Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 森林環境暨資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7559
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林增毅(Tzeng Yih Lam)
dc.contributor.authorJyuhn Yann Tanen
dc.contributor.author陳雋彥zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T17:46:27Z-
dc.date.available2028-06-27
dc.date.available2021-05-19T17:46:27Z-
dc.date.copyright2018-07-19
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-17
dc.identifier.citation王兆桓、王光仁、蘇柏翰、李威震. 2005. 棲蘭山檜木森林調查與健康監測. 行政院國軍退役官兵輔導委員會榮民森林保育事業管理處研究計劃.
王亞男、詹明勳、林法勤、黃憶汝、陳勁豪. 2006. 非破壞性檢測方法應用台灣老樹健康監測評估與樹齡測定. 行政院農業委員會林務局保育研究系列94-07號11.
王松永、丁昭義. 1984. 林產學(上冊). 臺灣商務印書館.臺北:143.
朱德民. 1993. 植物與環境逆境. 明文書局股份有限公司. 臺北.
吳孟玲. 2014. 樹病, 樹醫生與樹木健康管理. 林業研究專訊 21:56-59.
吳淑傑、 韓喜林、 李淑珍. 2003. 土壤結構, 水分與植物根系對土壤能量狀態的影響. 東北林業大學學報 31:24-26.
呂坤旺、周中華、鍾宜君、王兆桓. 2002. 臺灣東部老樹評比暨活力調查研究. 宜蘭技術學報:211-221.
李有田. 2014. 從香港和新加坡經驗, 談臺灣樹藝制度的導入. 林業研究專訊 21:60-65.
林振榮、黃裕星、黃國雄、張東柱、吳孟玲. 2012. 都市樹木風險評估及管理參考手冊. 行政院農業委員會林業試驗所. 臺北.
林振榮. 2012. 樹木風險評估的概念. 林業研究專訊 19:10-15.
邱志明、唐盛林、林謙佑. 2012. 目視樹木健康評量芻議 造園季刊 75:40 - 45.
姚開屏. 2002. 台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展與應用. 臺灣醫學 6:193-200.
胡弘道. 1999. 森林土壤學.
張勵婉、陳意婷、黃正良. 2017. 颱風擾動後台灣中部蓮華池森林動態樣區木本植物的傷害及更新. 臺灣林業科學 32:1-14.
章錦瑜. 1991. 論台灣常見之爭議性行道樹. 造園景觀學報 15:1-19.
章錦瑜. 2000. 颱風對台中市喬木破壞之調查. 東海學報 41:149-160.
許秀玉、肖利、王明懷、張華新. 2015. 沿海抗颱風樹種評價體系建構與選擇. 浙江農林大學學報 32:516-522.
黃彥三、許富蘭、李金梅. 2017. 樹木之抗風力與臨界風速. 林業研究專訊 24:41-45.
黃敏碩. 2010. 以 VTA 法進行台中市綠園道行道樹之危險度評估. 中興大學園藝學系所學位論文. 台中.
楊昆翰. 2008. 都市公園綠地喬木維護管理之研究. 中國文化大學環境設計學院景觀研究所碩士論文. 臺北.
詹明勳、洪立上、蔡明哲、陳勁豪. 2011. 應用目視樹木評估法診斷台南地區老樹危險度. 中華林學季刊 44:517-538.
劉宛純. 2011. 大學校園樹木健康-安全度與棲地因子調查與研究-以逢甲大學為例. 國立中興大學園藝學系碩士學位論文. 臺中.
潘瑞熾. 2011. 植物生理學. 藝軒圖書出版社. 新北市.
魏士偉 、楊明仁. 2015. 臺灣地區極端降雨颱風之環境特徵與渦旋尺度特徵合成分析研究. 大氣科學 43:233-263.
Berrang, P., Karnosky, D.F., and Stanton, B.J. 1985. Environmental factors affecting tree health in New York City. Journal of Arboriculture 11:185-189.
Costello, L. and Peterson, J. 1989. Decay detection in eucalyptus: an evaluation of two methods. Journal of arboriculture 15:185-188.
Dwyer, J.F., Nowak, D.J., Noble, M.H., and Sisinni, S.M. 2000. “Connecting people with ecosystems in the 21st century: an assessment of our nation's urban forests,” Portland, OR.
Goldman, G. and Templeton, S. 1996. Urban forestry adds $3.8 billion in sales to California economy. California Agriculture 50:6-10.
Herzog, T.R., Herbert, E.J., Kaplan, R., and Crooks, C. 2000. Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior 32:323-346.
Hjelmfelt, M.R. 2010. Microbursts and macrobursts: windstorms and blowdowns, p. 59. In: E. A. Johnson and K. Miyanishi (eds.). Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the response. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Jim, C. and Liu, H.H. 1997. Storm damage on urban trees in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and urban planning 38:45-59.
Jim, C. and Zhang, H. 2013. Defect-disorder and risk assessment of heritage trees in urban Hong Kong. Urban forestry & urban greening 12:585-596.
Jorgensen, E. 1986. Urban forestry in the rearview mirror. Arboricultural Journal 10:177-190.
Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. 1989. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
Kennard, D.K., Putz, F.E., and Niederhofer, M. 1996. The predictability of tree decay based on visual assessments. Journal of Arboriculture 22:249-254.
Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and behavior 33:343-367.
Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D., and Lawrence, C. 1998. Windows in the workplace: Sunlight, view, and occupational stress. Environment and behavior 30:739-762.
Lily, S.J. 2010. Arborists’ certification study guide: International Society of Arboriculture. 3/Ed. International Society of Arboriculture.
Lin, T.-C., Hamburg, S.P., Lin, K.-C., Wang, L.-J., Chang, C.-T., Hsia, Y.-J., Vadeboncoeur, M.A., McMullen, C.M.M., and Liu, C.-P. 2011. Typhoon disturbance and forest dynamics: lessons from a northwest Pacific subtropical forest. Ecosystems 14:127-143.
Lugo, A.E. 2008. Visible and invisible effects of hurricanes on forest ecosystems: an international review. Austral Ecology 33:368-398.
Mattheck, C. and Breloer, H. 1994. The body language of trees: a handbook for failure analysis. HMSO Publications Centre.
McPherson, E.G. 2006. Urban forestry in North America. Renewable Resources Journal 24:8-12.
Newell, P.B. 1997. A cross cultural examination of favorite places. Environment and Behavior 29:495-514.
Nowak, D.J., Noble, M.H., Sisinni, S.M., and Dwyer, J.F. 2001. People and trees: assessing the US urban forest resource. Journal of Forestry 99:37-42.
Peltola, H.M. 2006. Mechanical stability of trees under static loads. American journal of botany 93:1501-1511.
Pernek, M., Lacković, N., Mačak-Hadžiomerović, A., and Stamenković, V. 2013. Adapted VTA and SIA method in tree static assessment with use of resistography. Periodicum biologorum 115:447-453.
Putz, F.E. and Sharitz, R.R. 1991. Hurricane damage to old-growth forest in Congaree Swamp National Monument, South Carolina, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:1765-1770.
Rohde, C. and Kendle, A. 1994. “Human Well-Being, Natural Landscapes and Wildlife in Urban Areas: A Review.,” Horticulture and Landscape and the Research Institute for the Care of the Elderly, University of Reading, Bath.
Rohde, C. and Kendle, A., eds. 1997. Nature for people., pp. 1-319-335. Taylor & Francis, London.
Sheets, V.L. and Manzer, C.D. 1991. Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: Some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior 23:285-304.
Shigo, A.L. 1985. Compartmentalization of decay in trees. Scientific American 252:96-105.
Sreetheran, M., Adnan, M., and Azuar, A.K. 2011. Street tree inventory and tree risk assessment of selected major roads in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 37:226.
Unger, P.W. and Kaspar, T.C. 1994. Soil compaction and root growth: a review. Agronomy Journal 86:759-766.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7559-
dc.description.abstract樹木健康評估一般使用目視樹木評估法以量化都市樹木對人類生命財產帶來的潛在威脅。本研究以大安森林公園為基地,並應用現有樹木健康評估方法,整理出簡易目視樹木評估 (Simplified visual tree assessment, SVTA) 表格作為判斷標準,對大安森林公園內10種常見樹種(n = 214)進行健康度評估,常見樹種包括:垂榕(Ficus benjamina L.)、黑板樹(Alstonia scholaris L. R. Br)、榕樹(Ficus microcarpa L.)、阿勃勒(Cassia fistula L.)、楓香(Liquidambar formosana Hance)、茄苳(Bischofia javanica Bl.)、水黃皮(Pongamia pinnata L.)、台灣欒樹(Koelreuteria elegans Laxm.)、樟樹(Cinnamomum camphora L.)及印度紫檀(Pterocarpus indicus Willd.)。
SVTA評估指標包括樹形、樹冠、主幹、分枝、樹基的生長勢及缺陷類型評分結果。為了驗證SVTA之判視是否具有一致性,本研究將評估人員以具備樹木健康評估經驗分為有和無兩組進行測試。此外,颱風風損為常見之樹木擾動因子,本研究根據風害調查結果分析樹種、SVTA各項指標及SVTA綜合健康度與風害之關係。
根據本研究調查結果,大安森林公園10種常見樹種平均健康度(Mean ± SD)有顯著差異(P < 0.001),排名由高至低依序為楓香(4.41±0.4)、茄苳(4.31±0.5)、黑板樹(4.01±0.5)、正榕(3.91±0.6)、樟樹(3.73±0.8)、印度紫檀(3.71±0.4)、台灣欒樹(3.71±0.9)、垂榕(3.61±0.4)、阿勃勒(3.58±0.6)及水黃皮(3.53±0.5)。對於人員評估一致性而言,無論評估人員有無經驗,兩組之間評估結果並無顯著差異,但組內之變異數較大,因此證明無法證明經驗是結果具有在一致性。此外樹冠均勻程度會因人員經驗之不同而有顯著差異。
尼莎颱風後樹木風損調查中,受損狀況可分為受損類型為枝條斷裂、半倒、全倒和主幹斷裂。本研究經由卡方檢定我們發現黑板樹、印度紫檀及垂榕較容易發生風損,而茄苳、正榕、阿勃勒及楓香相對於不容易發生風害。此外,SVTA樹木健康度與樹木颱風損傷無顯著相關,而主幹明顯缺陷指標與風害有顯著相關。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractVisual Tree Assessment is used as common way to quantify potential threats of urban trees that posed to human life and property. In this study, we established a Simplified Visual Tree Assessment (SVTA) which based on the current tree health assessment and then applied on Da-an Forest park in Taipei. This study selected 10 common tree species (n = 214), including Ficus benjamina L., Alstonia scholaris L. R. Br, Ficus microcarpa L., Cassia fistula L., Liquidambar formosana Hance, Bischofia javanica Bl., Pongamia pinnata L., Koelreuteria elegans Laxm., Cinnamomum camphora L., Pterocarpus indicus Willd. as research subjects.
Used indicators of SVTA in this study include growth potential, defect of tree form, tree crown, trunk, branch, and tree base. In this study, evaluators were divided into 2 groups: with experienced group and without experienced group to verify consistency of SVTA’s results. Moreover, we analyzed relations between wind damage and tree species, every single indicator of SVTA, as well as scores of tree health.
It was found that, average score of tree health (Mean ± SD) have significant difference (P < 0.001) among 10 common tree species in Da-an Forest Park, which L. formosana(4.41±0.4) has highest score, following were B. javanica (4.31±0.5), A. scholaris (4.01±0.5), F. microcarpa (3.91±0.6), C. camphora (3.73±0.8), P. indicus (3.71±0.4), K. elegans (3.71±0.9), F. benjamina (3.61±0.4), C. fistula (3.58±0.6), and P. pinnata (3.53±0.5). In respect of assessment consistency, with or without experienced has no effect on result of tree health assessment. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between with experienced and without experienced groups, while the number of variations within each group are large. However, significant differences were found between with experienced and without experienced group when evaluating degree of crown balance.
Damage conditions such as broken branch, lean trees, uprooted trees, broken stem of 10 tree species in Da-an Forest Park were investigated after Typhoon Nesat. A chi-square test conducted on investigation data, also indicated that A. scholaris, P. indicus, and F. benjamina are more prone to wind damage. It was also found that no significant relationship existed between tree health and wind damage and correlated relationships existed between trunk defect and wind damage.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:46:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R04625052-1.pdf: 1786892 bytes, checksum: 743335a46eefbd5f5360f736f90af017 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章、前言 1
一、研究背景 1
二、研究動機 1
三、研究範圍 3
四、研究目的 3
第二章、文獻回顧 5
一、名詞定義 5
二、樹木風險評估之概念 6
三、都市樹木風害 11
第三章、簡化目視樹木評估探討大安森林公園樹木之健康度 16
一、前言 16
二、材料與方法 17
三、結果 25
四、討論 26
五、小結 28
第四章、颱風風害對大安森林公園樹木與指標關係探討 37
一、前言 37
二、材料與方法 37
三、結果 42
四、討論 42
五、小結 44
第五章、總結與建議 48
參考文獻 51
附錄 55
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title都市公園樹木之健康度評估與環境因子探討-以大安森林公園為例zh_TW
dc.titleRelationships between Tree Health Assessment and Environmental factor of Urban Tree-A case study in Da-an Forest Parken
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor張育森(Yu-sen Chang)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee邱志明
dc.subject.keyword樹木健康,簡易目視評估法,都市公園樹木,風損,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTree health,SVTA,Urban park trees,wind damaged,en
dc.relation.page56
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201801155
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2018-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept森林環境暨資源學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2028-06-27-
顯示於系所單位:森林環境暨資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  此日期後於網路公開 2028-06-27
1.75 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved