請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76132完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 黃雪玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T08:18:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T08:18:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1995 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 沈明來。試驗設計學。臺北市：九州，1993年。 林清山。心理與教育統計學。臺北市：東華，1992年。 傅雅秀。「塔夫克塞拉西維克與資訊檢索」。資訊傳播與圖書館學 1:1（1994年9月），頁66-74。 黃雪玲。「資訊檢索中相關概念與相關判斷」。美國資訊科學學會臺北 學生分會會訊 6（1993年6月），頁84-106。 Barhydt, Gordon C. The Effectiveness of Non-User Relevance Assessment. Journal of Documentation 23 (1967): 146-149, 251. Barry, Carol L. A Preliminary Examination of Clues to Relevance Criteria within Document Representations. Proceeding of 30th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 81-86. -----, User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study. Journal of the American Society Information Science (JASIS) 45:3 (1994): 149-159. Belkin, N. J., R. N. Oddy, & H. M. Brooks. ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I: Background and Theory. Part II: Results of Design Study. Journal of Documentation 38 (1982): 61-71, 145-164. -----, Shan-Ju C., Trudy Downs, Tefko, Saracevic and Shuyuan Zhao. Taking Account of User Tasks, Goals and Behavior for the Design of Online Public Access Catalogs. Proceeding of the 53rd ASIS Annual Meeting (1990): 69-79. Bollmann, Peter, V. V. Raghavan, and G. S. Jung. On Probabilistic Notion of Precision as a Function of Recall. Information Processing and Management 28:3 (1992): 291-315. Bookstein, Abraham. Relevance. JASIS 30:5 (1979): 269-273. Boyce, Bert. Beyond Topicality. Information Processing and Management 18:3 (1982): 105-109. Bruce, Harry W. A Cognitive View of the Situational Dynamism of User-Centered Relevance Estimation. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 142-148. Buckland, Michael K. Relatedness, Relevance and Responsiveness in Retrieval Systems. Information Processing and Management 19:3 (1983): 237-241. Burgin, Robert. Variations in Relevance Judgements and the Evaluation of Retrieval Performance. Information Processing and Management 28:5 (1992): 619-627. Cook, Kenneth H. A Threshold Model of Relevance Decisions. Information Processing and Management 11 (1975): 125-135. Cooper, W. S. A Definition of Relevance for Information Retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval 7:1 (1971): 19-37. -----. A Perspective on the measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness. Drexel Library Quarterly 14:2 (1978): 25-39. -----. On Selecting a Measure of Retrieval Effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS) 24 (1973): 87-110. Cuadra, Carlos A. and Robert V. Katter. Opening the Black Box of Relevance. Journal of Documentation 23:4 (1967): 291-303. DeSalvo, William. Measurement of Full Text Retrieval Effectness and Relevance Judgments across Varying of Expertise. (Thesis) Univ. of NC at Chapel Hill, 1992, 64p. Egelund, Janet and Gertrude Foreman, Reference Service: Searching and Search Technique, in Handbook of Medical Library Pratice, 4th ed. Chicago: Medical Library Assn., 1982. Eisenberg, Michael and Carol Barry. Order Effects: a Preliminary Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. Proceeding of the 49th ASIS Annual Meeting, vol 23. (1986): 80-86. -----. Order Effects: a Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgment of Document Relevance. JASIS 39:5 (1988): 293-300. -----, and Xiulan Hu. Dichotomous Relevance Judgment and the Evaluation of Information Systems. Proceeding of the 50th ASIS Annual Meeting (1987): 66-70. -----, Measuring Relevance Judgments. Information Proceeding and Management 24:4 (1988): 373-389. Ellis, David. Theory and Explanation in Information Retrieval Research. Journal of Information Science 8:1 (1984): 25-38. Froehlich, Thomas J. Relevance Reconsidered---Towards an Agenda for the 21st Century: Introduction to Special Topic Issue on Relevance Research. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 124-134. -----. Toward a Better Conceptual Framework for Understanding Relevance for Information Science Research. Proceeding of the 54th Annual Meeting of ASIS (1991): 118-125. -----, and Michale Eisenberg. SIG/FIS---Relevance: a Dialogue about Fundamentals. Proceeding of the 55th Annual Meeting of ASIS (1992): 330-333. Gillaspie, D. L. Why Online Legal Retrieval Misses Conceptually Relevant Documents Proceeding of 55th ASIS Annual Meeting (1992): 256-259. Harman, Donna. Evaluation Issues in Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management 28:4 (1992): 439-440. Harter, Stephen P. Psychological Relevance and Information Science. JASIS 43:9 (1992): 602-615. Hersh, William. Relevance and Retrieval Evaluation: Perspectives from Medicine. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 201-206. Howard, Dara Lee. Pertinence as Reflected in Personal Constructs. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 172-185. Janes, Joseph W. An Alternative to Precision. Proceeding of the 54th Annual Meeting of ASIS. (1991): 629-646. -----. The Binary Nature of Continuous Relevance Judgments: a Study of User's Perceptions. JASIS 42 (1991): 754-756. -----. On the Distribution of Relevance Judgment. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 104-114. -----. Other People's Judgments: A Comparison of Users' and Others' Judgment of Document Relevance, Topicality, and Utility. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 160-171. -----. Relevance Judgments and the Incremental Presentation of Document Representations. Information Processing and Management 27:6 (1991): 629-646. -----, and Renee Mckinney. Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: a Comparative Study. Library Quarterly 62:2 (1992): 150-168. Jones, W. P., G. W. Furnas. Pictures of Relevance: a Geometric Analysis of Similarity Measures. JASIS 38 (1987): 420-442. Kemp, D. A. Relevance, Pertinence and Information System Development. Information Storage and Retrieval 10:2 (1974): 37-47. Koll, Matthew B. and Padmini Srinivasan. Fuzzy verse Probabilistic Models for User Relevance Judgments. JASIS 41 (1990): 264-271. Kuhlthau, C. C. Developing a Model of the Library Search Process: Cognitive and Affective Aspects. RQ 28:2 (1988): 232-242. Lancaster, F. W. Pertinence and Relevance, in Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing & Evaluation. 2nd ed. (NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1968), p.256-272. Lee, Pao Miranda, Chunpei He and Dennis B. Worthen. Comparing Retrieved Items with Subjective Relevance Judgment. Proceeding of the 49th ASIS Annual Meeting (1986): 261-264. Leigh, William, Noemi M. Paz. SORT-AID With RANK: Search Post processing Tools for Automating the determination of Citation Relevance. Information Technology and Libraries 5 (1986): 345- 349. Losee, R. M. Predicting Document Retrieval System Performance: an Expected Precision Measure. Information Processing and Management 23:6 (1987): 529-537. MacMullin, S. E., Robert S. Taylor. Problem Dimensions and Information Traits. The Information Society 3:1 (1984): 91-111. Meadow, C. T. Relevance JASIS 36:5 (1985): 353-355. Nisonger, Thomas E., Stephen P. Harter and Aiwei Weng. Subject Relationships between Cited and Citing Documents in Library and Information Science. Proceeding of 55th ASIS Annual Meeting (1992): 13-19. O'Brien, Ann. Relevance as an Aid to Evaluation in OPACs. J. of Information Science 16:4 (1990): 265-271. Park, Taemin Kim. The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: an Empirical Study. Library Quarterly 63:3 (1993): 318-351. -----. Toward a Theory of User-Based Relevance: A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 135-141. Parker, L. M. Purgailis, Robert E. J. Does Order of Presentation Affect Users' Judgment of Documents JASIS 41:7 (1990): 493-494. Petry, F. E., Bill P. Buckles, Devaraya Prabbu and Donald H. Kraft. Fuzzy Information Retrieval Using Genetic Algorithms and Relevance Feedback. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 122-125. Price, Rosanne, Tat-Seng Chua, and Suliman Al-Hawamdeh. Applying Relevance Feedback to a Photo Archival System. Journal of Information Science 18:3 (1992): 203-215. Robertson, S. E. The Probabilistic Character of Relevance. Information Processing and Management 13 (1977): 247-251. -----. On Relevance Weight Estimation and Query Expansion. Journal of Documentation 42 (1986): 182-188. -----, C. L. Thompson and J. D. Bovey. Weighting, Ranking and Relevance Feedback in a Front-End System. Journal of Information Science 12 (1986): 71-75. Rouse, W. B., Sandra H. Rouse. Human Information Seeking and Design of Information Systems. Information Processing and Management 20:1/2 (1984): 129-138. Salton, Gerard. The State of Retrieval System Evaluation. Information Processing and Management 28:4 (1992): 441-449. Saracevic, Tefko. The Concept of Relevance in Information Science: a Historical Review. in Introduction to Information Science. compiled & edited by Tefko Saracevic (NY: Bowker, 1970): 111-151. -----. Relevance: a Review of the Literature and a Framework of Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. in Advances in Librarianship. vol.6 edited by M. J. Voigt and M. H. Harris, (NY: Bowker, 1970): 111-151. -----. A Review of and a Framework for the Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. JASIS 26:6 (1975): 321-343. -----, Paul Kantor, Alice Y. Chamis and Donna Trivison. A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving I. Background and Methodology II. Users, Questions, and Effectiveness III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap. JASIS 39:3 (1988): 161-216. Schamber, Linda, Michael B. Eisenberg and Michael S. Nilan. A Re-examination of Relevance: toward a Dynamic, Situation Definition. Information Processing and Management 26:6 (1990): 755-776. -----. On Defining Relevance. J. of Education for Library and Information Science 31 (1991): 238-240. Shaw, W. M., Judith B. W., and Robert E. W. The Cystic Fibrosis Database: Content and Research Opportunities. Library and Information Science Research 13 (1991): 347-366. Soergel, Dagobert. Is User Satisfaction a Hobgoblin JASIS 24:2 (1976): 256-259. Spink, Amanda. Interaction with Information Retrieval Systems: Reflections on Feedback. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 115-121. Su, Louise T. Evaluation Measures for Interactive Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management 28:4 (1992): 503-516. -----. Is Relevance an Adequate Criterion for Retrieval System Evaluation: an Empirical Inquiry into the User's Evaluation. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 93-103. -----. The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 207-217. Sutton, Stuart A. The Role of Attorney Mental Models of Law in Case Relevance Determinations: An Exploratory Analysis. JASIS 45:3 (1994): 207-217. Swanson, Don R. Historical Note: Information Retrieval and the Future of an Illusion. JASIS 39:2 (1988): 92-98. -----. Some Unexplained Aspects of the Cranfield Tests of Indexing Performance Factors. The Library Quarterly 41:3 (1971): 223-243. -----. Subjective versus Objective Relevance in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems. Library Quarterly 56:4 (1986): 389-398. Thomas, N. P. Information Seeking and the Nature of Relevance PHD Student Orientation as an Exercise in Information Retrieval. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 126-130. Tiamiyu, M. A., Isola Y. Ajiferuke. A Total Relevance and Document Interaction Effects Model for the Evaluation of Information Retrieval Processes. Information Processing and Management 24:4 (1988): 391-404. Wang, Peiling and Dagobert Soergel. Beyond Topical Relevance: Document Selection Behavior of Real Users of IR Systems. Proceeding of 56th ASIS Annual Meeting (1993): 87-92. Wilson, Patrick. Situational Relevance. Information Storage & Retrieval 9 (1973): 457-471. -----. Some Fundamental Concepts of Information Retrieval. Drexel Library Quarterly 14:2 (1978): 10-23. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76132 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人類的資訊尋求過程與資訊需求的滿足並非僅憑藉主題上的相關就能完整地解釋，通常還涉及了資訊需求者所處的情境、認知與時間變化等因素。因此研究資訊需求者本身與其他判斷者間「相關判斷」結果的差異，除了能瞭解「相關判斷」的特性，並可進一步分析判斷者「相關判斷」的行為與探究判斷者判斷結果之一致性。 本研究之研究對象包含了資訊需求者與次判斷者，係以公共衛生學院的18名研究生為資訊需求者，次判斷者則包含兩種類型，一為公共衛生學院的其他18名研究生，一為18名圖書館學研究所研究生；目的在於分析比較他們之間判斷文獻資料相關程度的結果與特性；研究者在透過檢索前晤談後一一進行線上檢索，產生研究用的文獻組；並將文獻組與檢索問題交由各判斷者進行相關判斷；在得到所有相關判斷結果後再利用統計軟體進行分析比較。 本論文研究結果發現：資訊需求者閱讀判斷所花費的時間最少，進行相關判斷時最常依據「摘要」欄位，最容易選擇的閱讀欄位為「題名」與「摘要」。公衛次判斷者則擁有最為嚴謹的判斷結果，相關判斷結果間的個別差異最小，亦最常依據「摘要」欄位來進行相關判斷，最容易選擇的閱讀欄位亦為「題名」與「摘要」，判斷類型以「完全一致」居多。至於圖館次判斷者則花費在閱讀與判斷的時間最多，判斷的態度也最為鬆散，最常依據「敘述語」欄位來進行相關判斷，最容易選擇的閱讀欄位則為「題名」與「敘述語」，判斷類型以「部份重合」（距離為1）居多。綜而言之，公衛次判斷者不僅在判斷結果上與資訊需求者最為一致，且其判斷行為與特性亦多與資訊需求者有一致的傾向。 本研究冀望探究分析的結果能喚起我們重視資訊需求者本身的資訊需求，加強與讀者間的溝通晤談；並能重視讀者研究，繼續研究讀者過濾、選擇與尋求資訊的行為與特性；同時也可間接審視圖書館學系學生具備其他學科背景的重要性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:18:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 1995 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭……………………………………………………i 摘要……………………………………………………ii 目次……………………………………………………iv 表目次……………………………………………………viii 圖目次……………………………………………………x 第一章 緒論 第一節 問題陳述……………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………3 第三節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………4 第四節 研究方法……………………………………………………5 第五節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………6 詮釋……………………………………………………9 第二章 文獻分析 第一節「相關」概念的形成……………………………………………………11 一、50年代……………………………………………………13 二、60年代……………………………………………………14 三、70年代……………………………………………………15 四、80年代……………………………………………………16 五、90年代……………………………………………………16 第二節 「相關」的定義……………………………………………………18 一、「客觀相關」觀點……………………………………………………19 二、「主觀相關」觀點……………………………………………………20 三、相似詞之說明……………………………………………………22 第三節 「相關判斷」的特性與影響「相關判斷」的因素……………………………………………………25 一、「相關判斷」……………………………………………………25 二、影響「相關判斷」的因素……………………………………………………26 三、「相關判斷」的特性……………………………………………………30 第四節 「相關判斷」的實證性研究……………………………………………………32 一、文獻特性……………………………………………………33 二、檢索問題的特性……………………………………………………34 三、判斷時的情境……………………………………………………35 四、判斷結果的表現方式……………………………………………………36 五、判斷者的特性……………………………………………………37 六、有關影響因素種類的質化研究……………………………………………………37 七、由認知概念出發的「適當判斷」行為研究……………………………………………………38 八、衍自「相關判斷」概念的其他研究……………………………………………………39 第五節 資訊需求者與次判斷者相關判斷之比較研究……………………………………………………40 註釋……………………………………………………46 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究對象……………………………………………………56 第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………58 第三節 研究程式……………………………………………………60 第四節 資料處理與分析……………………………………………………62 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 第一節 研究對象背景資料分析……………………………………………………64 一、資訊需求者背景資料之分析……………………………………………………64 二、次判斷者者背景資料之分析……………………………………………………65 三、文獻組與判斷組之分析……………………………………………………65 第二節 「相關判斷」結果與判斷時間之分析……………………………………………………67 一、判斷結果評級之初步分析……………………………………………………69 二、判斷結果評級之進一步分析……………………………………………………73 三、閱讀判斷時間之分析……………………………………………………78 第三節 「相關判斷」依據欄位與閱讀欄位之分析……………………………………………………80 一、「相關判斷」依據欄位之分析……………………………………………………80 二、「相關判斷」閱讀欄位之分析……………………………………………………85 第四節 一致性分析……………………………………………………92 一、「相關判斷」一致性之初步分析……………………………………………………92 二、「相關判斷」一致性之進一步分析……………………………………………………99 註釋……………………………………………………103 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………104 第二節 建議……………………………………………………110 第三節 進一步研究之建議……………………………………………………113 註釋……………………………………………………116 參考書目……………………………………………………118 附錄 附表一 檢索問題表……………………………………………………128 附表二 「相關判斷」之指引說明……………………………………………………130 附表三 判斷問卷……………………………………………………132 附表四 公共衛生學相關資料庫表……………………………………………………133 附表五 資訊需求者檢索問題綜表……………………………………………………134 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 資訊需求者與次判斷者相關判斷之比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 83-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.relation.page | 135 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書館學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。