Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77300Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林俊昇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jiun-Sheng Chris Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 施冠丞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Cheng Shih | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T21:54:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
陳倉輝,2018,金屬加工業價值共創與技術創新對於工業性品牌權益的影響-以C 公司例,國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)未出版之碩士論文。 蔡明義,2001,企業技術能力發展與產學合作關係之研究,國立成功大學工業管理科學系未出版之博士論文。 蕭榮吉,2015,台灣矽晶太陽能產業競爭策略其技術創新發展因素之探討-應用模糊層級分析法,國立中央大學高階主管企管未出版之碩士論文。 蕭建宏,2005,原廠委託設計製造與自有品牌經營型態之資源能力的共通與互補–價值網路觀點,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系未出版之碩士論文。 英文部分 Aaker, D. A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press. Ahtola, Olli T. 1985. Hedonic and utilitarian aspects of consumer behavior: an attitudinal perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 12: 7-10. Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., and Neslin, S. A. 2003. Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 67 (4): 1-17. Ali, A. 1994. Pioneering versus incremental innovation: review and research propositions. Journal Product Innovation Management, 11: 46-61. Autio, E., and Laamanen, T. 1995. Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (7/8): 643-664. Abernathy, W. J., and Utterback, J. M. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80 (7): 41-47. Batra, R., and Ahtola, O. T. 1991. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letter, 2 (2): 159-170. Betz, F. 1993. Strategic Technology Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc. Booz, A. & H. 1982. New Product Management for the 1980’s. New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Baldinger, A. L., and Rubinson, J. 1996. Brand loyalty: The link between attitude and behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, 36 (6): 22-36. Cooper, R. B. 2000. Information technology development creativity: a case study of attempted radical change. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2): 245-276. Cooper, R. G. 2000. Product innovation and technology strategy. Research Technology Management, 43 (1): 38-41. Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S. 2013. Business Research Methods (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Damanpour, F., and Evan, W. M. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of "organizational lag". Administrative science quarterly, 29 (3): 392-409. Doyle, P. 1990. Building successful brands: the strategic options. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7 (2): 5-20. Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Public Productivity Review, 10 (1): 105-109 Farquhar, P. H. 1989. Managing brand equity. Marketing Research, 1 (3): 24-33. Griffin, A., and Page, A. L. 1993. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10 (4): 291-308. Hill, Charles W. L., and Jones, G. R. 1998. Strategic Management theory: An integrated approach (4th ed). New York: Houghton Mifflin. Hirschman, E. C. 1980. Attributes of attributes and layers of meaning. Advance in Consumer Research, 7: 7-12. Holbrook, M. B., and Hirschman, E. C. 1982. The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2): 132-140. Keller, K. L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1): 1-22. Keller, K. L. 2010. Brand equity management in a multichannel, multimedia retail environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24 (2): 58-70. Kotler, P. 1991. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Kamakura, W. A., and Russell, G. J. 1993. Measuring brand value with scanner data. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10 (1): 9-22. Lanning, M., and Michaels, E. 1988. A business is a value delivery system. Mckinsey staff paper. 41. Leone, R. P., Rao, V. R., Keller, K. L., Luo, A. M., McAlister, L., and Srivastava, R. 2006. Linking brand equity to customer equity. Journal of Service Research, 9 (2): 125-138. Leroy, G. P. 1978. Transfer of Developing Economics within the Multinational Enterprise. Lukas, B. A., and Ferrell, O. C. 2000. The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2): 239-247. Mansfield, E. 1975. International technology transfer: forms, resources, requirements and policies. The American Economic Review, 65 (2): 372-376. Mittal, B., Brian, R., and Prabhakar, P. 1990. Functional and expressive attributes as determinants of brand-attitude. Research in Marketing, 10: 135-155. Mullen, M., and Mainz, A. 1989. Brands, bids and balance sheets: putting a price on protected products. Acquisitions Monthly, 24 (4): 26-27. Eurostat. 1997. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (2nd ed.). Paris: European commission. Eurostat. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.). Paris: European commission. Park, C. W., Macinnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A.B., and Iacobucci, D. 2010. Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74 (6): 1-17. Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press. Rego, L. L., Billett, M. T., and Morgan, N. A. 2009. Consumer-based brand equity and firm risk. Journal of Marketing, 73 (6): 47-60. Schumpeter, J. A. 1943. Theory of economic development (10th ed.). New York: Transaction Publisher. Sharif, M. N. 1988. Basis for techno-economic policy analysis. Science and Public Policy, 15 (4): 217-229. Solomon, M. R. 1983. The role of produces as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 ( 3): 319-329. Souder, W. E. 1987 Managing new product innovations. Lexington MA: Lexington books. Souitaris, V. 2002. Firm-specific competencies determining technological innovation: a survey in Greece. R & D Management, 32 (1): 61-77. Srinivasan, V., Park, C. S., and Chang, D. R. 2005. An approach to the measurement, analysis, and prediction of brand equity and its sources. Management Science, 51 (9): 1433-1448. Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H., and Mitronen, L. 2007. Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. Managing Service Quality, 17 (6): 621-634. Rochford, L. 1991. Generating and screening new product ideas. Industrial marketing management, 20 (4): 287-296. Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). CA: Sage Publications. 網路部分 Interbrand 2018,https://www.interbrand.com,搜尋日期:2019年6月20日。 有機矽市場,https://www.giichinese.com.tw,搜尋日期:2019年6月29 日。 有機矽市場,https://www.grandviewresearch.com,搜尋日期:2019年7月2日。 石化及塑橡膠產業鏈簡介,https://ic.tpex.org.tw,搜尋日期:2019年7月1日。 矽膠產業,https://www.mordorintelligence.com,搜尋日期:2019年7月2日。 Silitech,https://www.silitech.com,搜尋日期:2019年7月15日。 GSWEB,http://www.gsweb.com.tw,搜尋日期:2019年7月16日。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77300 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著全球經濟不斷成長以及自由貿易下,逐漸受到中國及東南亞國家低勞力與低生產成本的威脅,矽橡膠產業的競爭受到國際化跟自由化的發展,資源、技術、與供應已無國界的限制,進入全球白熱化的競爭。在此環境下,技術創新則是驅動企業成長的關鍵策略,企業只有透過不斷的創新技術,使公司符合顧客需求,幫助顧客建立競爭優勢,強化品牌權益,才能取得永續發展的優勢。
過去品牌權益的研究多數以消費性產品為主;鮮少研究進行B2B公司之品牌權益相關討論。本研究以矽橡膠產業代工製造商為例,就技術創新對工業性品牌權益的影響進行探討,並檢視技術創新對品牌忠誠度、品牌知名度、知覺品質、品牌聯想及其他品牌專屬資產的影響,進而探討如何強化B2B 市場工業性品牌權益。本研究結果為工業性品牌的企業提供有正面價值的管理意涵,透過技術創新來建立永續差異化的優勢的結果,極大化顧客價值並提升品牌權益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the era of globalization, the competition become increasingly intense in the silicon rubber industry. Under the threats of the low cost labor and production from China and Southeast Asian, technology innovation has been considered one of the most important competitive strategies in this industry. In other words, technology innovation becomes the key factor to strengthen the brand equity since it is the foundation of customer needs fulfillment.
As past brand equity related research mostly focused on the branding issues in consumer markets, relatively fewer studies focused on B2B brands. This research takes the contract manufacturers in the silicon rubber industry as example to examine the influences of technology innovation on brand equity, including four facets of perceived quality, brand awareness, brand association and brand loyalty. The result shows that, in the B2B market, technology innovation is beneficial in building up competitive differentiation, maximizing customer value and eventually enhancing the brand equity. Implication, limitation and future research directions are then discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:54:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-P05746008-1.pdf: 2019226 bytes, checksum: f1244f06cf87e2ab34226b4b7d4e1e5f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員審定書..............................................i 誌謝......................................................ii 中文摘要.................................................iii 英文摘要..................................................iv 目錄.......................................................v 圖目錄...................................................vii 表目錄..................................................viii 第一章 緒 論..............................................1 第一節、研究背景............................................1 第二節、研究動機............................................1 第三節、研究目的............................................2 第四節、研究架構............................................3 第五節、研究方法............................................4 第二章 文獻探討.............................................5 第一節、技術創新............................................5 第二節、顧客價值主張.......................................11 第三節、品牌價值...........................................14 第四節、品牌權益及品牌權益金字塔............................17 第三章 個案分析............................................22 第一節、矽橡膠產業.........................................22 第二節、K公司簡介..........................................26 第三節、K公司價值主張......................................35 第四節、K公司技術創新對品牌權益之關係........................43 第四章 結論與建議..........................................50 第一節、研究結論與管理意涵..................................50 第二節、研究限制與未來研究方向..............................54 參考文獻..................................................56 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究架構圖...........................................3 圖2-1 Mark Johnson商業模式圖..............................11 圖2-2 Interbrand 2018年最佳台灣全球品牌...................15 圖2-3 Interbrand 2018年最佳全球Top100品牌.................16 圖2-4 Aaker (1991)的品牌權益來源及價值圖...................18 圖2-5 Keller(2001)品牌權益金字塔衡量模式...................20 圖3-1 石化及塑橡膠產業鏈路圖...............................22 圖3-2 矽橡膠產業鏈路圖....................................23 圖3-3 2018矽橡膠產業應用分布圖............................24 圖3-4 2019 - 2024矽橡膠市場區域成長趨勢圖..................25 圖3-5 K公司組織圖.........................................26 圖3-6 K公司各廠房取得國際認證圖............................28 圖3-7 K公司B2B品牌成功方程式..............................36 圖3-8 K公司品牌價值圖.....................................37 圖3-9 K公司顧客價值主張圖.................................40 圖3-10 K公司之主要競爭者、標竿品牌三角本體圖................41 圖3-11 品牌權益構面圖.....................................43 圖3-12 Keller(2001)品牌權益金字塔衡量模式..................45 圖3-13 K公司商標圖........................................46 圖3-14 K公司網站圖........................................46 圖3-15 K公司醫療/生活網站.................................47 表目錄 表2-1 Rochford, Linda產品創新觀點表........................9 表3-1 K公司各廠房生產產品表...............................27 表3-2 K公司技術專利列表...................................34 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 技術創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 顧客價值主張 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品牌價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品牌權益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品牌權益金字塔 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Brand value | en |
| dc.subject | Brand equity | en |
| dc.subject | Technological innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Customer Value Proposition | en |
| dc.subject | Brand equity pyramid | en |
| dc.title | 矽橡膠產業代工製造商技術創新對品牌權益之影響:以K公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Influence of Technological Innovation on the Brand Equity of Contract Manufacturers in the Silicon Rubber Industry: The Case of Company K | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃恆獎;連勇智 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Heng-Chiang Huang;Yung-Chih Lien | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳思寬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shi-Kuan Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 技術創新,顧客價值主張,品牌價值,品牌權益,品牌權益金字塔, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Technological innovation,Customer Value Proposition,Brand value,Brand equity,Brand equity pyramid, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902726 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班國際企業管理組 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 國際企業管理組 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-2.pdf Restricted Access | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
