請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74479完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江昭皚 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Lun Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江侑倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:38:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahn, J., Shin, D., Kim, K., and Yang, J. J. S. 2017. Indoor air quality analysis using deep learning with sensor data. Sensors 17(11), 2476.
Ajmani, G. S., Suh, H. H., and Pinto, J. M. 2016. Effects of ambient air pollution exposure on olfaction: a review. Environmental Health Perspectives 124(11), 1683-1693. Athira, V., Geetha, P., Vinayakumar, R., and Soman, K. P. 2018. Deepairnet: Applying recurrent networks for air quality prediction. Procedia Computer Science 132, 1394-1403. Barba, C. T., Mateos, M. A., Soto, P. R., Mezher, A. M., and Igartua, M. A. 2012. Smart city for VANETs using warning messages, traffic statistics and intelligent traffic lights. In 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 902-907). IEEE. Bengio, Y., Simard, P., and Frasconi, P. 1994. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 5(2), 157-166. Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., and Ljung, G. M. 2015. Time series analysis: forecasting and control: John Wiley & Sons. Brauer, M., Hoek, G., Van Vliet, P., Meliefste, K., Fischer, P. H., Wijga, A., . . . Brunekreef, B. 2002. Air pollution from traffic and the development of respiratory infections and asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166(8), 1092-1098. Bui, T. C., Le, V. D., and Cha, S. K. 2018. A Deep Learning Approach for Air Pollution Forecasting in South Korea Using Encoder-Decoder Networks & LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07891. Chen, J., Lu, J., Avise, J. C., DaMassa, J. A., Kleeman, M. J., and Kaduwela, A. P. 2014. Seasonal modeling of PM2.5 in California's San Joaquin Valley. Atmospheric Environment 92, 182-190. Chiang, K. C., and Liao, C. M. 2006. Heavy incense burning in temples promotes exposure risk from airborne PMs and carcinogenic PAHs. Science of the Total Environment 372(1), 64-75. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. 2014. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1259. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555. Du, S., Li, T., Yang, Y., and Horng, S. J. 2018. Deep Air Quality Forecasting Using Hybrid Deep Learning Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04783. Elman, J. L. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14(2), 179-211. Fan, J., Li, Q., Hou, J., Feng, X., Karimian, H., and Lin, S. 2017. A spatiotemporal prediction framework for air pollution based on deep rnn. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 4, 15. Feng, X., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Jin, L., and Wang, J. 2015. Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2. 5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmospheric Environment 107, 118-128. Feng, Y., Zhang, W., Sun, D., and Zhang, L. 2011. Ozone concentration forecast method based on genetic algorithm optimized back propagation neural networks and support vector machine data classification. Atmospheric Environment 45(11), 1979-1985. Fenger, J. 1999. Urban air quality. Atmospheric Environment 33(29), 4877-4900. Forastiere, F., Stafoggia, M., Tasco, C., Picciotto, S., Agabiti, N., Cesaroni, G., and Perucci, C. A. 2007. Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: differential exposure or differential susceptibility. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 50(3), 208-216. Freeman, B. S., Taylor, G., Gharabaghi, B., and Thé, J. 2018. Forecasting air quality time series using deep learning. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 68(8), 866-886. Gardner, M. W., and Dorling, S. 1998. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmospheric Environment 32(14-15), 2627-2636. Gauderman, W. J., Avol, E., Lurmann, F., Kuenzli, N., Gilliland, F., Peters, J., and McConnell, R. 2005. Childhood Asthma and Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide. Epidemiology 16(6), 737-743. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000181308.51440.75 Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., and Cummins, F. 1999. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Givoni, B. 1991. Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: a review. Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere 25(3), 289-299. Goyal, P., Chan, A. T., and Jaiswal, N. 2006. Statistical models for the prediction of respirable suspended particulate matter in urban cities. Atmospheric Environment 40(11), 2068-2077. Graves, A. 2013. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850. Harrison, R. M., Jones, A. M., and Barrowcliffe, R. 2004. Field study of the influence of meteorological factors and traffic volumes upon suspended particle mass at urban roadside sites of differing geometries. Atmospheric Environment 38(37), 6361-6369. Hoek, G., Brunekreef, B., Goldbohm, S., Fischer, P., and van den Brandt, P. A. 2002. Association between mortality and indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands: a cohort study. The Lancet 360(9341), 1203-1209. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11280-3 Hooyberghs, J., Mensink, C., Dumont, G., Fierens, F., and Brasseur, O. 2005. A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium. Atmospheric Environment 39(18), 3279-3289. Jerrett, M., Burnett, R. T., Ma, R., Pope, C. A., Krewski, D., Newbold, K. B., . . . Thun, M. J. 2005. Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology 16(6), 727-736. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000181630.15826.7d Jordan, M. 1986. Serial order: a parallel distributed processing approach. In Advances in psychology Vol. 121, pp. 471-495 Kök, İ., Şimşek, M. U., and Özdemir, S. 2017. A deep learning model for air quality prediction in smart cities. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 1983-1990). IEEE. Künzli, N., Kaiser, R., Medina, S., Studnicka, M., Chanel, O., Filliger, P., . . . Sommer, H. 2000. Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. The Lancet 356(9232), 795-801. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02653-2 Kallawicha, K., Lung, S. C. C., Chuang, Y. C., Wu, C. D., Chen, T. H., Tsai, Y. J., and Chao, H. J. (2015). Spatiotemporal Distributions and Land-Use Regression Models of Ambient Bacteria and Endotoxins in the Greater Taipei Area. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 15(4), 1448-1459. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2015.01.0036 Kurt, O. K., Zhang, J., and Pinkerton, K. E. 2016. Pulmonary health effects of air pollution. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 22(2), 138. Lal, B., and Tripathy, S. S. 2012. Prediction of dust concentration in open cast coal mine using artificial neural network. Atmospheric Pollution Research 3(2), 211-218. Le, V. D., and Cha, S. K. 2018. Real-time Air Pollution prediction model based on Spatiotemporal Big data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00432. Li, C., Hsu, N. C., and Tsay, S. C. 2011. A study on the potential applications of satellite data in air quality monitoring and forecasting. Atmospheric Environment 45(22), 3663-3675. Li, X., Peng, L., Yao, X., Cui, S., Hu, Y., You, C., and Chi, T. 2017. Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions: Method development and evaluation. Environment Pollution 231, 997-1004. Liu, B., Yan, S., Li, J., Qu, G., Li, Y., Lang, J., and Gu, R. 2018. An Attention-Based Air Quality Forecasting Method. In 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 728-733). IEEE. Liu, B., Yan, S., Li, J., Qu, G., Li, Y., Lang, J., and Gu, R. 2019. A Sequence-to-Sequence Air Quality Predictor Based on the n-step Recurrent Prediction. IEEE Access 7, 43331-43345 Loy-Benitez, J., Vilela, P., Li, Q., and Yoo, C. 2019. Sequential prediction of quantitative health risk assessment for the fine particulate matter in an underground facility using deep recurrent neural networks. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 169, 316-324. Lung, S. C. C., Hsiao, P. K., Wen, T. Y., Liu, C. H., Fu, C. B., and Cheng, Y. T. 2014. Variability of intra-urban exposure to particulate matter and CO from Asian-type community pollution sources. Atmospheric Environment 83, 6-13. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.046 Lung, S. C. C., and Kao, M. C. 2003. Worshippers’ exposure to particulate matter in two temples in Taiwan. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 53(2), 130-135. Lung, S. C. C., Lee, C. R., and Hu, S. C. 2014. Inequality of Asian-type neighborhood environmental quality in communities with different urbanization levels. Environmental Science & Policy 38, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.009 Lung, S. C. C., Mao, I. F., and Liu, L. J. S. 2007. Residents' particle exposures in six different communities in Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment 377(1), 81-92. Luo, X., and Cao, H. 2012. Evaluation of air quality using the CMAQ modeling system. Procedia Environmental Sciences 12, 159-165. Ma, X., Tao, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, H., and Wang, Y. 2015. Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 54, 187-197. McConnell, R., Islam, T., Shankardass, K., Jerrett, M., Lurmann, F., Gilliland, F., . . . Berhane, K. 2010. Childhood incident asthma and traffic-related air pollution at home and school. Environmental Health Perspectives 118(7), 1021-1026. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901232 Merbitz, H., Fritz, S., and Schneider, C. 2012. Mobile measurements and regression modeling of the spatial particulate matter variability in an urban area. Science of the Total Environment 438, 389-403. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.049 Nejadkoorki, F., and Baroutian, S. 2012. Forecasting extreme PM10 concentrations using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Environmental Research 6(1), 277-284. Nieto, P. G., Combarro, E. F., del Coz Díaz, J., and Montañés, E. 2013. A SVM-based regression model to study the air quality at local scale in Oviedo urban area (Northern Spain): A case study. Applied Mathematics and Computation 219(17), 8923-8937. Ong, B. T., Sugiura, K., and Zettsu, K. 2016. Dynamically pre-trained deep recurrent neural networks using environmental monitoring data for predicting PM 2.5. Neural Computing and Applications 27(6), 1553-1566. Pardo, E., and Malpica, N. 2017. Air quality forecasting in Madrid using long short-term memory networks. In International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation (pp. 232-239). Springer, Cham. Park, J. H., Yoo, S. J., Kim, K. J., Gu, Y. H., Lee, K. H., and Son, U. H. 2017. PM10 density forecast model using long short term memory. In 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) (pp. 576-581). IEEE. Park, S., Kim, M., Kim, M., Namgung, H. G., Kim, K. T., Cho, K. H., and Kwon, S. B. 2018. Predicting PM10 concentration in Seoul metropolitan subway stations using artificial neural network (ANN). Journal of hazardous materials 341, 75-82. Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., and Thurston, G. D. 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Jama 287(9), 1132-1141. Prakash, A., Kumar, U., Kumar, K., and Jain, V. K. 2011. A wavelet-based neural network model to predict ambient air pollutants’ concentration. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 16(5), 503-517. Prybutok, V. R., Yi, J., and Mitchell, D. 2000. Comparison of neural network models with ARIMA and regression models for prediction of Houston's daily maximum ozone concentrations. European Journal of Operational Research 122(1), 31-40. Rao, K. S., Devi, G. L., and Ramesh, N. 2019. Air Quality Prediction in Visakhapatnam with LSTM based Recurrent Neural Networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications 11(2), 18. Reddy, V., Yedavalli, P., Mohanty, S., and Nakhat, U. 2018. Deep Air: Forecasting Air Pollution in Beijing, China. Saide, P. E., Carmichael, G. R., Spak, S. N., Gallardo, L., Osses, A. E., Mena-Carrasco, M. A., and Pagowski, M. 2011. Forecasting urban PM10 and PM2. 5 pollution episodes in very stable nocturnal conditions and complex terrain using WRF–Chem CO tracer model. Atmospheric Environment 45(16), 2769-2780. Sharma, A., Mitra, A., Sharma, S., and Roy, S. 2018. Estimation of Air Quality Index from Seasonal Trends Using Deep Neural Network. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 511-521). Springer, Cham. Stern, R., Builtjes, P., Schaap, M., Timmermans, R., Vautard, R., Hodzic, A., . . . Wolke, R. 2008. A model inter-comparison study focussing on episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations. Atmospheric Environment 42(19), 4567-4588. Stern, R. E. 2003. Hong Kong haze: air pollution as a social class issue. Asian Survey 43(5), 780-800. Sun, R., and Gu, D. 2008. Air pollution, economic development of communities, and health status among the elderly in urban China. American Journal of Epidemiology 168(11), 1311-1318. Sun, X., Xu, W., and Jiang, H. 2019. Spatial-temporal prediction of air quality based on recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Tong, W., Li, L., Zhou, X., Hamilton, A., and Zhang, K. 2019. Deep learning PM 2.5 concentrations with bidirectional LSTM RNN. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 12(4), 411-423. Tsai, Y. T., Zeng, Y. R., and Chang, Y. S. 2018. Air Pollution Forecasting Using RNN with LSTM. In 2018 IEEE 16th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 16th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 4th Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech) (pp. 1074-1079). IEEE. Vautard, R., Builtjes, P. H., Thunis, P., Cuvelier, C., Bedogni, M., Bessagnet, B., . . . Schaap, M. 2007. Evaluation and intercomparison of Ozone and PM10 simulations by several chemistry transport models over four European cities within the CityDelta project. Atmospheric Environment 41(1), 173-188. Vlahogianni, E. I., Kepaptsoglou, K., Tsetsos, V., and Karlaftis, M. G. 2016. A real-time parking prediction system for smart cities. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 20(2), 192-204. Wang, B., Yan, Z., Lu, J., Zhang, G., and Li, T. 2018. Deep Multi-task Learning for Air Quality Prediction. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 93-103). Springer, Cham. Wang, J., and Song, G. 2018. A deep spatial-temporal ensemble model for air quality prediction. Neurocomputing 314, 198-206. Weber, S., Kuttler, W., and Weber, K. 2006. Flow characteristics and particle mass and number concentration variability within a busy urban street canyon. Atmospheric Environment 40(39), 7565-7578. Wen, C., Liu, S., Yao, X., Peng, L., Li, X., Hu, Y., and Chi, T. 2019. A novel spatiotemporal convolutional long short-term neural network for air pollution prediction. Science of the Total Environment 654, 1091-1099. Wu, C. D., and Lung, S. C. C. 2012. Applying GIS and fine-resolution digital terrain models to assess three-dimensional population distribution under traffic impacts. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 22(2), 126-134. doi:10.1038/jes.2011.48 Yang, Y., Dong, J., Sun, X., Lima, E., Mu, Q., and Wang, X. 2018. A CFCC-LSTM model for sea surface temperature prediction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 15(2), 207-211. Yoon, H., Jun, S. C., Hyun, Y., Bae, G. O., and Lee, K. K. 2011. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 396(1-2), 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.002 Zhao, X., Zhang, R., Wu, J. L., and Chang, P. C. 2018. A deep recurrent neural network for air quality classification. J. Inf. Hiding Multimed. Signal Process 9, 346-354. Zheng, Y., Liu, F., and Hsieh, H. P. 2013. U-Air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1436-1444). ACM. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74479 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來,隨著環境與健康意識抬頭,都會地區空氣汙染的議題逐漸備受矚目,尤其是造成人體健康危害最嚴重的PM2.5¬。許多研究皆已證實空氣汙染物存在空間變異性,間接證明居民之暴險濃度值與周界環境濃度值之間具有顯著差異,遑論周界環境濃度值的代表性。有別於佈署大規模之空氣盒子靜態測站,或是攜帶儀器之移動式定點測站,用以精準量測居民之暴險濃度,本研究開發出一以物聯網技術為基礎的車載監測系統(On-board monitoring system, OBMS),負責於都會地區進行PM2.5之即時監測,量測數據包含當前時間、位置、移動速度、PM1、PM2.5、PM10、環境溫度與濕度,不僅能達到靜態測站的精準測量,亦能經濟且效率地測量空間中的濃度變化,尤其是交通汙染與社區汙染源在都會地區中對於居民暴險濃度的影響。
除了即時監測暴險濃度之外,都會地區空氣品質預測之重要性亦被廣泛認可,準確的空氣品質預測使得政府與民眾足以提前採取相關預防或是減緩的措施。受限於準確的汙染源資料取得不易、汙染物交錯複雜的化學反應、簡化的汙染物傳輸模式難以實際量化真實情況,許多傳統的預測模型難以突破上限,因此,擅長從大數據當中找尋模式與規則的機器學習方法近年來蓬勃發展,唯使用機器學習方法的限制在於資料本身的多寡優劣,許多使用機器學習作為預測方法的文獻當中,不僅資料來源採用代表性不足的周界環境濃度值,時間預測刻度多半也以小時計,對於居民暴險濃度來說,代表性、即時預測性實為欠缺。因此,本研究以機器學習方法中的遞迴神經網路-長短期記憶網路(Long short-term memory, LSTM)與其重要變形版本(Gated recurrent unit, GRU)作為預測方法,搭配空氣盒子即時數據作為主要的資料來源,以台北都會區作為研究範圍,發展出一時間刻度更細緻的預測模型,包含預測未來6分鐘至30分鐘的濃度變化,並結合OBMS蒐集而得的數據進行預測比對。本研究結果證實,藉由車載監測系統即時監測空間尺度更細緻的居民暴險濃度與時間尺度更細緻的空氣品質預報乃是可行的,藉由物聯網與機器學習的方式,實現大數據蒐集與分析預測,提供決策者與民眾更精準的依據來源,漸漸邁向智慧城市的目標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Recently, with the rise of environmental and health consciousness, issues about air pollution in urban areas are gradually attracting attention, especially for PM2.5 that causes the most severe health risk to human beings. Many studies have highlighted the phenomenon of spatial variability in air pollution, indirectly supporting that there are significant differences between residents’ exposure and background levels. Based on such a factor, background levels cannot represent residents’ exposure around a static station. Different from deploying large-scale airbox stations or mobile fixed-point stations with portable instruments to accurately measure residents’ exposures, this study therefore develops an on-board monitoring system (OBMS) based on the IoT technology, which is responsible for real-time PM2.5¬ measurement in urban areas. In addition to PM¬2.5¬, the measured parameters include current time, current location, moving speed, PM1, PM10, ambient temperature and humidity. The OBMS not only achieves the goal of accurate measurement like what static stations can do, but also efficiently measures the PM2.5 levels in space in an economical way, especially that its measuring results can indicate the impacts of traffic pollution and community pollution in urban areas on residents’ exposure.
In addition to providing real-time monitoring data on residents’ exposures, it is also important to predict air quality in urban areas based on these kind of monitoring data (however, limited by small data collected by OBMS, the prediction is based on large data collected by airbox stations). Accurate air quality prediction enables government officials and the public to take proper prevention actions in advance. However, it is difficult to accurately evaluate a real situation because accurate pollution data are hard to obtain, chemical reactions of pollutants are complicated, and the ways utilized to describe pollutant transmission are too simple. Thus, many traditional prediction models have their own limitations, making many prediction tasks use statistical methods that are good at finding patterns and rules from big data. Machine learning is one of statistical methods, which has been adopted by many air quality prediction studies. In these studies, data sources generally use under-represented background levels, and the prediction intervals are mostly in hours, which may not be suitable for air quality prediction needed by residents. Therefore, this study proposes to use long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) as the prediction method. With the real-time airbox data as the main source of data, the Taipei metropolitan area is used as a research area to develop a more detailed forecasting model in which the PM2.5 levels changes in next 6 to 30 minutes are predicted. The predictions are also compared with the data collected by the OBMS. This study confirms that the OBMS can instantly monitor residents’ PM2.5 exposure with smaller time interval, and that using smaller time intervals to predict air quality is feasible. Using the techniques of Internet of Things and machine learning, big data collection, analysis and forecasting can be achieved, decision-makers and people can obtain more accurate information, and the goal of smart cities can be met eventually. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:38:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06631003-1.pdf: 11637143 bytes, checksum: ab040e81691c240bc7788016e7464939 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
誌謝 i 摘要 iii Abstract v Table of Contents ix List of Figures xiii List of Tables xxi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation and propose 3 1.3 Thesis organization 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Spatial variability of particulate matter 7 2.2 The Challenge of air pollution monitoring 15 2.3 Overview of different methods for air quality prediction 18 2.4 Literature review on studies focusing on air quality prediction using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) 20 Chapter 3 Materials and Methods 27 3.1 Measurement of PM2.5 in urban areas 27 3.1.1 Airbox 27 3.1.2 On-board monitoring system 30 3.1.3 Target areas 36 3.2 Prediction of PM2.5 in urban areas 37 3.2.1 Machine Learning Methods utilized in this research 37 3.2.2 Framework of an LSTM/GRU-based PM2.5 predictive model 42 3.2.3 Three PM2.5 prediction models 44 3.2.4 Establishment of single timestamp predictive model with single airbox station data (STSA) 47 3.3 Measurement and prediction performance evaluation 50 3.3.1 R-square, r, and RMSE 50 3.3.2 Accuracy score 51 3.3.3 K-fold cross validation 52 Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 55 4.1 On-board monitoring system 55 4.1.1 Validation of the on-board monitoring system under a static condition 55 4.1.2 Setting before mobile monitoring experiments 59 4.1.3 Experimental datasets 60 4.1.4 Effects of moving speeds on the measurements 62 4.1.5 Relationships between the data from the OBMS and Graywolf 65 4.1.6 Real-time data visualization 73 4.1.7 Comparison of spatial interpolation with or without OBMS 77 4.2 Single timestamp predictive model with the data from a single airbox station (STSA) 79 4.2.1 Dataset 79 4.2.2 Selection of feature combinations and hyperparameters in the training stage 82 4.2.3 Predictive model performance in the testing stage 90 4.3 Multi-timestamp predictive model with the data from a single airbox station (MTSA) 96 4.3.1 Dataset 96 4.3.2 The results of the LSTM-based MTSA with the testing data set 98 4.3.3 The results for the GRU-based MTSA with the testing data set 107 4.4 Multi-timestamp predictive model with the data from multiple airbox stations (MTMA) 115 4.4.1 Dataset 115 4.4.2 The results generated by the MTMA at different timestamps in the fourth and fifth experiment 117 4.5 Combinations of the OBMS measurements and MTMA prediction 120 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Work 123 References 127 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 都會地區PM2.5預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 物聯網 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | GRU | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | LSTM | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 車載監測系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | On-board monitoring system (OBMS) | en |
| dc.subject | Gated recurrent unit (GRU) | en |
| dc.subject | Long short-term memory (LSTM) | en |
| dc.subject | PM2.5 prediction in urban areas | en |
| dc.subject | Internet of Things | en |
| dc.title | 都會地區PM2.5監測系統與預測之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On the monitoring and prediction for PM2.5 in urban areas | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周呈霙,溫在弘,曾傳蘆,俞齊山 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 物聯網,車載監測系統,都會地區PM2.5預測,LSTM,GRU, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Internet of Things,On-board monitoring system (OBMS),PM2.5 prediction in urban areas,Long short-term memory (LSTM),Gated recurrent unit (GRU), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 135 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901826 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業機電工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物機電工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 11.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
