請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74441
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳焜裕 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yu Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許瀞尤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:35:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | SCCNFP. (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers concerning Acetaldehyde
Adkins, H., & Broderick, A. E. (1928). The Rate of Synthesis and Hydrolysis of Certain Acetals. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 50(1), 178-185. doi:10.1021/ja01388a025 Allen, N. E., Beral, V., Casabonne, D., Kan, S. W., Reeves, G. K., Brown, A., & Green, J. (2009). Moderate alcohol intake and cancer incidence in women. J Natl Cancer Inst, 101(5), 296-305. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn514 Alpert, D. J., Iman, R., Johnson, J. D., & Helton, J. C. (1984). A Demonstration Uncertainty/Sensitivity Analysis Using the Health and Economic Consequence Model CRAC2. Aquino Neto, S., Forti, J. C., Zucolotto, V., Ciancaglini, P., & De Andrade, A. R. (2011). The kinetic behavior of dehydrogenase enzymes in solution and immobilized onto nanostructured carbon platforms. Process Biochemistry, 46(12), 2347-2352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.09.019 Awika, J. M., & Rooney, L. W. (2004). Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential impact on human health. Phytochemistry, 65(9), 1199-1221. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.001 Awika, J. M., Rooney, L. W., Wu, X., Prior, R. L., & Cisneros-Zevallos, L. (2003). Screening methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products. J Agric Food Chem, 51(23), 6657-6662. doi:10.1021/jf034790i Belpoggi, F., Soffritti, M., Minardi, F., Ciliberti, A., Padovani, M., Cattin, E., & Maltoni, C. (2002). Results of a long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on vinyl acetate monomer in Wistar rats. Eur. J. Oncol, 7, 279-293. Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance. (2012). Risk Assessment Forum. Bueno, M., Marrufo-Curtido, A., Carrascón, V., Fernández-Zurbano, P., Escudero, A., & Ferreira, V. (2018). Formation and Accumulation of Acetaldehyde and Strecker Aldehydes during Red Wine Oxidation. Frontiers in Chemistry, 6(20). doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00020 Cavalcante, R. M., Seyffert, B. H., D’Oca, M. G. M., Nascimento, R. F., Campelo, C. S., Pinto, I. S., . . . Costa, A. H. R. (2005). Exposure Assessment for Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde in the Workplace. Indoor and Built Environment, 14(2), 165-172. doi:10.1177/1420326x05052564 Chen, C.-H., Ferreira, J. C. B., Gross, E. R., & Mochly-Rosen, D. (2014). Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase 2: new therapeutic opportunities. Physiological Reviews, 94(1), 1-34. doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2013 Clayton, W. D., Renvoize, S. A., & Royal Botanic Gardens, K. (1986) Genera graminum : grasses of the world (pp. 338-345): H.M.S.O, London. Sautier, D. & O'Deye, M. (1989). Mil, Mais, Sorgho-Techniques et alimentation au Sahel. Harmattan. Paris, France. De Stefani, E., Deneo-Pellegrini, H., Boffetta, P., Ronco, A. L., Aune, D., Acosta, G., . . . Ferro, G. (2009). Dietary patterns and risk of cancer: a factor analysis in Uruguay. Int J Cancer, 124(6), 1391-1397. doi:10.1002/ijc.24035 Dietrich, A., & König, S. (1997). Substrate activation behaviour of pyruvate decarboxylase from Pisum sativum cv. Miko. FEBS Letters, 400(1), 42-44. doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01326-9 EPA. (2005). Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Forum. Erten, H., Tanguler, H., Cabaroglu, T., & Canbas, A. (2006). The Influence of Inoculum Level on Fermentation and Flavour Compounds of White Wines Made from cv. Emir. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 112(3), 232-236. doi:10.1002/j.2050-0416.2006.tb00718.x Evaluating the Reliability of Predictions Made Using Environmental Transfer Models. (1989). Vienna: INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. FAO/WHO. (2005). Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual 15th Edition. Faria-Oliveira, F., Puga, S., & Ferreira, C. (2013). Yeast: World's Finest Chef (pp. 519-547). FEMA. (2003). Acetaldehyde. FEMA Number. Feron, G., Bonnarme, P., & Durand, A. (1996). Prospects for the microbial production of food flavours. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 7(9), 285-293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(96)10032-7 Freedman, N. D., Abnet, C. C., Leitzmann, M. F., Mouw, T., Subar, A. F., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Schatzkin, A. (2007). A prospective study of tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes. Am J Epidemiol, 165(12), 1424-1433. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm051 Grimes, W. (1993). Straight up or on the rocks. A Cultural History of American Drink: New York:Simon & Schuster. Haas, C. N., Rose , J. B., & Gerba, C. P. (1999). Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: New York:John Wiley & Sons. Haddad, S. A., & Lindegren, C. C. (1953). A method for determining the weight of an individual yeast cell. Applied microbiology, 1(3), 153-156. Hayes, J. E., Jr., & Velick, S. F. (1954). Yeast alcohol dehydrogenase: molecular weight, coenzyme binding, and reaction equilibria. J Biol Chem, 207(1), 225-244. IARC. (1985). Allyl Compounds,Aldehydes, Epoxides and Peroxides. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 36, 32-101. IARC. (1999). Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 36(7), 71. IARC. (2010). Alcohol consumption and ethyl carbamate. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 96(1–1428 ). IARC. (2012(g)). Consumption of alcoholic beverages. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 100E, 373–499. International Atomic Energy Agency, V. (1989). Evaluating the reliability of predictions made using environmental transfer models. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): IAEA. JECFA. (1998). Saturated aliphatic acyclic linear primary alcohols, aldehydes, and acids (Vol. Safety Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants): World Health Organization. Kanteres, F., Lachenmeier, D. W., & Rehm, J. (2009). Alcohol in Mayan Guatemala: consumption, distribution, production and composition of cuxa. Addiction, 104(5), 752-759. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02507.x Kresze, G. B., & Ronft, H. (1981). Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from baker's yeast. 2. Molecular structure, dissociation, and implications for the origin of mitochondria. Eur J Biochem, 119(3), 581-587. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05647.x Lachenmeier, D. W., Kanteres, F., & Rehm, J. (2009). Carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages: risk assessment outside ethanol metabolism. Addiction, 104(4), 533-550. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02516.x Lachenmeier, D. W., Przybylski, M. C., & Rehm, J. (2012). Comparative risk assessment of carcinogens in alcoholic beverages using the margin of exposure approach. Int J Cancer, 131(6), E995-1003. doi:10.1002/ijc.27553 Lachenmeier, D. W., & Sohnius, E. M. (2008). The role of acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism in the carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages: evidence from a large chemical survey. Food Chem Toxicol, 46(8), 2903-2911. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.034 Lieber, C. S., & DeCarli, L. M. (1968). Ethanol oxidation by hepatic microsomes: adaptive increase after ethanol feeding. Science, 162(3856), 917-918. Linderborg, K., Joly, J. P., Visapää, J.-P., & Salaspuro, M. (2008). Potential mechanism for Calvados-related oesophageal cancer. Food Chem Toxicol, 46(2), 476-479. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.08.019 Maltoni, C., Ciliberti, A., Lefemine, G., & Soffritti, M. (1997). Results of a long-term experimental study on the carcinogenicity of vinyl acetate monomer in mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 837, 209-238. Marino, S., Hogue, I. B., Ray, C. J., & Kirschner, D. E. (2008). A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. Journal of theoretical biology, 254(1), 178-196. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.011 Matysiak-Budnik, T., Jokelainen, K., Karkkainen, P., Makisalo, H., Ohisalo, J., & Salaspuro, M. (1996). Hepatotoxicity and absorption of extrahepatic acetaldehyde in rats. J Pathol, 178(4), 469-474. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(199604)178:4<469::aid-path510>3.0.co;2-9 McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239-245. doi:10.2307/1268522 Meinrath, G., Ekberg, C., Landgren, A., & Liljenzin, J. O. (2000). Assessment of uncertainty in parameter evaluation and prediction. Talanta, 51(2), 231-246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00259-3 Michaelis, L., Menten, M. L., Johnson, K. A., & Goody, R. S. (2011). The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. Biochemistry, 50(39), 8264-8269. doi:10.1021/bi201284u Minardi, F., Belpoggi, F., Soffritti, M., Ciliberti, A., Lauriola, M., Cattin, E., & Maltoni, C. (2002). Results of long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on vinyl acetate monomer in Sprague-Dawley rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 982, 106-122. Morrissey, P. A., & O’Brien, N. M. (1998). Dietary Antioxidants in Health and Disease. International Dairy Journal, 8(5), 463-472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(98)00070-3 Namiki, M. (1990). Antioxidants/Antimutagens in food (Vol. 29). National Research Council Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public, H. (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Nazaroff, W. W., & Singer, B. C. (2004). Inhalation of hazardous air pollutants from environmental tobacco smoke in US residences. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 14 Suppl 1, S71-77. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500361 Oliveira, V. A., Vicente, M. A., Fietto, L. G., Castro, I. M., Coutrim, M. X., Schuller, D., . . . Brandao, R. L. (2008). Biochemical and molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains obtained from sugar-cane juice fermentations and their impact in cachaca production. Appl Environ Microbiol, 74(3), 693-701. doi:10.1128/aem.01729-07 Organization, W. H. (2003). Hazard Characterization for Pathogens in Food and Water. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series, No. 3. Paget, V., Lechevrel, M., & Sichel, F. (2008). Acetaldehyde-induced mutational pattern in the tumour suppressor gene TP53 analysed by use of a functional assay, the FASAY (functional analysis of separated alleles in yeast). Mutat Res, 652(1), 12-19. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.11.010 Poschl, G., & Seitz, H. K. (2004). Alcohol and cancer. Alcohol Alcohol, 39(3), 155-165. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh057 Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. (978-0-309-03349-7). (1983). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/366/risk-assessment-in-the-federal-government-managing-the-process. Seeman, J. I., Laffoon, S. W., & Kassman, A. J. (2003). Evaluation of relationships between mainstream smoke acetaldehyde and 'tar' and carbon monoxide yields in tobacco smoke and reducing sugars in tobacco blends of U.S. commercial cigarettes. Inhal Toxicol, 15(4), 373-395. doi:10.1080/08958370304461 Seitz, H. K., & Stickel, F. (2007). Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer, 7(8), 599-612. doi:10.1038/nrc2191 Soffritti, M., Belpoggi, F., Lambertin, L., Lauriola, M., Padovani, M., & Maltoni, C. (2002). Results of long-term experimental studies on the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 982, 87-105. Thygesen, L. C., Keiding, N., Johansen, C., & Grønbæk, M. (2007). Changes in alcohol intake and risk of upper digestive tract cancer. Acta Oncologica, 46(8), 1085-1089. doi:10.1080/02841860701441806 Til, H. P., Woutersen, R. A., Feron, V. J., & Clary, J. J. (1988). Evaluation of the oral toxicity of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde in a 4-week drinking-water study in rats. Food Chem Toxicol, 26(5), 447-452. Wallington, T. J., & Kurylo, M. J. (1987). The gas phase reactions of hydroxyl radicals with a series of aliphatic alcohols over the temperature range 240–440 K. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 19(11), 1015-1023. doi:10.1002/kin.550191106 Weikert, C., Dietrich, T., Boeing, H., Bergmann, M. M., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., Clavel-Chapelon, F., . . . Riboli, E. (2009). Lifetime and baseline alcohol intake and risk of cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Int J Cancer, 125(2), 406-412. doi:10.1002/ijc.24393 Woutersen, R. A., Appelman, L. M., Van Garderen-Hoetmer, A., & Feron, V. J. (1986). Inhalation toxicity of acetaldehyde in rats. III. Carcinogenicity study. Toxicology, 41(2), 213-231. Yamada, M. (1927). On the Origin of Aldehydes in Fermentation Products. Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan, 3(4-6), 76-83. doi:10.1080/03758397.1927.10856830 Yokoyama, A., Muramatsu, T., Ohmori, T., Yokoyama, T., Okuyama, K., Takahashi, H., . . . Ishii, H. (1998). Alcohol-related cancers and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 in Japanese alcoholics. Carcinogenesis, 19(8), 1383-1387. doi:10.1093/carcin/19.8.1383 王大明(1998)。酒精蒸餾理論中的揮發係數K。釀酒,第三期,52-54。 王宗曦、蔣榮先、顏哲傑、邱展賢、鄭萬金、張上淳, . . . 張志凱(2006)。行政院衛生署疾病管制局九十五年度科技研究發展計畫研究報告。 王瑞章、曾清田(1996)。高粱製酒量與千粒重、澱粉含量及其結構之關係。[The Relations of 1,000-seed-weight, Starch Content and its Structures to Alcohol Volume of Sorghum Grain]。臺南區農業改良場研究彙報(33),57-66。doi:10.29558/xlzy.199612.0005 王維宏(2009)。應用高壓均質技術對高粱酒進行催化熟成。大葉大學生物產業科技學系碩士論文,彰化縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dfz3q3 台灣財政部國庫署(民101年10月26日財政部台財庫字第 10103722650 號令修正)。財政部酒品認證標誌-高粱酒。 朱梦旭、范文來、徐岩(2016)。我國白酒蒸餾過程及原酒、成品酒中乙醛的研究。 食品與發酵工業,42(4),6。 行政院農委會農糧署統計資料(2017)。 Retrieved from: https://agr.afa.gov.tw/afa/afa_frame.jsp 林俊杰、黃中宜、周正俊、丘志威、廖萱蓉、方繼, . . . 許清森(2014)。食品發酵學蒸餾酒、高粱酒、米酒、紹興酒及日本清酒。台灣,台中:華格那企業。 姚汝華(1989)。白酒生產工藝。中國,北京:中國輕工業出版社。. 施小清、吴吉春、姜蓓蕾、方瑞、孫媛媛(2009)。基於LHS方法的地下水流模型不確定性分析。水文地质工程地质,36,1-6。 孫黎瓊(2007)。啤酒中乙醛的形成及控制。啤酒科技,Beer Science and Technology(1), 5-7。 徐岩(2014)。中國白酒健康安全與生態釀造技術研究-第二屆中國白酒學術研討會文集。中國,北京:中國中國輕工業出版社。 高啟雲、梁致遠、鄭建瑋.(2012)。文獻回顧:高粱之機能性成分及抗氧化特性。銘傳大學-生技學報。 健康風險評估技術規範(民100 年7月20日)。 國家衛生研究院(2007)。消費者食用加拿大牛肉風健康險評估期末報告。 康明官(1991)。白酒工業手冊。中國,北京:中國輕工業出版社。. 章克昌(1995)。酒精與蒸餾酒工藝學。中國,北京:中國輕工業出版社。 陳錦樹(2012)。酒精發酵微生物暨發酵原理。發酵學。。 華南工學院(1981)。酒精與白酒工藝學。中國,北京:中國輕工業出版社。 黃子軒(2016)。高粱酒糟萃取液之製備及其有機酸成分與胞外生物活性之評估。國立中興大學食品暨應用生物科技學系所碩士論文,台中。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t9egrd 黃玶吉、黃文治、李碧芬、葉俊賢、袁明程(2016)。核設施除役之輻射安全技術研究委託研究計畫期末研究報告。行政院原子能委員會。 黃燕君(2003)。高粱酒釀造過程噴酸處理對高粱酒品質風味之影響。大葉大學食品工程學系碩士班論文,彰化,台灣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pe7br8 趙生偉、劉之華、張樹勳、楊振昇(1957)。高粱酒改良釀造法之試驗報告。[Some Modified Processes for Making Kao-liang Wine]。化學(46年1),37-47。doi:10.6623/chem.1957004 趙克然、楊毅軍、曹道俊(2003)。氧自由基與臨床:中國醫藥出版社,台北,台灣。 賴舜堂(2011)。台灣高粱酒增香製程之研究。大葉大學生物產業科技學系博士論文,彰化。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yrhzf6 戴嘉慶(2005)。酵母菌乙醇脫氫酶與乙醛脫氫酶之抽取及其在原核系統之表達。國立屏東科技大學獸醫學系碩士論文,屏東縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mcjkue.doi:https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mcjkue | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74441 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國際癌症研究機構 (International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC) 於 2012年將酒精飲料及存在其中的乙醛(Acetaldehyde) 列為1級致癌物(IARC 1)。目前國外已有針對酒精飲料中乙醛之致癌風險進行評估,評估酒品項目包括啤酒、葡萄酒、威士忌、白蘭地等常見洋酒。高粱酒為華人文化中十分常見的中式白酒品項之一,中式白酒因屬酒精濃度高的蒸餾酒類,且製程相比其他蒸餾酒類更為複雜,故乙醛含量普遍高於國外蒸餾酒,惟目前國內外皆未有針對中式白酒進行風險評估的研究。本論文藉由模擬高粱酒製程預測乙醛在其最終產品中的含量,並針對國內男性、女性及全體國民因飲用高粱酒而暴露到乙醛致使產生不良健康反應之風險進行評估。
本研究將高粱酒製程分成發酵、蒸餾、熟成三階段,探討各階段製程條件對乙醛濃度之影響,並分析各階段之乙醛濃度,得結果分別為72、295、471 mg/L,後續利用拉丁超立體取樣(Latin Hypercube Sampling, LHS)技術及部分排序相關係數(Partial ranked correlation coefficient, PRCC)執行製程條件敏感度分析,以得知各製程參數對乙醛生成的影響程度。另採用Sprague-Dawley大鼠進行為期104周的慢性毒性實驗結果以Benchmark Dose Software進行運算,經過體重比例調整後得基準劑量10%下限值(BMDL10)為16.91 mg/kg/day。利用Crystal Ball軟體對各參數進行50000次蒙地卡羅抽樣進行風險值評估,計算國內高粱酒消費者(Consumer only)透過攝食高粱酒而暴露乙醛之致癌風險(Cancer risk)及暴露限值(Margin of exposure, MOE)。全體國人高粱酒消費者致癌風險(Cancer risk)中位數為5.35×10-3,95%的信賴區間上限為2.72×10-2,男性及女性高粱酒消費者致癌風險中位數則分別為4.68×10-3及1.43×10-2;全體國人、男性及女性之暴露限值中位數分別為18.5、21.2、6.94。致癌風險高於10-4或暴露限值低於104表示透過攝食高粱酒而攝取到乙醛並產生不良健康影響的風險需要特別關注。本研究亦對致癌風險進行敏感度分析,發現影響最大的影響因素為高粱酒的攝食量,與致癌風險呈正相關且影響程度約占94%。 本論文希望建立可作為未來產品生產前預測最終產品之特定有害物質的濃度並進行風險評估之方法,讓產品在生產前即可預測特定化學物質之風險,供業者作為製程改良及消費者購買之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Acetaldehyde (ethanol, CHCHO, CAS # 75-07-0) is a metabolite of ethanol which occurs in the human body after the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Additionally, it is widely exists in foods, beverages and industry as well as in the environment. It is known as a carcinogenic substance. In 2012, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) listed acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages as a Class 1 carcinogen. Foreign research has already assessed the risk of acetaldehyde in many kinds of alcoholic beverages included beer, wine, whiskey, brandy and other common alcohols. However, there is no research on risk assessment for Chinese liquor at present. We simulated the production process of sorghum liquor to predict the amount of acetaldehyde in the final product, and then evaluate the health risk for domestic men, women and all citizens who exposure to acetaldehyde due to drinking sorghum liquor. According to the results from this study, we knew the predicted concentration of acetaldehyde after the end of the three stages of fermentation, distillation and aging is 72、295、471 mg/L respectively. In addition, we used Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method and Partial ranked correlation coefficient (PRCC) to perform sensitivity analysis to know the influence of each manufacturing parameter.
On the other hand, we used the results from chronic animal experiment in Sprague-Dawley rats for a period of 104 weeks to establish dose-response relationship and obtain the baseline dose 10% lower limit (BMDL10). After adjusting the body weight, BMDL10 is 16.91 mg/kg/day. The risk exposed acetaldehyde due to consume sorghum liquor is evaluated by using the Crystal Ball software to perform 50,000 Monte Carlo sampling of each parameter to calculate the cancer risk and margin of exposure (MOE).The median of cancer risk and MOE for all citizens drinking sorghum liquor are 5.35×10-3 and 18.5, respectively. The result indicated that adverse health effects from exposure through consuming sorghum liquor requires attention. The study also analyzed the sensitivity of cancer risk and MOE, and find that the most influential factor is the intake of sorghum liquor, which was positively correlated with cancer risk, but negatively with MOE, both influence accounts for about 94%. This study hopes to establish a method for predicting the concentration of specific hazardous substances in the final product before production and conduct the risk assessment to provide the industry a reference for process improvement and consumer purchase. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:35:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06851002-1.pdf: 1943860 bytes, checksum: cd4806d2a4fe80e8b758ad921c03e8ce (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………...ii
誌謝………………………………………………………………………………..iii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..iv 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..vi 目錄………………………………………………………………………….........vii 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………….........xii 表目錄………………………………………………………………………........xiv 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………...1 1.1高粱簡介………………………………………………………........……..1 1.2高粱酒介紹……………………………………………………………..…3 1.2.1高粱酒製程………………………………………………………...….3 1.2.1.1製麴…………………………………………………………….....3 1.2.1.2糖化及發酵………………………………………………………3 1.2.1.3蒸餾……………………………………………………………..…5 1.2.1.4熟成與勾兌………………………………………………………5 1.3乙醛簡介……………………………………………………………….…6 1.4健康風險評估介紹…………………………………………………….…6 1.4.1有害物質鑑定……………………...……………………………….…7 1.4.2有害物質特性化………………………………………………………9 1.4.3暴露評估……………………………………………………………10 1.4.3.1食入途徑之潛在劑量(Potential dose)及內部劑量(Internal dose)……….…………..........................................................…11 1.4.4風險特性化…………………………………………………………12 1.4.5蒙地卡羅(Monte Carlo)模擬、拉丁超立體取樣(Latin Hypercube Sampling, LHS)技術及部分排序相關係數(Partial ranked correlation coefficient, PRCC)………………………………………………………12 1.5研究動機與目的……………………………………………………….…14 第二章 研究方法…………………………………………………………..17 2.1研究大綱及架構………………………………………………………….17 2.2評估目的與範圍…………………………………………………………18 2.3有害物質鑑定……………………………………………………………18 2.4暴露評估…………………………………………………………………19 2.4.1高粱酒乙醛濃度模擬預測…………………………………………20 2.4.1.1建立乙醛濃度模擬預測模型……………………………………20 2.4.1.2輸入製程參數之選擇……………………………………………25 2.4.2高粱酒製程參數敏感度分析………………………………………37 2.4.3國人攝食量估計……………………………….…………………… 37 2.5有害物質特性化…………………………………………………………38 2.5.1毒理資料……………………………………………………………38 2.5.1.1吸收、分佈、代謝和排泄…………………………………………38 2.5.1.2流行病學…………………………………………………………39 2.5.1.3動物實驗…………………………………………………………39 2.5.1.4作用模式(Mode of action)……………………………………41 2.5.1.5基因遺傳流行病學(Genetic epidemiology)……………………42 2.5.2劑量反應關係評估…………………………………………………42 2.5.2.1基準劑量10%下限值及軟體使用…………………...……… 42 2.5.2.2癌症斜率因子(Cancer slope factor, CSF)……………….……43 2.6風險特性化………………………………………………………………43 2.6.1致癌風險(Cancer Risk)……………..…………………………44 2.6.2暴露限值(Margin of exposure, MOE)……………………………44 2.6.3軟體………………………………………………………………44 第三章 結果與討論………………………………………………………….. 45 3.1暴露評估………………………………………………………………45 3.1.1高粱酒乙醛濃度模擬結果……………………………………..……45 3.1.2乙醛預測值與實際測定值比較…. …………………………………45 3.1.3 高粱酒製程參數敏感度分析…. ……………………………...……46 3.1.4 終生每日平均暴露劑量(LADD)…..………………………...…..…48 3.2有害物質特性化………………………………………………………48 3.2.1劑量反應關係評估結果……………………………………………48 3.2.1.1基準劑量10%下限值(BMDL10).………………………………48 3.2.1.2癌症斜率因子(Cancer slope factor, CSF) ………………………50 3.3風險評估特性化………………………………………………………50 3.3.1致癌風險(Cancer risk) ………………………………………………50 3.3.2暴露限值(Margin of exposure, MOE) ………………………………51 3.3.3敏感度分析………………………………………………………51 3.3.3.1致癌風險(Cancer risk)之敏感度分析…………………………52 3.3.3.2暴露限值(MOE)之敏感度分析…………………………………52 3.3.4不確定因子………………………………………………………53 3.3.4.1高粱酒中乙醛濃度的模擬………………………………………53 3.3.4.2國人攝食量數據的引用………………………………………55 3.4高粱酒與其他酒類之乙醛含量比較……………………………………55 3.5高粱酒與其他乙醛暴露來源之健康風險比較…………………………56 第四章 結論…………………………………………………………………… 58 參考文獻………………………………………………………………….………59 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 健康風險評估於食品加工之應用-以高粱酒中乙醛為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of Health Risk Assessment in Food Processing-Using Acetaldehyde Contained Sorghum Liquor as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭尊仁,黃俊儒,王宗櫚(tlwang@nuk.edu.tw) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 乙醛,高粱酒,劑量反應關係,健康風險評估,致癌風險,暴露限值, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Acetaldehyde,Sorghum liquor,Dose-response relationship,Health risk assessment,Cancer risk,Margin of exposure, | en |
dc.relation.page | 109 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902520 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 食品安全與健康研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 食品安全與健康研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.9 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。