請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74816
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱振豪(Chen-Hao Chiu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yin-Ching Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張殷綮 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:08:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allen, J. S., Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(6), 3171-3183. Allen, J. S., Miller, J. L., DeSteno, D. (2003). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(1), 544-552. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390-412. Baese-Berk, M. M. (2010). An examination of the relationship between speech perception and production (Thesis). Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. Beddor, P. S., Gottfried, T. L. (1995). Methodological issues in cross-language speech perception research with adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 207-232). Baltimore: York Press. Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 171-206). Baltimore: York Press. Boersma, P., Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [version 6.1.06]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ Borden, G., Gerber, A., Milsark, G. (1983). Production and perception of the /r/‐/l/ contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning, 33(4), 499-526. Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299-2310. Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436-458. Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., Viemeister, N. F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 961-970. Chen, Y., Pederson, E. (2017). Directing attention during perceptual training: A preliminary study of phonetic learning in southern min by Mandarin speakers. INTERSPEECH, 1770-1774. Cooper, W. E. (1974). Selective adaptation for acoustic cues of voicing in initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 2(4), 303-313. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787-816. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(4), 575-600. Escudero, P. (2007). Second-language phonology: the role of perception. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Phonology in context (p. 109-134). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press. Flege, J. E. (2016). The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. Plenary address delivered at New Sounds, Aarhus, Denmark. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Gooch, R., Saito, K., Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60, 117-127. Hardison, D. M. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 495. Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 255-270. Heeger, D. (2006). Signal detection theory. Retrieved from https://www.cns.nyu.edu/~david/courses/perception/lecturenotes/sdt/sdt.html Jügler, J., Zimmerer, F., Möbius, B., Draxler, C. (2015). The effect of high-variability training on the perception and production of French stops by German native speakers. In S. Möller, H. Ney, B. Möbius, E. Nöth, S. Steidl (Eds.), Proceedings of interspeech 2015. speech beyond speech. towards a better understanding of the most important biosignal (Vol. 2, p. 806-810). Baixas: ISCA. Jenkins, J. J., Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (1995). Cross-language speech perception: Perspective and promise. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 463-479). Baltimore: York Press. Kuhl, P. K., Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect'. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 121-154). Baltimore: York Press. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of educational research, 47(2), 211-232. Lasagabaster, D., Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students'versus teachers'perceptions. Language awareness, 14(2-3), 112-127. Leather, J. (1999). Second-language speech research: An introduction. In J. Leather (Ed.), Phonological issues in language learning (p. 1-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Lee, A. H., Lyster, R. (2016a). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 35-64. Lee, A. H., Lyster, R. (2016b). Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language learning, 66(4), 809-833. Lee, A. H., Lyster, R. (2017). Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy? Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2), 371. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in second language acquisition, 37-63. Lenth, R. (2020). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka Least-Squares Means. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 60(2), 309-365. Lin, P. T. (2015). Taiwanese grammar: A concise reference. Greenhorn Media. Lisker, L., Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384-422. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 94(3), 1242-1255. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874-886. Logan, J. S., Pruitt, J. S. (1995). Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 351-378). Baltimore: York Press. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The modern language journal, 82(3), 357-371. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language learning, 48(2), 183-218. Lyster, R., Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(2), 453-498. Lyster, R., Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in second language acquisition, 37-66. Lyster, R., Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167-184. Lyster, R., Saito, K. (2010). Corrective feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302. Lyster, R., Saito, K., Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language teaching, 46(1), 1-40. Lyster, R., Sato, M. (2013). Skill acquisition theory and the role of practice in L2 development. Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition, 71, 92. Mackey, A., Gass, S., McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in second language acquisition, 22(4), 471-497. Macmillan, N. A., Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Maye, J., Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. In Proceedings of the 24th annual boston university conference on language development (Vol. 2, p. 522-533). McClaskey, C. L., Pisoni, D. B., Carrell, T. D. (1983). Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing. Perception psychophysics, 34(4), 323-330. McClelland, J. L., Fiez, J. A., McCandliss, B. D. (2002). Teaching the /r/–/l/ discrimination to Japanese adults: behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology Behavior, 77(4-5), 657-662. Myers, J. (2019). Yet another statistics-for-linguists book [Unpublished Work]. Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. H., Pham, M. T. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of pragmatics, 44(4), 416-434. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language learning, 51(4), 719-758. Pallier, C. (2002). Computing discriminability and bias with the R software. Retrieved from http://www.pallier.org/ressources/aprime/aprime(LastviewedJune12,2015) Pan, H. H. (1994). The voicing contrasts of Taiwanese (Amoy) initial stops: Data from adults and children (Thesis). Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 8(2), 297-314. Pisoni, D. B., Lazarus, J. H. (1974). Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(2), 328-333. Pisoni, D. B., Lively, S. E. (1995). Variability and invariance in speech perception: A new look at some old problems in perceptual learning. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 433-459). Baltimore: York Press. R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ Richards, J. C., Platt, J., Platt, H. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics 2nd ed. Essex, England: Longman. Rvachew, S., Jamieson, D. G. (1992). Remediating speech production errors with sound identification training. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 16, 201-210. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928. Saito, K. (2013). The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language learning, 63(3), 499-529. Saito, K. (2015). Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 377-409. Saito, K. (2018). Corrective feedback and the development of L2 pronunciation. In H. Nassaji E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Saito, K., Lyster, R. (2012a). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language learning, 62(2), 595-633. Saito, K., Lyster, R. (2012b). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL quarterly, 46(2), 387-398. Saito, K., Wu, X. (2014). Communicative focus on form and second language suprasegmental learning: Teaching Cantonese learners to perceive Mandarin tones. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 647-680. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158. Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language teaching research, 10(4), 361-392. Stanislaw, H., Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior research methods, instruments, computers, 31(1), 137-149. Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (p. 3-48). Baltimore: York Press. Styler, W. (2015). Normalize_duration [praat script]. Retrieved from https://github.com/stylerw/styler_praat_scripts/blob/master/normalize_duration.praat Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (p. 235-252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Tees, R. C., Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 38(4), 579-590. Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. Calico Journal, 28(3), 744-765. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners'ability to write accurately. Journal of second language Writing, 16(4), 255-272. Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., Flege, J. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33(3), 263-290. Wang, X., Munro, M. J. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539-552. Whalen, D. H., Abramson, A. S., Lisker, L., Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(4), 2152-2159. Whyte, M. M., Karolick, D. M., Nielsen, M. C., Elder, G. D., Hawley, W. T. (1995). Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 195-203. Winne, P. H., Butler, D. L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. International encyclopedia of education, 2, 5738-5775. Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’preference of corrective feedback types. Language awareness, 17(1), 78-93. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74816 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 以往有關修正性回饋(corrective feedback) 的文獻探討多著重於發音上的修正性回饋(pronunciation-focused corrective feedback),並證實其在矯正發音上帶來一定的功效。相對而言,著重於語音感知層面的修正性回饋(perception-focused corrective feedback) 較不受重視,尤其是對可能會造成不同認知處理過程作為學習策略,因而再細分為不同類別的語音感知修正性回饋,相關的文獻探討可謂寥寥無幾、屈指可數。語音感知上的修正性回饋宣稱能重塑、確認並強化學習者對目標語言中逐漸發展的語音心理表徵,從而使學習者能正確分辨出語音間的細微差別。本文旨在探討不同型態的語音感知修正性回饋是如何影響臺灣華語母語使用者判別臺灣閩南語的清濁音。在訓練階段,受試者會隨機分配至不同組別,接收三種不同形式的聽覺回饋與視覺刺激,分別為回答錯誤的警示加上目標音節、非目標音節,抑或是目標音節與非目標音節的組合(組合式),來當作受試者判別臺灣閩南語清濁音的基準。此系列實驗共包括兩個子實驗,第一個實驗主要討論不同形式的聽覺回饋與視覺刺激是否會強化學習者的學習;第二個實驗將探討由不同發音人錄製而成的聽覺刺激材料是否會造成不同的語音感知訓練成果。研究結果證實了語音感知修正性回饋的成效。而三種不同型態的聽覺回饋中,尤以組合式的聽覺回饋,透過提供音素最小辨義詞對(phonemic minimal pair) 的方式,帶來最佳的訓練功效。然而,將訓練而來的語音辨識能力歸納至其他尚未訓練過的音節卻十分有限。研究成果亦顯示受試者可能會利用個人的語音特徵,來辨別臺語的清濁音,從而影響不同型態的語音感知修正性回饋所引起的表現。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Corrective feedback (CF) is largely concerned with pronunciation-focused feedback and has proven its positive effects on modifying articulation. In comparison, perception-focused CF is rather understudied, especially for different types of CF which may trigger different kinds of cognitive processing as learning strategies. Perception-focused CF is alleged to entrench learners’ mental representation of the target phonemes. The present study constitutes two experiments to investigate to what extent Taiwan Mandarin speakers can correctly identify voicing contrasts in Taiwan Southern Min using different types of perception-focused CF. Auditory and visual feedback is provided during the training session. For incorrectly identified responses, one of the three auditory CFs (a rejection followed by a target form, a rejection followed by a nontarget form, and a rejection followed by target and nontarget forms) was provided to direct their attention to related cues. While Experiment I examined whether different CF types would induce differential effects in acquiring a non-native contrast, Experiment II furthered the issue of high-variability perception training, in which stimuli were produced by multiple speakers. The results showed positive effects of all three types of auditory CF while combinatory CF which provided information with a minimal pair (a rejection followed by target and nontarget forms) was the most effective, in line with previous findings. However, generalizations based on corrective feedback (i.e., transfer from trained to untrained stimuli) were only limited. The comparison between the two experiments also suggest that participants may rely on speaker-specific characteristics to identify voicing differences. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:08:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0102202110343000.pdf: 4354912 bytes, checksum: a87f0ddc3f566a87329eb0e7b424c03b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research background 2 1.2 Aims of the study 5 1.3 Organization 7 Chapter 2 Literature Review 8 2.1 Using feedback as a learning strategy 8 2.1.1 Corrective feedback (CF) 9 2.1.2 Pronunciation-focused CF 10 2.1.3 Perception-focused CF 12 2.2 The malleability of voicing feature 14 2.3 High-variability perception training 15 2.4 Voicing in Taiwan Southern Min 16 Chapter 3 Experiment Ⅰ: Single Speaker 19 3.1 Method 19 3.1.1 Participants 19 3.1.2 Stimuli 19 3.1.3 Procedure 22 3.2 Data analysis 28 3.3 Results 33 3.3.1 Phonetic judgment 33 3.3.2 Overall performance 35 3.3.3 Training effect 37 3.3.4 Transfer effect 39 3.3.5 Accuracy rate in the training session 43 3.4 Discussion 45 Chapter 4 Experiment Ⅱ: Multiple Speakers 51 4.1 Method 51 4.1.1 Participants 51 4.1.2 Stimuli 51 4.1.3 Procedure 54 4.2 Data analysis 55 4.3 Results 57 4.3.1 Phonetic judgment 57 4.3.2 Overall performance 59 4.3.3 Training effect 61 4.3.4 Transfer effect 63 4.3.5 Accuracy rate in the training session 66 4.4 Discussion 68 Chapter 5 General Discussion 74 5.1 Summary of findings 74 5.1.1 Benefits of CF for speech perception training 74 5.1.2 Benefits of combinatory CF for speech perception learning 78 5.1.3 Comparison of Experiments Ⅰ and Ⅱ 79 5.2 Methodological differences in comparison to Lee Lyster (2016b) 80 5.3 Limitations and future directions 82 5.4 Conclusion 84 Appendices 93 A Irrelevant Feedback in the Control Group 93 B Questionnaire Reports (Experiment Ⅰ) 94 C Questionnaire Reports (Experiment Ⅱ) 96 D Stimuli in the Sub-analysis of the Transfer Effect 98 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 修正性回饋在非母語語音對立下之感知成效:以臺灣閩南語清濁音為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Corrective Feedback on Perception of Non-native Contrasts: A Training Study of Voicing Contrast in Taiwan Southern Min | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 馮怡蓁(Yee-Jean Fon),甯俐馨(Li-Hsin Ning) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 修正性回饋,語言感知,語音感知訓練,臺灣閩南語,清濁音, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | corrective feedback,speech perception,high-variability perception training,voicing,Taiwan Southern Min, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100314 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0102202110343000.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。