Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76572
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo)
dc.contributor.authorHua-Yi Changen
dc.contributor.author張華倚zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-10T21:33:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-10T21:33:08Z-
dc.date.copyright2017-08-29
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-07-18
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
1. 張茂芸譯,2012,建築大師:諾曼‧佛斯特,台北:天下遠見。Deyan Sudjic,2010,Norman Foster A Life in Architecture, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
2. 管婧譯,2011,「現代主義大師的建築帝國」,英國金融時報。Emma Jacobs,2011,Driven Designer Constructs A Global Empire, Financial Times, January 31.
3. 錢思程,2006,「設計方程式與孕育場:維也納的建築工作室」,台灣建築,第129期,頁86-91。
二、英文部分
1. Alex Frangos, 2009. Foster Architecture Firm to Lay Off 300, The Wall Street Journal.
2. Alison Beard, 2011. Life’s Work: Norman Foster,Harvard Business Review.
3. Andrea Klettner, 2012. Foster & Partners sees dip in profits, Building Design.
4. Arthur Gensler & Michael Lindenmayer, 2015. Art’s Principles: 50 years of hard-learned lessons in building a world-class professional services firm, Wilson Lafferty.
5. Building Design, 2015. WA100 2016, Building Design.
6. Building Design, 2017. WA100 2017, Building Design.
7. David Rogers, 2014. Foster's signs up to wages pledge, Building Design.
8. David Rogers, 2014. Foster's buys out private equity stake, Building Design.
9. David Rogers, 2014. Foster's tribute to staff, Building Design.
10. David Rogers, 2015. Foster's tops biggest architects list, Building Design.
11. David Rogers, 2015. Foster’s staff land bumper pay tonic, Building Design.
12. Hyun Tae Jung, 2011. Organization and Abstraction: The Architecture of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill from 1936 to 1956, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University.
13. Joey Gardiner, 2014. Foster is crowned Britain's biggest architect, Building Design.
14. Marguerite Lazell, 2007. Foster signs deal with 3i, Building Design.
15. McKinsey, 2015. Startup Best Practices 11 - The 9 Box Matrix Talent Model.
16. Michael Glackin, 2010. Foster gets £90,000 rise despite firm’s £18.5m loss, Building Design.
17. Real Deals, 2014. 3i in £70m Foster + Partners exit, Real Deals.
18. Stephen Kennett, 2010. 3i to dispose of stake in Foster + Partners, Building Design.
19. The American Institute of Architects, 2014. The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice Fifteenth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20. The American Institute of Architects, 2008. The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice Fourteenth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21. The American Institute of Architects, 2002. Definition of Architect Positions, AIA Compensation Report: A Survey of U.S. Architecture Firms.
22. The American Institute of Architects & National Council of Architectural Registration Boards, 2012. IDP Mentoring.
23. The American Institute of Architects & National Council of Architectural Registration Boards, 2012. The Intern Development Program.
24. Yoshida & Nobuyuki ed., 2015. A+U 533: One SOM, Tokyo: A+U.
三、網路資料
1. Open house London, http://www.openhouselondon.org.uk.
2. Google 80/20, https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/08/innovate-or-die-why-googles-8020-rule-is-a-red-herring/.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76572-
dc.description.abstract近年來,台灣的建築設計產業面臨嚴重的人才短缺困境,主要原因來自於:(1)全球化與中國大陸崛起的衝擊,使得留在台灣建築設計業發展不再是相關科系畢業學生的唯一選擇與出路;(2)建築設計業的工時長、壓力大,以致人員流動率高,再加上電腦應用軟體與工程技術的不斷創新,提高了建築設計案的難度與挑戰;(3)台灣的學校建築教育注重且鼓勵學生的創意發想,但卻欠缺足夠的專業養成訓練。
一般而言,一個建築設計案從開始設計到完工往往需要3年以上的時間,其間除了需要有能符合設計需求的創意、各種與案子相關的知識技能之外,尚需具備與業主和團隊溝通協調的能力。但台灣相關科系畢業的新鮮人,往往要先經過數年的專業養成訓練,才能處理複雜的設計案,若其中途離職,不但事務所先前的投入付諸流水,且又必須重新開始招募與訓練的過程。
為解決上述困境,本研究首先比較台灣與歐美建築教育的差異,討論其對台灣建築設計業的影響,並整理建築設計業的產業生態與所需具備之技能,接著以個案分析,探討以往人才養成方式的利弊得失,以及思考如何引進新制度來加以改善,最後則歸納提出研究結論與建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, architectural design in Taiwan has faced a serious personnel shortage, the main reasons for which are: (1) the impact of globalization and the rise of China have given graduates choices beyond staying and furthering their careers; (2) long working hours and high stress result in high turnover rates, and continuing advancements in computer software and construction technologies pose challenges for architectural projects; (3) architecture education in Taiwan emphasizes and encourages creative thinking, but there is a lack of teaching and training in professional practice.
Generally speaking, architectural projects take more than three years to complete, from the beginning of the design phase to the completion of the construction. Not only does this process require creativity to draw up schemes that fulfill the programming requirements, as well as other project-related knowledge and skills, but it also requires the ability to communicate and negotiate with the client and the design team. But graduates in these fields in Taiwan usually have to undergo several years of professional training before they can handle complex projects. If they leave the firm in the middle of this training, the firm will have wasted its investment and will also have to restart the recruitment and training process.
In response to this crisis, the thesis first compares architecture education in Taiwan with that in the U.S. and Europe, and discusses the influence of the latter on the architectural design business in Taiwan. Next, the thesis lays out the industrial ecology and its requisite skills. The thesis also uses case studies to examine the pros and cons of conventional programs of personnel development and considers how to bring in new systems to mitigate the situation. Finally, the thesis ends with conclusions and suggestions.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:33:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-P03748026-1.pdf: 4329181 bytes, checksum: 1e2d1ce4afc349c7955ff55b4a5c2d63 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的與架構 2
第三節、研究方法與範圍 4
第四節、研究流程 5
第二章、文獻探討 7
第一節、設計產業的人力資源策略 7
第二節、AIA員工開發及留人方式 11
第三節、美國實習建築師制度 16
第四節、維也納建築教育 18
第三章、建築設計業的組織與工作流程 24
第一節、建築從業人員的角色定義 24
第二節、組織架構 25
第三節、工作流程 31
第四節、建築專業需具備的核心能力 33
第四章、個案分析-以A建築事務所為例 38
第一節、專案分析研究 38
第二節、建築實作,設計流程前、中、後 47
第三節、建築師的養成訓練 62
第四節、人才角色分類及責任(Role & Responsibility) 69
第五節、考核指標 74
第五章、結論與建議 76
第一節、研究結論 76
第二節、研究建議 79
參考文獻 82
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject人才短缺zh_TW
dc.subject建築設計zh_TW
dc.subject設計團隊zh_TW
dc.subject建築法規zh_TW
dc.subject建築教育zh_TW
dc.subjectArchitectural educationen
dc.subjectArchitectural designen
dc.subjectPersonnel shortageen
dc.subjectDesign teamen
dc.subjectBuilding regulationsen
dc.title建築設計業人才培訓新思維zh_TW
dc.titleNew Thinking about Personnel Training in Architectural Designen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳俊忠,陸洛,陳家麟
dc.subject.keyword建築設計,設計團隊,建築法規,建築教育,人才短缺,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordArchitectural design,Design team,Building regulations,Architectural education,Personnel shortage,en
dc.relation.page83
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701666
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2017-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-P03748026-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.23 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved