Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 植物科學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75712
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.author陳忠信zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T08:14:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-01T08:14:51Z-
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.citation1. 張魯智 1969.試驗設計講義。台大農學院。台灣,臺北。345pp.
2. 劉棠瑞 1960. 台灣木本植物圖誌。共上下二冊。台大農學院。台灣,臺北。1388pp.
3. Abdul-Wahab, A.S. and E.L. Rice. 1967. Plant inhibition by Johnson grass and its possible significance in old-field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 94: 486-497.
4. Bode, H. R. 1940, ?ber die Blattanssdeidung des Wernuts und ihre wickung auf andere planzen. Planta 30:567-589.
5. Bode, H. R. 1958. Beitr?ge zur kenntnis allelopathischen Erschei-nungen bei elnigen Juglandaceae. Planta 51:440-480.
6. B?rner, H. 1960. Liberation of organic suhstances from higher plants and their role in the soil sickness problem. Bot. Rev. 26:293-424.
7. Chang, C.C. and B.Y. Lin. 1973. Accumulation of peptide in crown-gall tumors. Bot. Bull. of Academia Sinica 14:174-179.
8. Chou, C.H. 1971. Allelopathic mechanisms of Arctostaphylos glandulosa var, zacensis. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Santa Babara, U.S.A. 114pp.
9. Chou, C.H. 1973. The affect of fire on the California cheparral vegetation. Bot. Bull. Academia Binica 14:23-34.
10. Chou, G.E. and Y.T. Chung. 1974. The allelopathic potential of Miscanthus floridulus. Bot. Bull. Academia Siniea 15:14-17.
11. Chou, C.H. and C.H. Muller. 1972. Allelopathic mechanisms of Arctostaphylos glandulosa var. zacensis. Amer. Kidl. 88: 324-347.
12. Chou, C.H. and C.C. Young. 1974. Effects of osmotic concentration and pH on plant growth. Taiwania 19 (in press).
13. Chuang, T.I. 1959. Preliminary notes on the vecetation and flora of Mt. Ta-Tun, Taipei, M.S. thesis, Nitional Taiwai University. Taipei, Taiwan.
14. Davidonis, G.H. and M. Ruddat. 1973. Allelopathic compounds, Thelypterin A and B in the fern Thelypteris normalis planta 111: 23-32.
15. DeBell, D.S. 1969. An evaluation of phytotoxic effect of cherry-bark oak (Ouercus faloata var. pagodaefolia Ell.) Ph.D. dissertation at Duke Univ. 107pp.
16. de Candolle, A.P. 1832. Physiologie Vegetale t III:1474-1475.
17. del Moral, R. and C,H. Muller. 1969 Fog drip: a mechanism of toxin from Eucalyptus globules, Bull. Torrey Bot.Club 96: 467-475.
18. del Moral, R. and R.G. Cater. 1971. Allelopathic patential of the dominant vegetation of western Washingtion. Ecology 52: 1030-1037.
19. Evenari, M. 1949. Germination inhibitors. Bot. Rev. 15:153-194.
20. Evenari, M. 1961. Chemical influences of other plants (allelopathy) Handbuch Pflanzenphysiol. 16:691-736.
21. Fowden, L. 1963. Amino acid analogues and the growth of seedlings. J. Exptl. Botany 14: 387-398.
22. Funke, G.L. 1943. The influence of Artemisia on neighboring plants. Blumea 5:281-293.
23. Gr?mmer, G. and Beyer, H. 1960. The influence exerted by species of Gamelina on flax by means of toxio subatancea. Brit. Soc. Symp. 1:153-157.
24. Gr?mmer, G. 1961. The role of toxic substances in the interrelationships between higher plants. Symp. Soc. Exptl. Bio. No. XV:219-228.
25. Hais, I.M. and K. Macek. 1963. Paper Chromatography. Publishing House of the Czechoslovek Academy of Soiences, Prague, 955pp.
26. Holm, L. 1971. Chemical interactions between plants on agricultural lands. In “Biochemical interactions among plants” pp. 95-101. National Academy of sciences, Washington, D.C.
27. Hook, D.D. and J. Stubbs. 1967. U.S. For. Sev. Research Notes, SE-70.
28. Jameson, D.A. 1970. Degradation and accumulation of inhibitory substances fro Juniperus asteosperma (Torr.) Little, Plant and soil 33:213-224.
29. McPherson, J.K., C.H. Chou and C.H. Muller, 1971. Allelopathic constituents of the chaparral shrub Adenostoma fasciculatum. Phytochemistry. 10: 2925-2933.
30. McPherson, J.K. and C.H. Muller. 1969. Allelopathic effect of Adenostoma fasciculatum, “Chamise” in the California chaparral. Ecol. Monogr. 39:177-198.
31. M?lish, H. 1937. Der Einfluss einer Pflanze auf die andere allelopathie. Guster Fischer, Jene. 106pp.
32. Muller, C.H. 1966. The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition. Bull. Torrey Bat. Club 93:332-351.
33. Muller, C.H. and C.H. Chou. 1972, Phytotoxin: an ecological phase of phytochemistry. In “Phytochemical ecology” (J.B. Harborne, ed.) pp. 201-204. Academic press, London & N.Y.
34. Rice, E.L. and S.K. Pancholy. 1972. Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. Amer. J. Bot. 59:1033-1040.
35. Rovira, A.L. 1969. Plant root exudates. Bot. Rev. 35:17-34.
36. Tukey, H.B., Jr. 1966. Leaching of metabolites from above ground. plant parts and its implications. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 93: 385-401.
37. Tukey, H.B. 1969. Implications of allelopathy in agricultural plant sciences. Bot. Rev. 35: 1-16.
38. V?zouea, A., J. M?ndez, M.D.V. Gesto, E.Seoane, and. E. Vieitez 1968a. Growth substances isolated from woody cuttings of salix viminalis L. and Ficus carica L. Phytochemistry 7:161-167.
39. Wang, T.S.C., S.Y. Cheng and H. Tung. 1967. Extraction and analysis of soil organic acids. Soil Sci. 103:360-366.
40. Wang, T.S.C., T.K. Yang, and S.Y. Cheng. 1967. Amino acids in subtropical soil hydrolysates. Soil. Sci. 103:67-74.
41. Wang, T.S.C., T.K. Yang, and T.T. Chuang. 1967. Soil phen1ic acids as plant growth inhibitors. Soil Sci. 103:239-246.
42. Whitehead, D.C. 1964. Identification of p-hydroxybenioic, vanillic, p-coumaric and ferulic acids in soils. Nature 202: 417-418.
43. Whittaker, R.H. 1970. The biochemical ecology of higher plants. In “Chemical ecology” (E. Sondheimer and J. B. Simeone, ed.) pp. 43-70. Academic Press, New York and London.
44. Whittaker, R.H. 1971. The Chemistry of communities. In “Biochemical interactions among plants”. pp. 10-18. National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C.
45. Winter, A.G. 1961. New physiological and biological aspets in the interrelationships between higher plants. Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol. 15: 229-244.
46. Woods, F.W. 1960. Biological antagonisms due to phytotoxic root exudates. Bot. Rev. 26:546-559.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75712-
dc.description.abstract植物毒質(Phytotoxin)在植物社會消長變遷過程中的重要性已有多方面的報告。此報告大多來自乾旱、半乾旱及地中海型氣候區的研究,但在熱帶及亞熱帶此方面的研究報告尚不多見。本論文乃就台灣北部地區(包括臺北、基隆、竹仔湖等地)常見植物來研究其植物毒質潛能。
試驗材料包括植物的鮮葉、枯葉及其樹冠下的土壤,分夏冬二季採集。植物毒性是以兩種生物分析加以測定。由生物分析結果顯示在pH值、滲透濃度及元素含量不影響的情形下,大部分植物的鮮葉、枯葉及其土壤水溶萃取液對萵苣種子發茅幼根生長具有顯著的抑制作用。更進一步做植物毒質鑑定時,發現許多樁物毒質為酚類化合物,那是P-hydroxybenjoic,P-coumaric,Vanillic,SyringicFerulic,及(o-Hydroxyphenyl)aceticacids,其中最常見者為(o-Hydroxypheny)aceticacid,另外發現五種未知高毒性化合物及對ninhydrin正反應的斑點。
比較鮮葉及枯葉水溶萃取液中酚類化合物的相對量時,發現前者所含的量相對大於後者,但由生物分析結果顯示多數植物的鮮葉與枯葉毒性差異不顯著,因此推測另有其他植物毒質也存在水溶萃取液中。
由土壤加鹼分解萃取液中,發現大部分土壤中的酚類化台物組成相同,包括Ferulic,p-Coumaric,Syringic,Vanillic,p-Hydroxybenjoic及(o-Hydroxyphenyl)aceticacid等,唯相對量各有不同。
比較夏冬二季鮮葉、枯葉及土壤水溶萃取液之毒性及其元素含量,發現二季間役有頭著之差異,可能與北部雨量豐富、乾季短暫有關。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAlthough phytotoxins that ploy on important role in the succession of plant communities have been elucidated in the arid, semi_arid and mediterranean areas, only a limited inJormation is available in the area of tropical and subtropical climate. Thus this study is trying to evaluate the phytotoxic potential of twenty_five common species in northern Taiwan. Fresh leaves, litter (unrotten) end soils underneath the plants were collected in sunmor eeh winter separately. The phyto_toxicity was determined by two bioassay methods. Aqueous sxtracts of most species exhibited significant inhibition en the radical growth of lettuce on sponge bioassay, when the effects of pH, osmotic concentration and cations were not significant. The chromatographic bioassay showed 12 toxic spots. Six of them, p-hydroxybenzoic, p_cenmaric, vanillic, syringic, forulic, and (p-hydroxyphenyl) acetic acids, are the common phytotexic compounds, while the rest of them have not been identified, Although the phenolic content of the leaf litter was relatively lower than that of fresh leaves, the texicit/ revealed by the former was almost the same as the latter. This suggested that some non_phenolic toxic compounds may present in the litter. p_Coumaric, p-hydorxybenzoic, syringic, vanillic, ferulic, and (o_hydroxyphenyl)_. acetic acids were found to be widespreaded in various soils. However, the amount of each toxin present in each soils sample are relatively different. The phytotoxicity and the amount of cations in plant materials were not significantly affected by seasons. This was probably ascribed to the heavy rainfall and short duration of drought period of the study area.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:14:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 1974
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………1
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………3
一、緒言………………………………………………………………………………………4
二、研究區域及其地理環境…………………………………………………………7
三、材料及方法………………………………………………………………………10
(一)材料………………………………………………………………………10
(二)方法………………………………………………………………………10
1.植物鮮葉及枯葉水溶液之萃取…………………………………………………10
2.土壤水溶液之萃取……………………………………………………………………10
3.土壤中植物毒質之萃取…………………………………………………………11
4.水溶萃取液之PH值及滲透濃度之測定……………………………………………11
5.水溶萃取液之陽離子元素分析…………………………………………………11
6.植物毒性之分析………………………………………………………………12
7.植物毒質在紙色層圖上之位置…………………………………………12
8.生物統計分析……………………………………………………………………13
9.植物毒質之鑑定……………………………………………………………………13
四、結果…………………………………………………………………………………14
(一)水溶萃取液之物理及化學性質……………………………………………………14
1.水溶萃取液之PH值…………………………………………………………………14
2.水溶萃取液之滲透濃度……………………………………………………………14
3.水溶萃取液之陽離子元素含量……………………………………………………17
(二)植物毒性分析………………………………………………………………………20
1.夏季鮮葉及枯葉水溶萃取液及調節為10milliosmols滲透濃度後之毒性比較……20
2.冬季鮮葉及枯葉水溶萃取液及調節為10milliosmols滲透濃度後之毒性比較……27
3.夏冬兩季鮮葉間及枯葉間毒性比較…………………………………………………27
4.夏冬兩季土壤水溶液之毒性比較……………………………………………………28
(三)植物毒質在紙色層圖上的位置……………………………………………………28
(四)植物毒質之鑑定……………………………………………………………………31
(五)土壤中植物毒質之萃取……………………………………………………………36
五、討論…………………………………………………………………………………41
六、引用文獻……………………………………………………………………………47
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title臺灣北部地區植物群落之植物毒性潛能zh_TW
dc.titlePHYTOTOXIC POTENTIAL IN THE VEGETATION OF NORTHERN TAIWANen
dc.date.schoolyear62-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.relation.page50
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.contributor.author-dept生命科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept植物科學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:植物科學研究所

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved