請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76684
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葉丙成 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hao-Zheng Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林浩正 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T21:35:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-10T21:35:02Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-10-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] K. J. Topping and S. W. Ehly, 'Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation,' Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–132, Jun. 2001.
[2] P. Orsmond, S. Merry, and K. Reiling, 'The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment,' Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 239–250, Sep. 1996. [3] C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, 'Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results,' American Journal of Physics, vol. 69, no. 9, p. 970, 2001. [4] R. Williams, S. Gumtau, and J. Mackness, 'Synesthesia: From cross-modal to modality-free learning and knowledge,' Leonardo, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 48–54, Feb. 2015. [5] C. Ramineni, 'Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement,' Assessing Writing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–61, Jan. 2013. [6] The evolution of MVC and other UI architectures. Available: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/531349778 [7] HTML 4.0 Specification. World Wide Web Consortium. Available: https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40-971218 [8] 'What Is JavaScript?'. Wiley. Retrieved 16 July 2016. Available: http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/88/07645790/0764579088.pdf [9] jQuery Official Site. Available: https://jquery.com [10] AngularJS Official Site. Available: https://angularjs.org [11] CSS Values and Units Module Level 3. Available: https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values [12] Bootstrap Official Site. Available: http://getbootstrap.com [13] Node.js Official Site. Available: https://nodejs.org/en [14] MySQL Official Site. Available: https://www.mysql.com [15] K. Topping, 'Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities,' Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249–276, Jan. 1998. [16] S. Fallows and B. Chandramohan, 'Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment,' Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 229–246, Apr. 2001. [17] P. Orsmond, S. Merry, and K. Reiling, 'The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment,' Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 239–250, Sep. 1996. [18] N. Falchikov, 'Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment,' Innovations in Education & Training International, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 175–187, May 1995. [19] A. Sivan, 'The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach,' Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 193–213, Jul. 2000. [20] S. J. Hanrahan and G. Isaacs, 'Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views,' Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–70, May 2001. [21] C. Brindley and S. Scoffield, 'Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes,' Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Mar. 1998. [22] B. H. Khan, 'Web‐Based instruction (WBI): An introduction,' Educational Media International, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 63–71, Jun. 1998. [23] A. Kukulska-Hulme and J. Traxler, Eds., Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London, United Kingdom: Routledge Falmer, 2005. [24] E. J. Emanuel, 'Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few,' Nature, vol. 503, no. 7476, pp. 342–342, Nov. 2013. [25] ZuviO Official Site. Available: http://www.zuvio.com.tw [26] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, 'The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality,' Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–134, Jun. 1985. [27] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Eds., Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2008. [28] S. J. Ashford and L. L. Cummings, 'Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information,' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 370–398, Dec. 1983. [29] R. W. Renn, 'Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance,' Journal of Management, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 563–583, Oct. 2001. [30] S. J. ASHFORD and L. L. CUMMINGS, 'Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment,' Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 67–79, Mar. 1985. [31] V. D. Miller and F. M. Jablin, 'Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process,' The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 92, Jan. 1991. [32] ORID – strategic questioning that gets you to a decision Available: http://pacific-edge.info/2010/08/orid [33] Sequel Pro Official Site. Available: http://www.sequelpro.com [34] 'Mathematical methods for digital computers,' Students Quarterly Journal, vol. 31, no. 122, p. 121, 1960. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76684 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,隨著智慧型行動裝置與雲端網路技術發展的普及性,將科技產品融入教育現場已然成為一種趨勢,不論是結合軟體或硬體,都能創造出嶄新型態的教育模式,國內外教育科技不斷創新突破,讓傳統的課堂學習添增豐富性,學生更能擁有高效的學習效率,科技與教育的共生發展必然是未來的教育模式。
本論文致力於開發多媒體互評系統於簡報口語表達課程,採用雲端伺服器架構系統,學生只需要利用可上網的電腦、平板電腦或智慧型手機,就可以使用瀏覽器進入本系統,無需另外下載任何軟體。此系統提供多媒體平台讓學生能夠上傳簡報影片作業,且同學間可以互相評分與給予建議回饋,再利用演算法設計,讓每次作業都能透過系統全自動的計算成績與排名,將學生彼此的互動回饋整理成線上報告以供學生參考與檢討,過程中完全不需要授課教師批改,完全以學生彼此互評即可完成作業評分。 本多媒體互評系統,設計了多項學生自主互動功能,每項功能皆有不同互動面向,透過實際應用此互評系統於簡報口語表達課程一整個學期,蒐集大量的使用者數據,再分析數據得知系統功能的使用率與不同功能間彼此的關聯,目標為找出具備何種因素之自主互動功能較能受學生使用,其結果可作為未來多媒體互評系統設計的考量,提升同儕相互學習的效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Due to the explosive growth of smart devices and emerging cloud computing technology, technology use in education has become a trend. This new type of technology is called “EdTech”. Technological breakthroughs in EdTech have changed the traditional education. Whether combined with software or hardware, EdTech products can create more new types of teaching methods. Symbiotic development of technology and education will be our future mode of education.
In this thesis, a new multimedia peer review system is proposed and implemented to help create interactions among students. The system uses the cloud server architecture. Students can use a computer, tablet or smartphone to access system. This system provides a multimedia platform for students to be able to upload video presentations. Students can score and give feedback to each other via the system. The system itself can automatically calculate scores and rankings by using algorithm that can then be exported to online reports as references and reviews. The system is designed with many interactive features. Each feature has different design considerations. In order to find out user behavioral tendencies, the thesis analyzes the system usage statistics from Sep 2015 to Jan 2016. Based on the statistics, this thesis tests the correlation between usage rate and different features in order to figure out which factors influence usage. The results can be used as a reference for EdTech system design considerations in the future to enhance the effect of peer learning. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:35:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03942032-1.pdf: 2436482 bytes, checksum: dc5224b70cc7bfd5efa07397d33cf0cb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 1.1. 前言 1 1.2. 研究目的 1 1.3. 設計背景 2 1.4. 論文架構說明 3 第二章 系統架構與功能 5 2.1. 系統概述 5 2.2. 架構說明 6 2.2.1. 前端 7 2.2.2. 後端 11 2.2.3. 資料庫 11 2.3. 系統特色功能 11 2.3.1. Facebook登入功能 12 2.3.2. 首頁 12 2.3.3. 助教端設定作業功能 13 2.3.4. 作業上傳與額外提問功能 14 2.3.5. 互評、按讚與留言功能 15 2.3.6. 成績報告 16 2.3.7. 排行榜 19 第三章 文獻回顧 21 3.1. 同儕互評相關回顧 21 3.2. 數位學習相關回顧 22 3.3. 自我決定理論 23 3.3.1. 自我決定理論的三種心理需求 24 3.4. 回饋尋求相關回顧 25 第四章 教學環境設計 26 4.1. 課程規劃 26 4.2. 課程作業形式 26 第五章 研究方法 29 5.1. 資料來源 29 5.1.1. 問卷 29 5.1.2. 系統資料 30 5.1.3. 訪談 31 5.2. 分析方法 32 5.2.1. 問卷數據前後差異分析方法 33 5.2.2. 使用者行為分析方法 33 第六章 研究結果 36 6.1. 問卷數據結果 36 6.1.1. 問卷樣本資料 36 6.1.2. 問卷結果分布圖 38 6.1.3. 成對樣本 T 檢定結果 41 6.2. 使用者行為分析結果 42 6.2.1. 系統資料分析結果 42 6.2.2. 訪談質性分析結果 48 第七章 使用者行為分析與討論 53 7.1. 問卷數據前後差異分析-討論 53 7.2. 使用者行為分析-討論 54 7.2.1. 整體討論 54 7.2.2. 額外提問功能-討論 54 7.2.3. 影片按讚功能-討論 55 7.2.4. 選最佳評論功能-討論 57 7.2.5. 留言功能-討論 58 第八章 結論與未來展望 59 參考文獻 62 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 多媒體互評系統:簡報口語表達課程之學生行為分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Multimedia Peer Review System: Students' Behavior in Presentation Course | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林顯達,賴以威 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 線上教育,多媒體教育,互評系統,互動教育, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | EdTech,online education,interactive education,peer review, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602899 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 電信工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 電信工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-R03942032-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。