Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 植物科學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75471
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.author黃元動zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T08:13:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-01T08:13:23Z-
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.citation李尚癸。1948.台灣紅樹林分佈現狀.台灣省林業試驗所通訊41~48: 337~339。
朱士謹。1960.台灣產紅樹林植物(Mangrove)莖葉之解剖。省立博物館科學年刊3: 67~87。
呂光洋。1980.1980年亞洲紅樹林環境研討會記實。科學月刊11(11): 29~31。
呂光洋。1982.竹圍紅樹林沼澤生態調查(l),中華林學季刊15(3): 69~76。
周昌弘。1973.環境壓力對於植物的傷害。頁28~42。中央研究院生物研究中心專刊第四號:生物與環境.中央研究院。臺北市.
周昌弘。1980.水筆仔紅樹林的保護經過。大眾科學1(6): 7~9。
周昌弘、姚正。1980.紅樹林的生態及其價值.科學月刊11(11): 32~35。
周昌弘、楊棋明。1981.紅樹林生態生理之研究。科學農業29(11-12): 327~335。
洪丁興、孟傳樓、李遠慶、陳明義。1976.台灣海邊植物(1).農復會、林務局、中興大學合印。
洪丁興、孟傳樓、李遠慶、陳明義。1978.台灣海邊植物(2).農復會、林務局、中興大學合印。
洪丁興、孟傳樓、本遠慶、陳明義。1981.台灣海邊植物(3).農復會、林務局、中興大學合印。
俞其海。1975.實用統計學。中國石油公司印。
胡敬華。1959.台灣南部紅樹林植物之研究。省立博物館年刊2: 77~95。
耿?。1952.台灣的紅樹林。台灣農林月刊6(1): 38~39。
馬以工。1980.紅樹林的保護與規劃。科學月刊11(11): 36~37.
陳正祥。1957.氣候之分類與分區。台灣林業叢刊第七號。
陳明義。1981.亞洲之紅樹林。台灣林業7(8): 10~15。
陳明義、陳谷季、李遠慶。1976.淡水河口紅樹林之生態研究。中華林學季刊9(3): 43~50。
陳建初。1981.水質分析。九大圖書公司。臺北。
連深。1981.作物分析結果的解釋與施肥推薦。頁66~75.作物需肥診斷技術。台灣省農業試驗所編印。
張淑賢。1981.本省現行植物分析法。頁53~59.作物需肥診斷技術。台灣省農業試驗所編印。
張寬敏。1982.紅樹林之貝類。大眾科學3(1): 7~9。
路統信。1982.紅樹林專輯。中華林學季刊15(3): 1~86。
劉棠瑞。1965.紅樹林。台大林業叢刊第二號。
劉棠瑞、賴明洲。1982.淡水河口竹圍地區水筆仔紅樹林來源問題之探討。中華林學季刊15(3): 85~86。
Adams, C. A., M. J. Oesterling, S. C. Snedaker, and W. Seaman. 1973. Quantitative dietary analysis for selected dominant fishes of the Ten Thousand Islands, Florida. pp. H 1-56 In S.C. Snedaker, and A. E. Lugo, eds. The role of mangrove ecosystem in the maintenance of environmental quality and a high productivity of desirable fisheries. Atlanta, Georgia, U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries & Wildlife.
Aksornkoae, S., and C. Khemnark. 1980. Nutrient cycling in Mangrove forest of Thailand. In Asian symposium of Mangrove Environment Research and Management.
Atkinson, M. R., G. P. Findlay, A. B. Hope, M. G. Pitman, H. D. W. Saddler, and K. R. West. 1967. Salt regulation in the mangroves Rhizhora mucronata lam, and Aegialitis annulata R. BR. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 589-599.
Bieleski, R. L., and N. A. Turner. 1966. Separation and estimation of amino acid in crude plant extracts by thin-layer electrophoresis and chromatograph. Analy. Biochem. 17: 278-293.
Black, D. A. 1965. Methods of soil analysis, Part Ⅰ & Ⅱ. American Society of Agronomy Inc. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, U. S. A. 1572pp.
Bower, C. E., and H. H. Thomas. 1980. A simplified hydrazinereduction method for determining high concentrations of nitrate in recirculated sea-water. Aquaculture 2l: 281-286.
Bunt, J. S., W. T. Williams, and H. J. Clay. 1982. River water salinity and the distribution of mangrove species along several rivers in North Queensland. Aust. J. Bot. 30: 401-412.
Clarke, L. D., and N. J. Hannon. 1967. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney district. Ⅰ. Vegetation, soil and climate. J. Ecol. 55: 753-771.
Clarke, L. D., and N. J. Hannon. 1969. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communties of the Sydney district. Ⅱ. The holocoentic complex with particular reference to physiography. J. Ecol. 57: 213-234.
Clarke, L. D., and N. J. Hannon. 1970. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney district. Ⅲ. plant growth in relation to salinity and waterlogging. J. Ecol. 58: 351-369.
Conner, D. J. 1969. Growth of grey mangrove (Avicennia marina) in nutrient culture. Biotropica 1(2): 36-40.
Duke, N. C., J. S. Bunt, and W. T. Williams. 1981. Mangrove litter fall in North-Eastern Australia. I. Annual totals by component in selected species. Aust. J. Bot. 29:57-553.
Epstein, E. 1972. Mineral nutrition of plant: Principles and perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, Sydney, Toronto. 412pp.
Gocke, K., M. Vitola, and G. Rojas. 1981. Oxygen consumption patterns in a mangrove swamp on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 29(l):143-152k.
Golley, F., H. T. Odum, and R. F. Wilson. 1962. The structure and metabolism of a Puerto Rican red mangrove forest in May. Ecology 43(l):9-13.
Hesse, P. R. 1961. Some differences between the soils of Rhizophora and Avicennia mangrove swamps in Sierra Leone. Plant and Soil 14: 335-346.
Hesse, P. R. 1962. Phosphorus fixation in mangrove swamp muds. Nature 20: 295-296.
Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood cliffs, N. J. 498pp.
Levitt, J. 1979. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. 2nd. ed. Vol. Ⅰ. Acadamic Press, N. Y. and London. 497pp.
Levitt, J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. 2nd. ed. Vol. II. Acadamic Press, N. Y. and London. 606pp.
Li, H. L. 1977. Rhizophoraceae. pp. 868-874 In Flora of Taiwan, Vol. III. Epoch Publ. Co. Taipei.
Limpsaichol, P. 1930. An investigation of some ecological parameters at Ao Nam Bor mangrove, Phuket Island, Thailand. In Asian Symposium on Mangrove wnvironment Research and Management.
Lugo, A. E., and S. C. Snedaker. 1973. Properties of a mangrove forest in south Florida. pp. Bl-87 In S. C. Snedaker, and A.
E. Lugo, eds. The role of mangrove ecosystem in the mainten nce of environmental quality and a high productivity of desirable fisheries. Atlanta, Georgia, U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries & Wildlife.
Lugo, A. E., and S. C. Snedaker. 1974. The ecology of mangroves. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:39-64.
Lugo, A. E., M. Sell, and S. C. Snedaker. 1976. Mangrove ecosystem analysis. pp. 113-l45 In B. C. Patten ed. Systems analysis and simulation in ecology. Vol. IV. Acadamic Press, N. Y..
Lugo, A. E., G. Cintron, and C. Goenaga. 1981. Mangrove ecosystems under stress. pp. l29-153 In G. W. Barrett, and R. Rosenberg, eds. Stress effects on natural ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
MacNae, W. 1963. Mangrove swamps in South Africa. J. Ecol. 51:1-25.
MacNae, W. 1967. Zonation within mangroves associated with estuaries in North Queensland. pp. 432-44l In G. H. Lauff, ed. Esturies. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Pubi. 83, Washington D. C..
MacNae, W., and M. Kalk. 1962. The ecology of the mangrove swamp of Inhaca Island, Mocambique. J. Ecol. 50: 19-34.
McConnaughey, B. H. 1978. Introduction to marine biology. 3rd. ed. The C. B. Mosby Company, St. Missouri. 624pp.
Pviengel, K., 2nd E. A. Kirkby. 1982. Principles of plant nutrition. 3rd. ed. International Potash Institute, Switzerland. 655pp.
Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd. ed. W. B. Saunders company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto. 574.pp.
Odum, H. T. 1971. Environment, Power and Society. Wiley interscience, N. Y. 331p.
Pannier, F. 1979. Mangroves impacted by human-induced disturbances: a case study of the Orinoco Delta mangrove ecosystem. Envir. Manag. 3(3): 205-216.
Pool, D. J., and A. E. Lugo. 1973. Litter production in man-groves. pp. G 1-35 In S. C. Snedaker, and A. E. Lugo, eds. The role of mangrove ecosystem in the maintenance of environmental quality and high prodictivity of desirable fisheries. Atlanta, Georgia, U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries & Wildlife.
Scholander, P. E., H. T. Hammel, E. D. Bradstreet, and E. A. Hemrningsen. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular platns. Science 148: 339-345.
Snedaker, S. C., And D. J. Pool. 1973. Mangrove forest types and biomass. pp. Cl-13 In S. C. Snedaker, and A. E. Lugo, eds. The role of mangrove ecosystem in the maintenance of environmental quality and high productivity of desirable fisheries. Atlanta, Georgia, U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries & Wildlife.
Stern, W. L., and G. K. Voigt. 1959. Effect of salt concentration on growth of red mangrove in culture. Bot. Gaz. 121: 36-39.
Stewart, G. R., and J. A. Lee. 1974. The role of oroline accumulation in halophytes. Planta 120: 279-289.
Stoddart, D. R. 1980. Mangroves as successional stages, inner reefs of the northern Great Barrier Reef. J. Biogeo. 7: 269-284.
Storey,. R., and R. G. Wyn Jones. 1977. Quaternary ammonium compounds in plants in relation to salt-resistance. Phytochemistry 16:447-453.
Teas, H. J. 1979. Silviculture with saline water. pp. 117-161 In A. Hohaender, ed. The biosaline concept. Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Thom, B. G. 1967. Mangrove ecology and deltaic geomorphology: Tabasco, Mexico. J. Ecol. 55: 30l-343.
Tschirley, F. H. 1969. Defoliation in Vietnam. Science 163: 779-786.
Walsh, G. E. 1967. An ecological study of a Hawaiian mangrove swamp. pp. 420-431 In G. H. Lauff, ed. Esturies. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci Publ. 83, Washington D. C..
Walsh, G. E. 1974. Mangroves: a review. pp. 51-174 In R. J. Reirnmold, and W. H. Queen, eds. Ecology of halophytes. Acadamic Press, N. Y., and London.
Ward, C. J., and T. D. Steinke. 1982. A note on the distribution and approximate areas of mangroves in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 1:51-53.
Westing, A. H. 1971. Ecological effects of millitary defoliation of the forests of south Vietnam. Bioscience 21:893-893.
Williams, W. T., J. S. Bunt, and N. C. Duke. 1981. Mangrove litter fall in North-Eastern Australia. II. Periodiity. Aust. J. Bot. 29:555-563.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75471-
dc.description.abstract竹圍紅樹林沼澤地位於淡水與竹圍間的淡水河畔。本地區共有12科25種植物,但僅水筆仔(Kandelia candel L. Druce)屬於紅樹科(RhizoPhoraceae)為紅樹林植物,餘則為其他常見的海邊植物。水筆仔為構成紅樹林的主要樹種,生長於潮間帶,其他植物則生長於潮水不易到達的地方。依沼澤地的植被與潮水沖擊程度的不同,筆者將此地區劃分為潮溪紅樹林區,河邊紅樹林區、混生林區、草生地區及河邊沙灘地區等六區。潮溪紅樹林區與河邊紅樹林區之水筆仔林生長良好,其平均落葉量為1.83g/m平方公尺/day。其落葉具週期性,於八月颱風過境時,落葉量高達7.7g/m平方公尺/day,四、五月因當地氣溫上升,落葉量可達2~3g/m平方公尺/day,其他月份則維持在1g/m平方公尺/day左右。由水筆仔生育過程的觀察顯示其為適合生長於溫度低於20℃的種類。由土壤分析結果顯示水筆仔生長較好的潮溪紅樹林區的土壤質地為坋壤土,其有機質含量、總氮量、有效磷量及陽離子交換量均較其他地區高,且已具適合紅樹林生長的最佳條件。由潮水分析結果顯示,潮水可供給紅樹林生長所需的多量元素,而紅樹林則提供海水中所缺乏的氮化合物和磷化合物,而有利於海中生物生長。由水筆仔葉片營養分析結果顯示幼葉中含有較高量的氮、磷、鉀,而老葉中則含有較高量的鈉、鎂、鈣。潮溪紅樹林區的水筆仔葉片中含有較高量的氮和磷,且其氮:磷:鉀的比值類似幼苗葉片中者,介於2.5~3.0:0.28~0.33:1。矮小紅樹林區的水筆仔葉片中,氮和磷的含量與氮:磷:鉀的比值均偏低,與其生長的土壤中含有的氮和磷偏低的結果成正比。水筆仔體內含有大量的鈉,尤以老葉的含量高,顯示水筆仔可藉老葉掉落的方式來排除體內過多的鈉鹽。由水筆仔葉片中游離態胺基酸的含量分析,顯示水筆仔並未以堆積大量的proline來適應其生長的鹽分地。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe Chuwei mangrove swamp is situated at the estuary of Tanshui river. Floristically, 25 species belonging to 16 genera and 12 families are found here. Kandelia candel, a member of Rhizophoraceae, is the only mangrove species locally, the remainders being common seaside plants. K. candel is also the dominant species in the swamp. It grows in the intertidal zone, while other seaside plants occur in areas free of tide. According to the degree of tidal action and the difference in floristic composition, the swamp was arbitrarily classified into six areas, i.e., tidal creek mangrove area, riverine mangrove area, mixed species area, grassland area, dwarf mangrove area, and sandy beach area. The average leaf fall rate of K. candel forest in the tidal creek mangrove area and the riverine mangrove area was 1.83g/m^2/day. The leaf fall rate correlated well with climate. During the period of 1982-1983, the rate was relatively stable, being about 1g/m^2/day in most months. A higher rate of about 2-3g/m^2/day was obtained in April and May, owing to the raise of air temperature. The rate reached a maximum of 7.7g/m^2/day in August as a result of the occurrences of typhoon. K. candel grows luxuriously in winter when the air temperature is below 20℃. The results of soil analyses indicate that the soil sampled from the creek mangrove area is silt loam with high contents of organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphate, and high cation exchange capacity, thus providing favorable conditions for the mangrove growth. The results of tidal water analyses reveal that tidal water can offer macro-nutrients which sustain the productivity of mangrove. On the other hand, the mangrove swamp contains high contents of nitrogenous and phosphatic compounds which benefit marine habitants in the estuary. The mineral contents of K. candal seedlings vary with plant parts. High contents of N, P, and K are found in young leaves, whereas in older leaves, high level of Na, Mg, and Ca are observed. The contents of N and P in leaves of K. candel is lower in the dwarf mangroves area. This seems to be correlated with the low level of N and P in the soil. The ratio of N:P:K found in young leaves is close to that in old leaves regardless of the location of sampling area. K. candel can accumulate high level of Na, especially in older leaves. The results of free amino acid analyses in leaves of K. candel indicate that the concentration of proline is not high enough for interpreting the adaptation mechanism of K. candel in the saline environment.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:13:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 1983
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝……………………………………………………Ⅰ
中文摘要……………………………………………………Ⅳ
英文摘要……………………………………………………Ⅴ
一、緒言……………………………………………………1
二、研究地點概況……………………………………………………8
(一)竹圍紅樹林沼澤地的地理位置與形成原因………………8
(二)氣候條件……………………………………………………8
(三)竹圍紅樹林沼澤的植被與土壤概況………………………………10
三、研究方法……………………………………………………17
(一)竹圍紅樹林沼澤地的植被調查……………………………………………………17
(二)水筆仔林落葉量之調查……………………………………………………17
(三)沼澤地的土壤調查……………………………………………………17
1.採樣方法……………………………………………………17
2.分析項目及其方法……………………………………………………17
(四)水質的調查……………………………………………………19
1.採樣方法……………………………………………………19
2.分析項目及其方法……………………………………………………20
(五)水筆仔幼苗各器官多量元素含量分析……………………………………………………22
1.採樣方法……………………………………………………22
2.分析項目及其方法……………………………………………………22
(六)潮溪紅樹林區與矮小紅樹林區水筆仔葉片中多量元素與遊離態按基酸的分析………23
1.採樣方法……………………………………………………23
2.分析項目及其方法……………………………………………………23
(七)數據的分析……………………………………………………23
四、結果……………………………………………………24
五、討論……………………………………………………45
六、結論……………………………………………………51
七、引用文獻……………………………………………………52
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title竹園紅樹林生態營養物質流轉之動力學研究zh_TW
dc.titleDynamics of Nutrient Flow in Chuwei Mangrove Ecosysternen
dc.date.schoolyear71-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.relation.page59
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.contributor.author-dept生命科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept植物科學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:植物科學研究所

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved