請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76760
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭佳瑋 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chang-Fu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳昌甫 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T21:36:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-10T21:36:24Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-10-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 蕭重建,2014,”運用六準差於客戶等候改善之研究”,國立臺灣大學,管理學院碩士論文。
2. 許瑞松,2005,”運用六準差設計(DFSS)方法導入製造業,以提昇競爭力 – 以案例探討研究”,國立臺灣科技大學,工業管理系碩士論文。 3. 丁惠民 譯,2006年2 月,六標準差設計簡單講,台北:美商麥格羅.希爾國際股份有限公司。 4. 丁惠民 譯,2006年9 月,精實六標準差工具手冊,台北:美商麥格羅.希爾國際股份有限公司。 5. 葉俊億 譯,2005年12 月,服務精實六標準差,台北:美商麥格羅.希爾國際股份有限公司。 6. Baril, C., S. Yacout and B. Clement, 2011, Design for Six Sigma through collaborative multiobjective optimization, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 60, 43-55. 7. Brue, G. and R. Launsby, 2003, Design for Six Sigma, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies. 8. Cavanagh, R., R. Neuman and P. Pande, 2005, What is Design for Six Sigma? New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies. 9. Chakravorty, S., 2009, Six Sigma Programs : An implementation Model, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol.119, 1-16. 10. Hasenkamp, T., 2010. Engineering Design for Six Sigma – A Systematic Approach, Qual. Reliab Engng. Int. , Vol 26, 317-324 11. Huber, C. and G. Mazur, 2005, QFD and Design for Six Sigma, 14th Symposium on QFD, 1-11. 12. Jou, Y., C. Chen, C. Hwang, W. Lin and S. Huang, 2010, A Study on the improvement of new product development procedure performance – an application of design of Six Sigma in a Semi-conductor equipment manufacturer, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.48, No. 19, 5573-5591. 13. Koziolek, S. and D. Derlukiewicz, 2012, Method of assessing the quality of the design process of construction equipment with the use of DFSS (design for six sigma), Automation in Construction, Vol. 22, 223-232. 14. Lin, C., F. Chen, H. Wan, Y. Chen and G. Kuriger, 2013, Continuous improvement of knowledge management systems using Six Sigma methodology, Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 29, 95-103. 15. Liu, X., S. Wang, J. Qiu, J. Zhu, Y. Guo and Z. Lin, 2008, Robust Optimization in HTS Cable Based on Design for Six Sigma, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 978-981. 16. Mader, D., 2004, Selecting Design for Six Sigma Projects, Quality Progress, July 2004, 65-68. 17. Mader, D., 2002. Design for Six Sigma, Frontiers of Quality, July, 82-84. 18. Mast, J., G. Diepstraten, J. Ronald and M. Does, 2011, Quality Quandaries : Design for Six Sigma : Method and Application, Quality Engineering, Vol. 23, 204-211. 19. Mast, J. and J. Lokkerbol, 2012, An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol.139, 604-614. 20. Rajagopal, R. and E. Castillo, 2004, A Bayesian Approach for Muitiple Criteria Decision Making with application in “Design for Six Sigma”, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University. 21. Riley, B., J. Kovach and L. Carden, 2013, Developing a Policies and Procedure Manual for a Consumer Lending Department : A Design for Six Sigma Case Study, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 25, 3-13. 22. Treichler, D., R. Carmichael, A. Kusmanoff, J. Lewis and G. Berthiez, 2002, Design for Six Sigma : 15 Lessons Learned, Quality Progress, January, 33-42. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76760 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 六標準差方法的相關發展與運用,已在世界各大企業推展已久,除了提供企業一系列有效率的流程改善手法,提昇企業競爭力外,也成為企業追求卓越的經營模式。本研究採新產品開發個案的研究模式,以電子業的新產品開發過程,來印證六標準差設計中 DIMDOV (Define, Identify, Measure, Design, Optima, Verify) 程序,對新產品開發的效率與成效所造成的影響。
本研究從客戶需求VOC開始,結合 SIPOC (供應商- supplier,投入- Inputs,製程- Process,產出- Outputs,顧客- Customer) Model 的分析,逐步確認關鍵品質項目 CTQs ,再搭配生產流程的分析與品質手法的運用,判斷出關鍵流程 CTPs,輔以量測系統分析 Gauge R & R確認量儀與監控方式的精確性後,以實驗計劃法 DOE確認關鍵因子並予以最佳化確認,最後再輔以失效模式效應分析 FMEA確認開發成果的風險度,而完成本研究的新產品開發,進而探討六標準差設計應用於新產品開發的差異。 研究結果顯示:DIMDOV 六標準差設計的手法,能於3個月的時間內,有效率的將產品流程改造,以最適化的流程與參數,選擇最適合此產品的材料與設備,將良率提昇到可量產合理良率70%以上,大幅降低新產品開發上市週期。驗證了六標準差設計的 DIMDOV 程序,能在新產品開發專案上,以循序漸進的方法,迅速且徹底的進行流程與參數的最佳化,提昇開發效率,對於日異競爭的電子相關產業,將可以有效提昇企業對新市場的擴展,確保企業競爭力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The development and implement of Six Sigma has been executed in enterprise for a long time. It has not only provided a set of efficient process improvement method but also enhanced competitiveness for enterprise. Now, it has become a business strategy for enterprise to seek for excellence on management. The research adopts for new products development project, to verify how DIMDOV procedure of DFSS affects on new products development in electronic industry.
This research starts from voice of customer (VOC). With the analysis of SIOOC Model, Critical To Quality, CTQs, step by step. With process analysis & Quality Control method, also have identified Critical To Process CTPs complied. By using Gauge R & R analysis, to make sure the measure instruments and metrodology with good accuracy. And also applied DOE to further confirm the optimization of major factors. Finally, the research is finished by adopting Failure Mode Effect Analysis, FMEA, to assess the risk level of new process and to prove how the influence of DFSS applies to the process of new product development project. The research indicates that DIMDOV procedure is capable of improving process development in three months. By using optimized parameters, material, and equipment, the yield has been raised to 70% , reasonalble for Mass Production. It can help enterprise to improve the efficiency of new product development project through using step by step method. Enhance the speed of new market expansion and keep the competitiveness for enterprise. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:36:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-P03748046-1.pdf: 3402402 bytes, checksum: 83e07fba73cd7e0083aae9febc5daabc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目 錄 v 圖目錄 1 表目錄 3 第一章 緒 論 5 第一節、研究背景 5 第二節、研究動機 7 第三節、研究目的 9 第四節、研究流程 10 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節、六標準差的緣由與定義 11 第二節、六標準差設計(Design For Six Sigma) 13 第三節、量測系統分析GRR (Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility) 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節、研究架構 19 第二節、研究範圍 21 第三節、個案分析流程 22 第四章 個案分析 26 第一節、研究個案公司背景介紹 26 第二節、界定 (Define) 階段 27 第三節、鑑定 (Identify) 階段 35 第四節、量測 (Measure) 階段 51 第五節、設計 (Design) 階段 59 第六節、最佳化 (Optima) 階段 64 第七節、驗證 (Verify) 階段 79 第八節、專案成效 86 第五章、結論與建議 88 第一節、研究結論 88 第二節、研究建議 90 參考文獻 91 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 運用六標準差設計於內埋式線路晶圓封裝載板開發之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying Design for Six-Sigma Method to the Development of Embedded Trace IC Package Substrate Case Study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳學良,陳俊忠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 六標準差設計,DIMDOV,SIPOC Model,量測系統分析,實驗計劃法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | DFSS,DIMDOV,SIPOC Model,Gauge R & R,DOE, | en |
dc.relation.page | 92 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600987 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-P03748046-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。