請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74822
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林麗雲(Lih-Yun Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Man-Jung Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭嫚容 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:08:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-12-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-11-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
江明晏(2019年6月30日)。〈國外影視巨擘長驅直入 本土業者嘆台灣大門沒裝〉,《中央社》。取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201906300065.aspx 何佩珊(2018年7月20日)。〈今年全球OTT訂閱用戶上看7.65億人,Netflix佔44%〉,《數位時代》。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/49950/emarketer-global-subscription-ott-market-forecast 吳柏羲(2018)。《付費興起偷閒觀看-OTT偏好與追劇行為狀況》。台北市:資策會產業情報研究所。 李淳、顧振豪(2011)。〈歐盟通訊匯流管制革新經驗對我國之政策意涵——以歐盟與英國隨選視訊服務(VOD)為例〉,李貫英(編),《歐洲聯盟經貿政策之新頁》,頁293-322。台北:台大出版中心。 林淑惠(2019年10月14日)。〈立法納管OTT NCC擬抓大放小〉,《工商時報》。取自https://ctee.com.tw/news/policy/158348.html 唐士哲、魏玓(2014)。《國際傳播:全球視野與地方策略》。台北市:三民。 唐子晴(2018年12月14日)。〈打擊盜版之外,台灣OTT下一個更大難題是愛奇藝、Netflix跨境威逼〉,《數位時代》。取自 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/51661/ott-industry-in-taiwan-netflix-iqiyi 財團法人電信技術中心(2017年8月3日)。〈歐洲議會一讀通過視聽媒體服務指令修正草案〉。取自https://www.ttc.org.tw/mobile/index.php?apps=news&action=more&id=208 馬晨歌、孫佳慧(2018年6月30日)。〈Netflix、亞馬遜、HBO是如何拓展歐洲業務的?〉,《品玩》。取自https://www.pingwest.com/a/172931 高小倩(2016年12月14日)。〈亞馬遜prime video向全球200個國家開放,意料之中的是不包括中國,為啥入華那麼難?〉,《36氪》。取自https://36kr.com/p/5059252 許文宜(2017)。〈OTT TV對既有媒體之衝擊〉,劉幼琍(主編),《OTT TV的創新服務、經營模式與政策法規》,頁 23-56。台北市:五南。 陳筱茵(2017)。資訊儲存服務提供者民事責任探析─以誹謗性言論流通為中心。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/34x58e 喬瑟芬(2015年10月1日)。〈電視產業的沒落,不是過度競爭,是「沒有競爭」:是政治問題,也是人性〉,《鳴人堂》。取自https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/8703/1222259 馮建三(2019年5月14日)。〈OTT變影視活水 學學歐盟〉,《聯合報》。取自https://udn.com/news/story/11321/3810867 馮建三、程宗明譯(1998)。《傳播政治經濟學:再思考與再更新》,台北市:五南。(原書 Mosco, V. [1996]. The political economy of communication: Rethinking and renewal. London, UK: Sage.) 馮建三、蘇蘅(1994)。《歐洲共同體的GATT影視產業政策分析及其對台灣的參考價值評估》。台北:工業技術研究院。 馮建三譯(2003)。《全球好萊塢》,台北市:巨流。(原書 Miller, T., Govil, N., Mcmurria, J., & Maxwell, R. [2001]. Global Hollywood. London, UK: British Film Institute.) 楊安琪(2018年12月14日)。〈對抗境外 OTT 業者、走向國際,OTT 協會「六大建議」盼政府扶助〉,《科技新報》。取自https://technews.tw/2018/12/14/taiwan-ott-association-white-paper/ 葉至誠、葉立誠(2011)。〈文獻資料分析法〉,《研究方法與論文寫作》,頁 138-154。台北市:商鼎文化。 葉志良(2015)。〈我國線上影音內容管制的再塑造:從OTT的發展談起〉,《資訊社會研究》,29: 49-98。 廖禹揚、江明晏、潘姿羽、吳柏緯(2019年9月22日)。〈境外OTT帝國大軍壓境 韓國動起來台灣摸石過河〉,《中央社》。取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201909220040.aspx 劉幼琍、徐也翔(2017)。〈臺灣OTT TV的創新服務與經營模式〉,劉幼琍(主編),《OTT TV的創新服務、經營模式與政策法規》,頁 229-270。台北市:五南。 編輯委員會(2015)。〈Unesco 與 WTO、文化與經濟〉,《傳播、文化與政治》,2: 161-178。 盧非易(2001)。《歐盟影視政策發展之研究》。(行政院國家科學委員會補助科學與技術人員國外短期研究計畫成果報告,NSC 38053F)。 顏理謙(2017年11月2日)。〈台灣OTT協會成立,第一步要對抗共同敵人:盜版〉,《數位時代》。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/46843/taiwan-first-ott-association 羅世宏(2013)。〈媒體壟斷如何防制?媒體多元如何維護?―邁向一個複合式的管制取徑〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,3(2): 1-25。 羅世宏(2018年12月10日)。〈當「追劇」已成潮流 文化部、NCC可有扶植本土OTT TV攻略?〉,《信傳媒》。取自https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/13232 二、 英文部分 Association of Commercial Television in Europe. (2015). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11540 Brussels Talking Lecture Series. (2019, April 3). 30% quota – A trouble-making “guardian” of EU content. Retrieved from https://brusselstalking.blog/2019/04/03/30-quota-a-trouble-making-guardian-of-eu-content/ Busson, A., Paris, T., & Simon, J. (2016). The European audiovisual industry and the digital single market: Trends, issues and policies. DigiWorld Economic Journal, 101(1), 17-44. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2981759 Chakravartty, P., & Sarikakis, K. (2006). Media policy and globalization. UK: Edinburgh University Press. Council of the European Union. (2018, January 10). The ordinary legislative procedure. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/decision-making/ordinary-legislative-procedure/ Digital Europe. (2015, September 28). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11546 Dohmen, F., & Pauly, C. (2014, July 1). Fighting Google: Europe eyes digital agenda to better compete with the US. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/international/business/eu-wants-to-challenge-google-with-new-digital-strategy-a-978521.html Erickson, M., & Dewey, P. (2011). EU media policy and/as cultural policy: Economic and cultural tensions in MEDIA 2007. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(5), 490-509. European Broadcasting Union. (2015, September 30). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11551 European Commission. (2015, October 30). Contributions and preliminary trends of the Public consultation on Audiovisual Media Services (AVMSD). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/contributions-and-preliminary-trends-public-consultation-audiovisual-media-services-avmsd European Commission. (2016a, May 25). Synopsis report of the public consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=15874 European Commission. (2016b, May 25). Digital single market – Commission updates EU audiovisual rules and presents targeted approach to online platforms. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1873_en.htm European Commission. (2018, March 23). General principles. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/general-principles European Commission. (2018, December 5). Revision of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/revision-audiovisual-media-services-directive-avmsd European Commission. (2019, February 15). Shaping the Digital Single Market. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/policies/shaping-digital-single-market European Film Agency Directors. (2016, October 17). AVMS Directive FAQ – Country of Origin principle and financial contributions. Retrieved from http://www.efads.eu/news/avms-directive-faq-country-of-origin-principle-and-financial-contributions.html European Film Agency Directors. (2017, January 19). Busting the myths behind Article 13 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive Review. Retrieved from http://www.efads.eu/news/article-13-of-the-audiovisual-media-services-directive-review.html European Film Agency Directors. (2017, October 12). Audiovisual Media Services Directive: EFADs recommendations for the trilogue meetings. Retrieved from http://www.efads.eu/common-positions/audiovisual-media-services-directive-efads-recommendations-for-the-trilogue-meetings.html European Film Agency Directors. (2018, November 22). Audiovisual Services Media Directive: the EFADs welcome the newly approved and signed text. Retrieved from http://www.efads.eu/news/avmsd-the-efads-welcome-the-newly-approved-and-signed-text.html European Parliament. (2017, April 25). Media services: Same rules needed for TV and internet to protect children better. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20170425IPR72335/media-services-same-rules-needed-for-tv-and-internet-to-protect-children-better Federal Republic of Germany. (2015, November 3). Position paper of the Federal Republic of Germany on the revision of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=12157 Flew, T. (2018). Platforms on trial. InterMEDIA, 46(2), 24-29. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364. Gouvernement français (French Government). (2015). Consultation sur la directive 2010/13/UE relative aux services de médias audiovisuels (directive SMA). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11850 Government Europa. (2018, April 27). EU agrees proposed revisions to audiovisual media legislation. Retrieved from https://www.governmenteuropa.eu/eu-agrees-proposed-revisions-to-audiovisual-media-legislation/86929/ Ingram, M. (2017, January 4). How Google and Facebook have taken over the digital ad industry. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/01/04/google-facebook-ad-industry/ Kelion, L. (2016, May 25). Netflix and Amazon face quota on EU-made content. BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36378078 Kostaki, I. (2017, May 23). EU ministers agree to raise ‘Netflix quota’ to 30%. New Europe. Retrieved from https://www.neweurope.eu/article/eu-council-raises-eu-content-netflix-quota-30/ Mann, C. (2016, May 25). New EC rules: Quotas for Netflix, Prime. Advanced Television. Retrieved from https://advanced-television.com/2016/05/25/ec-proposes-new-audiovisual-media-rules/#.V0XPG4NolFQ.mailto Mann, C. (2018, April 27). EU to set 30% quota for SVoD. Advanced Television. Retrieved from https://advanced-television.com/2018/04/27/svods-set-for-eu-quotas/ McChesney, R. W. (2001). Global media, neoliberalism, and imperialism. Monthly Review, 52(10), 1-19. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London, UK: Sage. Middleton, R. (2017, May 25). Netflix, Amazon face 30% Euro quota. C21 Media. Retrieved from https://www.c21media.net/netflix-amazon-face-30-euro-quota/ Ministère d’Etat (Ministry of State). (2015, July 14). Consultation sur la directive 2010/13/UE relative aux services de médias audiovisuels (directive SMA). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11274 Murdock, G. (1990). Redrawing the map of the communications industries: Concentration and ownership in the era of privatization. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 1-15). London, UK: Sage. Napoli, P. M. (2015). Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers. Telecommunications Policy, 29(9), 751-760. Netflix International B.V. (2015). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11459 Orange. (2015, September 30). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11467 Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2), 134-149. Roxborough, S. (2019, April 2). International streamers investing millions to take on Netflix overseas. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/international-streamers-investing-millions-take-netflix-overseas-1198653 Sacquet, M. (2017, February 28). AVMSD: European audiovisual reform - It’s not all about quotas. Disruptive Competition Project. Retrieved from http://www.project-disco.org/european-union/022817-the-european-audiovisual-reform-its-not-all-about-quotas/ Society of Audiovisual Authors. (2015, September 30). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11577 Society of Audiovisual Authors. (2016, September). Proposal for a Directive amending the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2010/13/EU - SAA comments. Retrieved from https://www.saa-authors.eu/file/36/download Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Stolton, S. (2018, October 2). MEPs vote for more European TV on our screens. EURACTIV. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/media4eu/news/meps-vote-for-more-european-tv-on-our-screens/ Stupp, C. (2017, April 26). MEPs raise Netflix quota to 30% and sharpen rules on violent online posts. EURACTIV. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/meps-raise-netflix-quota-to-30-and-sharpen-rules-on-violent-online-posts/ Stupp, C. (2018, April 28). Broadcasters face new levies to fund European films and TV. EURACTIV. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/broadcasters-face-new-levies-to-fund-european-films-and-tv/ Thomson, S. (2018, June 8). Public and commercial broadcasters divided over revised audiovisual directive. Digital TV Europe. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltveurope.com/2018/06/08/public-and-commercial-broadcaster-divided-over-revised-audiovisual-directive/ Toor, A. (2016, May 25). Netflix and Amazon face quotas for European movies and TV shows. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2016/5/25/11766600/netflix-amazon-prime-quota-european-film-tv UK Government. (2015, September 28). UK response to the consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11282 Valais, S. (2018, May 13). The promotion of European works in the EU. European Audiovisual Observatory. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/presentation-sophie-valais-meeting-cannes-13-may-2018-efad-erga-meetin/16808b05f0 van Cuilenburg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts: Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181-207. Verizon. (2015, September 30). Consultation on Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) - A media framework for the 21st century. Retrieved from. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=11472 Video Advertising Bureau. (2018). You down with OTT? An overview of the competitive video ecosystem. Retrieved from http://www.thevab.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/OTT-Ecosystem-Overview-Final.pdf White, S. (2017, May 24). Council backs 30% European content threshold for audiovisual platforms. EURACTIV. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/council-backs-30-european-content-threshold-for-audiovisual-platforms/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74822 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 當代OTT平台興起,少數跨國科技巨賈壟斷市場,衝擊全球在地視聽與內容產業,台灣也面臨OTT平台管制與本土內容缺乏問題,亟需相關管制立法。面對平台資本主義壟斷,歐盟在全球管制相對積極,延續其自1989年以來的管制邏輯,從《電視無疆界指令》到2018年修正之《視聽媒體服務指令》,共識是文化保護,具備管制共識。歐盟在新版指令中不只進一步納管線上影音分享平台,也強制隨選服務業者提供至少30%的歐洲內容,並允許會員國要求視聽服務業者投入財政捐助,支持歐洲作品生產。為思考台灣相關管制問題,本研究以傳播政治經濟學的理論視角,採用McQuail媒體政策政治過程分析架構,將歐盟指令修法中「線上影音分享平台管制」與「歐洲內容配額與財政捐助」兩大議題之政治和社會情境納入考量,分析各方利害關係人提出之政策主張與價值理念依據,希望能借鏡台灣參考討論。
整體而言,歐盟指令修法可分為支持與反對管制兩大立場,各有其在經濟與社會文化價值的主張論點。支持管制方主要為重視文化保護的國家、傳統廣電業者與內容創作者,反對方則為奉行新自由主義的國家、ISP與電信產業,以及平台等新進業者。政治過程中兩大主要競爭勢力為跨國科技平台和歐盟決策者,歐盟內部又以大國為主要改革驅力,其中法國尤其積極主張提升管制。歐盟小國態度則相對消極,但也並未抵制,體現歐洲長達三十年累積之管制歷史與共識,值得台灣學習借鏡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the rise of modern OTT platforms, a small number of transnational technology giants dominate the global market, having great impact on local audiovisual and content industries. And Taiwan is no exception. Faced with the problems of OTT platform regulation and the lack of local content, the need of relevant regulatory legislation is urgently needed. European Union acts proactively to cope with platform capitalism. From Television without Frontiers in 1989 to the latest amendment to Audiovisual Media Services Directive(AVMSD) in 2018, the consistent regulatory framework shows the social consensus of protecting European culture among the EU. The latest revision of AVMSD not only extends to cover video sharing platforms, but also increases obligations for on-demand services to have at least 30% share of European content in their catalogues. Also, member states are allowed to require media service providers to make financial contributions to the production of European works.
This study is based on the theoretical perspective of political economy of communications, and addresses two main issues in the AVMSD reform: “the regulation of online video sharing platform” and “European content quota and financial contributions”. To have in-depth understandings of the claims and the hidden values supported by different stakeholders during the legislative process, the study adopts McQuail’s framework for identifying public interest claims in media policy assessment, while taking the political and social situation into account. On the whole, the stakeholders are divided into two positions, for or against regulation, and each of which has its own economic and social-cultural arguments. The stakeholders supporting regulation are mainly countries attaching great importance to culture, legacy media providers and content creators. Those who oppose regulation are countries upholding neo-liberalism, ISP and telecommunication industry, and new entrants, such as platforms. In the political process, the two main competitive forces are transnational technology platforms and the European Union decision makers. Within the EU, big member states, notably France, are the driving forces for strengthening regulation in the political process. As for small member states, the attitude towards regulation is less positive, but they have not boycotted the legislation. In conclusion, the EU reform has reflected the merit of EU’s 30-year history of regulation which Taiwan should learn from. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:08:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06342009-1.pdf: 1644137 bytes, checksum: 1427b19904bd6dc5b47748399c09120d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 12 第一節 傳播政治經濟學典範的歐盟媒體政策研究 12 第二節 數位平台的管制 19 第三節 綜合分析與架構 25 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 文獻資料分析法 27 第二節 媒體政策之政治過程分析 28 第三節 資料來源 31 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 線上影音分享平台管制 37 一、支持管制方 39 二、反對管制方 43 第二節 歐洲內容配額與財政捐助 47 一、辯論時期 48 二、協商與決議 55 第三節 小結 67 第五章 結論 72 第一節 研究結果 72 第二節 討論 75 第三節 研究限制與建議 80 參考文獻 82 一、中文部分 82 二、英文部分 85 附錄一 《視聽媒體服務指令》公眾諮詢問卷 93 附錄二 歐盟實施隨選服務業者財政捐助規範之國家 95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 治理線上影音串流服務—以歐盟《視聽媒體服務指令》修法為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Regulating Over-the-Top (OTT) Services: The Case of European Union’s Audiovisual Media Services Directive Reform | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 馮建三(Chien-San Feng),劉昌德(Chang-De Liu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | OTT,平台管制,媒體政策,歐盟,視聽媒體服務指令, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | OTT,platform regulation,media policy,European Union,Audiovisual Media Services Directive, | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904297 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-11-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。