請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74701
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許鉅秉 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsu-Kuei Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊祖魁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:06:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-01-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-01-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Beamon, B.M. 1999. Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information management. 12(4): 332-342.
Banerjee, S. B., E. S. Iyer, R. K. Kashyap. 2003. Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents, and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing. 67(2): 106-122. Thierry, M., M. Salomon, J. V. Nunen, L. V. Wassen,hove. 1995. Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management. California Management Review. 37: 114-135. Geyer, R., L. N. Van Wassenhove, A. Atasu. 2007. The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles. Management Science. 53(1): 88-100. Toyota. 2014, Environmental Responsibility. https://global.toyota/en/sustainability/. Accessed Jul. 1. 2019. Corbett, C. J., R. D. Klassen. 2006. Extending the horizons: environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Management & Service Operations Management. 8(1): 5-22. Zhu, Q. H., Y. Geng, T. Fujita, S. Hashimoto. 2010. Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers: Case studies in Japanese large companies. Management Research Review. 33(4): 380-392. Sheu, J. B. 2016. Buyer Behavior in Quality-Dominated Multi-Sourcing Recyclable-Material Procurement of Green Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management. 25(3): 477-497. Chen, Y. S. 2009. The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust. Journal of Business Ethics. 93(2): 307-319. Chen, C. L. 2001. Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development. Management Science. 47(2): 250-263. Green, K., Morton B., New S. 1998. Green purchasing and supply policies: do they improve companies’ environmental performance? Supply Chain Management. 3(2): 89-95. Drozdenko, R., M. Jensen, D. Coelho. 2011. Pricing of Green Products: Premiums Paid, Consumer Characteristics and Incentives. International Journal of Business, Marketing, and Decision Sciences. 67(2): 106-116. Seshadri, S., K. Chatterjee, G. L. Lilien. 1991. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Science. 10(3): 246-263. Burke, G. J., J. E. Carrillo, A. J. Vakharia. 2007. Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies. European Journal of Operational Research. 182(1): 95-112. Federgruen, A., N. Yang. 2009. Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Operations Research. 57(6): 1451-1468. Balcik, B., D. Ak. 2014. Supplier selection for framework agreements in humanitarian relief. Production and Operations Management. 23(6): 1028-1041. Mendoza, A., J. A. Ventura. 2012. Analytical models for supplier selection and order quantity allocation. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 36(8): 3826-3835. Silbermayr, L., S. Minner. 2014. A multiple sourcing inventory model under disruption risk. International Journal of Production Economics. 149(1): 37-46. Dotoli, M., M. Falagario. 2012. A hierarchical model for optimal supplier selection in multiple sourcing contexts. International Journal of Production Research. 50(11): 2953-2967. Levina, N., N. Su. 2008. Global multisourcing strategy: the emergence of a supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decision Sciences. 39(3): 541-570. Glock, C. H., J. M. Ries. 2013. Reducing lead time risk through multiple sourcing: the case of stochastic demand and variable lead time. International Journal of Production Research. 51(1): 43-56. Hoffman, A. J. 1997. From Heresy to Dogma. New Lexington: San Francisco, CA. Wood, D. J., R. E. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical researchon corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 3(3): 229-267. Hart, S. L., G. Ahuja. 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 5(1): 30-37. Ginsberg, J. M., P. N. Bloom. 2004. Choosing the Right Green Marketing Strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review. 79-84. Eltayeb, T. K., S. Zailani, T. Ramayah. 2010. Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 55(5): 495-506. Lee, H., K. O’Marah, G. John. 2012. The Chief Supply Chain Officer Report 2012. SCM World Annual Report. Rapture World Ltd, available at https://www.scmr.com/subs/E2open_SCMWorld_CSCOreport2012.pdf Líšková, Z. D., E. Cudlínová, P. Pártlová, D. Petr. 2016. Importance of green marketing and its potential. Visegard Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. 5(2): 61-64. Rex, E., H. Baumann. 2007. Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15(6): 567-576. Prakash, A. 2002. Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 11(5): 285-297. Shu, C., K. Z. Zhou, Y. Xiao, S. Gao. 2016. How green management influences product innovation in China: the role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics. 133(3): 471-485. Drumwright, M. E. 1994. Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing. 58(3): 1-19. Panasonic. 2019. Procurement Policy. https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/for-suppliers.html Accessed Jul. 15. 2019. SHARP. 2018. Green procurement guideline. https://corporate.jp.sharp/corporate/eco/supplier/g_procure/pdf/gguide_e.pdf Accessed Jul. 15. 2019. Sony. 2001. Green procurement. https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/procurementinfo/green.html Accessed Jul. 15. 2019. Supply Chain Sustainability School. 2017. School Impact Survey 2017. https://www.supplychainschool.co.uk/default/about-the-school/impact-survey-2017.aspx Accessed Jul. 15. 2019. Renda, A., J. Pelkmans, C. Egenhofer, L. Schrefler, G. Luchetta, C. Selcuki, J. Ballesteros, A. C. Zirnhelt. 2012. The uptake of green public procurement in the EU27. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/CEPS-CoE-GPP%20MAIN%20REPORT.pdf Accessed Jul. 15. 2019. Clifford, S., A. Martin. 2011. As consumers cut spending, ‘green’ products lose allure. New York Times, April 22, B1. Chien, M. K., L. H. Shih. 2007. An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 4(3): 383-394 Li, C., F. Liu, H. Cao, Q. Wang. 2009. A stochastic dynamic programming based model for uncertain production planning of remanufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research. 47(13): 3657-3668. Wu, Z. H., M. Pagell. 2011. Balancing priorities: Decision making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management. 29(6): 577-590. Zhu, Q. H., J. Sarkis. 2004. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management. 22(3): 265-289. Linton, J. D., R. Klassen, V. Jayaraman. 2007. Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management. 25(6): 1075-1082. Kleindorfer, P. R., K. Singhai, L. N. V. Wassenhove. 2009. Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management. 14(4): 482-492. Klassen, R. D., C. P. McLaughlin. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science. 42(8): 1199-1215. Handfield, R., S. V. Walton, R. Sroufe, S. A. Melnyk. 2002. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 141(1): 70-87. Zhu, Q. H., J. Sarkis, K. H. Lai. 2008. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics. 111(2): 261-273. Vachon, S., R. D. Klassen. 2008. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics. 111(2): 299-315. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., P. V. Beek, L. Hordijk, L. N. V. Wassenhove. 1995. Interactions between operational research and environmental management. European Journal of Operational Research. 85(2): 229-243. Sheu, J. B., Y. H. Chou, C. C. Hu. 2005. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 41(4): 287-313. Florida, R. 1996. Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review. 39(1): 80-105. Sarkis, J., J. J. Cordeiro. 2001. An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research. 135(1): 102-113. Dotoli, M., M. P. Fanti, C. Meloni, M. C. Zhou. 2006. Design and optimization of integrated e-supply chain for agile and environmentally conscious manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybermetics – Part A: Systems and Humans. 36(1): 62-75. Min, H., W. P. Galle. 1997. Green purchasing strategies: trends and implications. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 33(2): 10-17. Goebel, P., C. Reuter, R. Pibernik, C. Sichtmann, L. Bals. 2018. Purchasing managers’ willingness to pay for attributes that constitute sustainability. Journal of Operations Management. 62: 44-58. Walker, H., S. Brammer. 2012. The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics. 140(1): 256-268. Qin, J. D., X. W. Liu, W. Pedrycz. 2017. An extender multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research. 258(2): 626-638. Hashemi, S. H., A. Karimi, M. Tavana. 2015. An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics. 159: 178-191. Ghodsypour, S. H., C. O’Brien. 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics. 56-57: 199-212. Humphreys, P. K., Y. K. Wong, F. T. S. Chan. 2003. Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 138(1-3): 349-356. Lin, C. W. R., H. Y. S. Chen. 2004. A fuzzy strategic alliance selection framework for supply chain partnering under limited evaluation resources. Computers in Industry. 55(2): 159-179. Dobos, I., G. Vörösmarty. 2014. Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators. International Journal of Production Economics. 157: 273-278. Tang, S. Y., H. Gurnani, D. Gupta. 2014. Managing disruptions in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability. Production and Operations Management. 23(7): 1198-1211. Manuj, I., J. T. Mentzer. 2011. Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics. 29(1): 133-155. Chen, Y. H. F., C. A. Yano. 2010. Improving supply chain performance and managing risk under weather-related demand uncertainty. Management Science. 56(8): 1380-1397. Rezapour, S., R. Z. Farahani, M. Pourakbar. 2017. Resilient supply chain network design under competition: a case study. European Journal of Operational Research. 259(3): 1017-1035. Ha, A. Y., L. Li, S. M. Ng. 2003. Price and delivery logistics competition in a supply chain. Management Science. 49(9): 1139-1153. PrasannaVenkatesan, S., M. Goh. 2016. Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 95(1): 124-142. Karan, G., N. Serguei. 2013. Business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 15(4): 537-544. Drake, D. F., S. Spinler. 2013. Sustainable Operations Management: an enduring stream or a passing fancy? Manufacturing & Serivce Operations Management. 15(4): 689-700. Chiou, Z. Y., H. K. Chan, F. Lettice, S. H. Chung. 2011. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 47(6): 822-836. Chan, Y. K. Ricky, H. W. He, H. K. Chan, Y. C. Wang William. 2012. Environmental orientation and corporate performance: the mediation mechanisms of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity. Industrial Marketing Management. 41(4): 621-630. Lee, S. Y., R. D. Klassen. 2009. Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small- and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Production and Operations Management. 17(6): 573-586. Handfield, R. B., S. V. Walton, L. K. Seegers, S. A. Melnyk. 1997. ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management. 15(4): 193-315. Montabon, F., R. Sroufe, R. Narasimhan. 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management. 25(5): 998-1014. Villena, V. H., D. A. Gioia. 2018. On the riskiness of lower-tier suppliers: managing sustainability in supply networks. Journal of Operations Management. 64: 65-87. Jacobs, B. W., V. R. Singhal, R. Subramanian. 2010. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management. 28(5): 430-441. Dutt, N., A. A. King. 2014. The judgment of garbage: end-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Science. 60(7): 1812-1828. Tong, X., K. H. Lai, Q. H. Zhu, S. L. Zhao, J. H. Chen, T. C. E. Cheng. 2018. Multinational enterprise buyers’ choices for extending corporate social responsibility practices to suppliers in emerging markets: A multi-method study. Journal of Operations Management. 63: 25-43. Dow, D., D. Samson, S. Ford. 1999. Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management. 8(1): 1-27. Foster Jr, S. T. 2008. Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management. Journal of Operations Management. 26(4): 461-467. Kaynak, H., J. L. Hartley. 2008. A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management. 26(4): 468-489. Darnall, N. 2009. Regulatory stringency, green production offsets, and organizations’ financial performance. Public Administration Review. 69(3): 418-434. Yang, C. L., S. P. Lin, Y. H. Chan, C. Sheu. 2010. Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics. 123(1): 210-220. King, A. A., M. J. Lenox. 2009. Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and Operations Management. 10(3): 244-256. Kleindorfer P. R., K. Singhai, L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2005. Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management. 14(4): 482-492. Agrawal, V. V., S. Ülkü. 2012. The role of modular upgradability as a green design strategy. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 15(4): 640-648. Guide Jr, V. D. R. 2000. Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management. 18(4): 467-483. Guide Jr, V. D. R., V. Jayaraman, J. D. Linton. 2003. Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. Journal of Operations Management. 21(3): 259-279. Noori, H., C. Chen. 2003. Applying scenario-driven strategy to integrate environmental management and product design. Production and Operations Management. 12(3): 353-368. Al-e-hashem, S. M. J. M., A. Baboli, Z. Sazvar. 2013. A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research. 230(1): 26-41. Demeester, L., M. Qi, L. N. V. Wassenhove. 2013. Plant networks for processing recyclable materials. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 15(4): 670-688. Gong, X. T., S. X. Zhou. 2013. Optimal production planning with emissions trading. Operations Research. 61(4): 908-924. Fahimnia, B., J. Sarkis, A, Eshragh. 2015. A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning: a leanness-versus-greenness analysis. Omega. 54: 173-190. Stucki, T. 2019. Which firms benefit from investments in green energy technologies?-The effect of energy costs. Research Policy. 48(3): 546-555. Örsdemir, A., V. Deshpande, A. K. Parlaktürk. Is servicization a win-win strategy? Profitability and environmental implications of servicization. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 21(3): 674-691. Zhang, F. Q., R. Y. Zhang. 2018. Trade-in remanufacturing, customer purchasing behavior, and government policy. Manufacturing Service & Operations Management. 20(4): 601-616. Kim, S. H. 2015. Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production. Operations Research. 63(1): 1-20. King, A., M. Lenox. 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science. 48(2): 289-299. Mehdi, G., F. Neng, J. Tongdan. 2017. Multistage stochastic optimization for production-inventory planning with intermittent renewable energy. Production and Operations Management. 26(3): 409-425. Conti, C., M. L. Mancusi, F. Sanna-Randaccio, R. Sestini, E. Verdolini. 2018. Transition towards a green economy in Europe: Innovation and knowledge integration in the renewable energy sector. Research Policy. 47(10): 1996-2009. Martin, G. 2014. Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Research Policy. 43(2): 301-317. Rogge, K. S., J. Schleich. 2018. Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany. Research Policy. 47(9): 1639-1654. Chan, T. Y., C. W. Y. Wong, K. H. Lai, V. Y. H. Lun, C. T. Ng, E. W. T. Ngai. 2015. Green service: construct development and measurement validation. Production and Operations Management. 25(3): 432-457. Krass, D., T. Nedorezov, A. Ovchinnikov. 2013. Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management. 22(5): 1035-1055. Mota, B., M. I. Gomes, A. Carvalho, A. P. Barbosa-Povoa. 2018. Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modeling approach under uncertainty. Omega. 77: 32-57. Genovese, A., A. A. Acquaye, A. Figueroa, S. C. Lenny Koh. 2017. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega. 66, Part B: 344-357. Böhringer, C., U. Moslener, U. Oberndorfer, A. Ziegler. 2012. Clean and productive? Empirical evidence from the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy. 41(2): 442-451. Chen, Y. M. J., J. B. Sheu. 2009. Environmental-regulation pricing strategies for green supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 45(5): 667-677. Zhou, S. X., Y. K. Yu. 2011. Technical note-Optimal product acquisition, pricing, and inventory management for systems with remanufacturing. Operations Research. 59(2): 514-521. Wu, C. H. 2012. Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research. 222(2): 204-215. Olson E. L. 2013. It’s not easy being green: the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 41(2): 171-184. Abbey, J. D., J. D. Blackburn, V. D. R. Guide Jr. 2015. Optimal pricing for new and remanufactured products. Journal of Operations Management. 36: 130-146. Yenipazarli, A., A. Vakharia. 2015. Pricing, market coverage and capacity: Can green and brown products co-exist? European Journal of Operational Research. 242(1): 304-315. Dai, R., J. X. Zhang. 2017. Green process innovation and differentiated pricing strategies with environmental concerns of South-North markets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 98: 132-150. Hong, Z. F., H. Wang, Y. G. Yu, 2018. Green product pricing with non-green product reference. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 115: 1-15. Saraph, J. V., P. G. Benson, R. G. Schroeder. 1989. An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences. 20(4): 810-829. Deng, S. J., W. Elmaghraby. 2009. Supplier selection via tournaments. Production and Operations Management. 14(2): 252-267. Cui, Z. J., C. Loch, B. Grossmann, R. He. 2011. How provider selection and management contribute to successful innovation outsourcing: an empirical study at Siemens. Production and Operations Management. 21(1): 29-48. Tse, Y. K., K. H. Tan. 2012. Managing product quality risk and visibility in multi-layer supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics. 139(1): 49-57. Handfield, R. B., G. L. Ragatz, K. J. Petersen, R. M. Monczka. 1999. Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review. 42(1): 59-82. Moorthy, K. S., I. P. L. Png. 1992. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Science. 38(3): 345-359. Chiu, C. H., T. M. Choi, X. Dai, B. Shen, J. H. Zheng. 2018. Optimal advertising budget allocation in luxury fashion markets with social influences: a mean-variance analysis. Production and Operations Management. 27(8):1611-1629. Blattberg, R. C., K. J. Wisniewski. 1989. Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Science. 8(4): 291-309. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74701 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文主要探討問題為綠色供應鏈模式下,以市場需求狀況為基礎的製造商,面對回收原料的不同供應商品質存有差異的情況下之最佳採購定價行為。模型在消費者對單一產品的效用為隨機的情況下,計算一製造商在其所生產但品質可分高低的兩類產品各自市佔狀況以及品質標準,並以此為基礎推斷製造商的最佳原料採購數量和對兩供應商的最佳採購價格。本研究對三種情況進行敏感度分析,分別為:一、在製造商所生產的同種產品之高、低品質款項品質已決定的情況下,隨著高品質款項相對於低品質款項的市佔率上升,製造商與兩供應商間的相對利潤變化;二、隨著高品質原物料轉換為高品質成品比例的變化,製造商與兩供應商的利潤變化;三、隨著高品質原物料轉換為高品質成品比例的變化,兩供應商各自相對於製造商的議價能力變化。透過將製造商的利潤最大化作為主要目標,可計算出兩款產品的相對市佔、價格,以及製造商對兩供應商的最佳訂購量及最佳採購價。本文並以台灣紡織及電子業製造商為例,透過將其採購價及商品售價標準化,檢驗概念模型的有效程度。從資料驗證的結果可發現,三種敏感度分析的推斷方向在真實情況中皆存在,可知在綠色供應鏈中的採購決策須考量面向之多。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The main focus in this study is the optimal procurement pricing behavior of a buyer firm in a market-driven situation with the supply quality of suppliers different in the situation of a green supply chain. The model calculates the respective market share and quality level of two types of the same kind of green product produced by the same buyer firm under the circumstance that a consumer’s utility of buying a product is random, and then further figures out the best procurement quantity and procurement price toward the two suppliers. This study then makes sensitivity analyses for three variables: 1). As the quality levels of the two types of green product are determined, with the relative market share of the high-quality type increases, the following change in the relative profit of the buyer firm and the two suppliers; 2). As the ratio of high-quality material that are transformed into high-quality end product changes, the change in profits of the buyer firm and the two suppliers; and 3). As the ratio of high-quality material that are transformed into high-quality end product changes, the change of bargaining power of the two suppliers toward the buyer firm, respectively. By setting the maximization of the profit of the buyer firm, the relative market share and price of the two types of green product as well as the optimal procurement quantity and procurement price of the buyer firm can be calculated. Furthermore, this study takes several Taiwanese companies manufacturers in the textile and electronics industry as an example and normalizes their procurement price and selling price to testify the effectiveness of the conceptual model. According to the result of verification, the three propositions exist in the real business world, and thus we can realize the complexity of procurement decisions in a green supply chain. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:06:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06741001-1.pdf: 767450 bytes, checksum: 0f72bea98cc816a4be3a0d8a67c167ee (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction..................................3
2. Literature Review.............................7 2.1 Green supply chain...........................7 2.2 Green Procurement............................9 3. Research Framework...........................11 4. Assumptions..................................13 4.1. The suppliers can be divided into high and low supply quality ones.............................14 4.2. Only one type of product can be produced by materials of both quality levels................15 4.3. Both the buyer firm and consumers in the market are quality-oriented................................15 4.4. The utility of buying the products is uncertain ................................................16 4.5. The two types of products can not cannibalize the market of each other, and the two suppliers can not collude.........................................17 4.6. The ratio of input/output in transformation of both high- and low-quality materials into the target types of green product is 1..............................17 4.7. The price-quantity relationship between the buyer firm and the suppliers follows the rule of economics. ................................................18 5. Market-Driven Pricing Model..................18 5.1. Modeling Consumer Demand...................19 COROLLARY 5.1 The optimal price of both types of the green product can exist simultaneously..........21 5.2. Modeling buyer firm utility................22 5.2.1. Transformation of green materials into products ................................................22 5.2.2. Buyer firm utility.......................23 5.3. Modeling supplier utility..................25 6. Normative Model..............................26 6.1. Random utility market demand model.........26 7. Sensitivity Analysis.........................29 Proposition 7.1. Given qH and qL, the relative profit of buyer firm and supplier of higher quality decreases as the high-quality type occupies more of the market share ................................................30 Proposition 7.2. Given qH and qL, R(H) can not be too low, and as R(H) increases, the profit of supplier A decreases while that of supplier B increases. But the buyer firm gets the highest relative profit when all material from supplier A is transformed into high-quality type............................................32 Proposition 7.3. Given qH and qL, as R(H) decreases, the bargaining power of supplier A may increase, but only to a certain point.................................34 8. Validation of proposition....................35 8.1. Validation of Proposition 7.1..............35 8.2. Validation of Proposition 7.2..............36 8.3. Validation of Proposition 7.3..............37 9. Conclusions and Limitations..................38 9.1. Conclusions................................39 9.2 Limitations.................................41 References......................................44 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 綠色供應鏈下雙回收原料供應源中以市場為導向的製造商採購定價行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Market-Driven Buyer Pricing Behavior in Supply-Quality-Oriented Dual-Sourcing Recyclable-Material Procurement of Green Supply Chains | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭人介,陳穆臻 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 綠色供應鏈,製造商,採購,議價,最佳化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Green supply chain,buyer firm,and procurement,negotiation,optimal, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000049 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-01-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 749.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。