。
研究3:研究中包括了2,339名有Amoxicillin 抗藥性資料的受試者。統合分析顯示Amoxicillin抗藥性的存在與含Amoxicillin治療處方治療失敗的風險增加有關(當斷點為0.5 mg/ L時,RR:1.41;95% CI:1.12-1.78,P = 0.004),異質性低(I2 = 0%,p = 0.615)。統合分析結果還表明Amoxicillin是造成含Clarithromycin三合一治療失敗的獨立危險因子,而當Amoxicillin抗藥性的斷點≥ 0.125mg/ L時,Amoxicillin抗藥性與療效的相關性是最好的(Kappa係數: 0.298)。
研究結論:
和1992年時相比,現在台灣幽門螺旋桿菌感染的盛行率在各年齡層都是下降的。我們的研究發現無症狀成人中幽門桿菌感染率為21.2%,消化不良成人患者中感染率為37.9%。驗證了幽門桿菌糞便抗原可準確應用於華人中用做為幽門桿菌篩檢。對於幽門螺旋桿菌一線治療中,給予5或10天的四合一療法優於3天或7天或10天的三合一療法,但不優於14天三合一療法。含有Amoxicillin處方的療效會受Amoxicillin抗藥性的影響,其最小抑制濃度(Minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC)的最佳斷點為≥0.125mg/ L。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective:
Helicobacter pylori has been proved to be an important predisposing factor for gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. An updated prevalence Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in asymptomatic adults is lacking in Taiwan. We hope to assess the updated age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori infection in asymptomatic subjects and in patients with dyspepsia in Taiwan. Besides, optimizing treatment and reducing side effects are also very important. Whether concomitant therapy is superior to triple therapy of various treatment lengths for the first-line treatment of H. pylori remains controversial. We hope to compare the efficacy of concomitant therapy and triple therapy given for 5 to 14 days. Antimicrobial resistance has great impact on eradication efficacy of H. pylori. The antibiotic’s resistance of clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin has been shown to affect the eradication efficacy; however, the impact of amoxicillin resistance on eradication efficacy remains unknown. It’s worthy to investigate whether the efficacy of amoxicillin containing regimen is affected by amoxicillin resistance.
Methods:
Study1: Asymptomatic adult subjects (N=189) were screened for H. pylori infection using HpSA, serology, and 13C-Urea Breath Test (13C-UBT) in 2016-2017. Adult patients with dyspepsia (N=145) were screened for H. pylori using 13C-UBT, HpSA, serology, rapid urease test, and histology during 2016-2018. In the present study, the 13C-UBT was used as the gold standard diagnostic tool for identification of H. pylori infection.
Study 2: Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of concomitant therapy for 5 to 14 days and proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (PAC) based triple therapy for 5 to 14 days in the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection published from 1990 to January 2018 were searched from the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. The primary and secondary outcomes were the eradication rate according to the intention-to-treat analysis and the adverse effects, respectively. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to treatment length.
Study 3: This was one analysis of five randomized trials conducted in Taiwan from 2007 to 2016. Patients who received amoxicillin-containing regimens were recruited. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk ratio of eradication failure in amoxicillin resistant strains compared to susceptible strains of seven different regimens. Then, pooled analysis and logistic regression in patients treated with clarithromycin triple therapy were performed to identify the optimal breakpoint of amoxicillin resistance.
Results:
Study1: The un-adjusted prevalence of H. pylori was 21.2% in asymptomatic adults and 37.9% in patients with dyspepsia (p<0.001). The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori was 28.9% in asymptomatic adults in Taiwan. Of the 334 patients included for analysis, the area under the curve of HpSA ELISA test was 0.978, and the optimal cut-off value of OD was 0.03. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HpSA ELISA were 0.929, 0.983, and 0.967, respectively.
Study 2: Of the 639 articles identified, 23 RCTs including 3,305 patients in the concomitant therapy group and 3,327 patients in the triple therapy group were eligible. Overall, concomitant therapy was superior to triple therapy [Risk ratio (RR): 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.09-1.21; p<0.001]. However, there were significant heterogeneity (I2=74.0%, p<0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 5-day concomitant therapy was superior to 5-day triple therapy (RR: 1.30; 95% CI:1.04-1.62; p=0.02), 5-or 7-day concomitant therapy was superior to 7-day triple therapy (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.12-1.21; p<0.001), and 5- or 7- or 10- or 14-day concomitant therapy was superior to 10-day triple therapy (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08-1.23; p<0.001). However, 5- or 10-day concomitant therapy was not superior to 14-day triple therapy (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.89-1.16; p=0.796). The frequency of adverse effects was significantly higher in concomitant therapy than triple therapy (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.34; P=0.004).
Study 3: A total of 2,339 patients with available data of amoxicillin MICs were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that the presence of amoxicillin resistance was consistently associated with increased risk of treatment failure of amoxicillin-containing regimens at different breakpoints (Risk ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.78, P= 0.004 when cut at 0.5 mg/L). The heterogeneity was low (I2=0%, p=0.615). Pooled analysis also showed that amoxicillin resistance was an independent risk factor of treatment failure of clarithromycin triple therapy at different breakpoints. The best correlation was observed when the breakpoint of amoxicillin resistance was ≧0.125 mg/L (Kappa coefficient: 0.298), at which the resistance rate was 11.1% (110/990).
Conclusions: The reported prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in Taiwan was 54.4% in 1992. Compared with the study in 1992, our study found that prevalence of H. pylori has decreased in all age groups in Taiwan. HpSA test is an accurate tool for screening of H. pylori for Chinese population. Concomitant therapy given for 5 or 10 days was superior to 5- or 7- or 10-day PAC based triple therapy, but was not superior to 14-day triple therapy. The efficacies of amoxicillin containing regimens are affected by amoxicillin resistance and the optimal breakpoint of MIC is ≧0.125 mg/L.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:59:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-D03841014-1.pdf: 3770159 bytes, checksum: 730ea76c9e490ac5ef3412d19fa6d881 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents
口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract v
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and gastrointestinal disease 1
1.2 The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection 1
1.3 The first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection-concomitant therapy versus triple therapy 2
1.4 The impact of antibiotic resistance on eradication efficacy of Helicobacter pylori 3
1.5 Study objectives 5
CHAPTER 2. METHODS AND MATERIALS
2.1 The updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan 6
2.2 Concomitant therapy versus triple therapy for the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication 10
2.3 Amoxicillin resistance and eradication of Helicobacter pylori 14
CHAPTER 3. RESULTS
3.1 The updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan 17
3.2 Concomitant therapy versus triple therapy for the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication 20
3.3 Amoxicillin resistance and eradication of Helicobacter pylori 24
CHAPTER 4. DISCUSSION
4.1 The updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan 27
4.2 Concomitant therapy versus triple therapy for the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication 30
4.3 Amoxicillin resistance and eradication of Helicobacter pylori 35
REFERENCE 40

List of Figure
Figure 1. The flow chart (STARD 2015 flow diagram)
1(a). The flow chart to evaluate the accuracy of H. pylori stool antigen test (ELISA) for diagnosis of H. pylori infection 51
2(b). The flow chart to evaluate the accuracy of H. pylori stool antigen test (Rapid test) for diagnosis of H. pylori infection 52
Figure 2. The H. pylori prevalence of asymptomatic group
2(a). The H. pylori prevalence between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups according to different age groups.. 53
2(b). The time trend of H. pylori prevalence for adult asymptomatic population in Taiwan between 1992 and 2016 . 54
Figure 3. ROC curve for HpSA ELISA test to identify the optimal cut-off value (all study population) . 55
Figure 4. ROC curve for HpSA ELISA test
4(a). ROC curve for HpSA ELISA test to identify the optimal cut-off value
(asymptomatic group). 56
4(b). ROC curve for HpSA ELISA test to identify the optimal cut-off value
(symptomatic group) . 56
Figure 5. PRISMA diagram of the literature search . 57
Figure 6. Forest plot of efficacy of concomitant therapy versus triple therapy
6(a). All eligible trials 58
6(b). Subgroup analysis: concomitant therapy for 5 days vs. triple therapy for 5 days 58
6(c). Subgroup analysis: concomitant therapy for 5 days or 7 days vs. triple therapy for 7 days 58
6(d). Subgroup analysis: concomitant therapy for 5 days or 7 days or 10 days or 14 days vs. triple therapy for 10 days 59
6(e). Subgroup analysis: concomitant therapy for 5 days or 7 days or 10 days vs. triple therapy for 14 days 59
6(f). Eligible trials except concomitant therapy for 5 days and triple therapy for 5 days 59
Figure 7. Forest plot of adverse effects of concomitant therapy versus triple therapy
7(a). Concomitant therapy for 5 days, 7 days, or 10 days or 14 days vs. triple therapy for 5 days, 7 days, 10 days or 14 days. 60
7(b). Concomitant therapy for 7 days, or 10 days or 14 days vs. triple therapy for 7 days, 10 days or 14 days. 60
Figure 8. Forest plot of efficacy of concomitant therapy versus triple therapy according to clarithromycin resistance
8(a). Clarithromycin resistant strains. 61
8(b). Clarithromycin susceptible strains. 61
Figure 9. Funnel plot of concomitant therapy for 5-14 days vs. triple therapy for 5 -14 days
9(a). Funnel plot on trials comparing the efficacy (Kendall’s tau 0.324, p=0.03). 62
9(b). Funnel plot on trials comparing the adverse effects (Kendall’s tau 0.13, p=0.545). 62
Figure 10. Flow chart for selecting the study cohort from 5 randomized clinical trials . 63
Figure 11. Forest plot of eradication efficacy of Helicobacter pylori by per-protocol analysis in amoxicillin susceptible strains compared to amoxicillin resistant strains. (Breakpoint of minimum inhibitory concentrations at 0.125). 64
Figure 12. Forrest plot of “Area under ROC curve” of amoxicillin MIC for eradication efficacy of Helicobacter pylori . 65

List of Tables
Table 1. Basic demographic characteristics of participants 66
Table 2. The Age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori infection in asymptomatic adults 68
Table 3. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA method at different cut-off values 69
Table 4. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy with theirs 95% confidence intervals of ELISA method and rapid screen test for identification of H. pylori infection 70
Table 5. Crude and adjusted ORs of gender, age, place of residence, siblings and dyspeptic symptom in H. pylori infected and non-infected groups 71
Table 6. Characteristics of the studies enrolled in this meta-analysis 73
Table 7. Risk of bias of the studies 77
Table 8. Efficacy of concomitant therapy and triple therapy of the individual studies 78
Table 9. Adverse effects of concomitant therapy and triple therapy of the individual studies 82
Table 10. The efficacies of concomitant therapy and triple therapy according to the antibiotic susceptibility patterns 85
Table 11. Regimens of each clinical trials 86
Table 12. Demographic characteristics of total participants and those who received triple therapy regimen 87
Table 13. Correlations between primary amoxicillin resistance and eradication failure by per protocol analysis at different breakpoints of Amoxicillin MIC in triple therapy group 88
Table 14. Crude and adjusted ORs of gender, age, body mass index, smoking, peptic ulcer disease and primary antibiotics resistance in treatment failure and comparison cohorts among those patients with receiving triple therapy regimen 89
Table 15. Adjusted odds ratios of amoxicillin resistance for eradication failure of H. pylori at different breakpoints of amoxicillin MIC in triple therapy group 91
Table 16. Correlations between primary amoxicillin resistance and eradication rate by per protocol analysis at different breakpoints of Amoxicillin MIC in triple therapy group comparing clarithromycin susceptible versus clarithromycin resistant strains 92
Table 17. The efficacies of concomitant therapy and triple therapy according to the antibiotic susceptibility patterns 93
Table 18. The efficacies of concomitant therapy according to the antibiotic susceptibility patterns in the literature 94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title幽門螺旋桿菌感染的一線治療與抗藥性對除菌療效的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe first-line treatment of H. pylori infection and the impact of antibiotic resistance on eradication efficacyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.coadvisor吳明賢
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張君照,羅景全,袁瑞晃,李宜家,劉志銘
dc.subject.keyword幽門螺旋桿菌,盛行率,一線治療,安莫西林,抗藥性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordHelicobacter pylori,first-line treatment,amoxicillin,resistance,en
dc.relation.page94
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201901202
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2019-07-04
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept職業醫學與工業衛生研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:職業醫學與工業衛生研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-D03841014-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
3.68 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved