請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74909
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊豐安(Feng-An Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhe-Yuan Guo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭哲源 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:10:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-04-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-09-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
朱永蕙、劉嘉騏,2016。「運用計畫行為理論探討環境關注對綠色民宿行為意向之研究」,『休閒與遊憩研究』,8期,2卷,97-119。 朱瑞伶、楊淑雯,2013。「臺灣民眾的利環境態度與行為:價值觀與罪感的影響」,『環境教育研究』,9卷,2期,91-129。 吳忠宏,2006。「生態旅遊知覺, 態度與行為之因果關係研究:以荒野保護協會會員為例」,『造園景觀學報』,12卷,3期,41-62。 林姿伶,2012。「環保意識與綠色消費行為之研究:誘因排擠效果之驗證」。碩士論文,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所。 原承君、林翠芳,2016。「我國民眾環境公共財及環境政策偏好之探討」,『財稅研究』,46卷,3期,101-127。 張子超,2000。「九年一貫課程-環境教育融入的內涵與教學」,『台灣教育』,589:12-21。 張子超,2003。「永續發展研究融入九年一貫課程之新環境典範的內涵概念。」,『全球變遷通訊雜誌』,38期,11-16。 張子超,2013。「環境倫理與典範轉移的通識內涵」,『通識在線』,46期。 陳怡君、郭文貴、 蕭美鈴,2004。「環保紡織品之綠色行銷與綠色消費行為關係之研究—以台北市為例」,華岡紡織期刊,,11卷,2期,117-131。 陳郁安、謝雨生,2016。「臺灣民眾社經地位對環境行為的影響」,『調查研究-方法與應用』,35期,7-45。 曾旻儀、李佳霖、李孟璋,2008。「消費者的綠色認知與生活型態對綠色消費行為影響之研究」。碩士論文。朝陽科技大學企業管理學系。 歐陽宇、陳妤甄,2013。「旅遊消費者環境知識, 新環境典範態度及環境行為之研究-以四重溪溫泉地區為例」,『嘉南學報』, 39期,420-433。 賴靜瑤、林祐樂、鄭羽舒、楊淑喻、王韻晴、林伊桂、蕭嘉誼,2016。「從綠色消費觀點探討環境意識對消費者使用油電混合低底盤公車意願的效果」,『綠色經濟期刊』。2卷,1-21。 Albrecht, D., Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., & Nowak, P., 1982. “The New Environmental Paradigm scale.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 13: 39–43. Arcury, T.A., 1990. “Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge.” Human Organization, 49(4): 300-304. Bamberg, S. & Mӧser, G., 2007. “Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behavior.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27: 14–25. Banerjee, B. & McKeage, K., 1994. “How green is my value: Exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism.” Advances in Consumer Research, 22: 147-152. Bansal, P. & Roth K., 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717-736. Berk, R.A., Schulman, D., McKeever, M., & Freeman, H.E., 1993. “Measuring the impact of water conservation campaigns in California.” Climatic Change, 24(3): 233-248. Brandon, G. & Lewis, A., 1999. “Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study.” Journal of environmental Psychology, 19(1): 75–85. Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O., 2000. “Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden.” Applied Economics, 32(6): 661-669. Dunlap, R. E. and K. D Van Liere., 1978. “The new environmental paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4): 10-19. Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., & Jones, R.E., 2000. “Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale.” Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 425-442. Ek, K. & Söderholm, P., 2010. “The devil is in the details: household electricity saving behavior and the role of information.” Energy Policy, 38 (3): 1578–1587. Evanschitzky, H. & Wunderlich, M., 2006. “An Examination of Moderator Effects: The Four Stage Loyalty Model.” Journal of Service Research, 8(4): 330-345. Gaspar, R., Antunes, D., 2011. “Energy efficiency and appliance purchases in Europe: consumer profiles and choice determinants.” Energy Policy, 39(11): 7335–7346. Grunert S. C., 1993. “Everybody seems concerned about the environment: but is this concern reflected in (Danish) consumers’ food choice?” ACR European Advances. Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., & Tomera, A.N., 1987. “Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.” The Journal of environmental education, 18(2): 1-8. Holden, E., & Linnerud, K., 2010. “Environmental attitudes and household consumption: an ambiguous relationship.” International Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(3): 217-231. Hungerford, H., Peyton, R. B., & Wilke, R. J.,1980. “Goals for curriculum development in environmental education. ” The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(3): 42-47. Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A.,2004. “Cross‐national gender variation in environmental behaviors. ” Social science quarterly, 85(3): 677-694. Inglehart, R.,1981. “Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. ” American Political Science Review, 75(4):880-900. Kahn,M.E.,2002.“Demographic change and the demand for environmental regulation. ” The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1): 45-62. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J.,2002. “Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?.” Environmental education research, 8(3): 239-260. Lindén, A., Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Eriksson, B., 2006. “Efficient and inefficient aspects of residential energy behaviour: what are the policy instruments for change?” Energy Policy 34(14): 1918–1927. Maddala, G.S.1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Marcincowski, T.,1991. “The relationship between environmental literacy and responsible environmental behavior in environmental education.” In M.Maldague(Ed.),Methods and techniques for evaluating environmental education. Paris:UNESCO. Meyer, A.,2015. “Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe.” Ecological economics, 116: 108-121. Mundaca, L., Neij, L., Worrell, E., & McNeil, M.,2010. “Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models. ” Annual review of environment and resources, 35: 305-344. Ohler, A. M., & Billger, S. M., 2014. “Does environmental concern change the tragedy of the commons? Factors affecting energy saving behaviors and electricity usage.” Ecological Economics, 107: 1-12 Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C., 2004. “Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use.” Environment and behavior, 36(1): 70-93. Robert, J.A. & Bacon, D.R., 1997. “Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior” Journal of Business Research, 40(1): 79-89. Rockcastle, V., 1989. “Environmental literacy: Philosophy, content, strategies.” Nature Study, 43(1-2): 8-9. Roth, C.E, 1968. “On the road to conservation.” Massachusetts Audubon, 38-41. Sardianou, E., 2007. “Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households.” Energy Policy, 35(7): 3778–3791. Shetzer, L., Stackman, R.W., & Moore, L.F., 1991. “Business Environment Attitudes and the New Environmental Paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 22: 14–21. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G.A., 1995. “The new environmental paradigm in social psychological perspective.” Environment and Behavior, 27(6): 723-745. Torgler, B., Garcia-Valiñas, M.A., & Macintyre, A., 2008. “Differences in preferences towards the environment: The impact of a gender, age and parental effect.” Viklund, M., 2004. “Energy policy options from the perspective of public attitudes and risk perceptions.” Energy Policy 32(10): 1159–1171. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J. & Zhang, Y., 2011. “Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behavior: evidence from Beijing, China.” Energy Policy, 39(6): 3550–3557. Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S. & Oates, C.J., 2010. “Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour When Purchasing Products.” Sustainable Development, 18(1): 20-31. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P., & Aldrich, C.,2000. “Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism-statistical data included.” Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 443-445. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74909 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 十八世紀的工業革命以後,科技進步為人類帶來繁榮與生活便利,然而近年來因為人類的過度開發與環境破壞,導致全球暖化出現與極端氣候發生,也因此環境保護的議題變成這世代的重要的全球議題。隨著環境的劇烈改變,漸漸的人類開始反思人類與自然環境之間的關係,也因此民眾的環境意識開始逐漸形成,而各界也開始對於改善環境問題進行研究,由於環境問題主要源自於人類的行為,因此對於環境行為的探討成為本世紀熱門的研究議題。然而有關環境行為的討論,主要多針對特定類型的環境行為,像是綠色消費與使用行為,鮮少有對不同類型的環境行為進行討論,因此為彌補過往研究不足,本研究將針對不同類型的環境行為進行研究,並加入環境意識與家計特徵變數,了解主要影響台灣民眾的環境行為因素。
本研究利用中研院 1996 年所調查之台灣地區家戶垃圾製造、回收行為、與垃圾收費意見調查問卷,以 20 歲至 74 歲之台灣都會區民眾為研究對象,共有 603 筆樣本,利用Probit model 與 Linear Probability Model 對環境意識與環境行為之間影響性進行相關研究。實證結果發現環境意識對私領域環境行為有正向顯著影響,且當中消費與使用類型之環境行影響結果較為顯著,而環境意識對公共領域各項環境行為與整體環境行為並沒有顯著影響。家計特徵變數方面,私領域環境行為方面,女性發生環境行為顯著高於男性約 0.467 單位,而教育程度與家庭人數對環境行為之影響多為顯著正相關,然而公共領域的環境行為估計結果多為不顯著影響。 最後本研究認為,由於環境意識對私領域環境行為影響顯著正相關,因此政府應該多加強對民眾環境意識的宣導與建立,增加民眾環境意識進而提高環境行為的發生,而其他受環境意識影響不顯著類型之環境行為,可透過調查了解其他可能影響環境行為發生之因素,像是對於民眾之交通行為,可以了解民眾住家與工作場所的距離,進行大眾運輸工具之路線規劃與綠色交通工具的地點設置,看是否能提高民眾綠色交通行為的發生。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After the industrial revolution of the eighteenth century, technological progress has brought prosperity and convenience to human. However, due to over-exploitation and environmental destruction, global warming and extreme weather have occurred, so environmental protection has become an important global issue to our generations. With dramatic changes in the environment, people began to put the relationship between human beings and the natural environment into consideration, and the environmental awareness began to grow up. Since then studies on improving the environment have been widely carried out., Needless to say, environmental problems mainly originated from human’s behaviors, so the discussion of environmental behaviors has become a popular issue during this century. However, the discussion about environmental behaviors so far mainly focuses on specific types of environmental behaviors, such as green consumption and usage behaviors. Therefore, in order to make up for the lack of past research, this study will target different types of research on environmental behaviors, and by adding environmental awareness and family property variables into the estimation, we can understand what kind of environmental behavior factors have impact on Taiwanese people.
This study used the questionnaires on household manufacturing, recycling, and garbage collection surveys conducted by the Academia Sinica in 1996. The survey was conducted in Taiwan metropolitan areas between the ages of 20 and 74. A total of 603 samples were used, and were put into estimation using Probit model and the Linear Probability Model to seethe relationship between environmental awareness and environmental behavior. The empirical results show that environmental awareness has a significant positive impact on the environmental behavior in the private sector, and the environmental impacts of consumption and use types are more significant among all types of behaviors , while environmental awareness has no significant impact on the environmental behaviors and overall environmental behaviors in the public sector. In terms of household characteristics, especially for environmental behaviors in the private sector, women's environmental behaviors are significantly higher than that of men's 0.467 units, while education and the number of family members have a significant positive correlation with environmental behaviors. However, the environmental behaviors estimates in the public sector are mostly insignificant. Finally, this study believes that environmental awareness has a significant positive correlation with environmental behaviors in the private sector, the government should strengthen the publicity and establishment of environmental awareness, in order to increase the occurrence of environmental behaviors. Other types of environmental behaviors that are insignificant with environmental awareness can be further studied by investigating other factors that may affect the occurrence of environmental behaviors, such as the traffic behavior of the people, the distance between the people's residence and workplace, the route planning of mass transit vehicles and the green transportation. By doing so, we can see if it can improve people's green traffic behaviors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:10:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06627012-1.pdf: 1580006 bytes, checksum: 6845e46923b60f0fc052d3ee4b2f32bf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
頁次 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目 次 vi 表 目 錄 viii 圖 目 錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程與研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 環境意識與環境行為定義及其概念 6 第二節 環境意識與環境行為之相關文獻 15 第三節 小結 18 第三章 資料介紹 19 第一節 資料背景介紹 19 第二節 資料處理過程與變數定義與篩選 21 第三節 敘述統計 27 第四章 實證模型與方法 34 第一節 線性機率模型(Linear Probability Model) 34 第二節 Probit模型 36 第五章 實證結果與分析 40 第一節 環境意識對私領域環境行為影響 40 第二節 環境意識對公共領域環境行為影響 52 第三節 環境意識對民眾整體環境行為影響 61 第四節 小節 64 第六章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結論與政策建議 67 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 68 參考文獻 70 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 環境意識和環境行為的關聯性:以台灣大都會區為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship Between Environmental Awareness and Environmental Behaviors:An Empirical Study on Metropolitan Region in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉家瑜,劉鋼,陳淑玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 環境素養,環境意識,環境行為,私領域環境行為,公共領域環境行為,線性機率模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | environmental literacy,environmental awareness,environmental behavior,private sector environmental behavior,public sector environmental behavior,Linear Probability Model,Probit model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904115 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-10-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。