Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/753
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor楊國鑫(Kuo-Hsin Yang)
dc.contributor.authorHsin-Chen Luen
dc.contributor.author呂昕臻zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T05:00:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-01
dc.date.available2021-05-11T05:00:38Z-
dc.date.copyright2019-08-05
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-07-19
dc.identifier.citationASTM D421. (2007). Standard practice for dry preparation of soil samples for particle-size analysis and determination of soil constants: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM D4253. (2002). Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM D4254. (2000). Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM D6836. (2008) Standard test methods for determination of the soil water characteristic curve for desorption using a hanging column, pressure extractor, chilled mirror hygrometer, and/or centrifuge: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM D792. (2013). Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
Balakrishnan, S., and Viswanadham, B. V. S. (2016). Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills through centrifuge model tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44(1), 95-108.
Bhattacherjee, D., and Viswanadham, B. V. S. (2015). Numerical studies on the performance of hybrid-geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes subjected to rainfall. Geosynthetics International, 22(6), 1-17.
Buckingham, E. (1914). On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical review, 4(4), 345.
Chen, H. T., Hung, W. Y., Chang, C. C., Chen, Y. J., and Lee, C. J. (2007). Centrifuge modeling test of a geotextile-reinforced wall with a very wet clayey backfill. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(6), 346-359.
FHWA. (2009). Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes-Volume I. U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, NHI-10-024.
FHWA. (2009). Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes-Volume Ⅱ. U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, NHI-10-024.
Gallage, C., Jayakody, S., and Uckimura, T. (2012). Effects of slope inclination on the rain-induced instability of embankment slopes. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment, 196-201.
Koerner, R. M., and Koerner, G. R. (2013). A data base, statistics and recommendations regarding 171 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 40, 20-27.
Langharr, H. L. (1951). Dimensional analysis and theory of models. Krieger.
Liu, C. N., Yang, K. H., Ho, Y. H., and Chang, C. M. (2012). Lessons learned from three failures on a high steep geogrid-reinforced slope. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 34, 131-143.
Liu, C. N., Yang, K. H., and Nguyen, M. D. (2014). Behavior of geogrid–reinforced sand and effect of reinforcement anchorage in large-scale plane strain compression. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42(5), 479-493.
Mamaghanian, J., Razeghi, H. R., Viswanadham, B. V. S., and Manikumar, C. H. S. G. (2018). Behaviour of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills with and without chimney drain in a geotechnical centrifuge. Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2, 1211-1216.
Portelinha, F. H. M., Bueno, B. S., and Zornberg, J. G. (2013). Performance of nonwoven geotextile-reinforced walls under wetting conditions: Laboratory and field investigations. Geosynthetics International, 20(2), 90-104.
Portelinha, F. H. M., and Zornberg, J. G. (2017). Effect of infiltration on the performance of an unsaturated geotextile-reinforced soil wall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45(3), 211-226.
Shibuya, S., Kawaguchi, T., and Chae, J. (2007). Failure of reinforced earth as attacked by Typhoon No.23 In 2004. Soils and Foundations, 47(1), 153-160.
Thuo, J. N., Yang, K. H., and Huang, C. C. (2015). Infiltration into unsaturated reinforced slopes with nonwoven geotextile drains sandwiched in sand layers. Geosynthetics International, 22(6), 1-18.
Tognon, A. R., Rowe, R. K., and Brachman, R. W. (1999). Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 17(4), 193-212.
Viswanadham, B. V. S., and König, D. (2004). Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 22(5), 307-328.
Wu, J. Y., and Chou, N. N. (2013). Forensic studies of geosynthetic reinforced structure failures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 27(5), 604-613.
Yang, K. H., Thuo, J. N., Chen, J. W., and Liu, C. N. (2019). Failure investigation of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil slope subjected to rainfall. Geosynthetics International, 26(1), 42-65.
Yang, K. H., Thuo, J. N., Huynh, V. D. A., Nguyen, T. S., and Portelinha, F. H. M. (2018). Numerical evaluation of reinforced slopes with various backfill-reinforcement-drainage systems subject to rainfall infiltration. Computers and Geotechnics, 96, 25-39.
Yoo, C., and Jang D.W., (2013). Geosynthetic reinforced soil wall performance under heavy rainfall. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2131-2134.
Yoo, C., and Shin, S. M. (2016). Performance of geosynthetic reinforced wall during rainfall. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 2(64), 2180-2185.
Yoo, C., and Jung, H. Y. (2006). Case history of geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall failure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(12), 1538-1548.
鄭恆志,(2004),“加勁格網之介紹與應用”,盟鑫工業股份有限公司
馮高原,(2010),“錨定織網系統邊坡加勁模型試驗”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,台北
陳榮河、紀柏全,(2010),“模型邊坡試驗之因次分析”,地工技術,125,pp. 7-14
蔡明宏,(2011),“三軸壓縮試驗下加勁土壤力學行為與加勁材應變發展之研究”,國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文,台北
黃渝紋,(2012),“三軸壓縮試驗探討蜂巢格網的圍束效應”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,台北
童自裕,(2013),“降雨引致異質性邊坡破壞之模型試驗”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,台北
周南山,(2016),“地工合成材料在永續工程之應用”,環境工程會刊
白名琁,(2018),“纖維加勁砂土土堤受滲流作用之模型試驗”,國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文,台北
賴兆偉,(2018),“加勁基礎受正斷層作用之物理模型試驗研究”,國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文,台北
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/753-
dc.description.abstract加勁擋土牆相較於傳統重力式擋土牆為柔性的擋土結構物,因此被視為邊坡穩定中最好的方法之一。然而為因應台灣地方法規,富含細粒料的現地土壤常被利用為背填土。當降雨入滲時,背填土基質吸力的喪失以及土壤剪力強度的弱化都是導致以含細粒料的現地土背填的加勁擋土牆破壞之主因。因此本研究致力於了解以富含細粒料的土壤為背填土的加勁擋土牆在降雨情況下的行為以及破壞模式。
本研究進行了一系列以富含細粒料的土壤為背填土的加勁擋土牆之縮尺試驗,除了了解其在降雨情況下的行為之外,也提出改善的方法供實際應用並探討其改善之效益。改善方法包含了縮小加勁材間距、使用高滲透係數的回填土、以及在加勁材界面鋪設薄砂層。試驗中降雨的延時設定使模型加勁擋土牆達到穩定狀態,或是直到擋土牆完全破壞為止。而在每組試驗中均紀錄了體積含水量、孔隙水壓、及牆變位;發展出的加勁材應變及土壤剪力也利用實驗後的影像處理來分析。
研究結果顯示縮小加勁材間距有助於維持模型加勁擋土牆之穩定,並使牆變位最小化。此外,使用高滲透係數的回填土雖然能有效的避免基質吸力的喪失,但仍會發展出張力裂縫,同時也使破壞機制轉為較於瞬間的表面淺層破壞。至於薄紗層的設計則是對以富含細粒料的土壤為背填土的加勁擋土牆在降雨情況下有相當優良的成效。除了加勁材與背填土之間的摩擦力增加之外,牆體本身受覆土壓力而變形的程度也因為採用了薄紗層而大幅改善。由於變形量為影響加勁擋土牆表現之關鍵因素,因此本研究認為在降雨情況下的設計安全係數須因應最大容許之牆變為來提升。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractGeosynthetic reinforced soil walls (GRS walls) are considered as one of the best among all slope stabilization methods. However, in-situ soil (marginal backfill) was often adopted to adhere to a local regulation which specifies that the excavated and backfilled soils should be balanced. Loss of matric suction and soil shear strength due to rainfall infiltration is a main cause of the failure of GRS walls with marginal backfill.
A series of reduced scale model tests was performed to investigate the performance of GRS walls with marginal backfill under rainfall conditions and to propose improved methods for practical design. The effects of the three improved methods, namely, reduction of reinforcement spacing, selection of better quality backfill, and adoption of sand cushions, were evaluated. Rainfall duration was set such that the wall model became fully wet or the monitored value reached steady state. The volumetric water content and the pore water pressure were monitored and the wall displacement was recorded throughout the tests. Mobilized reinforcement tensile strain was evaluated and the strain distribution in the wall models was analyzed via post image processing.
The test results indicated that the reduction of reinforcement spacing can effectively improve the stability of the wall; meanwhile, the displacement was diminished. In addition, applying granular backfill can indeed avoid the loss of matric suction; however, tensions cracks or critical failure surface developed suddenly. Finally, the adoption of sand cushions is complementary beneficial to the performance of GRS walls with marginal backfill under rainfall condition. Not only was the interface friction enhanced but the deformation characteristic was improved. The sand cushions also accelerated the dissipation of water.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-11T05:00:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-R06521108-1.pdf: 13058360 bytes, checksum: eb24b2730ece0352beaa68d7be6381ea (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgement II
Abstract III
Table of Contents V
List of Figures VIII
List of Tables XIII
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 5
1.3 Research Layout 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 8
2.1 History and Design Methods of GRS Structures 8
2.1.1 History 8
2.1.2 Basic Principles 8
2.1.3 Failure Mode and Design of GRS Structures 9
2.2 Performance of GRS Structures subjected to rainfall or seepage 12
2.2.1 Case Study 13
2.2.2 Model Tests 17
2.2.3 Full-scale Tests 23
2.2.4 Numerical Study 24
2.3 Model Tests and Scaling Laws 26
2.3.1 Similitude Law 26
2.3.2 Dimensional analysis 28
Chapter 3 Material Testing and Properties 31
3.1 Test Layout 31
3.2 Soil Physical Properties 32
3.2.1 Specific Gravity Test 32
3.2.2 Sieve Analysis Test 33
3.2.3 Hydrometer Test 35
3.2.4 Relative Density Test 37
3.2.5 Compaction Test 38
3.3 Engineering Properties of Testing Soil 40
3.3.1 Constant Head Test 40
3.3.2 Falling Head Test 41
3.3.3 Consolidated Drained Triaxial Test 42
3.3.4 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Test 45
3.4 Material Properties of Reinforcement 47
3.4.1 Wide Width Tensile Strength Test 48
3.4.2 Soil-Geogrid Interface Shearing Strength Test 50
Chapter 4 Model Tests and Test Program 53
4.1 Model test 53
4.1.1 Wall model 53
4.1.2 Model Preparation 59
4.1.3 Improved design measure 64
4.2 Instrumentation 65
4.2.1 Specifications of the Measuring Devices 65
4.2.2 Calibration of the Measuring Devices 68
4.2.3 Photography Equipment 74
4.3 Test Procedures and Test Repeatability 75
4.3.1 Test Procedures 75
4.3.2 Test Repeatability 77
4.4 Test Program 79
Chapter 5 Results of GRS Walls with Marginal Backfills 81
5.1 Test Results 81
5.1.1 Test SM-Sv9 (Baseline Case) 81
5.1.2 Test SM-Sv12 (Increase Spacing) 91
5.1.3 Test SM-Sv6 (Reduce Spacing) 98
5.2 Effects of Spacing 103
Chapter 6 Improved designs 110
6.1 Influence of Backfill Quality 110
6.1.1 Test SP-Sv9 (Granular Backfill) 110
6.1.2 Comparison 117
6.2 Effects of Sand Cushions 124
6.2.1 Test SM-Sv9-C4 (Adoption of Sand Cushions) 124
6.2.2 Comparison 131
6.2.3 Test SM-Sv12-C4 (Adoption of Sand Cushions) 138
6.2.4 Comparison 145
Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations 151
7.1 Conclusions 151
7.2 Recommendations for Future Study 152
References 153
Questions and Suggestions from the Panels 156
A. Professor Ching-Chuan Huang 156
B. Professor Yong-Shan Hung 157
C. Professor Yong-Show Fang 159
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject降雨zh_TW
dc.subject加勁擋土牆zh_TW
dc.subject富含細粒料之背填土zh_TW
dc.subject模型試驗zh_TW
dc.subjectModel testsen
dc.subjectMarginal backfillen
dc.subjectRainfallen
dc.subjectGeosynthetic-reinforced wallsen
dc.title加勁擋土牆以含細粒料之回填土在降雨作用下之行為及改善方法評估zh_TW
dc.titleEvaluation of Improved Methods for Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls with Marginal Backfills subjected to Rainfallen
dc.date.schoolyear107-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee方永壽(Yong-Show Fang),黃景川(Ching-Chuan Huang),洪勇善(Yong-Shan Hong)
dc.subject.keyword加勁擋土牆,富含細粒料之背填土,降雨,模型試驗,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordGeosynthetic-reinforced walls,Marginal backfill,Rainfall,Model tests,en
dc.relation.page160
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201901530
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2019-07-19
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf12.75 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved