請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7420
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 莊璦嘉 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Ching Yen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 嚴國晉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:43:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:43:16Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
Amabile,T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-87. Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Assessing creativity and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., and Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333. Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258. Andriopoulos, C., & Lowe, A. (2000). Enhancing organizational creativity: The process of perpetual challenging. Management Science, 38, 734-43. Aram, J. D., & Morgan, C. P. 1976. The role of project team collaboration in R&D performance. Management Science, 22, 1127-1137. Arnold, T., Flaherty, K. E., Voss, K. E., & Mowen, J. C. (2009). Role stressors and retail performance: The role of perceived competitive climate. Journal of Retailing, 85, 194-205. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y. M., & Otaye, L. E. (2012). Impact of high performance work systems on individual-and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 287- 300. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. 2004. Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Structure Distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951-968. Baggs, J. G. (1994). Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 176-182. Baer, M. 2010. The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 592-601. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68. Baer, M., Leenders, R. T. A., Oldham, G. R., & Vadera, A. K. (2010). Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 827-845. Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. 2006. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970. Baer M., Vadera A. K., Leenders R. T. A. J., Oldham G. R. (2014). Intergroup competition as a double-edged sword: How sex composition regulates the effects of competition on group creativity. Organization Science, 25, 892-908. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan. Basu, R., and Green, S. G. 1997. Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 477-499. Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99, 622-637. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 249-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition, New York, NY: Doubleday. Brislin, R. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Cross-cultural research and methodology series, vol. 8: 137–164. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intra organizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. Journal of Marketing, 62, 88-98. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models for social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Carmeli, A., Dutton, J. E., & Hardin, A. E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68, 1021-1047. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1–13. Cefis, E., & Ciccarelli, M. (2005). Profit differentials and innovation. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 14, 43-61. Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 172-192. Charbonneau, D., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. 2001. Transformational Leadership and Sports Performance: The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1521-1534. Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and innovation management, 15, 105-116. Chen, M. J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 288-304. Chen, X. P. & Farh, J. L. 1999. The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behavior in Chinese organizations:Evidence from Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago. Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 64–88. De Crada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365. De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. 2002. How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 280–295. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348–362. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed-pie: A motivated information-processing account of integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975–987. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648–661. De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 81-89. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). The influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889–905. De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201. Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. International journal of conflict management, 1, 237-263. Dong, Y., Liao, H., Chuang, A., Zhou, J., & Campbell, E. M. (2015). Fostering employee service creativity: Joint effects of customer empowering behaviors and supervisory empowering leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1364-1380. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. Fletcher, T. D., Major, D. A., & Davis, D. D. (2008). The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 899-922. Fletcher, T. D., & Nusbaum, D. N. (2010). Development of the competitive work environment scale: A multidimensional climate construct. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 105-124. Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453-470. Girffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347-358. Goff, K. & Torrance, E. P (2000). Brief demonstrator form of the Torrance tests of creative thinking: Training/teaching manual for adults with technical data. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service. Gong, Y., Huang, J., & Farh, J. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765-778. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96. Gumusluoglu, L. & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461-473. Hirst, G., Van Dick, R., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 963-982. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641. Hon, A. H. Y., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of Management, 40, 919-941. Hulbert, L. G., Correa da Silva, M. L., & Adegboyega, G. (2001). Cooperation in social dilemmas and allocentrism: A social values approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 641-658. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied psychology, 94, 1128. Ingham, A. G. (1997). Toward a department of physical cultural studies and an end to tribal warfare. In J. Fernandez-Balboa(Ed.), Critical postmodernism in human movement, physical education, and sport. Albany:State University of New York Press. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. James, L. R., & Sells, S. B. (1981). Psychological climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective, 275-295. Janssen, O. 2000. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. Janz, B. D. (1999). Self-directed teams in IS: correlates for improved systems development work outcomes. Information and Management, 35, 171-192. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley. Kerschreiter, R., Schulz-Hardt, S., Mojzisch, A., & Frey, D. (2008). Biased information search in homogeneous groups: Confidence as a moderator for the effect of anticipated task requirements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 679–691. King, N., and Anderson, N. Innovation in Working Group. In M. A. West and J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work, Psychological and Organizational Strategies, New York, John Wiley and Sons, (1990). Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass. Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54, 101-114. Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of applied psychology, 89, 610-621. LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational research methods, 11, 815-852. Leonard-Barton, D., & Swap, W. C. (1999). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. Harvard Business Press. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of social psychology, 10, 269-299. Li, C., Zhao, H., and Begley, T. M. (2015). Transformational leadership dimensions and employee creativity in China: A cross-level analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1149-1156. Liao, H. & Chuang, A. (2007). Transformational service employees and climate: A multiple, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1006-1019. Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1090-1109. Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1164-1188. Lin, C. P., Wang, Y. J., Tsai, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in competition: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1598-1606. Loebecke, C., Van Fenema, P. C., & Powell, P. (1999). Co-Opetition and Knowledge Transfer. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30, 14-25. Luo, Y. (2004). A coopetition perspective of MNC-host government relations. Journal of International Management, 10, 431-451. Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R.J. & Pan X. (2006). Cross-Functional Coopetition: The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition within Firms, Journal of Marketing, 70, 67–80. Madjar, N., & Ortiz-Walters, R. (2008). Customers as contributors and reliable evaluators of creativity in the service industry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 949-966. Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010). Shedding light on followers' innovation implementation behavior: The role of transformational leadership, commitment to change, and climate for initiative. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 408-429. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321-1339. Munkes, J., & Diehl, M. (2003). Matching or competition? Performance comparison processes in an idea generation task. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 305-320. Nemeth, C., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and the detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 788-799. Nijstad, B. A., & Paulus, P. B. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation-related behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 585-616. Nijstad, B. A., Selman, F., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2008). Innovation in top management teams: A motivated information processing approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., De Grada, E., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405-417. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors and creativity. Human Relations, 63, 981-1005. Rosing, K., Frese M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership–innovation relationship. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956-974. Sauers, D. A., & Bass, K. (1990). Sustaining the positive effects of goal setting: The positive influence of peer competition. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21, 30–40. Schneider, B. (1990). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539–552 Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking personality and career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874. Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: Historical overview. In C. E. Shalley & J. Zhou (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity, 3-32. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721. Singh, B. & Avital, M. (2007). The impact of collaboration and competition on project performance. Paper presented at International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Montreal, Canada. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628. Sun, L. Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 55-65. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual Creativity and Group to Utilize Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model. The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330. Tierney, P., and Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. Tjosvold, D. (1986). The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations. Human Relations, 39, 517-540. Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&d Management, 33, 297-311. Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 793-806. Torrance, E. P. (2000). Research review for the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking figural and verbal forms A and B. Scholastic Testing Service. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13, 179-190. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17. Wang, A. C. & Cheng, B. S. (2009). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 3, 106-121. Wang, D., & Hong, Y. (2010). How does supervisory support foster employee creativity? The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and mental involvement. Nankai Business Review, 13, 109-114. West, M. A., & Sacramento, C. A. (2012). Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 359-385). Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429-434. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., and Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321. Yeatts, d. E. & Hyten, C. (1998). High-performing self-managed work teams, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zhang, G., & Lu, X. (2010). The influence of learning culture on individual innovative behavior-an analysis on the mediating effects of motivation. R&D Management, 22, 16-23. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128. Zhang, Z., Hempel, P. S., Han, Y., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1722-1730. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333–359. Zhu, Y. Q., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H. G. (2016). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 9, 1-22. Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate:Testing the effect of group climate on micro-accidents in manufacturing jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587-596. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7420 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 許多具創意的成果都是在團隊過程中產生,要如何能同時提升成員個人與團隊整體的創造力表現,已成為近年學術及實務界所共同關心的重要議題。本研究依團隊動機資訊處理模型(MIP-G)觀點,將研究聚焦在團隊情境,並以團隊合作與競爭氣候分別作為誘發成員利他與利己性社會動機、團隊轉換型領導作為誘發成員知識動機的來源,探討對成員個人及團隊整體創造力表現之影響。本研究採問卷調查及實驗法二種不同方式對提出假設進行驗證。「研究1」以國軍旅級以上及機關單位幕僚為對象,調查樣本來自79個團隊中的395位部屬;「研究2」受試者對象則來自國軍某軍事院校357位學生所組成的120個團隊。
二研究結果皆顯示,當團隊成員知覺到越高團隊合作氣候時,成員個人及團隊整體創造力表現會愈佳;其次,團隊競爭氣候亦會正向地影響成員個人創造力表現;而團隊的轉換型領導則會強化團隊合作與競爭氣候各自對於成員個人創造力表現的正向影響關係。另外,進一步探究團隊合作與競爭氣候二者交互作用時的影響,二研究結果亦皆顯示,當團隊內同時具有高合作與高競爭氣候時,則會最有利於成員個人及團隊整體創造力表現。最後根據研究結果進行討論,並提出相關理論及實務意涵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Many creative achievements are generated within a team process. In recent years, the question of how to simultaneously enhance the creative performance of individual team members and teams as a whole has become a common focus in both academic and practical circles. In order to study the impacts on the creative performance of individual members and teams as a whole, we conducted a study from the perspective of the motivated information processing in groups (MIP-G) model, focusing on team context, and setting team collaborative and competitive climates as respective triggers of pro-social and pro-self social motivations in team members and team transformational leadership as the trigger of epistemic motivations. We used two different methods, surveys and experiments, to verify proposed hypotheses. “Study 1” targeted military staff at the brigade level and above and institutional staff; survey samples were composed of 395 staff members from 79 teams. The participants in “Study 2” were composed of 120 teams formed by 357 military academy students.
Results of both studies showed that the higher the level of team collaborative climate perceived by team members, the better the creative performance of both individual members and the teams as a whole; secondly, competitive climates within teams also positively impacted on the creative performance of individual members; team transformational leadership strengthened the positive impact team collaborative and competitive climates had on the creative performance of individual members. Additionally, further exploration of the impacts of interactions between team collaborative and competitive climates in both studies yielded results showing that when both collaborative and competitive climates were prominent within a team, this was the most beneficial for the creative performance of individual members and teams as a whole. Finally, we discuss our findings and put forward relevant theories and practical implications. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:43:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-D03741005-1.pdf: 2425684 bytes, checksum: e6824b28ec6ddd00b9851ba4a1227206 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 4 2.1 個人與團隊創造力 4 2.2 團隊動機資訊處理模型 5 2.3 團隊氣候 8 2.4 團隊合作氣候與創造力關係 8 2.5 團隊競爭氣候與創造力關係 10 2.6 轉換型領導作為誘發知識動機來源角色 12 2.7 團隊合作氣候與轉換型領導間交互的影響 13 2.8 團隊競爭氣候與轉換型領導間交互的影響 14 2.9 團隊合作與競爭氣候間交互的影響 15 第三章 研究方法 18 3.1 本研究架構 18 3.2 「研究1」問卷調查法 19 3.2.1 研究對象 19 3.2.2 施測程序 20 3.2.3 研究變項衡量 21 3.2.4 團隊資料之聚合 23 3.2.5 分析方法 24 3.3 「研究2」實驗設計 25 3.3.1 研究受試者與隨機分配 25 3.3.2 實驗操弄設計 26 3.3.3 團隊創意活動 27 3.3.4 研究觀察者訓練與前測 28 3.3.5 正式施測流程 29 3.3.6 衡量工具 31 第四章 研究結果 36 4.1「研究1」分析結果 36 4.1.1 敘述性統計 36 4.1.2 驗證性因素分析 37 4.1.3 層級線性分析 38 4.2「研究2」分析結果 41 4.2.1 實驗操弄檢核 41 4.2.2 研究假設驗證 42 第五章 討論與建議 47 5.1假設檢驗結果 47 5.2 結果討論 48 5.3 研究貢獻 50 5.4 研究限制與未來研究建議 53 參考文獻 54 附錄1. 「研究1」主管問卷 64 附錄2. 「研究1」部屬問卷 67 附錄3. 「研究2」測驗研究用同意書 70 附錄4. 「研究2」前測問卷 71 附錄5. 「研究2」研究問卷1 72 附錄6. 「研究2」指導說明書 74 附錄7. 「研究2」研究問卷2 77 附錄8. 「研究2」隊長問卷 80 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 團隊合作與競爭氣候對個人與團隊創造力表現之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The influence of team collaborative and competitive climate on individual and group creativity | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭仁偉,黃家齊,胡秀華,劉怡靖 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 合作氣候,競爭氣候,社會動機,知識動機,轉換型領導,創造力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | collaborative climate,competitive climate,social motivation,epistemic motivation,transformational leadership,creativity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 81 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803896 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-01-01 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2025-01-01 | 2.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。