請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74467
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 傅立成 | |
dc.contributor.author | En-Yu Chia | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賈恩宇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:37:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] E. J. Benjamin, P. Muntner, A. Alonso et al., “Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 139, no. 10, mar 2019.
[2] J. G. Broeks, G. J. Lankhorst, K. Rumping, and A. J. Prevo, “The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study.” Disability and rehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 357–364, aug 1999. [3] M. C. Cirstea and M. F. Levin, “Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.” Brain : a journal of neurology, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 940–953, may 2000. [4] F.-I. Hsieh and H.-Y. Chiou, “Stroke: morbidity, risk factors, and care in taiwan,” Journal of stroke, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 59–64, may 2014. [5] K. Gert, W. R. C., K. T. W., L. G. J., and K. J. C., “Effects of Intensity of Rehabilitation After Stroke,” Stroke, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1550–1556, aug 1997. [6] C. Butefisch, H. Hummelsheim, P. Denzler, and K. H. Mauritz, “Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.” Journal of the neurological sciences, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 59–68, may 1995. [7] H. I. Krebs, “Chapter 13 - Twenty + years of robotics for upper-extremity rehabilitation following a stroke,” R. Colombo and V. B. T. R. R. Sanguineti, Eds. Academic Press, 2018, pp. 175–192. [8] V. S. Huang and J. W. Krakauer, “Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 5, 2009. [9] G. B. Prange, M. J. A. Jannink, C. G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, H. J. Hermens, and M. J. Ijzerman, “Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation research and development, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2006. [10] D. H. Yoo and S. Y. Kim, “Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients.” Journal of physical therapy science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 677–679, mar 2015. [11] D. Lynch, M. Ferraro, J. Krol et al., “Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 594–599, sep 2005. [12] L. E. Kahn, M. L. Zygman, W. Z. Rymer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study,” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, vol. 3, p. 12, jun 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790067https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550245/ [13] M.-H. Milot, S. J. Spencer, V. Chan et al., “A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES,” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, vol. 10, p. 112, dec 2013. [14] A. Basteris, S. M. Nijenhuis, A. H. A. Stienen et al., “Training modalities in robotmediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 111, 2014. [15] N. Hogan, H. I. Krebs, B. Rohrer et al., “Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery.” Journal of rehabilitation research and development, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 605–618, 2006. [16] N. Hogan, H. I. Krebs, J. Charnnarong, P. Srikrishna, and A. Sharon, “MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training. I,” in Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1992, pp. 161–165. [17] C. G. Burgar, P. S. Lum, P. C. Shor, and H. F. Machiel Van der Loos, “Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience.” Journal of rehabilitation research and development, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663–673, 2000. [18] R. Loureiro, F. Amirabdollahian, M. Topping, B. Driessen, and W. Harwin, “Upper Limb Robot Mediated Stroke Therapy—GENTLE/s Approach,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 2003. [19] T. Nef, M. Mihelj, G. Kiefer et al., “ARMin - Exoskeleton for Arm Therapy in Stroke Patients,” in 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007, pp. 68–74. [20] T. Nef, M. Guidali, and R. Riener, “ARMin III –arm Therapy Exoskeleton with an Ergonomic Shoulder Actuation,” Appl. Bionics Biomechanics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 127–142, apr 2009. [21] H. Kim, L. M. Miller, I. Fedulow et al., “Kinematic data analysis for post-stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system.” IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 153–164, mar 2013. [22] Y. Hasegawa and S. Oura, “Exoskeletal meal assistance system (EMAS II) for progressive muscle dystrophy patient,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2011, pp. 1–6. [23] B. C. Tsai, W. W. Wang, L. C. Hsu, L. C. Fu, and J. S. Lai, “An articulated rehabilitation robot for upper limb physiotherapy and training,” in 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, pp. 1470–1475. [24] S. H. Chen, W. M. Lien, W. W. Wang et al., “Assistive Control System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1199–1209, 2016. [25] C. H. Lin, W. M. Lien, W. W. Wang et al., “NTUH-II robot arm with dynamic torque gain adjustment method for frozen shoulder rehabilitation,” in 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2014, pp. 3555–3560. [26] J. L. Ren, Y. H. Chien, E. Y. Chia, L. C. Fu, and J. S. Lai, “Deep Learning based Motion Prediction for Exoskeleton Robot Control in Upper Limb Rehabilitation,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019, pp. 5076–5082. [27] J. Zhang and C. C. Cheah, “Passivity and Stability of Human–Robot Interaction Control for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 233–245, 2015. [28] T. Teramae, T. Noda, and J. Morimoto, “EMG-Based Model Predictive Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction: Application for Assist-As-Needed Control,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 210–217, 2018. [29] E. T. Wolbrecht, V. Chan, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and J. E. Bobrow, “Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2008. [30] A. U. Pehlivan, D. P. Losey, and M. K. O’Malley, “Minimal Assist-as-Needed Controller for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 113–124, 2016. [31] T. Proietti, G. Morel, A. Roby-Brami, and N. Jarrassé, “Comparison of different error signals driving the adaptation in assist-as-needed controllers for neurorehabilitation with an upper-limb robotic exoskeleton,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 6645–6650. [32] A. U. Pehlivan, D. P. Losey, C. G. Rose, and M. K. O’Malley, “Maintaining subject engagement during robotic rehabilitation with a minimal assist-as-needed (mAAN) controller,” in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2017, pp. 62–67. [33] H. J. Asl, T. Narikiyo, and M. Kawanishi, “An Assist-as-Needed Velocity Field Control Scheme for Rehabilitation Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3322–3327, 2018. [34] U. Keller, G. Rauter, and R. Riener, “Assist-as-needed path control for the PASCAL rehabilitation robot,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013. [35] P. Agarwal and A. D. Deshpande, “Subject-Specific Assist-as-Needed Controllers for a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 508–515, 2018. [36] M. W. Spong and M. Vidyasagar, Robot Dynamics and Control. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [37] B. Bona and M. Indri, “Friction Compensation in Robotics: an Overview,” in Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2005, pp. 4360–4367. [38] H. Olsson, K. J. Åström, C. Canudas de Wit, M. Gäfvert, and P. Lischinsky, “Friction Models and Friction Compensation,” European Journal of Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 176–195, 1998. [39] 劉力愷, “具有摩擦力估測之無感測器上肢復健機器人控制,” 碩士, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 2018. [40] G. Welch and G. Bishop, “An Introduction to the Kalman Filter,” Chapel Hill, NC, USA, Tech. Rep., 1995. [41] R. G. Brown and P. Y. C. Hwang, Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering. Wiley New York, 1992, vol. 3. [42] L. L. Cai, A. J. Fong, C. K. Otoshi et al., “Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning.” The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 41, pp. 10 564–10 568, oct 2006. [43] A. Wahrburg, E. Morara, G. Cesari, B. Matthias, and H. Ding, “Cartesian contact force estimation for robotic manipulators using Kalman filters and the generalized momentum,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2015, pp. 1230–1235. [44] A. Wahrburg, J. Bös, K. D. Listmann et al., “Motor-Current-Based Estimation of Cartesian Contact Forces and Torques for Robotic Manipulators and Its Application to Force Control,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 879–886, 2018. [45] N. Hogan, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation,” in American Control Conference, 1984, pp. 304–313. [46] R. L. Burden and J. D. Faires, Numerical Analysis 9th Edition, 2011. [47] P. Y. Li and R. Horowitz, “Passive velocity field control (PVFC). Part II. Application to contour following,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1360–1371, 2001. [48] A. D. Dragan and S. S. Srinivasa, “A policy-blending formalism for shared control,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 790–805, jun 2013. [49] M. Najafi, K. Adams, and M. Tavakoli, “Robotic learning from demonstration of therapist’s time-varying assistance to a patient in trajectory-following tasks,” in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2017, pp. 888–894. [50] E. B. Brokaw, R. J. Holley, and P. S. Lum, “Comparison of Joint Space and End Point Space Robotic Training Modalities for Rehabilitation of Interjoint Coordination in Individuals With Moderate to Severe Impairment From Chronic Stroke,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 787–795, 2013. [51] S. Balasubramanian, A. Melendez-Calderon, A. Roby-Brami, and E. Burdet, “On the analysis of movement smoothness,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 112, 2015. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74467 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中風是造成成人失能一種常見的神經性損傷,其倖存者常伴隨上肢和下肢的運動障礙。據臨床研究結果顯示,中風患者可透過密集參與復健療程以回復其運動能力。將上肢復健外骨骼機器人引入療程,除了可降低醫療人力成本,更可實現密集且精確的治療。應用機器人於復健療程之控制策略可分為被動、輔助及主動控制。其中輔助控制的實現,需同時考量病患之運動意圖與欲達成的復健任務,藉此提供病患所需的協助達成目標。然而,於相關文獻中,復健任務之模型多為與時間相依之軌跡,導致其限制使用者自主控制的自由。本研究提出適用於上肢復健外骨骼機器人之輔助控制方法。首先,使用者的運動意圖可由應用卡爾曼濾波器之交互作用扭矩觀測器,經導抗模型轉換所獲得。接著,本研究提出基於速度場表示之任務模型,該模型可經由給定之任務軌跡生成,並且只與使用者之位置資訊相依,讓使用者不受限於需在特定時間達成特定動作。而提出之整合主動意圖與輔助的方法,可以根據使用者執行任務的投入程度與表現,於執行復健任務中調整機器人之輔助程度,並達成於考量任務的同時促進使用者之主動意圖。最後,透過Lyapunov穩定性分析,確保提出之輔助控制方法的穩定性與效能。本研究提出之輔助控制方法已應用於健康受試者之臨床試驗予以驗證。結果顯示與相關文獻方法相比,可於減少使用者完成任務之時間與施力的同時,促進使用者主動運動之意圖並精確達成給定之各項復健任務。於未來展望,為驗證提出系統之療效,需將本系統應用於中風病患之臨床試驗。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Stroke is a prevalent source of neurological impairment which causes disability in adults. The survivors of it commonly suffer from motor impairments on both upper and lower limb motion. According to clinical studies, the patients can regain their motor ability by intensively involving in rehabilitation therapy. Introducing upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot into the therapy can not only reduce the labor cost but also provide intensive and accurate treatment. The control strategy for applying robot in rehabilitation therapy can be classified as passive, active, active-resistive and active-assistive control. To implement active-assistive control, both motion intention of the patients and the given rehabilitation task should be taken into consideration so that the controller can provide necessary assistance to achieve the goal. However, most of the rehabilitation task model in related works is a time-dependent trajectory, which limits the freedom of subjects to control actively. An active-assistive controller based on interactive torque observer is proposed for upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot, NTUH-II. First, the motion intention of the subjects can be obtained by utilizing an adaptive Kalman filter based interactive torque observer. Next, we propose a velocity field based task model which can be generated via a given task trajectory. The model only depends on the location information of the subject so that the subject is not limited to achieve the motion at a specific time instant. The proposed active-assistive method can integrate the active and assistive motion based on the performance and the active involvement of the subject. The integration result considers not only the human active intention but also the given task such that the subject can perform the task more actively and accurately. Finally, the stability and effectiveness of the proposed active-assistive control system are verified by Lyapunov stability analysis. Various experiments are conducted on three healthy subjects and NTUH-II to verify the proposed active-assistive control system. The results show that compared with the related works, not only the execution time but also the subjects' exertion can be reduced when performing the given rehabilitation tasks. In addition, the proposed method can promote subjects' intention of active motion and assist them to accomplish the tasks accurately. In the future work, the effectiveness of the proposed system for stroke patients is required to be validated through clinical studies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:37:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06921018-1.pdf: 8910039 bytes, checksum: b7fe61d8c20b20c86579183b54e11e97 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 iii
中文摘要 v Abstract vii Contents ix List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii List of Acronyms xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Literature Survey 4 1.2.1 Robotics in Rehabilitation 4 1.2.2 Active-Assistive Mode Therapy with Robots 5 1.3 Contribution 8 1.4 Thesis Organization 9 2 System Overview and Preliminary 11 2.1 Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot NTUH-II 11 2.1.1 Hardware Design of NTUH-II 11 2.1.2 Design for Safety Concern 16 2.2 Forward Kinematics 17 2.3 Jacobian Matrix in Robotics 19 2.3.1 Angular Velocity 21 2.3.2 Linear Velocity 22 2.3.3 Application to NTUH-II 23 2.4 Robot Dynamics 23 2.4.1 Iterative Newton–Euler Dynamic Formulation 24 2.4.2 Friction Model 30 2.5 Kalman Filter 32 2.6 Active-Assistive Mode Therapy 36 3 Design of Active-Assistive Control System 39 3.1 System Block Diagram 39 3.2 Kalman Filter based Interactive Torque Observer 40 3.3 Admittance Control 46 3.4 Design of Active-Assistive Strategy 47 3.4.1 Task Motion Pattern Generation 47 3.4.2 Velocity Field Synthesis 49 3.4.3 Integration of Active and Assistive Motion 54 3.5 Controller Design 58 3.6 Stability Analysis 59 4 Experiment Result 63 4.1 Experiment Protocol 63 4.2 Experiment Result 70 5 Conclusion 91 REFERENCES 93 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 應用速度場之輔助控制於上肢復健外骨骼機器人 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Velocity Field based Active-Assistive Control for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robot | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 賴金鑫,陸哲駒,顏炳郎,盧璐 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 復健機械手臂,交互作用扭矩觀測器,輔助式療程,輔助控制,NTUH-II, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | rehabilitation robotics,contact force estimation,active-assistive rehabilitation,active-assistive control,NTUH-II, | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902686 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 電機工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 電機工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。